TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

I did a thing

christina_murray_

July 2, 2024
17 upvotes
/r/EverydayMisandry

https://www.reddit.com/r/femalepessimist/s/emagziqgh9

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title I did a thing
Author

christina_murray_

Upvotes 17
Comments 149
Date July 2, 2024 6:49 AM UTC
(2 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/EverydayMisandry
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1dtfexx/i_did_a_thing/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/i-did-a-thing.1523063
https://theredarchive.com/post/1523063
Top posts by christina_murray_

From a DV “expert” in the UK

242 upvotes
July 7, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

Wow

168 upvotes
April 30, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

Over on LWMA- “I’m glad you got raped”

162 upvotes
July 11, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

“Misandry doesn’t exist”

161 upvotes
February 18, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

TinMen calls out Jameela Jamil

155 upvotes
July 9, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

Oh, do fuck off

154 upvotes
August 31, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

“Massive red flag”

142 upvotes
March 25, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

Man vs bear *still* going on.

140 upvotes
May 1, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

Comments

[–]everydaymisandry-ModTeam[M] [score hidden] 2 years ago stickied commentlocked comment (0 children) | Copy Link

Your post/comment contains links to other subreddits or non redacted usernames in screenshots.

[–]gavkahootsmasher 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said 👏

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (143 children) | Copy Link

I made a comment too on that comment.

https://www.reddit.com/r/femalepessimist/s/p5ewZr9CKB

[–]Cold_Mongoose161 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol as usual a femcel replied to you saying "HoW yOu WeRe dErAiLiNg tHe ConVeRsatiOn"

[+]False-Purple3882 -7 points-6 points-5 points 2 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Defending males who masturbate to the abuse of women. Like the typical mra you are.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago* (114 children) | Copy Link

Men who watch porn on abuse of women are wrong ------> Women who watch porn of abuse of women are also wrong (who as I proved by studies are higher in number)

Women who watch porn of abuse of women are not wrong -------> men who watch porn of abuse of women are also not wrong

In a logically consistent scenario, only one of these can be true, choose yourself which one is true. Guessing by your comments you are anti porn, and you would likely go with the first scenario.

Oh and if you don't know (------>) means implies in logical analysis.

[–]False-Purple3882 -5 points-4 points-3 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I explained I wasn’t looking further into those studies because I don’t have unlimited free time. I will look into the matter on my own accord this weekend because frankly I don’t believe that to be reliable information and would like to know how they got those outcomes. I have things I need to do today and you clearly weren’t interested in an actual productive discussion. Never once did I defend anyone who watches the pornographic content I described. You did that. Calling other people illiterate for disagreeing with you doesn’t make your argument look better. Brigading a sub because you’re all mad about mens violent misogyny being exposed also doesn’t make your ‘egalitarian’ claims look valid.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 13 points14 points15 points 2 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

I have no idea when I forced you to look into those studies, I just linked them in case you wanted to see them as a proof of my claim, otherwise people would have shouted "SoUrCe".

Again I am not forcing you to read those studies but imagine dismissing proper peer reviewed and methodologised researches like that.

I was totally neutral on pornography on the comment I made so stop projecting.

How was I defending men's violent misogyny exactly considering I proved that women watch more violent porn videos on average than men? Either both of them are wrong or none of them are wrong, you are being hyporcritical for:

1: Holding men accountable for something which women do more

2: Something in which 97% men (as compared to 95%) need to know that the act is occuring willingly.

3: Saying men are wrong for watching violent porn but women aren't for doing the same and reading/listening erotica books involving forced sex and having fantasies about it.

4: Considering you are anti porn, you are also not holding women accountable for watching the largest fraction of violent porn.

I like how you called me misogynistic, male supremacist, entitled male, incel and all sorts of derogatory terms but still I am wrong for just calling you illerate. Nice projection.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I’m replying again since you want to edit your comment & falsely accuse me of calling you an incel and “other derogatory terms”. I never used the word incel throughout that entire thread. I also wasn’t speaking to you when I called someone an entitled male. I was speaking to someone else bitching about me not replying to you as if I owe you my time to look up all of those studies you’re citing when YOU want me to.

I’m not being hypocritical for anything I wrote in that article which I suspect none of you complaining about even bothered to read in the first place. I said I will look into the claims you’re making later.

[+]False-Purple3882 -10 points-9 points-8 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

“totally neutral” No, you weren’t. And I didn’t complain about you linking them. I said I don’t trust that info and will look into the matter later. And no actually people wouldn’t have asked for one, because you’re not supposed to be on that sub anyway. It’s for women.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

find me when I said, that watching very violent porn is totally ok or watching very violent porn is totally not ok. i never said either, I was totally neutral.

The source thing happens very frequently on reddit so it would be natural for anyone to assume that what I said needed sources to back up.

Look I wasn't forcing you read those studies, I was just saying that as a form of evidence. Its called empirical analysis, I wasn't shoving it down your throat.

Ok, I will never ever comment on that sub again if you think its so wrong, I never visit that sub again.

If you seriously believe me as a man commenting there benevolently is so bad then I will delete my comment from there if you want.

[–]pwishall 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no "commenting there benevolently" as a man. They hate you just for existing.

[–]False-Purple3882 2 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

You can comment wherever you want. I’m pointing out it wasn’t in good faith as you’re arguing because you know damn well that sub is for women. Multiple people from this sub literally just came over there for the sole purpose of antagonizing me. I don’t believe any of you actually wanted a discussion regarding the topic I brought up in the first place.

I know how to cite sources and what the purposes of doing so is. You and another man commenting on that post have complained repeatedly about me choosing to not read those studies immediately after I saw you post them. That is what I have a problem with. The idea that I’m somehow obligated to read it right when you commented it.

[–]rumpots420 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You are a misandrist

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

and you’re probably a r/womenarethings viewer

[–]pwishall 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

But... you're not exposing "mens violent misogyny"...

You're just attacking all men, denigrating them all together as a collective.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't bother replying bro, I tried to debate as peacefully and softly as I could using zero assumptions and only statistics and peer reviewed studies, yet you can see how am I being called.

[–]False-Purple3882 2 years ago [recovered] (29 children) | Copy Link

You didn’t read the article you’re complaining about either, did you? Pointing out the misogynistic behaviors of men isn’t “denigrating men”. You and everyone else in this sub just have a problem with women not tolerating misogyny. It’s very convenient none of you ‘egalitarians’ ever keep this same energy for men who have subreddits dehumanizing women. Where’s your outrage for men over on r/womenarethings ? Oh right it’s nonexistent because you all think the misogynistic content over there is perfectly acceptable.

[–]pwishall 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

Yikes, you got a lot of hate to share. I assure you there's already plenty of people expressing outrage over subs like womenarethings, but not nearly enough over misandrist subs like femalepessimist.

Yet you're triggered when someone points out the vile sexism on subs you participate in. That's very telling.

There is no singular "article" being referenced above either... everyone was talking about female pessimist... are you sure you're okay?

[+]False-Purple3882 -8 points-7 points-6 points 2 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Femalepessimist doesn’t promote raping or murdering men. In fact it’s explicitly against the rules. What’s telling is your selective outrage over ‘sexism’. Woman saying she sees why some women hate men after seeing violently misogynistic content referring to women as things= evil, hateful, misandrist

sub filled with hordes of men promoting raping women and referring to us as things= totes fine, great even, why are the feminists mad?

I’m talking about the article on the post this post literally references. Stop concern trolling and implying women are crazy for disagreeing with you.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Femalepessimist doesn’t promote raping or murdering men. In fact it’s explicitly against the rules

Then wtf is the KAM posts there along with the another post that said to throw old men out of the house.

Woman saying she sees why some women hate men after seeing violently misogynistic content referring to women as things= evil, hateful, misandrist

For the last time it is supposed to be a kink subreddit and not to promote real things, what about r/misandrykink should we also start complaining about that subreddit which posts for the same things?Nope both subreddits are supposed to be kink based, and reality or to promote anything.

sub filled with hordes of men promoting raping women and referring to us as things= totes fine, great even, why are the feminists mad?

Ok you can yourself visit r/misogynisticlife and r/womenarethings and you will see that most people posting there are actually women and not men, I just visited the two subreddits and most people who are commenting and posting there are women not men, you can check it out yourself if you want.

I’m talking about the article on the post this post literally references. Stop concern trolling and implying women are crazy for disagreeing with you.

Its not an article, its a comment lol. No one's trolling here except you.

[–]False-Purple3882 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

“I think misogyny is simply a kink because I fundamentally lack empathy for women” Every single one of you defending that sub. And what kam posts? I haven’t seen any. And what do you mean “throw men out of the house”?? never seen that either. “most people posting there are women” A bullshit B irrelevant to the fact it’s violently misogynistic and allowed to remain Also you’re deliberately ignoring what was referenced. What she COMMENTED on was a post that was linking that article. Once again you’re a liar.

[–][deleted]2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

We don't allow personal attacks to maintain civility.

At this point we've had to mod several of your posts for breaking rules and generally poor faith engagement, so now it's time for a short ban so I don't have to deal with this over the holiday.

[–]Alex_Mercer_231 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

“I think misogyny is simply a kink because I fundamentally lack empathy for women” Every single one of you defending that sub.

1: I have already proven most of the people watching those videos are women.

2: There's is no evidence whatsoever for proving that violent porn makes someone more misogynistic.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1524838020942754?journalCode=tvaa

http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html

https://www.springer.com/about+springer/media/springer+select?SGWID=0-11001-6-1042321-0

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sunny-side-of-smut/

https://slate.com/culture/2006/10/proof-that-internet-porn-prevents-rape.html

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-apes/202104/does-porn-use-lead-sexual-violence%3famp

And what do you mean “throw men out of the house”?? never seen that either.

There was a post on female pessimists which was asking women throw old men out of there houses.

A bullshit

I don't know how many times I'll have to link this, but I guess this is the 4TH or 5TH time.

Nope most violent porn is seen by women, I have studies and statistics of various porn websites to prove it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/01/are-women-responsible-for-extreme-sexual-violence-on-screen-germaine-greer

Women consume 60% to 80% of crime fiction (that is quite a large tolerance band, but let’s not nitpick), and are the main viewers of true crime drama.

She cites a study by the University of Texas, which found that nearly a third of women regularly fantasise about being violated

https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/google-researcher-porn-featuring-violence-against-women-is-more-popular-among-women-than-men/

researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, who says that porn featuring violence against women is significantly more popular among women compared to men.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/07/more-women-than-men-turned-on-by-aggressive-porn-study/

breaking down to 66% of women and 40% of men. Women, too, were more likely to go for “harder” expressions of aggression in porn and to seek it more than men — with themes such as bondage, discipline, dominance, submission and sadomasochis.

https://www.bustle.com/p/women-actually-watch-more-porn-than-men-heres-what-it-is-were-watching-63850

Pornhub and their Pornhub Insights have long broken down interesting facts and trends about all things porn. But now we have ten years of Pornhub data at our fingertips and looking at the information as a whole provides a whole new understanding. One things that the research found, according to The Cut, is that women, on average, spend 1:14 more minutes a day on the site than male viewers

https://www.vice.com/en/article/bm9w7v/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn

women, search rates for these more extreme types of sexual content are at least twice as common among women than men.

https://www.pornhub.com/insights/women-of-the-world

Threesome videos are the most watched by women

Dr. Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, a former Google data scientist, was given complete access to PornHub's search and views data, as well as google and a lot of pornographics website search data. He found that women were more than twice as likely as men to search for videos where women were abused, coerced into sex, or depicted as being raped.

On PornHub, women consume most of the porn where women are violently raped and abused.

https://aella.substack.com/p/women-prefer-more-violent-porn-and

Are men more interested in sexually violent content than women? According to my data, absolutely not. I looked at reports of watching violent porn, arousal from nonconsent, brutality, bondage, sadomasochism, gentle/cruel power dynamics, and humiliation. Across the board women report more interest in these things than men, and report greater interest in submission than men report being dominant. 

https://subredditstats.com/

73.32% followers of the rapefantasy subreddits are women.

https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/channels/news/are-men-or-women-more-likely-enjoy-aggression-porn-337544

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch. Radical feminist theorists have suggested that representations of aggression in pornography are entirely driven by the desires and preferences of male viewers, while the preferences of women regarding such representations of aggression have not been systematically explored.

https://www.psypost.org/more-women-than-men-report-being-aroused-by-aggression-in-according-to-study/

A study among pornography viewers suggests that more women than men are aroused by scenes that feature aggression toward women. Notably, both men and women emphasized a preference for aggressive porn that was consensual and pleasurable for both performers. The study was published in Archives of Sexual Behavior.

https://phys.org/news/2022-02-women-aggression-porn.html

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch.

Here's a meta analysis of 20 studies over 30 years.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/psyched/200805/why-do-women-have-erotic-rape-fantasies

recent analysis of 20 studies over the last 30 years indicates that between 31% and 57%.

Lastly there's zero evidence for violent porn increasibg violence.

https://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html

Meta analysis of 50 studies

https://www.galwaydaily.com/news/nuig-study-suggests-porn-use-exacerbates-sexual-aggression/

If you want I can link 10 more studies, I am an academic.

[–]Alex_Mercer_231 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Part 2/2

B irrelevant to the fact it’s violently misogynistic and allowed to remain Also you’re deliberately ignoring what was referenced.

How exactly is women posting watching more violent and misogynistic (in comparison to men as I proved by statistics and studies above, before saying bullshit this consider seeing the studies and debunk the studies if you still are against this fact) porn the fault of men, are we supposed to stop them from watching violent porn? I think that's also misogyny as it against bodily autonomy of women (you see by your eyes and eyes are a part of your body).

Another study here proves men need to know that the act is occuring willingly in order to get aroused.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/07/more-women-than-men-turned-on-by-aggressive-porn-study/

Nevertheless, both women and men preferred aggressive sexual content when performed consensually, as a vast majority of pornography viewers — 95% of women and 97% of men — are only aroused when they know they’re watching willing participants, PsyPost reported on Tuesday

If women are the ones watching most violent porn (again if you are against it, write research papers and perform experimenrs proving studies and researches I linked wrong)

Anything is allowed on reddit including extreme violence (against anyone) there are even subreddit advocating for racist violence and many other subreddits showing shock sites, misandry is also allowed on reddit, (r/MisandryKink). Literally any form of content no matter how disturbing or violent is allowed on reddit so you don't have a point here.

What she COMMENTED on was a post that was linking that article. Once again you’re a liar.

How is that comment related to our conversation here? I think this conversation is going in a totally different direction.

I literally backed up everything I said using statistics and studies so if you want to prove me wrong debunk those studies instead of calling me out.

[–]WomenSubsAreModByXYs -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Male-centered women and pickmes exist, like OOP for example. They are misogynists and female simps who do anything for male validation.

And how many of these "violent porn watching women" are actually trans-identified males? Last time I check a lot of transfolk are porn-addicts. This isn't tRaNsPhObIa its the truth.

[–]pwishall 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You have some issues for sure...

You're misrepresenting your own hate sub - there are far worse things allowed on there and we all know it.

Again, I looked super hard and couldn't find anywhere on here where someone is saying womenarethings is totally fine.

This is why I think you're just a troll with nothing better to do than try to get a rise out of people.

[+]False-Purple3882 -6 points-5 points-4 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

No, I’m accurately describing female pessimist. It’s literally a vent sub. Nothing more. “Far worse things” Link them. Because I don’t believe you.

[–]pwishall6 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Do you not read the posts on here from your very sub? Oh my bad, you can be as vile as you want about men because it's "just venting".

I'm going to find examples just from your comments.

[–]Alex_Mercer_234 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/Aa5EkVBNdS

https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/5gioEvAm1j

https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/XVvi39zuOu

https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/hFWkQdAWqJ

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Literally none of those show women promoting raping or murdering men. None of them describe men as ‘things’. And the last one you showed was of valerie solanas who no one mentioned in the first place.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

99% of the horrible misogynist content you're complaining about is not promoting raping or murdering women, yet you're still bringing attention to it.

Yet men can't do the same thing with misandry, I guess? In your mind?

I can't believe you've been continuing to post on here, well into the night last night. That's sad.

I think the mod is letting you stay here because you're only showing how pathetic most of the losers on your sub are.

[–]SunJiggy1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Literally none of those show women promoting raping or murdering men.

[Here is something that does] (https://i.imgur.com/BY0EJ53.jpeg)

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Never got this reply notif for some reason. Anyway, I don’t support that and I’d wager to guess most women don’t either. Also, that isn’t on the reddit platform and doesn’t have over 500,000 people defending it.

[–]rumpots420 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can't complain about things I have never heard of before today. Definitely object to it now that I've heard of it, though. Now please get your ugly, hatefilled ass tf outta hear and never come back

[–]sneakpeekbot 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Here's a sneak peek of /r/womenarethings [NSFW] using the top posts of the year!

#1: Forced it up her ass and didn't care that it hurt | 56 comments
#2: this teacher has known for a long time that this mouth belongs to all the dads that want it | 52 comments
#3: im that side piece you call when you need to use a hole | 74 comments


I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact | Info | Opt-out | GitHub

[–]AutoModerator[M] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminder everyone - Don't brigade the crossposted sub. It's against reddit rules.

You can also report misandry directly to the admins here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]False-Purple3882 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

And these captions just perfectly demonstrate the bs I’m talking about that’s allowed on this site that all of you seem perfectly ok with.

[–]pwishall 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I looked, I really did... but I'm not finding anyone saying they"re "perfectly ok" with it. Must be my male privilege blinding me to things again.

And... there's a slight difference between a kink sub and one like yours where you mean everything you say about men.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Unironically, yes. Yes it is. Once again not a single one of you sociopathic fucks have condemned it. But you’re all complaining because “wahmen being misandrist after seeing men gleefully promoting abusing women”. But k dude.

[–]rumpots420 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

We all think it's awful. Tf you on about?

[–]False-Purple3882 -3 points-2 points-1 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don’t think all of you do, but thanks for saying you do. Have a good day.

[–]Alex_Mercer_232 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Bruh all the people posting it are women and not men, just open the subreddit and check it out yourself.

Plus what about r/misandrykink its pretty much the same thing, besides most people on posting on r/misandrykink are women too.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Again, Bullshit. “pretty much the same” Has less than 5k followers. To the over 500k of women are things. And they don’t reference men as things in their description either. So no. Not remotely the same.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ok let me give a run down of that space

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/cUaxstp170

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/RN0OfXLBOT

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/1uA55Mbbi3

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/zjl1MBOXtc

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/xjsHMPBOlK

These are the top 5 posts there, just go to these posts and open the account of the OP literally all of them are women lol. Most of the people posting on r/womenarethings and r/misogynisticlife are women and not men, most women there are actually OF creators trying to promote their account so they should be the ones you criticize and not men, because most of the people posting there are female onlyfans creators.

[–]False-Purple3882 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Of creators cater to an audience 💀 it’s literally men creating the ‘need’ for that content

[–]Alex_Mercer_231 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Nope most violent porn is seen by women, I have studies and statistics of various porn websites to prove it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/01/are-women-responsible-for-extreme-sexual-violence-on-screen-germaine-greer

Women consume 60% to 80% of crime fiction (that is quite a large tolerance band, but let’s not nitpick), and are the main viewers of true crime drama.

She cites a study by the University of Texas, which found that nearly a third of women regularly fantasise about being violated

https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/google-researcher-porn-featuring-violence-against-women-is-more-popular-among-women-than-men/

researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, who says that porn featuring violence against women is significantly more popular among women compared to men.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/07/more-women-than-men-turned-on-by-aggressive-porn-study/

breaking down to 66% of women and 40% of men. Women, too, were more likely to go for “harder” expressions of aggression in porn and to seek it more than men — with themes such as bondage, discipline, dominance, submission and sadomasochis.

https://www.bustle.com/p/women-actually-watch-more-porn-than-men-heres-what-it-is-were-watching-63850

Pornhub and their Pornhub Insights have long broken down interesting facts and trends about all things porn. But now we have ten years of Pornhub data at our fingertips and looking at the information as a whole provides a whole new understanding. One things that the research found, according to The Cut, is that women, on average, spend 1:14 more minutes a day on the site than male viewers

https://www.vice.com/en/article/bm9w7v/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn

women, search rates for these more extreme types of sexual content are at least twice as common among women than men.

https://www.pornhub.com/insights/women-of-the-world

Threesome videos are the most watched by women

Dr. Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, a former Google data scientist, was given complete access to PornHub's search and views data, as well as google and a lot of pornographics website search data. He found that women were more than twice as likely as men to search for videos where women were abused, coerced into sex, or depicted as being raped.

On PornHub, women consume most of the porn where women are violently raped and abused.

https://aella.substack.com/p/women-prefer-more-violent-porn-and

Are men more interested in sexually violent content than women? According to my data, absolutely not. I looked at reports of watching violent porn, arousal from nonconsent, brutality, bondage, sadomasochism, gentle/cruel power dynamics, and humiliation. Across the board women report more interest in these things than men, and report greater interest in submission than men report being dominant. 

https://subredditstats.com/

73.32% followers of the rapefantasy subreddits are women.

https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/channels/news/are-men-or-women-more-likely-enjoy-aggression-porn-337544

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch. Radical feminist theorists have suggested that representations of aggression in pornography are entirely driven by the desires and preferences of male viewers, while the preferences of women regarding such representations of aggression have not been systematically explored.

https://www.psypost.org/more-women-than-men-report-being-aroused-by-aggression-in-according-to-study/

A study among pornography viewers suggests that more women than men are aroused by scenes that feature aggression toward women. Notably, both men and women emphasized a preference for aggressive porn that was consensual and pleasurable for both performers. The study was published in Archives of Sexual Behavior.

https://phys.org/news/2022-02-women-aggression-porn.html

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch.

Here's a meta analysis of 20 studies over 30 years.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/psyched/200805/why-do-women-have-erotic-rape-fantasies

recent analysis of 20 studies over the last 30 years indicates that between 31% and 57%.

Lastly there's zero evidence for violent porn increasibg violence.

https://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html

Meta analysis of 50 studies

https://www.galwaydaily.com/news/nuig-study-suggests-porn-use-exacerbates-sexual-aggression/

If you want I can link 10 more studies, I am an academic.

[–]WomenSubsAreModByXYs1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Again, pornsick women exist. There's a whole threads in women's spaces attacking and questioning why women are pro-porn and pro-degrading kinks.

Also, why do you think women sexualise their destruction??? Could it be because objectification, sexualization and abuse of women is so rampant everywhere, women used awful kinks as coping mechanism?? A lot of sex-workers and porn-addicted women have a history of being sexually-abused when they're young. Heck, if you study your family tree, you'd find out you're a descendant of rape and incest.

[–]pwishall 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (72 children) | Copy Link

You're kind of your own parody at this point. You claim to not have "unlimited free time" to read those studies, yet you've been arguing with people on here all day ..

[–]False-Purple3882 2 years ago [recovered] (66 children) | Copy Link

And once again I have yet to see a single one of you self proclaimed ‘egalitarians’ condemn the misogyny on any of the subs I spoke about

[–]pwishall 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (65 children) | Copy Link

That's not the point, that's silly. Blatantmisogyny has 300k people already doing that. This sub is for misandry, there's only a couple thousand. Yet you're offended when such a small minority deigns to point out the misandry that's also on here.

Do you think any of us go onto blatantmisogyny and whine about them not talking about subs like yours? No... 😆

[–]False-Purple3882 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (64 children) | Copy Link

Blatant misogyny bans women frequently for criticizing men. Over 500,000 people exist over on women are things. More than the supposed 300k people who are on blatant misogyny. And that’s just one of the male supremacist subs I’m talking about. There’s numerous others with just as many people. But you’re all okay with it as long as theyre dehumanizing women.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Blatant misogyny also only points out misogyny on reddit, also r/MensRights and r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates ban people for criticising women so what's you point considering these subreddits are dedicated to men's rights?

Most of the people posting r/WomenAreThings are literally female onlyfans creators so stop capping, just check out the subreddit for yourself and you will figure it out.

You should be critizing women if you are against these subs not men considering the people posting on these subreddits are female onlyfans creators.

[–]pwishall 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (57 children) | Copy Link

Okay you're just a troll aren't you. I'm not going to play oppression olympics about whatever sub is bigger.

You still haven't provided any evidence that anyone on this sub is okay with that sub. Yet that's your #1 argument.

None of that matters... because the fact is... that you yourself are a sexist bigot. So you have no leg to stand on.

[–]False-Purple3882 2 years ago [recovered] (56 children) | Copy Link

No, I want an explanation as to why you and everyone else here refuses to condemn r/womenarethings . It’s my argument because you and everyone else here complaining refuses to condemn it. “you’re sexist” Pointing out mens violent hatred of women isn’t misandrist.

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"Men don't like being held accountable for anything they do"

"#4"

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That was explicitly in reference to men in this comment section complaining about women acknowledging misogyny. But ok.

[–]pwishall3 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That's not what you said so I don't believe you.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You can believe what you want. The full context of that, as I recall, was men deflecting from misogyny on this platform.

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

There's a difference here though - I came to my conclusion based off your actual words, while yours... came from your head.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

No, it comes from the fact that you won’t outright say that sub shouldn’t exist. And no your conclusion is based off your interpretation of what I said.

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Because I'm not going to obey a bully like yourself ffs. That's it. Once you grow up a little you'll realize you can't bully people into virtue signalling about something to make you happy, and their refusal does not mean they support it.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It’s not about bullying or virtue signaling. It’s about the hypocrisy of complaining about misandry on a platform that allows the content I pointed out. It’s not about making me happy either. You’re willfully missing the point. I’m done with this convo, if you have any interest in an actual discussion rather than making inflammatory comments or baseless assumptions about me, feel free to pm me. Again, have a good day.

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yiu're absolutely a bully. You're completely trying to invalidate the reasonable points being made on a sub of less than 3000 people... because misogyny exists on the aite as well.

You've hammering that point all afternoon here.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Expecting you to stop pretending misogyny doesn’t exist as a problem isn’t bullying. And for the record, I came here because op literally LINKED my post in theirs. Otherwise I wouldn’t really interact with this sub. I believe outside of this post I have one interaction with this sub that consists of three comments

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You've got a selective memory... you were not expecting people on here to "stop pretending misogyny doesn't exist". Those are olympic level mental gymnastics.

No one here has ever pretended that. You've been all over this sub all afternoon, shaming everyone on here into providing you an appropriate value statement denouncing the one sub.

That's bullying in most peoples opinion.

[–]OtherwiseLack46571 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Then get the fuck out of here then

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The contempt pro birth people have for women is absolutely disgusting. They think women being expected to sacrifice all of our aspirations is perfectly fine because “well they’re women so what they want out of life isn’t important anyway teehee”

"#6"

Most people I know who have had kids do not think like this at all. In fact the women are showered with praise and people trying to help out.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You’re misconstruing the context of that and that also has nothing to do with this convo. I said pro birth. As in pro life people, regardless of sex or family status. As far as the treatment of new mothers, people may say they’ll help them out but often that doesn’t happen.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Sure, your bigoted comments are okay here because "context"... Again, how much of this is evidence-based vs. your limited view of how things work. I mean you watch tik tok and read tumblr and read femalepessimist and post scholarly articles to substack... you're an expert.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Bigoted how exactly? Pro life individuals aren’t an oppressed demographic, especially not in the deep south where I reside. Confused as to why you think I watch tiktok. I’ve never had the app on my phone. Also haven’t had tumblr on my phone in over a year. “scholarly articles” I didn’t say I was an expert nor did I describe the article I wrote that way. I said I cited proof. Because I did.

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Hyperbole genius, including the "scholarly" remark, because you've been so proudly telling everyone about it all day. And admitting to tumblr, you're kind of telling on yourself.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It’s not about being proud of it 🤦🏻‍♀️ you don’t understand my point at all. I didn’t say it was the greatest thing ever and I’m sure other people could write one better. That wasn’t the point, the point was the post y’all are complaining about in this specific thread was about misogynistic subs. Which I showed proof of and you’re still acting like they aren’t a problem.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

But everyone in this thread was not just complaining about you complaining about misogynistic subs. I didagree with that

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The post that op linked their comment on was my post specifically and it was the one where I posted proof of what I was talking about. I’m aware that people in this sub complain about the female pessimism sub frequently in general. That’s your opinion and you’re entitled to it but I don’t agree. Like I said earlier though, I’m done with this convo as far as this sub goes

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I could keep finding oodles of misandry on your sub, including from your comments. I found 7 examples just from you going back just 2 days...

Go ahead and tell me water isn't wet ..

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

None of the comments you listed were misandrist 💀 this convo has been exhausting and unproductive as I expected

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

They all were and I wxplained why. If you can't see how any of those are problematic then you're the one with issues.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Hyperbole genius, including the "scholarly" remark, because you've been so proudly telling everyone about it all day. And admitting to tumblr, you're kind of telling on yourself.

[–]rumpots4202 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I hereby, in my official capacity as a man, condemn the above linked subreddit for promoting sexual violence.

Now please fuck off, ok?

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

No one is refusing to do that crackhead. You're not going to bully or shame others to put out a "public condemnation" - your very misandry goes well beyond just "pointing things out".

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

So you admit you don’t view it as wrong then. I didn’t bully or shame anyone. I’m pointing out everyone on this sub is a massive hypocrite who is perfectly fine with the violently misogynistic subs on this platform. I’ve proven my point, I’m done with this conversation. Have a good day.

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Men have been leading for most of the world’s history, it’s resulted in climate change & nuclear weapons that could destroy the entire planet. “women and girls lie” I hope the daughter goes no contact with this creature.

2

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Neither of those are sexist. Men have been leading for most of world history, that’s a fact. The creation of nuclear weapons happened during those times & climate change is ongoing. “I hope the daughter goes no contact” Was in reference to someone accusing their daughter of lying about rape. And for the record based off the avatar & conservative leanings I’m pretty sure that was her mother. So how exactly is that sexism against men?

[–]pwishall3 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"Men" are not a monolith. The person you so derisively called a "creature" did not help the nazis or create nuclear weapons. Your generalizing all men together as blameworthy for problems of society is sexist as hell. Did mom and dad never teach you people are individuals? Sorry, you probably despised your dad and didn't listen to his advice because he was a lowly "creature".

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I explained quite clearly that the person I called a creature most likely wasn’t even a man, and also that I called her that because she automatically assumed her daughter was lying about being raped. What does that have to do with this conversation? I didn’t say men are to blame for all societal ills. I disputed the claim men are better leaders by pointing out precisely what’s happened while they’ve been ‘leading’.

You’re making baseless assumptions about my childhood because you don’t like what I say. For the record, my dad didn’t raise me and neither did my mother so you can fuck off with that. I’ve read several of the posts here actually. I just don’t feel inclined to comment on them.

[–]pwishall3 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Respectfully, when men are allowed on mod teams for subreddits that are supposedly for women they often censor female speech & criticism they personally don’t like. It’s fine to have mixed sex subreddits, but you can’t truly say a subreddit is for women if that’s the case.

"#5"

Men and women subs bith do this, and again, it's sexist to pretend it's endemic to me. The most heavily censored sub is probably askwomen. It's not just "misogyny" they're removing. They remove any "wrongthink" that goes against their narrative.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That is also a fact, not misandrist. And no it doesn’t go both ways. Reddit is overwhelmingly male. Nearly all of the subreddits supposedly for women have male moderators. Which defeats the entire purpose of the sub. Ask women wasn’t an exception last I checked. The only thing you’re right about in this comment is that most reddit mods are power hungry weirdos who heavily censor things they don’t agree with.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That is also a fact, not misandrist. And no it doesn’t go both ways. Reddit is overwhelmingly male. Nearly all of the subreddits supposedly for women have male moderators. Which defeats the entire purpose of the sub. Ask women wasn’t an exception last I checked. The only thing you’re right about in this comment is that most reddit mods are power hungry weirdos who heavily censor things they don’t agree with.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/femalepessimist/s/HipDwczdJU

"#7" and by far the worst. FFS I've only gone back 2 days! I try to give people the benefit of the doubt but you're a vile, hateful, misandrist person. I can only imagine how sad your life is that you make shitting on men your entire personality...

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

That was literally in response to the violent misogyny I was seeing in subs like women are things. It says so in the paragraph and also explicitly states why I was researching those subs. “I try to give people the benefit of the doubt” No you give men the benefit of the doubt. “you’re vile, hateful” You literally made inflammatory comments about my childhood/familial relationships because you didn’t like me pointing out misogyny.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Saying "the vast majority ofen are terrible" is not just pointing out misogyny!

Do you think it's also okay to assume most Germans are bloodthirsty warmongers because of Hitler? Or a thousand other examples that are just as ludicrous, and probably parroted by millions of other bigots in the past. You're just a contemporary bigot, using the same flawed thinking as them.

There is no excuse for that post. None.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Oh you’re talking about the post title. Still don’t think that’s the same thing. Like I said, it was based off what I saw and it’s not like men here have convinced me otherwise either. I also don’t think you get to pretend to be on a moral high ground considering you made inflammatory comments about my childhood. But you can think what you want.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"Not likeen have convinced me otherwise here"...

You are so holier than thou - you think because people aren't tripping over themselves to assuage your ego then they're not doing a good enough job of disproving your very misandrist post.

"Based off what I saw" - I guess you're in high school? Thinking one group you saw is indicative of 3,500,000,000 humans on the planet?

I saw a parade of KKK on TV once but I surely didn't conclude all or most white people are racist. Maybe your enlightened tumblr mind would disagree there ..

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Not about my ego, not about being holier than thou. Didn’t say you had to disprove it. It’s not just one group. I don’t know how many times I have to clarify that for you to understand it.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You've been crying for everyone on this sub to immediately accede to your demands and denounce womenarethings right away or else we're all misogynists. I think most people would admit there's an ego problem there somewhere.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

My problem is with the fact that this sub and several others complain about female pessimism but don’t even acknowledge misogyny as being an issue on the platform. I made that pretty clear. How is that an ego issue?

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Fuck, because you're browbeating everyone here to give you that answer within a couple hours of your demand. No one with self respect will obey someone like you doing that.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You're arguing completely from what you've personally seen. It's one-sided. There are at least as many women mods that are out of control as men.

That you're not even asking for more evidence only underscores that you're more interested in burgeoning your version of facts as opposed to any kind of truth.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

“there are atleast as many out of control female mods” That’s impossible simply for the fact that reddit is a male dominated platform. There’s not as many women who use this site as men. That’s just a fact. And as I also pointed out, men have control over nearly all of the subreddits supposedly for women.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It's about 60/40, not that big of a difference.

Do you have any evidence to back up that last claim?

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I do but I would have to continue this conversation further. If you’re interested I can send you the info via pm on here, though it might be later. I don’t think the 60/40 is entirely accurate, do you have the data on that? Because even on the subs that go to the popular page, it seems most commenters are men

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

FFS doing a google search.

Any kind of "info" you think backs up your point can indeed be posted in comments here - this sub isn't heavily censored like ones you frequent.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

“this sub isn’t heavily censored” I was prevented from commenting further on one post so yeah it is actually

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Really... you've been arguing with me all afternoon. Femalepessimist or twoxchromosomes or boysarequirky would have banned someone permanently for that within 5 or 10 minutes. No, this isn't heavily censored.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"It was literally modded by an mra"

"#3"

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Also a fact and not sexist. You’ve yet to demonstrate something legitimately sexist.

[–]pwishall1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"Male entitlement knows no bounds". #1

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Not misandrist. Male entitlement is a thing. Sex based socialization is a thing.

[–]pwishall2 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Females and males can bith be entitled. If you sincerely believe it's endemic to one gender more than the other... that's pretty damn sexist.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yes but no. I agree with the basic premise that anyone can be entitled. I disagree with the ridiculous notion that boys and girls are socialized the same or that behaviors in men & women are rewarded the same. My argument isn’t only males can be entitled. My argument is entitlement is specifically encouraged in males.

[–]OtherwiseLack4657 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are an annoying idiot. Please do us a favor and leave men alone.

[–]DecenterXYs_BeHappy -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

BlatantMisogyny mods are so damn male-centered.

[–]False-Purple3882 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are and I’m fairly certain most if not all are men anyway. You can’t claim it’s for women when there’s literally a man on the mod team.

[–]rumpots420 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's because it isn't a misandristic subreddit. You very obviously don't like women at all

[–]False-Purple3882 2 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

I haven’t been on here “all day” there’s literally hours in between my replies from earlier and my replies from this afternoon 🤦🏻‍♀️ once again you have no valid point

[–]pwishall 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You've been on here for hours, more than enough time to take 5 minutes to read a couple studies.

[–]False-Purple3882 2 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I haven’t been on here all day and once again I’ll read them when I damn well decide to. Once again, where’s your condemnation of women are things and other similar subs? Oh right. Nonexistent

[–]pwishall 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are already people doing that, about 15x as many as on here. I've tried a couple times to explain that to you already. Pointing iut misandry by people including yourself is severely underserved on this site.

This is a perfect time to point out your misandry. Give me a few minutes.

[–]False-Purple38821 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

And once again I have yet to see a single one of you self proclaimed ‘egalitarians’ condemn the misogyny on any of the subs I spoke about

[–]gavkahootsmasher 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

GTFO

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I was literally trying to debate there from a logical and benevolent pov yet I am getting called a misogynist and incel by that sub lol

[–]gavkahootsmasher4 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Anti-intellectualism runs rampant in that sub

[–]False-Purple3882 -5 points-4 points-3 points 2 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

How about no seeing as op started this? I wrote an article, with sources sited, about the rampant misogyny allowed on this site. And y’all are mad because “how dare evil wahmen not accept men wanting to beat and rape them and call them things”. But as per usual males can do no wrong

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ok here are the top 10 hot posts on r/WomenAreThings

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/eaKol2A4S1

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/Mi2lcEWRVZ

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/QiSimiP5N1

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/vawXPq7vmg

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/fLH0bNwETL

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/kw8dc3Lhsx

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/o5eEVN8OMi

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/FcHQYMvn4b

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/3HEtdXyBnn

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/m0YlJTaEIR

All the people posting it are women onlyfans creators and not men, so you are clearly blaming the wrong gender if you are against it lol.

[–]False-Purple3882 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Who exactly are the viewers who are creating a market for this misogynistic crap? Oh right, males like you.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Nope most violent porn is seen by women, I have studies and statistics of various porn websites to prove it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/01/are-women-responsible-for-extreme-sexual-violence-on-screen-germaine-greer

Women consume 60% to 80% of crime fiction (that is quite a large tolerance band, but let’s not nitpick), and are the main viewers of true crime drama.

She cites a study by the University of Texas, which found that nearly a third of women regularly fantasise about being violated

https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/google-researcher-porn-featuring-violence-against-women-is-more-popular-among-women-than-men/

researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, who says that porn featuring violence against women is significantly more popular among women compared to men.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/07/more-women-than-men-turned-on-by-aggressive-porn-study/

breaking down to 66% of women and 40% of men. Women, too, were more likely to go for “harder” expressions of aggression in porn and to seek it more than men — with themes such as bondage, discipline, dominance, submission and sadomasochis.

https://www.bustle.com/p/women-actually-watch-more-porn-than-men-heres-what-it-is-were-watching-63850

Pornhub and their Pornhub Insights have long broken down interesting facts and trends about all things porn. But now we have ten years of Pornhub data at our fingertips and looking at the information as a whole provides a whole new understanding. One things that the research found, according to The Cut, is that women, on average, spend 1:14 more minutes a day on the site than male viewers

https://www.vice.com/en/article/bm9w7v/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn

women, search rates for these more extreme types of sexual content are at least twice as common among women than men.

https://www.pornhub.com/insights/women-of-the-world

Threesome videos are the most watched by women

Dr. Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, a former Google data scientist, was given complete access to PornHub's search and views data, as well as google and a lot of pornographics website search data. He found that women were more than twice as likely as men to search for videos where women were abused, coerced into sex, or depicted as being raped.

On PornHub, women consume most of the porn where women are violently raped and abused.

https://aella.substack.com/p/women-prefer-more-violent-porn-and

Are men more interested in sexually violent content than women? According to my data, absolutely not. I looked at reports of watching violent porn, arousal from nonconsent, brutality, bondage, sadomasochism, gentle/cruel power dynamics, and humiliation. Across the board women report more interest in these things than men, and report greater interest in submission than men report being dominant. 

https://subredditstats.com/

73.32% followers of the rapefantasy subreddits are women.

https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/channels/news/are-men-or-women-more-likely-enjoy-aggression-porn-337544

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch. Radical feminist theorists have suggested that representations of aggression in pornography are entirely driven by the desires and preferences of male viewers, while the preferences of women regarding such representations of aggression have not been systematically explored.

https://www.psypost.org/more-women-than-men-report-being-aroused-by-aggression-in-according-to-study/

A study among pornography viewers suggests that more women than men are aroused by scenes that feature aggression toward women. Notably, both men and women emphasized a preference for aggressive porn that was consensual and pleasurable for both performers. The study was published in Archives of Sexual Behavior.

https://phys.org/news/2022-02-women-aggression-porn.html

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch.

Here's a meta analysis of 20 studies over 30 years.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/psyched/200805/why-do-women-have-erotic-rape-fantasies

recent analysis of 20 studies over the last 30 years indicates that between 31% and 57%.

Lastly there's zero evidence for violent porn increasibg violence.

https://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html

Meta analysis of 50 studies

https://www.galwaydaily.com/news/nuig-study-suggests-porn-use-exacerbates-sexual-aggression/

If you want I can link 10 more studies, I am an academic.

[–]gavkahootsmasher 2 years ago [recovered] (16 children) | Copy Link

Explain how I'm defending misogyny

[–]pwishall 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Well you gotta read her totally level-headed substack article, that some evil misogynist man dared to criticize. Poor thing is just getting abused by evil men left and right.

[–]False-Purple3882 -3 points-2 points-1 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You’re proving my point. You’re whining because some woman pointed out men are allowed to dehumanize women on the reddit platform freely.

[–]pwishall 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You're kidding right? I'm just pointing out your own misandry to you, and how ironic it is since you purport to be against all of the sexism on here...

Your sub does not just "point out misogyny". It's a hate sub. If you've somehow convinced yourself otherwise then I have to second guess if I'm talking to a real person or a troll here.

[–]False-Purple3882 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Pointing out misogyny isn’t misandry. Second of all, it’s not my sub and it solely exists for women to vent about frustration with misogyny. It’s perfectly fine for y’all to despise us and have hundreds of subs dehumanizing us, calling us things, but it’s a problem when we react to it by saying we get why some women hate you. That’s the problem. Sexism is fine as long as you men are doing it.

[–]pwishall 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You're on crack by this point. That sub does not merely "point out misogyny" and you know it. I could probably find vile sexist things you yourself said on it...

And the people on this sub, are not the ones on the subs you're complaining about. We're not the same people, and it's sexist to lump all of us together like that.

[–]False-Purple38820 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

“we’re not the same people” Bullshit. You probably regularly go to those exact subs. And you still refuse to outright say it’s misogynistic. “vile sexist things” but you can’t link them? Sure jan.

[–]pwishall5 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Oh my god, I "probably" go to those same subs... you got me there. Your imagination is never wrong.

[–]False-Purple3882 2 years ago [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

You’re dogpiling on me when all I did was criticize the misogyny rampant on reddit. But not a single one of you supposed “egalitarians” have condemned the misogyny I showed proof of in those subs.

[–]gavkahootsmasher 2 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

It's not the criticism of misogyny, it's the fact that you're on a vile man-hating sub

[–]False-Purple3882 -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

“Its not the criticism of misogyny” “vile man hating sub” Female pessimist is literally just a sub for women to vent. None of the women there promote violence against men and it’s literally against the rules to do so. But that’s what you want to complain about instead of acknowledging the hundreds of male subs that actually promote violence against women.

[–]Alex_Mercer_23 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

“Its not the criticism of misogyny” “vile man hating sub” Female pessimist is literally just a sub for women to vent. None of the women there promote violence against men and it’s literally against the rules to do so.

They do just look at some of the posts and they clearly do that, stop ignoring this.

But that’s what you want to complain about instead of acknowledging the hundreds of male subs that actually promote violence against women.

I literally proved that all the people posting on r/WomenAreThings are female onlyfans creators not men, blame women for all that if you are against it not men.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/mDMnRp4RZx

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/MoFQiv7bAX

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/LhZY7Mu5bv

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/LLOjbYUSYi

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/0siSvCe3mI

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/fY2YG0y6jv

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/YRjp5BVsU3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/jBASasF2cu

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/CF1yppg0Jf

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisogynisticLife/s/olVtsYxODz

here are the top 10 posts on r/misogynisticlife once again all the people posting it are female onlyfans creators and not men, so you should blame women for it if you want and not men, since they are the ones promoting this debumization on these subreddits.

Btw thanks for proving me right, you proved it by showing those misogyny kink subreddits and considering most of the people posting there are women, women are the ones who watch the most misogynistic, excellent perspective good job :)

[–]False-Purple3882 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Men are the ones who create the market for that content. Because men despise women and have made that abundantly clear through your support of violent misogyny. Also how do you know those are actually women and not men just posting images of women? Oh right, you don’t and you don’t care. Also “all”? No because literally two of the mods themselves are males. But as per usual that will be excused and enabled.

[–]Alex_Mercer_231 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Part 1/2

Men are the ones who create the market for that content. Because men despise women and have made that abundantly clear through your support of violent misogyny

Nope most violent porn is seen by women, I have studies and statistics of various porn websites to prove it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/01/are-women-responsible-for-extreme-sexual-violence-on-screen-germaine-greer

Women consume 60% to 80% of crime fiction (that is quite a large tolerance band, but let’s not nitpick), and are the main viewers of true crime drama.

She cites a study by the University of Texas, which found that nearly a third of women regularly fantasise about being violated

https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/google-researcher-porn-featuring-violence-against-women-is-more-popular-among-women-than-men/

researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, who says that porn featuring violence against women is significantly more popular among women compared to men.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/07/more-women-than-men-turned-on-by-aggressive-porn-study/

breaking down to 66% of women and 40% of men. Women, too, were more likely to go for “harder” expressions of aggression in porn and to seek it more than men — with themes such as bondage, discipline, dominance, submission and sadomasochis.

https://www.bustle.com/p/women-actually-watch-more-porn-than-men-heres-what-it-is-were-watching-63850

Pornhub and their Pornhub Insights have long broken down interesting facts and trends about all things porn. But now we have ten years of Pornhub data at our fingertips and looking at the information as a whole provides a whole new understanding. One things that the research found, according to The Cut, is that women, on average, spend 1:14 more minutes a day on the site than male viewers

https://www.vice.com/en/article/bm9w7v/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn

women, search rates for these more extreme types of sexual content are at least twice as common among women than men.

https://www.pornhub.com/insights/women-of-the-world

Threesome videos are the most watched by women

Dr. Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, a former Google data scientist, was given complete access to PornHub's search and views data, as well as google and a lot of pornographics website search data. He found that women were more than twice as likely as men to search for videos where women were abused, coerced into sex, or depicted as being raped.

On PornHub, women consume most of the porn where women are violently raped and abused.

https://aella.substack.com/p/women-prefer-more-violent-porn-and

Are men more interested in sexually violent content than women? According to my data, absolutely not. I looked at reports of watching violent porn, arousal from nonconsent, brutality, bondage, sadomasochism, gentle/cruel power dynamics, and humiliation. Across the board women report more interest in these things than men, and report greater interest in submission than men report being dominant. 

https://subredditstats.com/

73.32% followers of the rapefantasy subreddits are women.

https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/channels/news/are-men-or-women-more-likely-enjoy-aggression-porn-337544

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch. Radical feminist theorists have suggested that representations of aggression in pornography are entirely driven by the desires and preferences of male viewers, while the preferences of women regarding such representations of aggression have not been systematically explored.

https://www.psypost.org/more-women-than-men-report-being-aroused-by-aggression-in-according-to-study/

A study among pornography viewers suggests that more women than men are aroused by scenes that feature aggression toward women. Notably, both men and women emphasized a preference for aggressive porn that was consensual and pleasurable for both performers. The study was published in Archives of Sexual Behavior.

https://phys.org/news/2022-02-women-aggression-porn.html

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch.

Here's a meta analysis of 20 studies over 30 years.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/psyched/200805/why-do-women-have-erotic-rape-fantasies

recent analysis of 20 studies over the last 30 years indicates that between 31% and 57%.

Lastly there's zero evidence for violent porn increasibg violence.

https://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html

Meta analysis of 50 studies

https://www.galwaydaily.com/news/nuig-study-suggests-porn-use-exacerbates-sexual-aggression/

If you want I can link 10 more studies, I am an academic.

[–]Alex_Mercer_231 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Part 2/2

Also how do you know those are actually women and not men just posting images of women? Oh right, you don’t and you don’t care.

You can check their bio, they all have put the links to their onlyfans account.

Also “all”? No because literally two of the mods themselves are males. But as per usual that will be excused and enabled.

The other 4 are women, so statically that's 66.6% women and 33.3% percent men, seems like more women to me, also are the 4 women excused and all the other who watch violent porn (Which I just proved by statistics are larger in number) are right? Nice hypocrisy, before you go for "ProOF" here it is once again.

Nope most violent porn is seen by women, I have studies and statistics of various porn websites to prove it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/01/are-women-responsible-for-extreme-sexual-violence-on-screen-germaine-greer

Women consume 60% to 80% of crime fiction (that is quite a large tolerance band, but let’s not nitpick), and are the main viewers of true crime drama.

She cites a study by the University of Texas, which found that nearly a third of women regularly fantasise about being violated

https://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/google-researcher-porn-featuring-violence-against-women-is-more-popular-among-women-than-men/

researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, who says that porn featuring violence against women is significantly more popular among women compared to men.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/07/more-women-than-men-turned-on-by-aggressive-porn-study/

breaking down to 66% of women and 40% of men. Women, too, were more likely to go for “harder” expressions of aggression in porn and to seek it more than men — with themes such as bondage, discipline, dominance, submission and sadomasochis.

https://www.bustle.com/p/women-actually-watch-more-porn-than-men-heres-what-it-is-were-watching-63850

Pornhub and their Pornhub Insights have long broken down interesting facts and trends about all things porn. But now we have ten years of Pornhub data at our fingertips and looking at the information as a whole provides a whole new understanding. One things that the research found, according to The Cut, is that women, on average, spend 1:14 more minutes a day on the site than male viewers

https://www.vice.com/en/article/bm9w7v/why-are-so-many-women-searching-for-ultra-violent-porn

women, search rates for these more extreme types of sexual content are at least twice as common among women than men.

https://www.pornhub.com/insights/women-of-the-world

Threesome videos are the most watched by women

Dr. Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, a former Google data scientist, was given complete access to PornHub's search and views data, as well as google and a lot of pornographics website search data. He found that women were more than twice as likely as men to search for videos where women were abused, coerced into sex, or depicted as being raped.

On PornHub, women consume most of the porn where women are violently raped and abused.

https://aella.substack.com/p/women-prefer-more-violent-porn-and

Are men more interested in sexually violent content than women? According to my data, absolutely not. I looked at reports of watching violent porn, arousal from nonconsent, brutality, bondage, sadomasochism, gentle/cruel power dynamics, and humiliation. Across the board women report more interest in these things than men, and report greater interest in submission than men report being dominant. 

https://subredditstats.com/

73.32% followers of the rapefantasy subreddits are women.

https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/channels/news/are-men-or-women-more-likely-enjoy-aggression-porn-337544

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch. Radical feminist theorists have suggested that representations of aggression in pornography are entirely driven by the desires and preferences of male viewers, while the preferences of women regarding such representations of aggression have not been systematically explored.

https://www.psypost.org/more-women-than-men-report-being-aroused-by-aggression-in-according-to-study/

A study among pornography viewers suggests that more women than men are aroused by scenes that feature aggression toward women. Notably, both men and women emphasized a preference for aggressive porn that was consensual and pleasurable for both performers. The study was published in Archives of Sexual Behavior.

https://phys.org/news/2022-02-women-aggression-porn.html

Female viewers were more likely than male viewers to say that they enjoyed aggression in the pornography that they watch.

Here's a meta analysis of 20 studies over 30 years.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/psyched/200805/why-do-women-have-erotic-rape-fantasies

recent analysis of 20 studies over the last 30 years indicates that between 31% and 57%.

Lastly there's zero evidence for violent porn increasibg violence.

https://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html

Meta analysis of 50 studies

https://www.galwaydaily.com/news/nuig-study-suggests-porn-use-exacerbates-sexual-aggression/

If you want I can link 10 more studies, I am an academic.

[–]Alex_Mercer_232 points 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Ok here are the top 10 hot posts on r/WomenAreThings

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/eaKol2A4S1

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/Mi2lcEWRVZ

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/QiSimiP5N1

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/vawXPq7vmg

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/fLH0bNwETL

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/kw8dc3Lhsx

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/o5eEVN8OMi

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/FcHQYMvn4b

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/3HEtdXyBnn

https://www.reddit.com/r/womenarethings/s/m0YlJTaEIR

[–]DecenterXYs_BeHappy -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Male-centered women like OP will always drag other women down.

[–]christina_murray_[S] 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Show me where I’ve dragged other women down- I’ve said the majority of both men and women are good

[–]DecenterXYs_BeHappy -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You literally went to one of the few women-safe spaces to go full NAMALT and tone-police other women.

It doesn't go "both ways", it never will, majority of people are " good people" who don't do shit to stop evil. Male-centered women like you are dangerous to other women. Leave us alone and mingle with your beloved males, who'd never do anything the same for you.

[–]christina_murray_[S] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you do shit to stop evil? Doesn’t look like it to me.

And males have looked out for me… significantly… so I don’t know what you’re saying about them never doing the same.

[–]DecenterXYs_BeHappy1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I did plenty. I advocate for women, support radical feminism, criticize porn and bash misogynists, dickriders, incels and male-centered libfems like you. My accounts got banned many times because scroties don't like getting their fragile feelings hurt.

Last thing we need in this male-coddling Reddit is a woman high on hopium, thinking she did something by playing ✨both sides bad✨ BS.

[–]christina_murray_1 point 2 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

😂 I’m not a libfem- in fact I’m not a feminist to start with. I’m also anti porn too

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

Š TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter