FORWARD:

we are at the start of the actual first wave of trans feminism right now, and ciswomen being over is a part of it. we have to subtly chip away at ciswomen's social positioning. we have to do this because here's the reality: we are better than they are. i know that you know this to be true, too, like all of us first wavers do. aren't you tired of having to play along?

we're not at the point where we can outright say that yet. right now, we have to get more cismen on our side, while continuing to break down sex/gender cultural mores. we have to normalize ourselves and our bodies to them. we have to condition them to, if not like, then be excited for our cocks -- or at the very least ignore it while they're fucking us (or enjoy our designer vaginas). one of our biggest advantages over most ciswomen is our libido.

we're fighting for all rights -- trans rights, women's rights, and even men's rights. 3.5th wave feminism has utterly and completely failed society, causing us to lose faith in feminism, causing division rather than intersecting (lol), and causing former allies to pick fights with transpeople, all while helping to elect a monster who has begun to remove everyone's rights. cisfeminism is dead and splintered into a million pieces. we want to replace the "feminists" who have crippled feminism and women in general. we want normalization. we want to ensure our numbers continue to grow, and eventually replace ciswomen on the whole, or remove most of them from the positions that they occupy. we want cismen to look at us and consider us partners instead of freaks. we want ciswomen to know we're not their token toys and to tear down the cotton ceiling. it will be a long process, but it is happening very quickly -- we're already erasing these divisions within our language, and that's only the first step

ciswomen are over.

it's not that ciswomen are bad. they're not. i love my sister and mother, even if they're bitches sometimes. the reality is that now, in march 2017, ciswomen are over. we are currently experiencing their last gasp now.

for decades ciswomen have railed against "the patriarchy." except: women supported the patriarchy. they helped create it. they supported it more than cismen. it wouldn't exist without them. it's only now that they're trying to break that wheel, except: the patriarchy they railed against benefits them. it's something they need to exist. they created their own niche and are trying to crawl out of it. it's too late -- we don't need ciswomen anymore. andrea dworkin was the first to realize this; she realized that once male-sexed individuals didn't need ciswomen for sex or reproduction, that they would cease to be relevant in modern society.

for the longest time, sexual reproduction in the human species has been about quantity vs quality--and quantity always won. but let's break that down to what it is: male vs female. biologically, cismen want to sire as many children as possible, and ciswomen want to have the best, strongest children possible. so as human population grew, ciswomen became more choosey, because they could. this, however, left whole swaths of "beta males" without a partner or romantic interest. however, instead of weakening the patriarchy, this only strengthened it. in a matter of generations, rather than millenia, male-sexed individuals evolved to solve the problem, much like our primate ancestors who took up tools and reinvented civilization seemingly instantaneously.

the solution was that male-sexed individuals evolved to aid, rather than compete against other male-sexed individuals--cutting ciswomen out of the process. while homosexual men used to be a threat to patriarchy, within a generation they changed to support patriarchy against a ciswoman-run system that was beginning to drag down society. ciswomen used to use transwomen and homosexual men in their causes, to improve their own standing rather than society (and humanity) on the whole.

in essence, ciswomen made themselves irrelevant to anyone but themselves--and they were cheering for it. needless to say, everyone else was not pleased. ciswomen could insult anyone they wanted, but should any of them be insulted, the insultor would be brigaded against and tarred-and-feathered. equality was lost for "fairness;" respect for facts and reality was replaced with understanding feelings, regardless of reality. (to be fair, not every ciswoman was for this and caught themselves on their logical fallacy and spoke against it, but too little too late)

among young male-sexed individuals, evolution is powerfully visible. a relationship with another male-sexed person is prided over a relationship with a female-sexed person. for the first time, it's "cooler" and more socially acceptable for a male-sexed individual to have a relationship with a transwoman or another male-sexed individual than it is to have a relationship with a female-sexed person. male-sexed individuals have become more desired than female-sexed.

in older persons, worship of ciswomen is also breaking down. the most recent acceptance of "traps" (feminine male-sexed individuals) and transwomen (non-cis women) is causing their numbers to flourish. ciswomen give lip service in support of them and many follow; patriarchy welcomes them with open and loving arms and is gradually winning over more and more. patriarchy evolved to accept less masculine individuals; ciswomen require very strict guidelines and beliefs in order to be allowed in. it used to be an prideful thing to be a "feminist;" now non-ciswomen cringe and eyeroll at the thought of identifying as one.

one of the advantages of male-sexed individuals is the ability to impregnate, and science is desperately working at creating male-sexed fecundity. it's already succeeded in a few ways: with uterus transplants an actual thing (though still being tested for safety) and artificial uteri/ectogenesis mere months away, this has happened. ciswomen were irrelevant before that, but now there's no question about it. transwomen (myself included) are chomping at the bit for this technology and the ability to gestate and raise our own children, even others' children. we are more feminine than the average ciswoman today, and we want to prove it instead of just saying it.

andrea dworkin feared cismen attaining control over reproduction, and in the end she was right. she considered reproductive technology (including abortion) as the ultimate tool of the patriarchy, because cismen could finally have women for sex and women for reproduction. she never predicted that it would be ciswomen that caused this. of course cismen would want as many partners as possible, it's in their genes. if ciswomen refused cismen partnership, cismen would find new partners. throughout history, cismen have never considered other male-sexed individuals as reproductive partners. once science has its upcoming breakthrough, this will become a reality. after cismen readjust, ciswomen simply will not be able to compete. even now, ciswomen are having difficulty competing on the most superficial physical level: transwomen, with their coded words combined, take up the #1 spot on every top pornography video site search (with the exception of MotherLess).

i leave you with an ugly truth: patriarchy led ciswomen to be where they are today. humanity spent thousands of years shaping society into what it is, creating a patriarchy, and in the past few decades ciswomen have been trying to break it, because it wasn't working for them. indeed, the system was bad for them. so ciswomen worked together to create something to hopefully replace patriarchy with something better. as ciswomen were left to their own devices, we've seen that their designs don't work, and don't help society, working only to divide us further, radicalizing them against governance without creating anything new. they deconstruct rather than create. meanwhile, the patriarchy, for all its criticisms, continues to push forward and create, with a few potholes here and there, patched quickly. it's not a perfect system, but it's a system, and it supports people rather than tear them down.

back to the point at hand: ciswomen are over. more and more are realizing that ciswomen aren't needed, and are in fact a problem in an urbanized society. china and india are already killing assigned-female-at-birth babies. i argue that once it becomes possible for the average layperson to impregnate their (possibly former) male-sexed partner, ciswomen will lose their allure, and become ignored and outdated. like greek fire, they'll burn hot, but eventually they'll burn out, and no one will remember how to or will want to make any again.