Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]johnnyblorf 76 points77 points78 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]bdf3919 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
BINGO.
My own sentiments exactly.
I would LOVE to have a couple of kids (especially SONS) to teach, pass on my knowledge, skills, passions, even my "love of life."*
But... given the society that surrounds me -- the multigenerational forces that have brought it TO this "state of things" -- and primarily how much of it is arrayed, even "set" to essentially "steal" any children I might have away from me, effectively prevent me from TRULY being the "father/instructor/mentor" of them...
I would sooner that they (my "potential children") remain in whatever aethereal state of "pre-existence" they may be in -- Vaya Con Dios (or Acatar Con Dios) so to speak -- presuming of course that there even IS such a thing (and if there ISN'T any such aethereal state of "pre-existence"... well then it's even LESS of a "issue" {pun intended}).
* My only difference here is that I do love life, and enjoy living on this Earth... MY SINCERE FEAR (and I deem it to be a valid one) is that the society that surrounds me (including via the {presently} "necessary" FEMALE} would end up -- in one way or another -- TAKING my children away from me; prevent me from being able to raise that as I deem necessary (or worse yet, turning them and using them as "weapons" against me in several ways). I'll not "play" that game... not worth the risk (to me OR my "posterity").
[–]johnnyblorf 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DWShimoda4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thegrimraeper 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]johnnyblorf 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]apx24 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gundahir7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsntDebateClass3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]gundahir2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]EndlessPontification2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]calvinhague7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingCanuck63 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]plutosheen1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kornstar041 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Coxib73 points74 points75 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I love my 2 children, but my life would be better if i wasn't financially responsible for them
[–]NoThirst2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Scheinwelt20 points21 points22 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cfuse21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JStheHammer 16 points17 points18 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]pants_with_a_fan 15 points16 points17 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]csehszlovakze8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]goadsaid4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]scouse_till_idie5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (15 children) | Copy Link
Simplest straight-forward answer: So the pyramid/ponzi scheme they've setup doesn't collapse.
Old/aging people are full of anxiety about the idea there might not be enough people to fund their (currently woefully) underfunded) pension programs (including not only straight monthly-payments, but also health-care, etc -- that's what ObamaCare was REALLY about; it wasn't about insuring young people, it was about SUCKERING and FORCING young people {particularly young single males} into subsidizing/paying for "Baby Boomer" old-age medical treatments {knee & hip surgeries, cancer treatments, heart surgeries, etc}).
-- And more... the concern includes not only literally paying into pension programs (private, union, and/or public tax-based systems) AND helping sustain the "medical" system monetary/resource xfer -- but also anxiety over whether there will be sufficient young people willing/able to pay the ridiculous inflated prices for the various privately owned "stocks"; and even to buy the array of real estate that the oldsters "invested" in.
-- You see the "value" of ALL of those things is heavily dependent upon their being sufficient DEMAND -- specifically MORE "buyers" than "sellers" -- because it doesn't really take much to cause a "crash" in value:
11 buyers for every 10 sellers drives the price UP.
but change that just SLIGHTLY
10 buyers for every 11 sellers... tends to cause prices to DROP.
-- Now most people do NOT really understand that at the "technical/detailed" levels ... but what they DO sort of inherently (even I think you could say almost "instinctively") understand is the basic underlying principle of supply/demand -- which is a sort of "musical chairs" game (played by -- and even eventually "comprehended by" -- even the dumbest of small children).
And it's not that everyone "sees" or understands the full "macro" implications of it... but they DO comprehend it (at least) at the "family" level, and possibly their small community (church/town) level. They have SEEN various organizations (even towns) "fall apart" and disappear because all that is left is "old people" -- and so there is at least SOME (fairly shallow) understanding that younger people need to be HAVING kids, to supply the next generation of "workers."
-- Hence the "societal pressure."
[–]papertrace998 points9 points10 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
Well, half-heartedly trying.
The real cause* of the "birth rate collapse" isn't a LACK of women getting pregnant... it's a lack of women CARRYING the children to full term: that is the cause is ABORTION.
Which of course is a "policy" that cannot/will not be changed, because it is a CORE part of the "politically correct" feminist/gynocentric system, and THAT is a direct result via:
...of women "getting the vote" (and really it's a deeper symptom/problem inherent in "democracy" itself -- a system that allows people to "vote" for benefits, while also "voting" to NOT be responsible for the ultimate "costs" -- which is what ENABLES the "pyramid/ponzi" arrangement, and the wholesale corruption of politicians, who by definition are "doing the will of the population" so to speak {their personal "corruption" while part of the equation is actually somewhat secondary}).
--
They may try... but really its not going to work -- because you can't really get "blood" from a stone no matter how hard you try to squeeze it.
And besides, MGTOW are too decentralized -- too scattered to be effectively herded or harvested -- hells bells, the vast majority of men who are actually MGTOW don't even know the term, they are literally just hunkered down, hidden in plain sight so to speak, and yet also off "going their own way" (just in reaction to -- and avoidance of -- society's other preoccupations and insanity).
Ergo they can "scapegoat" us in the media, even attempt to pass laws or "taxes" on us... but NONE of that will actually work; and a system that is in a state of collapse/implosion will be entirely INCAPABLE of really "enforcing" any of that. (And if you want a PRIME example of how ineffective such attempts will be, simply look at the fiasco of the whole "Obamacare" thing in the US, regardless of all of the media "pressure" and even the threat of a major tax PENALTY, the vast majority of single young men are simply NOT in "compliance"; they're not necessarily actively in "defiance" of it, it's more that they don't GIVE A SHIT, cannot possibly "comply"; and or have figured other ways around the problem...).
--
Indeed... but all it will really end up doing is "consuming itself."
* There are of course, OTHER (even deeper) indirect "causes" of this... but that's another whole topic.
[–]papertrace994 points5 points6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
No need to apologize, I understood that's what you meant.
My point is that since they don't "self-identify" as such, they aren't necessarily going to be easy for society find or "identify" themselves; especially since "relationships" are no longer mandatorily invested in formal "marital" contract form.
IOW, we're a very difficult (nigh impossible) group to specifically "target."
The only way to even ATTEMPT to target us -- to go after any/all non-formally "married" men (including GAY guys, guys who are "baby daddies" cohabiting with some "baby momma"; guys who are in other "relationships" etc) -- is going to inevitably create an even larger amount of "collateral" damage.
It'd be like using a nuclear weapon to try to kill a mouse in your kitchen cupboard.
--
LOL, no they can't do that; and for several reasons:
First because the system is far to dependent upon the cash-flow from the array of taxes on all of those people... they can't SACRIFICE that $100 in a vain attempt to squeeze an extra $1 (or even $10) from a bunch of single MGTOW guys.
Secondly, that also doesn't work because a huge percentage of the population doesn't (presently) have "children" in their household for a number of OTHER reasons -- including again "gay" people, as well as "career" women, infertile couples, older "empty nest" couples, retirees/pensioners, etc.
Finally, as to both "tax incentives" (credits, etc) or "welfare payments" (benefits etc) -- and the whole "closing doors" and "quotas" thing... they're already implementing those, have been for DECADES.
LOL, in theory... the actual REALITY ends up not working out quite as they had planned.
In fact, its ends up being the opposite -- rather than being a "resource" that can be tapped -- the gimmegrants are a massive additional DRAIN on resources.
And that's just the PRESENT (short term) reality of that... the LONG TERM consequences of it are going to be even MORE costly.
Yeah... except that isn't what is going to happen. The present system will implode -- for OTHER reasons -- long before MGTOW numbers could possibly become large enough to really have an impact.
One of the things you need to remember is that -- biologically speaking -- an abundance of males is entirely NOT necessary to sustain pregnancy/birth rates. A single male can EASILY impregnate dozens even hundreds of females.
Ergo so long as at least somewhere around 1% to 10% of human males are willing to copulate with females; then the actions/choices of the rest of the males will have ZERO effect on the pregnancy/birth rates.
(And that's not to mention that -- naturally, demographically -- there tends to be a slight OVER-supply of males; that is a gender imbalance and an "excess" of men... some combination of "homosexuality" {which society is actually actively PUSHNG, and which also via Lesbianism reduces the female cohort} along with MGTOW would need to eat up that excess, and much much more... not gonna happen.)
Actually MGTOW largely exists (in it's "identifiable" named form) largely BECAUSE of the brute-force attempts at "social engineering."
We are the reaction to that.
-- And again, they can attempt any number of different "reactive-reactions" to our "reactionary" behavior -- but those things ALREADY EXIST, and "amping them up" will, if anything, end up being counterproductive to their goals.
I guess that depends on your definition of "stability."
I see the present civilization/society as essentially crashing, collapsing (or "imploding" upon and "consuming" itself)... much like the way that the Roman empire did (and/or take your pick of any of a number of other "empires/civilizations" that disappeared into the dusts of history... or indeed the many more that likely disappeared into the almost completely obfuscated "mists" of pre-history).
--
Assuming that the present system doesn't "nuke the planet" to the extent that it ends all human life... then yes, this seems to me to be the most likely scenario.
Various "new" societies & civilizations -- including possibly the revival of some of the more remote (seemingly "backward") "old order" ones like Amish, Mennonites, etc -- will rise on the detritus and "ash & rubble heap" of the present one.
Exactly WHAT they will retain (salvage, or preserve) from the present era will probably vary from one locale to another --- perhaps a lot, perhaps only a little.
-- About all I can say relative to the (IMO likely) "patriarchal" nature of such is that it's virtually a GIVEN that the will be "patriarchal" -- the reason being that, from history, we know THAT is the only structure capable of building a society... martiarchies and other non-patriarchal forms cannot even PRESERVE an existing society, and generally can only come about once a society is HUGELY affluent (and the they're inevitably DOOMED by the anti-patriarchal changes).
[–]papertrace990 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Well, it's not possible for me to lodge any valid complaints on that score; so no apology necessary.
;-)
But please to understand if I don't address the ENTIRETY of your reply at every detail. (Reddit does after all have a character limit on comments, LOL).
Yes... but each of those "workarounds" is already not only in existence, but close to having been pushed to "exhaustion" in terms of their effectiveness. (PUSH much further on any of them, and you in effect simply create a kind of "prohibition" state -- which NEVER works.)
-- Moreover the government isn't the ONLY one that can behave in a "work around it" fashion; as has been noted by many people in this forum whenever the subject of "bachelor taxes" is noted... the system, in enabling/facilitating "LGBT friendly" policies has effectively created an "out" for MGTOW...
If some *explicit insanely punitive** measures are enacted against men who are not formally/legally "married" -- well, we CAN just "pair up" and "marry" each other.
To be sure the government MIGHT then try to take a FURTHER "tack" and proceed to make an issue that would (somehow) require "cohabitation" (and/or regular sexual "consummation") of such "marriages"... but THAT would backfire on them in MULTIPLE ways; (not just the "creepiness" of attempting to insert itself LITERALLY into people's bedrooms, but it would effectively BLAST a whole host of other (unintended, non-targeted) people as well... and THEY would be really (royally) PISSED OFF about it.
Ergo I really can't see the government even attempting that... they've painted themselves in a corner on all of that; going even further will be of no avail; and backing out (in any gradual, or measured sense, just isn't going to be possible).
Actually 3rd world countries are NOT good examples, because they are largely sustained by the various 1st world nations... the implosion/collapse of the 1st world nations will be an entirely different thing.
And civil wars ARE in fact fairly likely... but they will be nothing like the prior US "Civil War" (so called); what is unlikely is that what comes out the other side bears ANY resemblance to the present order -- vastly more likely is a "balkanization" and a whole array of different regional states, with different regimes/different societies.
Actually, I think we'll see the opposite -- the meat grinder not only WILL discriminate, but "discrimination" (skin color/race/ethnicity & religion) will be the PRIMARY lines of division. Historically speaking, "polyglot" or "diverse" states never last for long... they always, always, always, end up redividing along "ethnic" lines.
I also don't see the present "class" system surviving -- certainly not with the present families/groups in place now; in part because they are unlikely to stay during the "crisis" (most already have plans to depart for various "bolt holes" where they plan to retreat to weather the storm, and the "return from" -- they may be allowed to retreat, but they will not be able to return).
Actually you really ought to look a bit more deeply into that. The USA was in fact largely shaped by "bachelors," much more than anyone imagines (much less what they are taught, which is "zip").
And sorry, but I need to sort of leave off there for now... I note that rain is starting to come down, and I have several proverbial "hatches" that I need to "batten down."
CHEERS!
[–]papertrace990 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]gundahir2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]papertrace990 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]androphilistic5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]DWShimoda5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Polaris3820 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]EndlessPontification1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cypher21115 points16 points17 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]mediumwaffle25 points26 points27 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]plutoniumfield4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]EndlessPontification1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MTGOStark 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DWShimoda7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Silver-Noxx6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]emoninja9514 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Polaris3821 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuu999 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IrateChief 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoThirst0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]IrateChief 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bonusfruit5 points6 points7 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]geldersekifuzuli4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]bonusfruit1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Which "people" would this be?
If you're talking about the "r" group (of "/r/K selection theory") then I will be in wholesale agreement with you.
But if you are also applying it to the "K" group, then I think you are entirely WRONG.
-- Ergo while most people don't "mate" based on ANY "calculation" or "consideration" at all, that isn't ALL people.
There is a certain segment of society -- by definition, the more intelligent, more "responsible" people -- who in fact do take such considerations into account.
They may not be MAINLY concerned over the aggregate totals of human population -- but they DO add that in as a factor relative to how it would affect the prospects for their OWN offspring -- that is both their OWN ability to provide for and raise their children, as well as the "fate" of those children (what world will they inherit).
-- Alas, more's the pity, but this USUALLY results in those "responsible" people (whom society could actually use MORE of) curbing their reproduction -- and meanwhile the "irresponsible" proliferate -- with the end result that the society becomes unstable and filled with the children of irresponsible people (and MOST of them will be irresponsible in turn)... in effect this DOOMS that society.
[–]bonusfruit0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DWShimoda2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NoThirst0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]89Thoradin5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DWShimoda2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]EndlessPontification0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]89Thoradin0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]EndlessPontification0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Talkytalktalk4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TK36003 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Eizieizz1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TK36000 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Eizieizz0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TK36000 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsntDebateClass4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cleats4u2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]moospot2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sonic11013 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]faggaren1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shoonx1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spungo1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]simplystimpy1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JosephBancor 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sonic11011 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jacqueau1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hernes777 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]allowsnackbar0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diam35 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Itisforsexy1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CynicalSoup2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CynicalSoup1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]plutoniumfield0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]vhemtmgtow1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoThirst0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]frankmarlowe0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Self_Descr_Huguenot1 point [recovered] | Copy Link