Feminists change Wikipedia Articles to suit their "definition" of Anti-Women Buzzwords

Mitthrawnuruodo1337 · 2015-01-22T15:51:05+00:00

What did they change it to?

ManRAh · 2015-01-22T18:24:18+00:00

It isn't exactly news that feminists basically have a stranglehold on social issue wiki pages. Maybe next time show us the bullshit edits instead of making a shitpost about a user name.

macman156 · 2015-01-22T21:26:44+00:00

This is a shit post. This should not be upvoted as much as it is. We have no proof she changed anything to her definition.

redpillschool · 2015-01-22T16:10:28+00:00

Fantastic feminist thought process.

In contrast, Paglia argues that a close reading of historical texts reveals that men do not hate women but fear them.

Can you say projection?

niggelprease · 2015-01-22T18:13:16+00:00

What is the problem here? That a feminist edits wikipedia?

The_0bserver · 2015-01-22T21:55:42+00:00

Down-vote this thread please. Mods please remove. This isn't an issue at all.

ZimbaZumba · 2015-01-22T21:49:37+00:00

Gramsci, Orwell and Huxley all wrote about this. Re-define a word to something that does not exist and then it appears to be a real thing.

elebrin · 2015-01-22T23:01:47+00:00

I think my defense for that would be, "I'll pee where I want and there is nothing you can do about it."

Hell, you'd have to imprison a man and cut off his legs (or otherwise incapacitate them) to force him to pee sitting down.

Title	Feminists change Wikipedia Articles to suit their "definition" of Anti-Women Buzzwords
Author	Diecreeperdie
Upvotes	55
Comments	16
Date	January 22, 2015 3:01 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2tajt4/feminists_change_wikipedia_articles_to_suit_their/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/feminists-change-wikipedia-articles-to-suit-their.989953 https://theredarchive.com/post/989953

Comments