There are many men who choose to do it later in life,
no there aren't. less than 1% of men who reach age 18 with their whole penis ever choose to get any of it amputated.
I've even read that a doctor working with geriatric male patients would advocate everyone doing it due to the amount of very painful infection he has had to deal with due to poor hygiene and bladder control problems.
it's horrifying that a doctor with this degree of misandry is allowed to see male patients. have you reported her to the AMA?
Sexually I am told it is not a big deal, some women prefer it, most don't care, my wife assures me one of her previous partners got plenty of pleasure even though he was cut so there's nothing to worry about there.
how would your wife know how much pleasure he got?
yes, i would rather the 85 year old keep his foreskin. if he needs help washing it, he should get help washing it. the same way i'd rather him keep his arms or legs rather than cut them off if he's unable to clean them. the foreskin has no impact whatsoever on bladder control.
there is no evidence that circumcision reduces a gay man's risk of HIV. none.
how would he know how much pleasure he was supposed to be getting? what age was he circumcised at?
if he's 85 years old and suffering from degeneration so severe he can't even wash his own penis, he's clearly not in a state of mind to be making those kinds of decisions for himself. dementia is a terrible thing.
no, there is literally no evidence that circumcision reduces a gay man's risk of HIV.
if you haven't the faintest idea of the details, maybe you shouldn't try to present the situation as if it backs up your point. i have asked many people who have experienced both and they tell me that circumcision ruins sex.
"it's like eating food and not being able to taste it".
[–]Rockbottom503 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]03Randomguy 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]baarelyalive 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]QueenOfMetals 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]ImaTigerShark 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]QueenOfMetals 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Equivalent_Parking_8 -1 points0 points1 point (15 children) | Copy Link
[+]needletothebar3 points [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link
no there aren't. less than 1% of men who reach age 18 with their whole penis ever choose to get any of it amputated.
it's horrifying that a doctor with this degree of misandry is allowed to see male patients. have you reported her to the AMA?
how would your wife know how much pleasure he got?
[–]Equivalent_Parking_8 -2 points-1 points0 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (5 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Equivalent_Parking_8 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Equivalent_Parking_8 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]needletothebar5 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
yes, i would rather the 85 year old keep his foreskin. if he needs help washing it, he should get help washing it. the same way i'd rather him keep his arms or legs rather than cut them off if he's unable to clean them. the foreskin has no impact whatsoever on bladder control.
there is no evidence that circumcision reduces a gay man's risk of HIV. none.
how would he know how much pleasure he was supposed to be getting? what age was he circumcised at?
[–]Equivalent_Parking_8 -3 points-2 points-1 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]needletothebar4 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
if he's 85 years old and suffering from degeneration so severe he can't even wash his own penis, he's clearly not in a state of mind to be making those kinds of decisions for himself. dementia is a terrible thing.
no, there is literally no evidence that circumcision reduces a gay man's risk of HIV.
if you haven't the faintest idea of the details, maybe you shouldn't try to present the situation as if it backs up your point. i have asked many people who have experienced both and they tell me that circumcision ruins sex.
"it's like eating food and not being able to taste it".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj\_nYcumC0c
[–]Equivalent_Parking_8 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Equivalent_Parking_8 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrHupfDohle 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FourFsOfLife 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]foreskin 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Trick_Tackle_8422 -1 points0 points1 point (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Trick_Tackle_8422 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Trick_Tackle_8422 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]MixedKid05 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Trick_Tackle_8422 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MixedKid05 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PuddleOfMush -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link