Do you believe in the core attraction principles of the red pill?

Reddit View
April 16, 2020
5 upvotes

Here is one of the top of posts there, and I am curious what the consensus here is on some of these points:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/5fihmu/how_to_get_laid_like_a_warlord_37_rules_of/

1) Women are attracted to you because you have a stronger frame than they do. That’s all. There’s nothing else to it.

2) Women would rather fuck an ugly guy with a strong frame than a handsome guy with a weak one

10) Women will test you brutally when they want to sleep with you

11) Fight Club analogy Getting a hot woman into bed is like the hazing scene in Fight Club where the new recruits are lined up outside the door. Tyler berates the recruits with personal insults. “Too old, go away.” “Too fat, go away.” He forces them to stand outside for days. He tells them there’s no possibility they’re getting in. Most give up. But the few who stay are ultimately invited inside. Seducing the hottest women is the same. It’s a WAR OF ATTRITION. Women will fuck pretty much any guy who’s around at the end of the night so long as he has a stronger frame than she does. But you have to stick around. You can’t leave when she insults you or acts like she doesn’t want to talk to you. If you do, you’re failing her tests. We’ll get into the mechanics of passing these tests in a moment. First we need to talk about inner game, which is the basis of out-framing anyone.

16) Be her cheat meal You can be a “4” and she can be a “9”. If the circumstances are right, she’ll fuck you so long as there’s no downside. Why? Because sex feels good. Even the hottest, slimmest yoga bunny pigs out on pizza every once in a while. It’s human nature. We’re not strong. We’re weak.

18) Cultivate a “reality distortion field”

20) Passing tests is where ALL attraction is ultimately generated.

29) You are TOO HIGH VALUE Yes, you read that correctly. When you’re getting “rejected” by girls, it’s because YOU’RE TOO HIGH VALUE FOR THEM, and it makes them nervous and self-conscious.

Just want to get a sense of what people think of this content.

EDIT: I posted this because it literally made me laugh out loud. Its one of the most delusional, ridiculous posts I have ever seen, and it got 4000+ upvotes on the main sub... WHAT!???

I just realized this is the number 2 post ALL TIME there...


Post Information
Title Do you believe in the core attraction principles of the red pill?
Author IsAllThisReal
Upvotes 5
Comments 30
Date 16 April 2020 12:15 AM UTC (12 months ago)
Subreddit askRPC
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/653364
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/askRPC/comments/g2477e/do_you_believe_in_the_core_attraction_principles/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
framegamethe red pill
Comments

[–]OsmiumZulu6 points7 points  (11 children) | Copy

Do you believe in the core attraction principles of the red pill?

Yes.

Baptism doesn't change how vaginas work.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy

I'd encourage you to read the post I linked and see what you think.

[–]OsmiumZulu2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy

I've read the post a half dozen times over the years; it's a classic for a reason.

Attraction is far more rote than people, especially Christians, tend to want to believe. That's the redpill fam. Attraction operates how it does, not how we wish it did.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy

I would consider myself a good looking guy, and I played in a club band for about 5 years. I was not a practicing christian at this time, I was back-slidden and spiritually dead. When a woman wants to sleep with you, she hands you her number and says 'My roommate isn't home tonight'.

Passing tests just means you're willing to jump through her ridiculous hoops in the hopes that you will get but a crumb of the coochie. You know what what girls do when they are actually attracted to you? They're usually pretty nice and receptive. They ask if you want to go out on the deck and talk. Then they blow you in the bathroom. Heck sometimes they skip that first part all-together.

Be her cheat meal? Women have a 5 page list of 8/10+ dudes who will be over at her apartment in 20 minutes if she texts them. She doesn't want a crusty 4 who is 'totally alpha'. Maybe if she is blackout drunk or on drugs.

The red pill is the pleasant lie: that by being masculine and confident you can get any woman you want. The most masculine, confident 5'4 balding Indian janitor is not going to walk out with 9/10 Stacy when there is a perfectly normal 8/10 dude whose only line to her was 'hey do you like tequila'.

[–]OsmiumZulu2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy

I played in a club band... When a woman wants to sleep with you, she hands you her number and says 'My roommate isn't home tonight'.

You're proving the point. When you are in a band you have unlimited social proof and pre-selection. She isn't testing you because she is already convinced that your frame is untouchable. Turns out that a lot of musicians and performers are insecure deep down and can't keep a woman attracted because they have weak frame.

Passing tests just means you're willing to jump through her ridiculous hoops in the hopes that you will get but a crumb of the coochie.

Go back to red pill 101 and learn what shit tests are.

You know what what girls do when they are actually attracted to you? They're usually pretty nice and receptive. They ask if you want to go out on the deck and talk. Then they blow you in the bathroom. Heck sometimes they skip that first part all-together.

Only when they are convinced of your frame. Take these same women and start to show deferential supplicating beta behavior. What happens? They start testing.

Be her cheat meal? Women have a 5 page list of 8/10+ dudes who will be over at her apartment in 20 minutes if she texts them.

Feels is reals. Novelty seeking behavior is real. The 5 page list of 8/10's don't excite her exactly because there are 5 pages of the same basic guy.

She doesn't want a crusty 4 who is 'totally alpha'. Maybe if she is blackout drunk or on drugs.

I knew a guy who was a 5 on his best days. He nailed almost every one of the hottest chicks in my high school. Why? Because he utterly DNGAF and was self-confident to a near sociopathic degree. He would approach with a stupidly sexual line like, "Hey baby doll, I like the way your shorts squeeze your ass. What's your number we should go out sometime...." and he would get shut down. Hard. Sometimes he'd get slapped. Then, completely ignoring the shut down like it never happened, he would just carry on. When they saw him utterly unfazed by their reaction they would visibly shift their demeanor toward him and begin giving IOI's. It was surreal to witness. It was no fluke and I saw him do this several times. It was honestly a massive redpill to see this go down.

The red pill is the pleasant lie: that by being masculine and confident you can get any woman you want.

This is an overstatement and a strawman. Accurate representation would be: by being masculine and confident you can get woman that are far beyond what would be expected of you. Even the most veteran hardliner in the red pill community would admit that there is no secret recipe that will unlock any woman's legs. Saying, "by being confident and masculine you can land a 9/10" is entirely different that saying "by being confident and masculine you can land any 9/10".

There has always existed a tension in the PUA / Red Pill / manosphere between the idea of innate attractiveness and game. PUAs say game is all that matters, Red Pill / manosphere types tend to say innate attractiveness is all that matters. The reality is both matter and compliment one another. Should a man focus on improving his inherent external attractiveness? Yes. Should a man learn how to develop internal game and learn how to capitalize on what qualities he already possess? Yes. This is true for both single and married men.

The christian is tempted to spiritualize the whole thing in an attempt to find an escape hatch but that is just blue pill fantasy and a refusal to accept the reality of the way things are.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy

She isn't testing you because she is already convinced that your frame is untouchable.

See this is where TRP begins to loose cohesion with itself. Is passing tests THE ONLY way to generate attraction or not? How could she know anything about my frame, I thought the only reason women are attracted to you is because your frame is stronger than hers? Is pre-selection now frame? Why didn't our front man, a 5'8 fat guy get women if he already had so much social proof and pre-selection? The answer is that physical attractiveness can override any and all TRP nonsense. It can only be rationalized with cognitive dissonance.

TRP is absolutely delusional about the level at which 'red pill' techniques matter. I never had to try at all, I never had to even say anything. I didn't have to pass tests. Attraction was fundamentally because they thought I was physically attractive.

Feels is reals. Novelty seeking behavior is real. The 5 page list of 8/10's don't excite her exactly because there are 5 pages of the same basic guy.

This is another red pill cope, and a pleasant lie: if I just keep approaching the right way, at some point I'll be her best option, even though I'm 5'5 and 130lbs! Why would she want the novelty of an annoying 5/10 when she could go on tinder, and in a city or college town have a new guy literally every day all year who is an 8/10. Novelty seeking behavior does not override biological instincts to reproduce with the best genes.

I want to bring up this point again because it is so delusional and wrong:

  1. Women will test you brutally when they want to sleep with you

Demonstratively false in basically every way. Simply factually incorrect.

It was no fluke and I saw him do this several times. It was honestly a massive redpill to see this go down.

I honestly just do not believe you. I'm not insinuating you're a liar, I think you're so bought into this ideology that you really believe this stuff. I would also be willing to bet a large amount of money that whatever happened was pre-tinder.

Even the most veteran hardliner in the red pill community would admit that there is no secret recipe that will unlock any woman's legs.

Thats exactly what this post is doing, though. The insinuation is that this guys techniques will allow anyone who can seduce a 5 to get with 9s. 'Seducing a 9 is no different than seducing a 5'. Pure delusion.

Saying, "by being confident and masculine you can land a 9/10" is entirely different that saying "by being confident and masculine you can land any 9/10".

Yeah sure, if you approach every 9/10 on earth eventually one will be drunk, high, or bored enough to have sex with you. That is if she doesn't have a cell phone with 500 tinder matches already.

There has always existed a tension in the PUA / Red Pill / manosphere between the idea of innate attractiveness and game. PUAs say game is all that matters, Red Pill / manosphere types tend to say innate attractiveness is all that matters. The reality is both matter and compliment one another.

What??? I thought only frame and passing tests matters!

Of course its a combination of both, but that silly post speaks in absurd absolutes because the PUA dude who wrote it needs to sell products to guys who have no luck with women. And if it works, he's out of a customer, what do they need him for then? It needs to have a semblance of working, but not quite well enough. It needs to rope them in, trick them into buying in, then keep them coming back with new, better advice.

Guys who try 'red pill' techniques in the modern dating scene will be laughed at, because the smorgasbord of cock available to the modern woman is beyond anything conceived in the 90s. Sven the 6'4 swedish artist with a downtown loft is banging a dozen chicks a week, and Joe Red Pill is confidently touching girls elbows at the bar and getting slapped and tossed out by a bouncer.

[–]OsmiumZulu0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

I never had to try at all, I never had to even say anything. I didn't have to pass tests.

Well slayer, why are you even here then? Sounds like you've got it all figured out.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

Way to not address any of my points.

I'm not and was not a slayer. I did well with women I was attracted to, often that i thought were better looking than me, and thats fine with me. But I am able to address the reality that if you are attractive, you don't have to jump through hoops. You don't have to 'employ techniques'. You have success because you are physically attractive, in spite of other 'flaws'. Flaws become 'quirks'. Your frame can be anything you want. You can say almost nothing, or you can talk all night.

TRP gives good advice on NOT screwing it up when you already have attraction, but sells false promises to ugly and below average guys.

[–]OsmiumZulu1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

I'm not addressing your points because you're committed to a contrary perspective. Why waste the time?

TRP sells false promises to ugly and below average guys.

Brother, I can't change your experience but I wish you could see what I've seen.

if you are attractive, you don't have to jump through hoops

Yes. This isn't contrary to the red pill. As I mentioned above, there is a tension between PUA and RP based on this very issue. End of the day, physically attractive men are playing the game with cheat codes. Women assume they are alpha when they often are not. This aids them in initial attraction but utterly ruins them in the medium / long run.

I have a post in my drafts about two guys I know. Both are exceptionally good looking guys. They are fitness nuts and re totally jacked. They slay it on dating apps. They are, aesthetically speaking, what most men aspire to.

They suck at maintaining attraction. Terrible in fact.

Why? Their internal game sucks.

They never had to develop any game / frame because they were playing the first level of the game on easy mode. On the other hand I grew up fairly average looking compared to these guys.

Guess what? While I've seen them grenade their relationships my wife is hotter than any of the women they've dated along the way and I've been with her for 7 years because I had to scrap and learn game, developing a concrete frame along the way. Sure, I've improved my attractiveness, but physical attractiveness is only the tip of the iceberg and that's the entire point of this.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

The things you are saying contradict explicitly with that post, which was ALL ABOUT ONS type interactions, picking up girls at bars, having casual sex. Attraction is -NOT- ONLY built by passing tests. Strong frame is NOT the only reason she is attracted to you. Women will NOT brutally test you before they sleep with you. All fabrications to sell products.

You have a reasonable and balanced opinion, while that post is wild hyperbole.

I have a cultural gap with most Americans I meet, as I grew up in a very poor immigrant community. Eastern Europeans are very patriarchal and very overtly masculine, to a fault after a bottle of cognac. As a child I saw only hard men, mostly laborers, some tradesmen, and it showed me how men were supposed to behave. Of course I agree that physical attractiveness is not the only factor in an LTR, and if thats all you bring to the table, you will fail. There is a basic standard of male behavior that is critical in maintaining the proper relationship dynamics. But that is utterly tangential to this topic.

[–]OrlandoTheAxe1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy

1 & 2) Ridiculous. You cannot have sex with someone's personality. Personality competing with physical appearance is the exception. It's how we're programmed.

 

11) "Orbit your lady at the bar all night until she caves and decides to sleep with you." Perhaps it does work for one night stands, but not for lifelong marriages.

 

16) Maybe low SMV sluts adhere to this. As many here have discovered, your wife doesn't. For long term relationships it's shape up or ship out. Nobody wants to marry a cheat meal.

 

18 & 20) "Portray a false self and keep it up when she calls you out on it. That'll get you in her pants for sure."

Does anyone else find this ridiculous? A Chihuahua can bark like a German Shepherd all it wants, no one is ever going to look at that Chihuahua and think "that's a German Shepherd." How is it not the same with people?

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy

Bro you are just not practice enough KINO and LITERALLY EMBODYING the frame of Conan the Barbarian. If you're not wearing an animal skin loin cloth and a broadsword to the bars, are you even trying? If you would just BUY MY PROGRAM for the low low price of $29.99 a month, you will be the SUPREME ALPHA. My dating and LIFE COACH tips will add an inch to your wallet and 5 INCHES to your cock!!!! BUY BUY BUY NOW

[–]OrlandoTheAxe1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy

If the TRP can use the modern dating situation to sell snake oil, imagine how we can use it to share Biblical truth and, ultimately, the gospel!

Incels are a universally hated, unreached group that make up a significant portion of western males, but these people could be absolutely transformed by the love of Christ! Imagine the effect on our society!

The Bible has a cure for loneliness and misery. If we can figure out how to articulate it and how to live it, that's a huge launchpad for a ministry.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy

I agree so much. I've reached out to many of them and they just call me a Christcuck lol. There is a lot of anger, frustration, social isolation, depression, and sadness in that community. And they're universally reviled. IMO many of them can change and live happy productive lives. They just so pedestalize sex and relationships that they can't imagine any other source of meaning.

[–]OrlandoTheAxe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

This community helped me, and I'm no better than the rest of 'em. Finding it marks a turning point in my life. I haven't made it yet, but I believe in the mission of this sub because I have experienced it to some degree.

 

IMO many of them can change and live happy productive lives. They just so pedestalize sex and relationships that they can't imagine any other source of meaning.

You're 100% right. I am convinced that there is a way for us to give them the true source of meaning!

[–]rocknrollchuck1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Most non-Christian subs are intolerant of traditional Christian views. You may not be completely wasting your time, but you are unlikely to find much fruit there because it's stony ground. The seeds that will sprout will ultimately take root first in good soil (here) where they can be nourished and reach their full potential. I'm not saying to stop trying, I'm just saying don't expect a bountiful harvest in the desert.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

You're probably right, but man I really do feel bad for them. Similar to ex-cons, they're the throwaways, the untouchables of our culture. Men are valued by society based on what they can contribute, what value they can add, and what they can DO. These types of men are considered expendable as their contribution to society is minimal or negative.

[–]rocknrollchuck1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Many of them have put themselves in that position. Some have not. Regardless, they have to be seeking the help before it will do any good.

Do you think Neo would have been contacted by Morpheus if he hadn't been searching for an answer already? At the beginning of The Matrix, Neo is running Internet searches for Morpheus because he understands that "something is not right with the world". When he meets Trinity, it is revealed that he wasn't just looking for Morpheus. He was really seeking knowledge of something they both understood to be called "The Matrix".

Similar to ex-cons, they're the throwaways, the untouchables of our culture.

This is where the Holy Spirit often intervenes. God specializes in seeking out those the world wants to throw away. This happens through the power of the Gospel. So what's the connection between the Gospel and the fruit? Look for the harvest. Look for those people and situations where the Gospel can best flourish in the hearts of those God has prepared for it. There's always a harvest somewhere, but some fields will never produce it, and others may not be ready yet.

[–]UpTanks0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I agree so much. I've reached out to many of them and they just call me a Christcuck lol.

Are you approaching them to only share Christ or to just spend time and chat with them? Walking up to someone sitting alone looking sad and having a vibrant conversation is probably the strongest sell you can do.

After a while or whatever you can ask them about God. The key is asking them for their opinion and focusing on that. Its also much better to let them ask you specific questions, because I usually get lost in my own thinking with open ended stuff lol.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Almost always I start by talking about how I believe them, and how I understand that their experiences are not a delusion. That they've been dealt a raw hand through random chance. These aren't people I meet in real life, though, so its not like I have that kind of rapport with them that I can bring up religion naturally.

[–]OrlandoTheAxe1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

The problem here is that truth (to some extent) is defined by the victors. The victorious high SMV males have a completely different experience than the guys at the bottom. They believe their experiences are the only valid experiences, and in doing so they completely fail to address the reality of half the guys out there. Incels do the same thing, only in reverse.

 

To GigaChad, women are easy and all you need to do is talk a big game and maintain frame.

To StBlackOpscel, women treat him like an insect, and nothing he can say or do will ever change that.

 

We will not have the truth until we find something that explains both of these equally valid experiences. Chad isn't lying when he says these 37 Rules work for him. BlackOpscel isn't lying when he says he has a great personality, but get's rejected anyway.

 


This absolute truth is worth finding because we can use it to pull incels out of their misery, give them tools that actually work, and point them to Christ. You cannot do that when you're peddling a theory that completely ignores and invalidates the reality of the low value male. It's real life; they're living it.


 

I came here initially because I want to find this truth. I was a daily lurker of incel forums, until one day I thought "what does the Bible (the ultimate source of truth) have to say about all this?" We need to be pulling folks from the matrix into real life, not from one matrix to another.

 

For the record, I think RPC gets it right on most points. The main thing we disagree on is how appearance is weighted in overall attractiveness.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I feel exactly the same way, there is an accurate in-between that explains all phenomena. But i do disagree on a few points:

One is that TRP stuff is irrelevant for chads. When a woman is interested in you, its the easiest thing in the world to hold that interest, you just have to be marginally not retarded. You don't have to talk a big game. You have a couple beers, hand her your phone, and say 'let go out sometime'. When a woman is interested in you, she lets you know.

By their logic, a rejection is really just her wanting you to pursue harder... and a kick to the nuts and a restraining order is just her cheeky way of saying "Lets go out sometime".

[–]OrlandoTheAxe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

One is that TRP stuff is irrelevant for chads.

I think we'd both actually agree that TRP is relevant for all males! I wouldn't be here otherwise. You and I are also on the same page that "Frame" doesn't cover all flaws.

 

The main reason incels reject the redpill is because it doesn't explain their experiences; it completely discounts them.

But I'm certain there's a way to do it with a BIBLICAL basis. I'm all fired up about this now because if we can figure this out, we can save incels from depression, and then save them from their sins! (Lord willing and through Jesus Christ of course).

I went on about this in another comment, but can you see how powerful this could be!?!

[–]Praexology2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

1) Untrue. There are plenty of high profile, high confidence quasimodos out there to prove the difference. The inverse is also true. Low frame but high attractive guys will also get it.

The issues arise when you apply this principal to a long term relationship.

2) Again not necessarily true. True frame translates to High RMV. SMV is for the most part a combination of confidence (which can be faked) and physical attractiveness.

10) Some might, some might not. ONSs are not good representation of LTRs. S*** tests come in when a woman is asking herself "Is this guy worth my time." Which they ask a LOT.

11) Whoever wrote this seems to not have an actual frame. Seems to be really pining for whatever girl he's after. "If I stick around long enough, and put up with her bullying maybe she'll be just hammered enough to put out." Value yourself more. If it isn't a hell yes, it's a hell no.

You can’t leave when she insults you or acts like she doesn’t want to talk to you. If you do, you’re failing her tests.

You can pass her test, but you'll fail at retaining some resemblance of respectability. TRP is full of fragile teenage boys trying to impress eachother. If you have to multiply a woman's n-count by 10, then you have to take the average TRP subscribers n-count and divice by 4.

16) Is he recommending being a 4 because it won't matter and you can still pull a 9? Pathetic.

I've said it before, and Ill elaborate it more here. TRP is about sex, at the end of the day it's all about getting a quick lay. TRP doesn't help you achieve self realization, or betterment. MRP is a bit better in that it focuses on building mission outside of women. "Be a quality man because you want to be. Then once you are, women are easy for the taking." RPC is about RP, and applying it to your Jesus focused marriage (or relationship that you intend on bringing to marriage.)

18) Whoever wrote this is really getting off on their own thoughts. If you can't explain a concept in it's most simple form then you shouldn't be dispersing that information. Brevity is key.

20) Simply not true. Hyperbole is for idiots and politicians.

29) (I'm not even going to dignify this one with a serious response.)

You are TOO HIGH VALUE Yes, you read that correctly. When you’re getting “rejected” by men, it’s because YOU’RE TOO HIGH VALUE FOR THEM, and it makes them nervous and self-conscious.

Get it girl!

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'm very thankful that you find this as ridiculous and pathetic as I do. It reads like some silly fantasy a child wrote imagining adult relationships.

[–]bella_lucky70 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

Thanks for the laugh, I can’t believe there are men that buy into this.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Its a strange fantasy that I can't imagine how grown men believe.

Women believe a similar fantasy, that they are attracted to great personalities and all of these intangible traits. They're mostly attracted to normal, masculine men who are physically attractive (tall, muscular, masculine features). They don't care about all of the absurd red pill 'techniques', they want someone who behaves like an adult male, and maybe its a bonus if he's funny.

[–]Deep_Strength0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Attraction must be interpreted in the context of the Bible and marriage, as God created it that way. I have a long post on that here:

https://deepstrength.wordpress.com/2016/06/29/a-christian-understanding-of-attraction-and-the-role-it-plays-in-marriage-part-2/

Women are attracted to you because you have a stronger frame than they do. That’s all. There’s nothing else to it.

This is wrong on many levels. Women are attracted to celebrities all the time for their fame, power, and status. You can see which celebrities do well with women, and which one get the women and then they want out once they figure out that they're pushovers. Same with professional athletes (fame, status, looks, money) and rich businessmen (money too).

"Frame" - AKA learning how to be a strong masculine leader is of course attractive to women but it's something that generally develops over time. There's many things that can attract women before you even meet them.

Women would rather fuck an ugly guy with a strong frame than a handsome guy with a weak one

Sorta true. Sometimes not-so-handsome men get the girl because they have other factors going for them. And women would rather be with a handsome guy with strong frame more than both of the above.

Women will test you brutally when they want to sleep with you

They will do it even when they don't want to sleep with you. Many a friend-zoned man that hangs around his crush get tested all the time by the women making them do stuff for them or listening to their sob stories.

Fight Club analogy

Doesn't matter with committed Christian women.

TRP suffers from a lot of confirmation bias. It's a numbers game to get a girl to sleep with you, and the ones that will do are women that are promiscuous. So they overgeneralize women by understanding only how promiscuous women operate. This is not to say NAWALT (not all women are like that) or anything, but a bunch of the stuff flat out does not work with Christian women who are chaste and want to be in a relationship to be married.

Be her cheat meal

Doesn't matter with committed Christian women.

Cultivate a “reality distortion field”

No clue what this means

Passing tests is where ALL attraction is ultimately generated.

Wrong. Some to most of attraction is generated at first impression (how tall, how handsome, how muscular, how well you carry yourself and body language, etc). Another chunk is in masculinity, humor, charisma, and other attractive personality traits. Passing tests is a part.

It's more of a disqualifer than anything; women will generally only start throwing out tons of tests if they're interested sexually and you are pushing for sex.

You are TOO HIGH VALUE Yes, you read that correctly. When you’re getting “rejected” by girls, it’s because YOU’RE TOO HIGH VALUE FOR THEM, and it makes them nervous and self-conscious.

Not true at all in most cases. I suppose this is meant as confidence booster for the men reading that, but the men reading that are generally there because they are unsuccessful with women.

Overall, it's not a great post. Too many over-generalizations and a lot of just flat out wrong info that can be proved empirically.

[–]IsAllThisReal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Agreed man, I got a good laugh out of it though. The 'reality distortion field' literally made me laugh.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter