Future of workforce and hypergamy

Lt_Muffintoes · 2014-11-20T15:44:42+00:00

What people forget is that though women make up more of the "qualified" workforce, the actual work is being done by men.

If all women went on strike tomorrow, not much would change. Sure, there'd be some inconvenience with filing, and they'd have to actually interact with their kids for once (the horror!), but shit would still get done.

If men went on strike tomorrow, trade would cease immediately, the electricity and water would be gone in hours, sewers would overflow in days, the food would rot in warehouses, and there would be utter global chaos.

I don't think there are enough "power women" to make a significant difference to the sexual marketplace. We are already seeing the beginning of female rejection of feminism with a return to family values.

RedPillSafe · 2014-11-20T15:26:55+00:00

You assume that things continue in a linear way.

History shows that things rise and fall.

In the modern economy the successful business tends to thrive on the innovations of a very small group of males who have the ability to actually create or improve on existing systems.

Women are taking over the pre-existing jobs that do not require this innovation. (middle management)

Eventually the businesses migrate to wherever the costs are lowest and so the bloated success of the business that is now occupied by women will go bankrupt.

Over time things dry up.

We are sort of at the peak of a dysfunctional bubble right now... I don't see this going linearly forever.

However, it might take some time to fall apart though.

harkrank · 2014-11-20T16:08:49+00:00

Women are not getting more influence because of quotas. They are getting it because the average man's value as a provider or protector has dropped to almost zero because of industrialization while women have maintained their value since it is in their womb. Therefore women in relationships control almost all the money of the family which has been brought in by the husband, thus creating a huge shift in the economy to cater towards women.

Governments are also fully feminized because of the diminishing value of men. The people owning democratic governments see no need to cater to men since there is not much they have to offer in an already developed surplus society that is safeguarded by the nuclear threat. Women will hold the majority of government jobs and this creates effects on all industries selling to the government, not to mention these women also effect the economy with their purchasing power.

The only sensible thing you can do is avoid paying taxes at all costs. This includes avoiding usury.

Your question is strange, because we are already at the future sexual marketplace and can see the effects fully. The trend is already less children born, the end is such a society annihilates itself. And that is not a thing to mourn. No factor can be changed.

bsutansalt · 2014-11-20T18:23:39+00:00

We're already seeing it with the resurgence of defacto harems in the younger demographics as women ride the cock carousel with a minority of men who are enjoying the bulk of the sex and relationships. As women age you're going to see them settle for their beta bucks, which older men tend to bring to the table. We're also seeing fewer kids being born and less marriages.

One of the things of particular interest to me is what TRP has to offer to older men in leveraging their status to start pulling those younger women who are riding the carousel. The trick is being in good enough shape so the status makes you competitive with the younger hot studs they're going for. This is going to leave a dearth of beta bucks available for older women who were counting on them being available, which is compounded by the women making their own money and the men "below" them becoming invisible. Cue the cries of "where are all the good men at?"

Over the long run you're going to see these older women start warning their younger sisters and daughters not to ride the carousel and to become more traditional/conservative and settle down with a nice guy sooner in life and not piss away their youth and fertility like is commonplace today. In fact this has already begun with the book Marry Him! by Lori Gottlieb. As time marches on you will see more and more of this sentiment, and it'll be met with vitriol and resistance as women try to maintain the status quo.

And so the cycle will repeat itself over the long run as we contract as a society into one that's more patriarchal and restrictive of women's sexuality. That's the grand irony of feminism and the sexual liberation of the 70s. Women wanted to "take down the patriarchy" and in doing so set the stage for its resurgence. It's only a matter of time before western society is out-bred by more patriarchal ones.

In the short term though beta males are going to take it on the chin. Those who resist TRP philosophy are going to have a hard life until they become some woman's beta bucks. And if he gets divorced raped he's going to be even worse for wear. I also fear the abundance of thirsty beta males is going to create some very real social strife as more and more go nuts and lash out. Sodini and Roger are society's canary in the coal mine. You need look no further than China if you want to see the full scope of what happens when there are too many men and not enough women to satisfy them.

R4F1 · 2014-11-20T15:58:18+00:00

Its not just quotas and affirmative action. The education system in and of itself is flawed. The average kid is simply not designed to sit still in a classroom staring at a wall for 6-8 hours. Why do you think so many kids (mainly boys) are being diagnosed with ADD and ADHD these days? Its not a mental illness to not want to sit still and actually go outside and do something hands on. That's what boys were built to do. There's a reason why so many boys, when they become men and graduate HS, decide to enter the workforce instead of spending another 4-8 years going through that again. Women coincidently, are built differently, and it just so happened to turn out that they are better suited for the classroom education model.

I recommend these few short videos to get my point:

-Changing Education Paradigms

-Education is Not the same as Schooling

[deleted] · 2014-11-20T15:24:01+00:00

It's a terrible bleak future for the beta male.

As the saturation of women increases, supply and demand should necessitate that these women fight harder for males, with winners receiving the best male and the losers ending up with lesser males down the line.

But, as we all know, there are two powerful forces that will upset this delicate equilibrium:

AF;BB
Hypergamy

The reality is that the men who meet the minimum and can withstand shit tests will be swimming in pussy and those that don't will be forced to deal with a life of involuntary celibacy. Why?

Women will be competing with each other for a few high value males with the silly assumption that they will win one all for themselves. This will make them unwilling to settle for a "lesser" man, even if he is her equal in regards to SMV. The reality is that these few men will have harems of women and, because Hypergamy, these women will not trade down for other men even if they have to share him.

Never forget, if given a choice, women will (in order of preference):

Have a higher SMV male of their own
Share a higher SMV male
Have a lower SMV male of their own
Be alone
Share a lower SMV male.

But that's just my two cents.

johnyann · 2014-11-20T20:10:05+00:00

Automation is going to destroy 80% of the work force anyway, so it really doesn't matter.

Americasballs · 2014-11-20T15:11:58+00:00

Women will continue to strive for the best option available. I.E would rather share an alpha than have a beta to themselves, this will create an excess of "lonely" men. These lonely men have a need that requires a service. Free market economics will work their magic eventually and sex robots or sex machines of some nature will fill that void for a price. This is elaborated on much more eloquently in the sidebar material titled : the misandry bubble.. But you would have had to have read the sidebar material to know that .... ;)

boxofcookies101 · 2014-11-20T15:27:38+00:00

Well I think its going to come down to a similar thing that men look for in women when they get really rich. Instead of looking for that super rich guy. They're looking for that masculine guy that can fill they're primal desires. There will always be a most alpha of the group regardless of where men as a whole stand. The most alpha will get the top picks.

The women will be looking for best possible offspring genes regardless of what she's planning to do in life career wise.

SQQQ · 2014-11-20T20:01:49+00:00

the future of work force is more women staying @ home.

because the wise men are turning to red pill n not willing to put up with hamster, drama n pussy pass in the workplace. n with technology improving, the demand for labor is REDUCED. n that puts cupcakes on the chopping block.

those college educated SJW's will end up as bartenders or sex workers.

AFPJ · 2014-11-20T19:25:21+00:00

So how do you think this will affect future of sexual market place?

Breaking news! Women culturally coercing themselves & their fellow women into unhappiness.

The value of Beta plummets (along with the societal stability it brings) and the value of the Alpha increases.

This has been engineered because unhappy women medicate (profits) and work through their fertile years (profits).

Women being ever more miserable and lost makes men think they have to do "more" to get women ...more profits.

Up to a point. That point has been crossed, which is why places like RP are starting to appear. Enjoy the future.

throwaway______77 · 2014-11-21T00:07:07+00:00

I'm an educated male with a good job and a decent salary in a major city, where the women you speak of are on the market.

As a guy with relatively high SMV, I have my pick of women. I'm drowning in as much pussy as I can handle.

However, among single women my age and even a bit younger (late 20s, early 30s) there's a general sense of despair: guys like me will date and sleep with them, but not commit... because why would we, when we can have our cake and eat it too? As for low SMV guys - the best advice I can give is Louis CK's: just keep upping your SMV and you'll find you get more and more interest from women as you get older.

sir_wankalot_here · 2014-11-20T15:15:14+00:00

This is what most members of TRP can't fathom out. They complain about the hypergamy of modern women, and how things where in the good old days. Yet the reality is women on a whole are actually less hypergamous.

Success in the past was fairly easy to measure. 100+ years ago most people never traveled more then 25 miles from their house, they never saw how the rest of the world lived. So if you where one of the top 100 richest people in a town you where considered successful.

Heinlein bothers both the majority of TRP and feminists. And yet he was a visionary. In his vision of the future women are able to do the jobs of many men, but yet they are still women. In his book Starship Trooper he outlines the flaws of our present day society.

The reason why most men on TRP are against a woman making more money then them is because they have little measure of thier own personal worth besides how much money they make. So it is their own security and fears speaking.

I don't know if polygamy will ever be legalized. I am kind of intrigued with the idea of getting a second wife to be honest.

Kaelteth · 2014-11-20T14:31:51+00:00

It used to the the 80/20 rule. 20% of the men got 80% of the pussy.

Today, its damn near the 90/10 rule.

In the future, the gap is going to further narrow. As more and more men go the beta douchebag route, there will be fewer and fewer of us to take on the challenge.

yummyluckycharms · 2014-11-20T16:32:35+00:00

The answer lies in the past - this isnt the first time something like this has happened over the 10 millenia of recorded human history. In any case, ultimately what will happen is that the SMV will become fractured and polarized.

On the high end, the elite will marry other elite to maintain wealth and to create alliances. The men will acquire lovers that will be on the side, but not the women as the downside of cheating will be much more severe for them. The trend will be for less children

On the low end, physical fitness not material wealth (due to less opportunity to gain said wealth) will be the key determinants. Few people will marry as it has no benefit, but there will be high fertility rates within this segment

Middle class will be small and inconsequential as it has been squeezed dry

Note: there will be a middle stage before reaching this ultimate stage - where women will refuse to marry down, and fertility rates will drop sharply. This shocks the system and will speed up the polarization process

Title	Future of workforce and hypergamy
Author	The_BitterTruth
Upvotes	19
Comments	48
Date	November 20, 2014 2:29 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2mvlzz/future_of_workforce_and_hypergamy/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/future-of-workforce-and-hypergamy.25164 https://theredarchive.com/post/25164

Comments