~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Don_Draper22
[–]magx01218 points219 points220 points 7 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
Multitasking is generally doing two or more things half assed.
[–]purussa48 points49 points50 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Unless you are capable of timing the tasks so you are only focusing on one at a time.
[–]Apaullo3583 points84 points85 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
Then that isn’t multitasking. That’s coordinating individual tasks
[–]BasedGodot 25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
That's how computers do multitasking.
Granted, the amount of time they give to each task is pretty long to them, and pretty short to us.
We're talking in ms here
[–]crsuarezf20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Not always. If kernel handles tasks by each core then is real multitasking. One thing is concurrency and other one is parallelism:)
[–]Uruke6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
A single CPU can multitask, but a single Core can only work on one line of code at a time. Something that CPU manufacturers don't tell you as that each additional core on a CPU performs at a slower rate than the core that supercedes it.
Example:
Intel Core i5 9700k 3.6 Ghz
Core 1: 3.6 Ghz
Core 2: 3.5 GHz
Core 3: 3.5 Ghz
Core 4: 3.4 Ghz
Core 5: 3.3 Ghz
Core 6: 3.3 Ghz
(I think that's the order it goes)
With this being said if a CPU "Multitasks" it will perform less efficiently in the long run just like a human brain.
[–]BasedGodot 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Intel Core i5 9700k 3.6 Ghz Core 0: 3.6 Ghz Core 1: 3.5 GHz Core 2: 3.5 Ghz Core 3: 3.4 Ghz Core 4: 3.3 Ghz Core 5: 3.3 Ghz
Core 0: 3.6 Ghz
Core 1: 3.5 GHz
Core 2: 3.5 Ghz
Core 3: 3.4 Ghz
Core 4: 3.3 Ghz
ftfy. Arrays ALWAYS begins at index 0 not index 1. There is pointer logic behind this
[–]SolidBadger93 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This was an amazing line of comments.
[–]BasedGodot 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The kind of comment line I still wait to have with women lmao
[–]SolidBadger93 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Haha, you can't have a good ol' honest discussion with women. Everything is about manipulation, hidden meanings and power control with them.
[–]newMGTOW1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Matlab would like to have a word with you
For those that don't get it matlab is a powerful mathematical program that starts its arrays with 1 not 0
[–]LJHova0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yup. Not all computer languages are 0-indexed (e.g. Fortran). Using terms like always and never is a great way to demonstrate ignorance.
[–]crsuarezf2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes. I’m talking about cores, not cpu as whole unit which is in fact what you said.
[–]hajamieli2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Except the human brain is like a single CPU core; it can't do several things at once, rather juggles time slices between several tasks. The short-term memory allows you to focus and/or task on up to several things at once (up to 5-9 depending on the person), but beyond that you hit hard limits and just become scatterbrained and fail to do the things. The harder the things you focus on are, the more "short term memory slots" you need to allocate and the easier you're disrupted.
For instance things like programming may require more than you have and you have to split the problem into smaller parts in order to work on them, yet still spend all your focus on it.
The more "memory slots" you are able to allocate, the more efficiently you can think and therefore can allow greater capacity on being smart. Therefore, get rid of all the nagging problems subtracting from your ability focus, if you want to perform.
[–]verynormalsimple-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's very inaccurate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZU_M-LFrkWo
Drumming is already like a multitask, it uses all your limbs (4 tasks), plus singing is like 3 more tasks (vocal chord control, air control, tongue control).
That's without even considering all the background tasks he's running, like breathing, digestion, listening, seeing, smelling.
Even things that seem like a single task like playing piano, are like 3 tasks in one because you're reading a sheet while playing 2 different things with each hand. And most people would be able to do that with enough training.
[–]hajamieli2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't confuse routines that your brain has joined into single tasks with separate tasks. This is why a juggler, drummer and anything else that requires complex sequences of things take a lot of time to master. It's basically letting your subconsciousness take over the routines freeing the conscious mind to do other things. If you've never drummed before, it's virtually impossible to perform the drumming actions, because you lack the routines involved.
Even if your routine consists of hundreds of separate movements you've reduced into one conscious action, it's only handled as single thought at that time. This is different from handling various different things consciously, where you are limited by the amount of things you can do within a brief amount of time.
[–]mattsmitty2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I am very dumb and have no idea what guys are talking about.
[–]MarzMonkey3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Fuck you Skynet.
[–]BasedGodot 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ave omni machina to you too, battle-brother
[–]hajamieli9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's literally how humans "multitask". They do one task at a time for a brief amount of time. Women in general are just less focused on any task, so it takes them less time to switch between them.
[–]joker380 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s coordinating individual tasks
Which is an additional task! 😲
[–]ideserveall5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
multitasking for a woman means: being married and looking for a better deal at the same time.
[–]3amDinner69 points70 points71 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
nagging & complaining?
[–]CDAYt18 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That’s exactly what’s going to happen 😂
[–]TheMuslimMGTOW51 points52 points53 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Gold. I'm gonna use this next time the topic comes up. On the topic of multitasking, it's actually proven that it's better to focus on one task alone. So women bragging about being better multitaskers means fuck all.
[–]treehauz10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Correct! Feels good to be a man again
[–]MarzMonkey3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Feels good to be a man again
FTFY
[–]Farhandlir51 points52 points53 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Humans are incapable of multitasking regardless of gender. The reason is simple, our brain functions as a single processing unit. What we think of as multitasking is actually task-switching. Some insects are capable of multitasking because the two sides of their brain function independently from each other, which isn't the case with mammals.
[–]hajamieli5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
multitasking because the two sides of their brain function independently from each other, which isn't the case with mammals
Insects have several "brains" scattered around the body, so do many other invertebrate animals as well. Both human/mammal brain halves can function independently, but only one of them are dominant; is in control. The other lays dormant afaik, or performs things like subconscious thoughts.
[–]Mathiya2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I often drift in thought when im brushing my teeth
[–]verynormalsimple0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's so inaccurate. Have you ever seen a singing drummer ? Or a person play piano while reading sheet music ?
Most people is able to knit or cook or juggle while talking to another person. It's not even exceptional TBH.
[–]polygon_thepentagram23 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's funny when I hear women are better multitaskers because being able to focus on one thing is a valuable skill and more effective than multitasking.
[–]SolidBadger911 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Taking both money and the kids?
[–]KarosGraveyard7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Doing 10 things half-assed < doing one thing at a time proficiently and finishing the job properly
[–]Solstus225 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Food for thought. When I was in a philosophy class, my teacher said it is virtually impossible to multitask. What really happens is when you do two things at the same time, your mind constantly juggles on what to focus on more. The attention during multitasking can never be 50/50, its either from 10/90 - 40/60, and vice versa.
[–]mickledick4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Despite what they claim, women can't multitask. I've never met a woman that can even do something as simple as have a headache and sex at the same time.
[–]mcros854 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think this quote from Bruce Lee is relevant here. 'I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times.'
[–]internet_badass_here2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women think that doing a half-assed job of something while alternately dicking around on their phones somehow gives them some kind of claim to superiority.
[–]Alx04272 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Lol this is really funny but I feel like outsiders to this sub would see this post and call the entire community mysoginistic. Just be careful!
[–]sedstar3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
theres no STING in it anymore. I'm not a leftist marxist? so I am automatically "alt right" and a "nazi".
i dont buy into the "purple hair buzzfeed bullshit"?? so i am automatically a sexist and a misogynist
so? if someone says "what are you sexist? a misogynist???"
I just say "yeah..."
*whatever*
try it? it works wonders... any liberal retard lecturing you and correcting you? their jaw drops open, and they dont know WHAT to say or do... or? they just have a snowflake meltdown, which is also pretty cool... after a few times? you get used to it, and you can say it with a straight face.
in truth? i'm not racist, i'm not sexist, i'm not a nazi... but... hey, whatever.
[–]Landiesaw3 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Gee, why would anyone get that impression when a post telling women to sit down and shut up is what you lot send to /all?
[–]angrybread2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ah, these are the people that got Last Man Standing brought back.
[–]Vrabo 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Humans can't multi-task, it's been proven again and again that 'multi-tasking' actually decreases performance and increases the time it takes to complete a task.
When you multi-task, what you're actually doing is switching tasks rapidly and every single time you make the switch, your brain has to get back into the flow state by having to build up momentum from the start.
[–]FutureCCIE0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Two possibles, both impossible for the Female 😂
[–]Gordon-G0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Excelente!!
[–]Slideri8120 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I hear females say that shit, and what I hear is: shaming language shaming language shaming language
[–]Kestral 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How can they multi-task when they can't even do one task right??
[–]Careabella-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s too bad that OP continually does things that require women to stand up and speak for themselves
[–]shadowhawk113144-2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Get nae naed
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
[removed]
[–]Megitgud-2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Woosh
[–]Onion_Guy-3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
see, you say that, but look at this thread. doomed sub of unironically misogynist people. MGTOW would be conceptually cool and good but so much energy goes to “boo women suck”
[–]Megitgud6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Misogynist this and that, don't you NPCs ever get tired of parroting the same lines over and over?
The "boo women suck" is a part of venting, because men aren't allowed to criticize the little angels in the real world.
[–]Onion_Guy0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
and this complete unwillingness to note that people in this thread venting by saying “lol women just nag and complain I wish they’d sit down and shut up” is incompatible with wanting men’s issues to be taken seriously is frustrating.
Nobody who’s commented here has ever given women the “well, they’re just venting about X” benefit of doubt.
It’s not about little angels. That’s a pedestalizing, ridiculous way to see issues and discussions. I understand the frustrations but that doesn’t mean you should turn around and become terrible
[–]Megitgud2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You're gonna write me an essay about how OP's Joke is offensive to women.
Little angels was sarcasm, no pedestal here, looks like that went over your head as well.
This is not Male's Rights Movement. MRAs failed for 100 years.
I'm done replying to you, throwing a tantrum over a joke.
[–]Onion_Guy7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
okay kiddo sure
[–]LJHova1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Your logic is flawed. Humor is a positive coping mechanism, one that psychologists encourage. In this case, humor is being used to confront the hubris and entitlement so common among women today. Humor is used precisely because having a reasoned discussion with feminists about reality, in this case what constitutes multitasking and whether it is truly of benefit, is verboten. The joke is essentially insider humor, a shorthand in this case for people on this sub to communicate about a similar frustration. Your complaint not only missed the point, it further supports the underlying premise of the joke.
[–]roscoedangle5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It was a goddamn joke dude. Calm down or troll somewhere else.
I’ve heard the base joke before. It’s much funnier without the MGTOW bastardization in the comments section. That’s all
[–]roscoedangle4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
😂😂😂 then why even read or comment?
[–]Onion_Guy2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Maybe in hopes of someone commenting “hey thanks for making it clear that not every comment on every MGTOW post is a raging anti-feminist”
[–]ovrload1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nothing wrong with being anti-feminist. Doesn’t mean you hate women...
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]magx01218 points219 points220 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]purussa48 points49 points50 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]Apaullo3583 points84 points85 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]BasedGodot 25 points26 points27 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]crsuarezf20 points21 points22 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uruke6 points7 points8 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]BasedGodot 11 points12 points13 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]SolidBadger93 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BasedGodot 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SolidBadger93 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]newMGTOW1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LJHova0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]crsuarezf2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hajamieli2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]verynormalsimple-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]hajamieli2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mattsmitty2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MarzMonkey3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BasedGodot 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hajamieli9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]joker380 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ideserveall5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]3amDinner69 points70 points71 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CDAYt18 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheMuslimMGTOW51 points52 points53 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]treehauz10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MarzMonkey3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Farhandlir51 points52 points53 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]hajamieli5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mathiya2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]verynormalsimple0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]polygon_thepentagram23 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SolidBadger911 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KarosGraveyard7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Solstus225 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mickledick4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mcros854 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]internet_badass_here2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Alx04272 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]sedstar3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Landiesaw3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]angrybread2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vrabo 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FutureCCIE0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gordon-G0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Slideri8120 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kestral 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Careabella-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shadowhawk113144-2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (12 children) | Copy Link
[removed]
[–]Megitgud-2 points-1 points0 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Onion_Guy-3 points-2 points-1 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Megitgud6 points7 points8 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Onion_Guy0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Megitgud2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Onion_Guy7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LJHova1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]roscoedangle5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Onion_Guy0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]roscoedangle4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Onion_Guy2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ovrload1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link