TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Critique of the Most Widely-Used Male Privilege Checklist

dakru

February 25, 2018
87 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2018/02/25/critique-of-the-most-widely-used-male-privilege-checklist/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Critique of the Most Widely-Used Male Privilege Checklist
Author

dakru

Upvotes 87
Comments 15
Date February 25, 2018 8:30 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8077ih/critique_of_the_most_widelyused_male_privilege/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/critique-of-the-most-widely-used-male-privilege.905364
https://theredarchive.com/post/905364
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by dakru

“The Future is Female”: The Bleak Outlook for Male Employment and Education

149 upvotes
March 26, 2017
/r/MensRights

Men Live 79% as Many Years in Retirement as Women

133 upvotes
August 13, 2017
/r/MensRights

"Just Do What She Tells You" Marriage Advice from President Obama, Celebrities, etc.

124 upvotes
December 11, 2016
/r/MensRights

Social Justice’s Punching Bags: Men, White People, Straight People

90 upvotes
September 18, 2016
/r/MensRights

Men’s Lives Matter Less? “Among the Dead Were Women and Children”

85 upvotes
January 21, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comprehensive Research on Discrimination Against Men in Finland

79 upvotes
October 22, 2017
/r/MensRights

Justice System Discrimination and the Myth That Sexism Against Men Isn’t “Institutional”

67 upvotes
January 29, 2017
/r/MensRights

Men’s Issues Reading List (Book Recommendations)

62 upvotes
June 10, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Juan_Golt 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The point about interruptions. I wonder if they controlled for "consecutive number of minutes talking without pause". It is difficult to interrupt someone who is responding in short sentences, and it is difficult to avoid interrupting someone who will continue talking unless there is an interruption.

I've worked with a number of people (both male and female) who will literally go on for 20-30minutes without a pause, making assumptions, drawing conclusions, formulating action plans, assigning tasks, and at then walk away with "any questions send me an email" type farewell. If I don't interrupt/stop them, I'll be stuck unwinding all their bullshit for the rest of the day.

[–]BlueOrange22 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It makes no sense to say that the economically and socially privileged class is the class that:

  • performs worse in school at every age

  • is likely likely to attend university

  • is more likely to be unemployed

  • is more likely to be homeless

  • is forced to join the military, or work for below minimum wage, for a period of a year or more

  • receives more jail time for the same crime. Likewise, it makes no sense that the oppressed class can assault the privileged class with more leniency

  • receives less healthcare funding despite shorter life expectancy

By any metric, men do not have the economic or social privileges as a whole.

[–]KOMRADE_DIMITRI 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like I need to say here that the national organization for mem against sexism is abreviated as NOMAS, which in Spanish means no more

[–]UsedCategory 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

MurderedByWords

[–]Bibiloup 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very insightful. A thorough approach, even handed, and completely genuine in tone.

Thank you for sharing!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/#39 and #40 slightly concern me because the writer is saying they want to have children with their "girlfriend or wife". I mean, why not both /s

Also the porn one is just petty. It's more of a supply demand thing. Men are visual creatures. We appreciate good looks more than women do so there are more good looking females in media. Also advertising often uses attractive women for drawing the attention of men for the same purpose.

On the counter side, I could argue that in many all romantic comedies women are more likely to find men who act as "knights in shining armour" and devote themselves completely to their SO.

[–]HotDealsInTexas 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A couple points to add:

Number 8: On average, I am taught to fear walking alone after dark in average public spaces much less than my female counterparts are.

This point is strange. Is it a disadvantage for women that people tend to be more concerned with their safety than the safety of men?

The article should have also mentioned that while women are taught to be more afraid, the actual risk to men is higher: they're more likely to be the victims of "street crimes," e.g. mugging or assault.

Number 38: If I have a wife or live-in girlfriend, chances are we’ll divide up household chores so that she does most of the labor, and in particular the most repetitive and unrewarding tasks. (More).

See the results from the American Time Use Survey. In 2016, women indeed spent 73 more minutes per day on “household activities” and “caring for and helping family members”. On the other hand, men spent 91 more minutes per day on “work and work-related activities”. We might note that men spent 44 more minutes per day on “sports and leisure”, but women spent 28 more minutes per day on “personal care, including sleep”.

In addition to that, IIRC these studies typically define traditionally male activities such as home or yard maintenance as not being housework, so they're about as valid as the rape statistics mentioned earlier that exclude prison rape (guess which sex ends up in prison a lot more?) and forced envelopment. And even if we accept that men do less housework in exchange for doing more paid work, the household tasks they do perform tend to be more physically strenuous, unpleasant, or even dangerous (mowing the lawn, taking out the trash, cleaning the gutters, and of course acting as impromptu security staff if there's a weird noise in the middle of the night).

Number 47: I have the privilege of being unaware of my male privilege.

Kafka Trap! Kafka Trap! Does whatever a Kafka Trap does!

[–]iainmf 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The article should have also mentioned that while women are taught to be more afraid, the actual risk to men is higher: they're more likely to be the victims of "street crimes," e.g. mugging or assault.

The difference is somewhat mitigated by the fact that men are more likely to be out on the street after dark.

[–]dakru[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The American Time Use Survey is actually pretty good as far as I can tell. They include "maintenance, repair, and decoration" and "lawn, garden, and houseplants" (both of which lean towards men) under household activities.

But I've made changes to #8 and #47 based on your suggestions. Thanks!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've honestly never thought twice about the identities of my coworkers and hiring practices until the feminist nonsense began getting increasingly noisy since around 2010/2009ish. I'm not sure if I was just asleep to it all and just noticed it as I entered the professional world or it started getting nonsensical with policymaking around then.

Since then, I've actually noticed how it almost seems like women are given a handicap in work situations. Every female co-worker I've had, from observation seems more likely to not get punished for calling out/goofing off at work. I've personally been punished at work for some things my female coworkers would get away with daily. All of us were on the same tier of pay/responsibility/job position too.

I can empathize with how some fields might be a bit of a boys club like finance or business.. But even then it's not necessarily "easy" for guys and sometimes their male colleagues can be even more vicious than a bitter wife looking for revenge via divorce.

Seriously the world needs to stop pretending a man's life is easy and we're just handed power (as if that power doesn't come with more headaches).

[–]iFunnyPrince 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand the list these women were trying to make. But that's probably to be expected lol. The first point is that men are more likely to get the job they apply for vs. Female applicants. So, if the wage gap is real (it's been debunked), feminists also say they are paid less then men. So how does this make sense? If women are cheaper to hire than men, wouldn't everybody be hiring men instead of women?

[–]Sasha_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Good effort, but these feminist 'checklists' - like all feminist writing and scholarship (!) - reads like the childish ramblings of a moody 13 year-old girl. So it feels like a wasted effort taking it seriously.

[–]Bibiloup 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think that's not very productive of you, to generalize like that. Feminist scholarship and academia has changed the world as we know it, and continues to be an important influence in the public discussions we have.

Yes, there are self described feminists who could more objectively be called matriarchal. They do not think the sexes are equal. But they are also unproductively contributing to the conversation, just like you were with that comment.

The article was very even handed with the deconstruction of the checklist - some items he completely disagreed with, others he demonstrated to be inconclusive or incomplete, and still others he admitted to being problematic as stated by the original checklist.

Gender discrimination is a problem for all humans. I think we should be talking about that instead of hating on each other. The author of that article gave us a good example of how to do it. Someone needs to make a point, then others need to consider that point. If no one starts, then the conversation doesn't happen.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not very productive to ignore the bad actions of one side and focus entirely on what you perceive to be the problem which is something I frequently see from new users on this sub. Why are you going after MRAs over a simple comment yet seem to have done fuck all to criticise feminists who openly hate men?

This isn't some minor phenomenon either, mainstream feminism is openly anti-male.

[–]Bibiloup 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're completely right. I haven't done anything to criticize feminists who openly hate men so far on Reddit because quite frankly I haven't come across those posts yet :/ I guess I'm on the wrong subs, or I just missed them. Though when I used to frequent 9Gag I did see a lot of those types of comments, and I made sure to say my piece to them as well. On Facebook too actually, I've had a hard-core matriarch try to publically humiliate me because I was contradicting her stance on "all men". But whatever, I'm not here to prove my credentials :p

My point to you still stands - that wasn't a very productive comment (sorry if you felt personally attacked tho), and if you're going to be setting your bar according to the bar set by the ones you're trying to overcome, then the movement will go nowhere. Don't turn this into a he-said-she-said thing, you're better than that.

That's why I'm here on this sub actually :)

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter