~ archived since 2018 ~

Uni of Sydney Union in hot water on Red Pill film ban

Imnotmrabut

April 17, 2017

27 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	Uni of Sydney Union in hot water on Red Pill film ban
Author	Imnotmrabut
Upvotes	27
Comments	12
Date	April 17, 2017 12:24 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/65v8c6/uni_of_sydney_union_in_hot_water_on_red_pill_film/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/uni-of-sydney-union-in-hot-water-on-red-pill-film.925526 https://theredarchive.com/post/925526

Comments

[–]andejoh 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]MagicTampon 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

True.

Also, note the false equivalence of substituting false allegation rates (based on whatever dubious statistical processes) tabulated from allegations made to police and district prosecutors, to simply assuming false allegation rates made to college administrators by people seeking to get someone kicked off campus for PC reasons, will be the same.

As the current university climate makes clear, there is no shortage of deranged campus SJWs willing to invent a false accusation, in order to have a man kicked off campus for infractions, either real or imagined. A man doesn't toe the line on PC crapola and fall in line with the doctrines of "safe space"? Well, let's see he is kicked out and a black mark is placed on his transcript. Easy - in this case, the campus disciplinary proceedings will be a politically correct farce, there would be no due process, no cross investigation, and a false allegation will will never be investigated, much less penalized. Plenty a deranged feminist would do it. As it is, absolute power corrupts absolutely, and on college campuses, feminists exercise absolute power.

After all, if a feminist's viewpoint is that a male does not deserve to benefit from the educational opportunities that a university offers for whatever bullshit PC reasons, it's a short step from there to ginning something up to get them kicked out from a place where you (erroneously) believe he doesn't belong.

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]MagicTampon 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Sorry I've been here so long and told this so many times I just assume all the regulars know.

That's what happened to me. A female student was harassing me. I reported it (and harassment by other females), was told to put up with it and it got to the point where she explicitly threatened me in writing (via email) for refusing to date her.

So there's her reported harassment of me and also an unequivocal act of sexual harassment in threatening me for refusing to date her.

All erased by her falsely accusing me - a gay man - of sexually harassing her.

And I'm aware there other motivations for false accusations. I reckon it's often a mad power trip.

On my first day on that job I had one female student try to bully me into giving her an extension for an assignment. She wanted an extension but wouldn't provide any reason or supporting documentation. Nothing. Because, she said, I'm a man and she didn't feel comfortable telling me. Which was fine with me. I told her she could talk to a female staff member who was just across the hall and who had had my job previously. Nope. She wouldn't do that. I told her she could talk to the female course co-ordinator. Nope. She wouldn't do that either. I told her she could talk to any of the female counsellors at student support services or any medical doctor and get a letter from them simply stating that they supported her getting an extension and for how long. No need to provide details. Nope. She just wanted to bully me into giving her the extension.

Towards the end she flung an accusation of 'discrimination' at me and that she'd take it to the head of school. I offered to let her use my own phone to make that appointment and gave her the number. She backed off.

The bizarre thing is she actually already had an extension from the person who was in the job previously and had been given to her tutor to give to her. But she hadn't been turning up to classes and also had said nothing to me about having made that application, which only made its way back to me after the tutor gave up on her coming to class. The previous person - someone I knew and stayed in contact with - told me she'd given it to the tutor (unlike all the other extension paperwork) so I wouldn't have to deal with that student, who she had found to be unpleasant.

Mad power trip.

[–]MagicTampon 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]MagicTampon 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DaeusPater 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I posted this somewhere else today:

Out of all reports of rape and sexual assault, around 8% are false accusations and in around 5% of those cases, the accused is convicted in the first trial(may be acquitted in the next with further evidence). So the other 87% of cases are undecided or dropped or not taken up at all due to lack of evidence or obvious false accusation.

Now how do feminists interpret these statistics? In most feminist publications this will be reported as follows.

Out of every 100 rapists, only 5 will face legal sentences, the other 95 go scot free. [Notice the dishonesty, 'rapists' should be replaced with 'rape and sexual assault reports'. Only 5% cases have enough evidence to lead to a conviction, the other 95% are not rapists getting lucky and escaping justice; they include some true rape cases without enough evidence(either he-said-she-said or often minor sexual assaults, they don't leave much evidence) and some false accusations which were not proven false. Due process bitch, deal with it!]

Only 8% of rapes are false accusations. [again very dishonest, when we talk of false accusations, we talk of false reports and also false accusations in social, professional circles. False accusations outside of court are a lot more frequent. Also, statistically speaking, atleast 8% of cases are false accusations(not only). So anywhere between 8% - 95% are potential false accusations. That is a lot].

[–]MagicTampon 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link