~ archived since 2018 ~

Learning from birds

August 11, 2022
2 upvotes

For most birds, the male is wearing colorful colors. He has to sing and/or dance to attract a lady and mate. He his to work his ass off to get noticed. The lady is usually just brown and does nothing fancy but wait.

The problem in human dating is that we swapped the role. We expect the women to look pretty, wear pretty clothes, paint their nails, dance and sing while the men just wears a brown tshirt and an unshaved beard. While this is the total opposite to birds, we dtill expect like birds that men will make the first move. Basically, this means we have to rely solely on genetics. This role swap is the main reason why dating sucks as humans.

The solution, for men, is to act like birds. Dye your hair, learn to play music or to dance, use makeup, buy pretty clothes, etc. If you do that, you'll go from the 80% unnoticed to the 20% noticed. Acting like birds is the easiest way to escape dating hell

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/AllPillDebate.

/r/AllPillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Learning from birds
Author ManWazo
Upvotes 2
Comments 24
Date August 11, 2022 11:02 AM UTC (3 months ago)
Subreddit /r/AllPillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/AllPillDebate/learning-from-birds.1139691
https://theredarchive.com/post/1139691
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/wlonc2/learning_from_birds/
Comments

[–]IHateNormis 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, men have to fly to attract a female these days

[–]Glad-Discount-4761 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

😂😂I would give this comment award if I could.

[–]Syrianchaddet 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Grow bigger lats? K

[–]lostwanderer28 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Since standards keep growing, what else was there to expect :P

[–]MasonSub4BlackPill 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Go on any dating app as a guy, I promise you your mind will change, men are the ones who have to be colourful and attractive to get a mate, the woman get a bunch of guys trying to get with them and she picks who catches her eye. Hence the men have to be attractive and the woman are the ones in the brown shirt.

In most relationships you will see that the guy is more attractive than their female partner

[–]ManWazoA poly Chad[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I did for 10 years and my experience plus the observation of incel tears is how I came with the bird analogy

[–]lostwanderer28 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

yOu mUsTbE ChAd

[–]Wide_Result9679 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have a totally different take on this.

In birds, the males' colors and prettiness are 100% expressions of his actual genes. Female birds can tell which males have the best genes based on what they look like. So you saying men just have to rely on genes as though it's novel is odd; male birds rely solely on genes too. Even their dance ability is arguably a partial result of genes.

What women do is 100% fake. I almost think of femininity as women camouflaging their actual genetics and looking as visually pleasing as possible. There's a reason so many famous women look like plain Janes without makeup: women are the plain Jane sex in nature. It's men who often have longer eyelashes, thicker hair, better skin without makeup, and that's because of testosterone.

It's also kinda interesting to note female birds look plain for camouflage purposes while males with their bright colors are risking their lives, whereas in the human world we're so removed from nature it's safe for females to wear loud bright colors.

And the dancing and singing male birds do isn't really different from the expectation that men be funny, make good convo, make the first move, etc.

I agree your average guy would up his game dramatically if he tried harder with appearance. The only time I've dated against type physically and otherwise (I don't go for musicians) was when I met a punk rocker whose flashy appearance, confidence, comfort with himself, and ability to charm me swept me off my feet.

I also think many men don't get wearing certain colors that go with your skin tone makes you look WAY more attractive than wearing dull colors. I never get hit on more than when I wear cool shades of blue or purple, because they make me glow. If I wear warm colors like orange or yellow, otoh, I look sickly. Neutral colors are just fine, and most men sadly live in neutral colors.

I do agree more men should peacock.

[–]Glad-Discount-4761 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

For most birds, the male is wearing colorful colors. He has to sing and/or dance to attract a lady and mate. He his to work his ass off to get noticed. The lady is usually just brown and does nothing fancy but wait.

All of this just sounds like humans.

The solution, for men, is to act like birds. Dye your hair, learn to play music or to dance, use makeup, buy pretty clothes, etc. If you do that, you'll go from the 80% unnoticed to the 20% noticed. Acting like birds is the easiest way to escape dating hell

No.That is for women

For man, just go gym,get haircut,take redpill and money! That's it.

[–]ManWazoA poly Chad[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

No.That is for women

If you want to keep thinking that way and stay in the bottom 80% then its your choice.

[–]Glad-Discount-4761 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you want to keep thinking that way and stay in the bottom 80% then its your choice.

I am woman so that doesn't apply to me.

I already mentioned what man should do.My brother is doing all this .It is going fine.Just focusing on being better version.

Even if all men were like top one . Women will still choose who is top one among them.

[–]kokorwqac 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Face is more important than muscles

[–]Liberated_Asexual 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1557119510318129153?s=21&t=XNTFv-P27ofsftMNcKSXQA

Birds are not primates. Ridiculous comparison. Nice try with this LGBTQIA2+ propaganda though.

[–]kokorwqac 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not lgbt to prettify yourself, women liking decorated or pretty men is nothing new.

In fact in the past, women dressed modestly while men were more flamboyant, current system is like, only used for 70 years.

[–]HodgekinWhitePill 0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

I understand your analogy, but it's not that simple.

For everyman that enters the coveted 20%, you're knocking down another man to the bottom 80%. If everyman reach their full potential, there will still be a hierarchy. Women will still pick from the top of the hierarchy.

At some point, a man has to decide if the effort to compete is worth it.

[–]ManWazoA poly Chad[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

If you dont want to be on top then its your choice

[–]HodgekinWhitePill 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I agree. It's a competition to be at the top though.

There's only 1 spot at the very top of all domains. That spot gets the most resources and attention.

Everyone wants the top position, and countless people compete to get there. But you don't give first place, second place and third place the same amount of prizes.

Also the west is slowly abandoning monogamy. Many guys that reach the top are taking several women out of the dating pool. There will be the very bottom 5% of men that will never get a relationship regardless of how much they compete.

[–]PaliantBlackPill 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Exactly if every guy on planet earth looksmaxxed, the top 20% would be the top 20% genetically.

The implication of women being attracted to a certain % of the population is that some guys get left out regardless of what they do besides monogamy.

[–]HodgekinWhitePill 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. The idea proposed here is that:

Your competition will sit by idly while you looksmax.

If I put in 50% effort, and some next dude puts in 60% effort to pass me, I'm not gonna just roll over and let him take the girl. I'm gonna say, fuck that guy, and put in 61% effort. And then it's just a matter of time before we both put in 100% effort and like you said, it then comes down to our genetics.

You have to pair that up with the current "girls" in the west. Are they even worth putting in 50, 60, 100% effort to get? Maybe at some point, you look at your girl and say, nah, she ain't worth more than 70% effort and just give up playing the game. Then you take your energy and apply it elsewhere. A lot of girls in the west don't know how to be a women. They're taught to be like men. Well, that's nice and all, but I don't want to date another man. So no thanks, I'll go find a women in a foreign country.

[–]kokorwqac 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Subcultures enter the picture in this case, the top man for a girl into bodybuilding, girl kpop, girl into rock, girl into hiphop, the normie stacy, the nerdy girl are all different things, of course if guys all take only the most normie cheerleader or clubber type's opinion into account then they will think women all like the same thing.

[–]HodgekinWhitePill 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I would say that's half true.

Those subcultures are created, true. Women still pick from the top.

All men would have relations with a 10/10 if she was willing.

Same thing for women. All women would want the top man of any given domain if he was willing.

There's also certain traits that extend across all domains. Traits like wealth, confidence, looks, genetics, status. This is what men mean when they say women want the same thing.

This isn't a diss to women. Men would do the same if given the same opportunity.

[–]kokorwqac 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Again, ''top looks' ' doesn't mean the same for every girl, some women like bodybuilder look, some like kpop look, some like weirdo look like adam driver, some like the' 'daddy' ' look, top man for all these girls would be different because those subcultures demand completely different features

[–]HodgekinWhitePill 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, looks can be broad but theses also have things in common.

Symmetry. Height. Good genes, like not balding. (I know some women like bald men, just in general). All the "good" looking men, of all domains, aren't fat, big nose, asymmetric face, short, etc.

[–]lostwanderer28 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dye your hair

Rejected. No, thanks. Or should I say "No u" :D

pretty clothes

I'll dress how I want, not how women want to see me dressed.

If you do that, you'll go from the 80% unnoticed to the 20% noticed. Acting like birds is the easiest way to escape dating hell

I'll stay with the 80% unnoticed gang. Our sheer numbers will soon ruler over the 20% noticed gang. But we will rule with mercy and compassion. :D

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2022. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter