Idk if this is even real or not, but it seems like the truth either way. Ur thoughts?

Octoxo · 2020-06-04T14:42:40+00:00

[removed]

ghulmar · 2020-06-04T14:48:45+00:00

please first fact check, if you post something like this.

He actually never said this.

(What does not mean that elites dont wanted this "equality of genders", its high likely that they funded or supported such movements in some way)

iseehot · 2020-06-04T14:41:13+00:00

[deleted]

DangZagnut · 2020-06-04T14:41:35+00:00

Don’t care.

One, I’d need to see hard evidence this is a real quote. I’m more than willing to believe it’s a fake quote by trad cucks as well. It’s been out awhile.

Two, so what, women should pay taxes. They’ve gotten off easy sitting at home all day and always loved sending their children to the state so they could sit around watching soap operas.

So tax them and make ‘em pay their own way.

Also, why would Rockefeller give a shit? Governments care about this, not rich guys.

GoodMan_Gone · 2020-06-04T15:03:01+00:00

tl;dr I think Rockerfeller (and the likes) are still pawns of feminists.

IDK OP. Indeed this does sound true. It's only part of the truth for me. I think the likes of him are high in the food chain of feminism. But I see him as a minister. Not the president of that movement. Why? Corporate business is IMO only part of the whole plan. There is media, education, politics, sexual "liberation" (a.k.a. the CC) and legal systems in play as well. Feminism seems to be designed to undermine, derail and enslave human kind. All with the narrative it's for our own good and you are free to chose. There are some people who greatly benefit from feminism. My only dying question is who and why? Rockerfeller might indeed have funded the woman's movement for said purpose. But I think he was told to do so. He seems a "speaker" for corporate business. Yes the workforce has been inflated by female population and yes it has lead to decrease in labor costs together with inflation of prizes so now people are economic slaves to society: they have to work their whole life to pay off that house, student lone and men are robbed from their income due to divorce laws (which backfires on elderly women when the extortion period has ended for men and women fall into bitter poverty). So those are great pro arguments for corporate businesses to support this. However I don't see the total benefit for businesses to be stuck with a mostly useless female workforce: non productive, calling in sick with psychiatric problems (because they go against their nature), being stuck with "women's quota" to fill in high paying jobs with useless workforce. Also with the price strangulation it forces people to cut in expenses thus lowering profits. I honestly don't know if my latter arguments are beneficial towards businesses. At least you must agree with me that feminism is not 100% beneficial to businesses. Also I don't see why getting control of children is something beneficial towards businesses. To feminists all arguments are beneficial, I totally agree.

So those are my arguments he is not "the guy."

VeritasDitum · 2020-06-04T18:38:51+00:00

Whenever I see this guys face, my mind automatically overlays a reticle and I'm suddenly aware of the airflow around me. I'm just about to check for waving grasses or smoke drifting before the rage subsides and I realize it's simply a photograph.

It would suffice to say, I see this man as an enemy of humanity.

tupelohoney9 · 2020-06-04T14:51:35+00:00

Is that picture not George Soros?

Iqbal40862715 · 2020-06-04T15:05:00+00:00

I'm sure there is a degree of truth in the statement. No matter who said it. It has to be one of their devious goals.

2020-06-04T18:39:55+00:00

Its true, its all apart of the globalist agenda. Feminism is just a small part of it.

https://youtu.be/MY8Nfzcn1qQ

https://youtu.be/OtjTRYrF8X4

https://youtu.be/SvAUa1FcvDk

greyman314 · 2020-06-04T18:34:36+00:00

I don't know if this actually happened,. But the net result is that these claims are true.
The only people who benefited from feminism are the ultra rich.
Starting from the 1970s with women entering the workforce the supply of labor doubled. And the net result was a major decrees in the cost of work.
Check out the graphs salaries have been steadily declining since 1970.
Basic supply and demand.

Phantom_Spark · 2020-06-04T22:05:44+00:00

Look up Aaron Russo. He has a very long video discussing his friendship with the Rockefeller’s and the story behind all of this.

Of course I believe it. Feminism was never grass roots. The power driving feminism is so often wealth or people who’s have sick goals.

Take Margaret Sanger and the reason she founded Planned Parenthood.

The US was also a problem because capitalism within a Republic government wasn’t failing. Families were strong and difficult to mess with.

So they gave women the right to vote, jobs, welfare and the ability to have abortions and destroy men in court.

Surprise surprise... the family unit is obliterated. Children are raised by the state, both parents must work.

And every other millennial or sooner things socialism and Medicare for all is the way to go.

Pretty easy to see that people are being led like sheep off a cliff.

Ody_ssey · 2020-06-04T15:13:28+00:00

Actually, this didn't work if it was real. Women at the of life consumes more free money from the government than they paid as tax to the state. It becomes negative $150,000.

Governement gives women privileges to buy their votes. The more you will pretend to hate men and make anti male laws, the more you will be able to win trust of women. E.g. Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden

harpoonkamasutra · 2020-06-04T17:00:49+00:00

Its probably false, they are usually careful in saying stuff in the public. However, its pretty clear that it was in the interest of the big corporations to get women to work. That way they could hold the wages down.

Its interesting how they did it though, they convinced women through propaganda that they are being exploited in the household by their husbands, but going to work for a greedy corporation for a minimum wage is freedom and emancipation.

U-94 · 2020-06-04T17:02:14+00:00

Nick Rockefeller was also part of the problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXoKKHziHIo

usnraptor · 2020-06-04T17:14:24+00:00

Prior to women in the workforce, it only took the salary of one to maintain a family. Now it takes the salary of two just to barely stay afloat.

roflcopt0rz_returns · 2020-06-04T18:43:06+00:00

According to Turd Flinging Monkey, women gained voting rights in one of the flyover US states (I think Wyoming?) because the men there were thirsty and thought that dangling women's suffrage in front of women would be an incentive for them to come over. Also, women were initially against getting suffrage, presumably because they knew what responsibilities came with it. From there it spread through the other states like wildfire.

It is possible that women's suffrage was pushed for more nefarious reasons, but remember occam's razor. Is this a 4D chess game where the elites were thinking three steps ahead to try and usher in some kind of new world order and control everyone, or did men give women voting rights because they were simping and/or trying to pander for more votes to win elections?

Also, I can't find proof that Rockefeller was the one who said this quote.

Marque01 · 2020-06-04T20:06:48+00:00

It was Aaron Russo who said that Rockefeller told him that. You can still find the Russo interview out there on Youtube

Chad_Thunderfist · 2020-06-04T16:45:43+00:00

Honestly, I'd believe that

CeleritySteam · 2020-06-04T19:44:54+00:00

Aye, it's true. The high turnover on housing is also intended as there are several people taking commissions at every step.

What they don't want is single men buying a modest house once and that's it.

2020-06-04T21:29:25+00:00

It was Nick Rockefeller who said this to Aaron Russo. Aaron said this it in an interview with Alex Jones, and I believe him. Here's the clip.

2020-06-04T22:05:04+00:00

How much does he look like Soros?

Byzantine_Attorney · 2020-06-05T01:28:05+00:00

Based Rockefeller.

TheSultanRS · 2020-06-04T17:18:25+00:00

You might want to delete this thread bro. The slightest questioning of 'god's chosen people' is enough to get this subreddit taken down.

slamdunktiger86 · 2020-06-04T17:30:11+00:00

It was actually his dad who can take credit for this when he started the NEA (national education association) modeled off the Prussian system to mass produce soldiers and factories.

To read more on this, read The Creature from Jekyll Island.

BlackPillPusher · 2020-06-05T08:13:31+00:00

Look up women's studies and who funded them, also look up who was the person to start selling female contraceptives in the states.

The_Mole_Dizzle · 2020-06-04T17:01:10+00:00

brilliant either way

altair43 · 2020-06-04T19:14:05+00:00

They are not that stupid. This seems fake.

2020-06-05T16:26:00+00:00

Absolutely true. Also when both sexes entered the work force it lowered wages for everyone.

Title	Idk if this is even real or not, but it seems like the truth either way. Ur thoughts?
Author	WGCaptainKid
Upvotes	176
Comments	70
Date	June 4, 2020 2:35 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/gwim9x/idk_if_this_is_even_real_or_not_but_it_seems_like/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/idk-if-this-is-even-real-or-not-but-it-seems-like.670832 https://theredarchive.com/post/670832

Comments