Proof that feminism is a shit test to weed out weak men.

DavidByron2 · 2018-05-03T20:24:00+00:00

Yes; in the same way that having laws against rape can be seen as a shit test. Of course the real feminists don't see it this way because real feminists hate all men. But for a lot of women that aren't feminists the "shit test" is a way to filter out men that are not "man enough" to break the rules and push past protestations, so yeah, all of feminism operates like a "shit test" for her because she can pretend to take offense at stuff using feminism as a pretext when she's really not offended by any of that stuff, but just looking for a way to filter out "weak" men.

The concept isn't unique to all that dating crap that the Red Pillers go on about. Plenty of examples of females forcing males to perform in nature with many species. Dances, nest building, collecting shit, extreme body parts, whatever. The shit test is the same except the female forces the male to risk social ill will by seeing if they will be brave enough to break the rules. Or something like that.

and if you pass it, you can still end up in jail or broke living on the streets

Yes in some species the female eat the male afterwards. Looks like humans might be heading that way.

tenchineuro · 2018-05-03T19:54:52+00:00

Historically, a minority of men reproduced. If porn is one of the many things that distract and keeps inferior men out of the reproductive pool, then good?

The number usually given is 20%.

It is quite possible that everything that is happening, the insanity of our court system, may be entirely organic and what needs to occur to keep the pool clean.

With technology headed in the current direction, we may be branching into a time where we have the smallest percentage of males reproduce in known human history.

Marriage rates are at an all time low, but the birthrate is still above that needed for replacement in the US. The same cannot be said for Japan, and if something is not done soon then there's going to be a big crash of some sort.

But divorce courts usually happen after there are children, so whatever else it does it does not affect reproduction and the gene pool.

As for what is meant by keeping the pool clean, I'd love to hear more details (which of course we won't).

Lethn · 2018-05-03T20:55:48+00:00

While this may be what they truly think of their own ideology in some cases, in the end, the funny thing I've noticed about feminists is they may rant a hell of a lot about consent but they sure as hell don't respect consent when it comes to men.

I'm an Anarcho-Voluntaryist, so it's kind of my speciality to know about this sort of thing and debate it seriously. It works both ways and they're that arrogant they clearly don't think that anyone would reject them but I think despite the pessimism on this sub men are actually better than that.

Sure, don't get me wrong, yes, men are horny bastards and we really will fuck anything and I'm a horny bastard myself. However, with men coming up with safe ways to satisfy that desire for sex that's going to be less and less an issue now and the feminists can see it coming which is why they're so pissed off all the time. Men are evolving, they're getting smarter about how to deal with their sex drive.

It's not weak men that are being weeded out by feminists, it's weak human beings in general. Haven't you noticed despite their best efforts at shaming and emotional blackmail feminists simply cannot get the men they want? They can't get the lives they want either and are stuck with these beta male feminists they absolutely despise.

They picked this fight and they're losing but they're too stupid to even realise it and because of how petty and manipulative they are it's all backfiring on them like everything they attempt.

fengpi · 2018-05-03T22:12:51+00:00

Hm. It sounds as if a propensity to rape could very well be a sign of superior breeding. Who knew?

Vwar · 2018-05-03T21:44:13+00:00

That data is heavily skewed by the fact that a significant majority of people killed in wars and genocides throughout history have been male. Recall that eg during Alexander the Great's conquests he would often kill every single man and teenage boy while leaving all women alive. Therefore many males have died never having fathered a child while women had numerous children.

The "Red Pill" belief that women have historically been able to simply choose the top dog while ignoring 80 percent of men is false, though undoubtedly some men had sex much more than others.

DNA studies are also skewed by the fact that the vast majority of people who have ever lived have done so under civilization. Nomadic forager societies (in which we lived for about 96 percent of our history) have very, very different forms of social organization. Not only is "apha" type behavior frowned upon, it is considered the greatest form of social deviance:

Nomadic hunter-gatherers have been uniformly egalitarian, seemingly for thousands if not millions of years. Boehm explains this seeming contradiction with the claim that hunter-gatherers have “reverse dominance hierarchies”: the adult males in the society form a general coalition to prevent any one of their number, alone or with a few allies, from dominating the others. Male egalitarianism is not necessarily extended to females—the degree to which females are subject to male despotism varies, even among hunter-gatherers. But the reverse dominance hierarchy prevents the monopolization of females by dominant males. This makes possible the heterosexual nuclear family as we know it, based on (relatively) stable cross-gender pair bonding and mutual nurturance of children by parents, precisely what is missing in our closest primate relatives.

Having said that, it is true that in highly hierarchical and competitive societies, female sexual liberation (non-monogamy) appears to correspond with the the dynamics you describe.

2018-05-04T08:29:55+00:00

I have to ask what I think is an obvious question: Did a man or a woman post this comment? It reads to me as if it could have been either.

LUClEN · 2018-05-21T15:08:12+00:00

In some ways, this model does explain the current trend. As a shit test, it fails to punish those who ignore it, or "maintain frame", such as the men who pursue traditionally masculine occupations in spite of the current feminization of the work sphere. As women and effeminate men continue to cower from those jobs, the wages keep rising.

2018-05-04T04:26:18+00:00

If porn is one of the many things that distract and keeps inferior men out of the reproductive pool, then good?

And if that filter doesn't select for superior men, then it's not good. Smart men won't be reproducing as much. Fathers aren't valued by our culture, they're exploited. Idiots reproduce. Idiots are the ones who can't see the scam for what it is. Idiots don't see the danger in front of them. Look around you, cucktard.

shit-zen-giggles · 2018-05-03T20:57:03+00:00

this is how bitches get car accidented.

seriously, how long before some guy who gets fucked over by a misandrist law skips the suicide and goes all law-abiding-citizen on their asses?

Title	Proof that feminism is a shit test to weed out weak men.
Author	MRA-automatron-2kb
Upvotes	34
Comments	34
Date	May 3, 2018 7:39 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8gt4ly/proof_that_feminism_is_a_shit_test_to_weed_out/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/proof-that-feminism-is-a-shit-test-to-weed-out.901826 https://theredarchive.com/post/901826

Comments