TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Women boycott pro hockey in North America until they "get" the league they deserve.

Missing_Link420

May 3, 2019
41 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.tsn.ca/more-than-200-players-call-for-overhaul-of-women-s-pro-hockey-1.1299658
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Women boycott pro hockey in North America until they "get" the league they deserve.
Author

Missing_Link420

Upvotes 41
Comments 27
Date May 3, 2019 1:36 AM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/bk2vz4/women_boycott_pro_hockey_in_north_america_until/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/women-boycott-pro-hockey-in-north-america-until.878510
https://theredarchive.com/post/878510
Red Pill terms in post
feminism

Comments

[–][deleted] 34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

we will not play in ANY professional leagues in North America this season until we get the resources that professional hockey demands and deserves.

They want the benefits of a pro league without the responsibility of building it themselves.

I personally think this is just a play to get the NHL invested in the women's league. Interesting that the women want/needs the mens league to provide for them though.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These women need to read up about the early days of the NHL, how it actually folded for quite a few years, it's early competitors, what the players earned while the league was being built, etc.

Just like most entitled women, they want the end result without having to actually live through the process of making it.

[–]Sir_Sux_Alot 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

My opinion isnt a popular one, but I think they would make the pro leagues unisex. Then women could fail on their own merits instead of blaming lack of funding.

[–]JaxJags904 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The leagues ARE unisex, but no women are able to compete.

[–]Sir_Sux_Alot 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I didnt know that, thank you for pointing that out. Well they should either rise to the challenge or just admit their league isnt as competitive.

[–]JaxJags904 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are physically unable to ride to the challenge. It’s just biology. That doesn’t mean they don’t deserve to play, but they clearly don’t deserve to be paid anything close to what top male athletes get.

[–]TheRealBidness 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I could get behind that, until some chick fucking dies because Colton Parayko or Ryan Reaves, or someone like that, blindsides her at 35mph. It would be funny at first until one of her mangled tits fly into the stands, while the other slides down the ice into the goal.

[–]DJ-Roukan 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They tried that by allowing the two top women in the world to participate in men's golf. Neither even made the cut, and for the most part, their careers went downhill from there.

​

...and I actually liked Annika. Just another woman tossed under the buss of feminism.

[–]TheRealBidness -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahahahahaha fuckin chicks

[–]Nielsen316 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it could be the 80s or 90s with guys like Nilan, Rob Ray, Milbury and McSorley roaming the Ice. Or hell just prime Chara.

[–]RunawayGrain 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The problem is that they would suck. Then instead of admitting they suck, they would start trying to nerf the guys through rule changes.

[–]Sir_Sux_Alot 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh yes that's the feminist way-

[–]Tailtappin 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They already are. Well, no, not really because men can't play in any female league. If they were truly open to both sexes, the women would be out-competed in about 5 minutes.

In any case, if this league is in the private realm, they need to up their crowd attracting game. If they want the NHL to pay for them then they need to find some way of explaining why the NHL should do that. The odds that a woman will actually make it into the NHL are extremely slim so it's not like a female league is a good way to scout talent or anything.

No doubt they'll demand the government pony up and pay for them to play a game. I honestly don't give a shit about any organized team sport so it doesn't matter to me. However, I know that sooner or later we'll all be forced to pay for these women.

[–]NAWALT_VADER 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They aren't making money because nobody is watching their games, so who are they threatening by not playing? Do they think the people not watching are suddenly going to get upset that they can no longer not-watch-by-choice, but now have to not-watch-by-force?

From the article: "This stand by not only the game’s high-profile players but so many of the rank-and-file players would seemingly put the five-team U.S.-based National Women’s Hockey League out of business for the coming season or damage its credibility beyond repair."

"It would appear the strategy or end game here is to create a void that could lead to a new model. That’s certainly the hope."

"If the NWHL is no longer operational, many will be watching the National Hockey League to see if it might step up in some way. In the past, the NHL has provided some token financial support of the women’s game."

It sounds a lot like they are hoping that they will just get paid the same as men even if their league is not financially viable and nobody watches or cares. Do they think nobody watches because they don't get paid enough? Will they try to force the NHL to pay somehow? I'm not sure how any of that will work out for them, but am interested in seeing how this plays out.

[–]DauntingMist34 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I was gonna comment something like this. Obviously this is ridiculous and is going to go nowhere. You summed it up better than i could though!

[–]Tailtappin 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, no, not really. They get paid something like 2000 bucks a year. That's a pittance. However, who cares? I mean, you're playing a game and the only reason that NHL players make as much as they do is because they attract thousands of people to every game they play. That's all private money. Now, granted, the NHL does get government handouts to build arenas and subsidize their teams from time to time but that's because they've been around for so long and civic populations view them as cultural amenities.

Around a decade ago, there were a couple sisters who insisted it was unfair that they couldn't play in the male league at the high-school level in my city. Of course they made a big stink about it, hired a lawyer and took it to one the "human rights kangaroo courts tribunals". Naturally they won because it was somehow deemed discriminatory that they not be allowed to compete against the boys. At no time did it ever occur to anybody in the press that if they got on the team but boys weren't allowed on the female teams then that was taking two spots away from the boys. Also, there are some very good reasons they weren't allowed to play with the boys (having their heads knocked off being the primary one) but, human rights tribunals don't use common sense when making decisions so that was no impediment.

In the end, they didn't make the cut. Thankfully. Had they somehow managed to make the cut, you can bet that by now there'd be no cross checking, slapshots or interesting shit left to watch.

[–]ZimbaZumba 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Winnipeg.

[–]theanchorman05 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I saw this and to me it's just a publicity stunt. I keep up with sports pretty regularly and had no clue there was a women pro hockey league.

[–]Tailtappin 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Pro" being rather misleading in this case. They're pro only because they're being paid, not because they provide an interesting game to watch.

[–]Kanonizator 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are sooo entitled these days... /s

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait, there was a womans league?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Give them a pro hockey league. But make the uniforms bikinis.

Like they did with that football league.

If they don’t like it, tell them to build their own league.

[–]andejoh 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hilary Knight said, "We can see where our game is now and where it has to be in order to be sustainable in the long term.”

From the article

"The NWHL is the sole remaining professional league after the Canadian Women’s Hockey League (CWHL) folded March 31 following 12 years of operation. "

They seem to be hemorrhaging money as it is. How would paying them more money going to stop rather than exacerbate it? I understand the concept of a better product will lead to more cash, but there's already a better product out there, men's hockey at basically every level including at the high school level and they play for free.

[–]JaxJags904 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me of the South Park episode, Canada on strike.

“Why do we want? We want more money. How about some of that internet money?”

[–]kragshot 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Simple question. How many people are going to see women's pro hockey games compared to men's?

The answer to the problem is that they need to do a huge promotion to get more asses in seats for the women's games. But in this lies another issue. WNBA games are boring...sad but true. That's why nobody bought tickets or watched the games on TV. I don't know about women's hockey.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh no! Not our beloved women's hockey. Whatever shall we do?

[–]antifeminist3 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The language of the women indicates entitlement:

"We will not play in ANY professional leagues in North America this season until we get the resources that professional hockey demands and deserves"

No responsibility to obtain the resources themselves, but just entitlement to receive from someone else. Therefore, 'someone else' has the responsibility to give women these entitlements. No responsibility to be financially viable.

The WNBA has not been financially viable, even after an initial multi-million dollar infusion:

“On average [we've lost] over $10 million every year we've operated,” NBA commissioner Adam Silver told the AP in a phone interview this week.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter