On Love

In the modern world, in the English speaking world especially, the concept of love has been bastardized to such a degree that its true meaning is almost unrecognizable. Understanding how the current regime of authoritarians use the study of psychology in the battle for your mind is critical to unplugging and understanding the true nature of the world around you.


Introduction

Orwell presciently wrote how the ruling regime would eliminate words from the lexicon with the hope that man, lacking the language to express a concept, would be unable to conceive of dissident thoughts. While this may sound ridiculous, obviously there is truth to this concept. Your own "stream of consciousness" is one of words for the most part. Thus, a man without language is no man at all.

 

Second to eliminating words, the next best thing the regime can hope for, is to redefine words such that their original meaning is lost.

 

...O, be some other name!

What's in a name? That which we call a rose

By any other name would smell as sweet;

—William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet

 

What is he saying? He is saying A is A. A is not B, no matter what you call it. You may call a dog a cat, or a dog a dog. But in the end a dog is always a dog, and a dog is not a cat.

 

However, these are the mental hijinks they attempt to pull. Another example is "gay marriage." This combination of words is an oxymoron, regardless of your political beliefs. Marriage, by definition, requires an opposite sex union, capable of producing offspring via sexual reproduction. Ask any millennial for the definition, and I’ll bet my bottom dollar that their definition is, "a marriage is between two people that love each other." For further proof, consult a dictionary from 10-20 years ago, to one of today.

 

Now, this essay is about the bastardized conception of love, not "gay marriage" or politics (outside of the agenda at work).

 

Body

In western society, you grew up with Hollyweird and Disney movies that showed you what BluePill love looks like.

 

  1. Boy sees girl.
  2. Boy is enamored by her beauty.
  3. Boy does a bunch of BluePill shit and eventually wins the girl.

 

This archetype is so common that I believe very little thought is given to it. One reason is because it is the low hanging fruit. That is, we all have experienced the rush of biological drugs in our bloodstream, racing heart and lightheaded when we were younger. It is an experience universal to humans.

 

Is this love? No. But this is the definition of love that you are taught, if you have no other reference.

 

The Greeks had several words for love (and maybe more, as I am no Greek historian)—Agápe, Éros, Philia, and Storge. Why would they have different words for love, while we simpletons have only one? Because, there are many facets of love. We do have a term that we use, "lust" and that might be most closely related to Éros. The love that they are showing us in BluePill reality is in actuality lust. It is a chemical, biological response to seeing a potential mate. You are literally in a state of drug induced insanity, and that biological effect only lasts for a short duration (read the Coolidge effect). In order to attain a new high, a novel partner must be found as your body gains tolerance to repeated stimulus of the same mate. This is not love.

 

So, again, what is love? What of love between a parent and child? What of love between friends? These relationships have much lower neurochemical spikes than that of lust, but are maintained for much longer. Furthermore, they lack the sexual component. Do parents tire of the child and discard them? Do friends tire of their friends and discard them? No. So clearly, there is a difference between lust and this form of love.

 

Next, I will add, most of what BluePill media brainwashes you with is passive behavior. That is, it insulates one from the culpability of one’s own actions. It eliminates the animus from your actions. You only loved when you felt passion. When you no longer feel passion then you are justified for falling out of love. BluePill, seeks to degrade humanity to its base form. TRP itself may be morality agnostic, but I think we agree, the overall goal of TRP is to turn men into better versions of themselves, in fact, turn them into the best they can be. This is the opposite of BluePill "reality." In BluePill reality, one is a zombie following their biological or state pre-approved programing with no conceptualization of self, responsibility, or ownership. It is a dehumanizing way of life.

 

Now, this is my own personal opinion. You are free to disagree, but I believe I’ve laid the foundation for the following conclusion.

 

Conclusion

Love is not a passive thing. Love is something one must actively work for to maintain, that means continuing even when you don’t have a neurochemical cocktail of drugs motivating you. Love, is working through the lows and highs. In short, love is a commitment, not an emotion as BluePillers would have you believe. It’s akin to gym life. You don’t go to the gym because you are motivated, you go because you are disciplined. (Motivation and discipline is short-term versus long-term.)

 

Now, this is why you can fuck whoever you want when you are ravaged by lust. However, do not be like BluePillers. Do not call lust "love." Love is active. You choose who you love, your body chooses who you lust. Thus, as men are the gatekeepers to commitment, you hold the key to giving your love. Do not cheapen your body and soul by giving your love freely.

 

I could write more, but this essay is 1000 words now. I hope you have gained something from this analysis.


  • Words have meaning. Never forget that.
  • Know the definition of words—the dictionary might not be correct.
  • Understand the definition of love and of lust.
  • Make a conscious decision on who you will love; for it is expensive.
  • Make sure she is worth it.