you're misunderstanding the very nature of religion by expecting proof.
Trust me I understand religion. "Have faith" is not an argument for religion being true.
Cannot declare something true without evidence. Or do you also think Obama is secretly a pink unicorn? If you say no, why not? You should have faith. Would that make it true?
Maybe cat urine cures diabetes but only if you have absolute faith 100% that it does, otherwise it won't work. And anyone who claims that they do but it doesn't work needs more faith.
You seem like the silly type of person to believe that.
Maybe you misunderstood what logic is?
Why should I believe in something without truth? That's stupid.
Stupidity is belief in defiance of fact and contrary to what most atheists will tell you, religions generally don't do this.
Hahahahaha yes they do. Quite frequently. So yeah you are very wrong and very ignorant.
You should read the Bible. And then look at how religious people believe things proven false, despite evidence that they are wrong.
Pretending that you know something to be fact when it is actually belief is illogical by any definition.
Actually it isn't. This is the definition:
lacking sense or clear, sound reasoning.
So yeah Catholics are more illogical. They deny the fact that their god actually cannot exist. Since their claims of his attributes are fundamentally contradictory.
Why should you believe something not rooted in fact? For personal or communal benefit.
The benefit doesn't make it true. So this is not proof of religion.
I don't think you understand what religion is. The whole point of religion is following a god or gods.
SO it does make a claim, retard (and no this isn't an ad hominem because I did also lay out why you're wrong and illogical). It says that "this/these particular god/s exist and we should worship them."
this is what feminists and SJW's do as well.
Not really. Feminism is more like a religion than anything else.
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ihatefeminazis1 21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tmomp 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnotherDAM 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ihatefeminazis1 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blutarg 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Red_Shambhala 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]lordfoofoo[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]a-man-from-earth 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Red_Shambhala 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]omegaphallic -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheExplodingKitten -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnotherDAM 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vandechoz 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]dazmo -7 points-6 points-5 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 5 points6 points7 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[+]dazmo -8 points-7 points-6 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[+]chatoyanteyesaquiver points [recovered] (16 children) | Copy Link
Prove it.
Actually religion is making the positive claim.
YOU are the one that must prove religion is true. Not the other way.
You have absolutely no idea how logic works.
[–]Doctor0000 -2 points-1 points0 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+]chatoyanteyesaquiver points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
So what?
That's such a stupid "argument." It's meaningless. It doesn't prove religion is true. It does not remove the burden of proof.
And it actually makes Catholics much more irrational and illogical than atheists.
No they aren't. And I explained why.
[–]Doctor0000 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]chatoyanteyesaquiver points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
Trust me I understand religion. "Have faith" is not an argument for religion being true.
Cannot declare something true without evidence. Or do you also think Obama is secretly a pink unicorn? If you say no, why not? You should have faith. Would that make it true?
Maybe cat urine cures diabetes but only if you have absolute faith 100% that it does, otherwise it won't work. And anyone who claims that they do but it doesn't work needs more faith.
You seem like the silly type of person to believe that.
Maybe you misunderstood what logic is?
Why should I believe in something without truth? That's stupid.
[–]Doctor0000 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]chatoyanteyesaquiver points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Hahahahaha yes they do. Quite frequently. So yeah you are very wrong and very ignorant.
You should read the Bible. And then look at how religious people believe things proven false, despite evidence that they are wrong.
Actually it isn't. This is the definition:
lacking sense or clear, sound reasoning.
So yeah Catholics are more illogical. They deny the fact that their god actually cannot exist. Since their claims of his attributes are fundamentally contradictory.
The benefit doesn't make it true. So this is not proof of religion.
[–]dazmo -3 points-2 points-1 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]chatoyanteyesaquiver points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
Lol you are so wrong.
I don't think you understand what religion is. The whole point of religion is following a god or gods.
SO it does make a claim, retard (and no this isn't an ad hominem because I did also lay out why you're wrong and illogical). It says that "this/these particular god/s exist and we should worship them."
Not really. Feminism is more like a religion than anything else.
[–]dazmo 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]chatoyanteyesaquiver points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Okay now you're just being a pedantic butthurt.
You have no idea wtf you're talking about.
Really? Obviously. Here you are being pedantic. Everyone knows what this means. It's shorthand.
Books make claims. Including religious books.
lol I understood everything before. I know why people call atheism a cult. It's because they are people like you, incapable of basic thought.
[–]dazmo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lordfoofoo[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dazmo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dazmo -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dazmo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dazmo 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link