~ archived since 2018 ~

Female Career Strategy (Patreon)

SnarkSticks

February 3, 2023

50 upvotes

Archived from /r/FemaleDatingStrategy

r/FemaleDatingStrategy is a subreddit where the focus is on effective dating strategies for women who know what they want, and want to take control of their dating lives. The focus is also on strategies to maintain a healthy relationship that benefits women.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/FemaleDatingStrategy archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Female Career Strategy (Patreon)
Author	SnarkSticks
Upvotes	50
Comments	9
Date	February 3, 2023 5:09 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/10sphe9/female_career_strategy_patreon/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/female-career-strategy-patreon.1151031 https://theredarchive.com/post/1151031

Comments

[–]13079 43 points44 points45 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]natalie2k8FDS Newbie 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]ZurfluFDS Newbie 18 points19 points20 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]SnarkSticksFDS Newbie[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]aeorimithrosFDS Newbie -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]lord_lava_lamp1 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Men continue to be entitled and continue to blame others when that entitlement is not satiated.

You're not thinking about these things on a deep enough level (I truly mean no offense by saying that).

Deprivation can be just as destructive as overstimulation. Imagine starvation vs gluttony, and there are infinite examples more of this concept.

Entitlement is a meaningless term in the context of evolution and thats because for one, we co-evolved and use and rely on each other and (2) the selfish gene has programmed itself to propagate by using these two particular organisms (male and female humans), and thus we are programmed to follow unique biologic directives.

Females are the relatively "inert" sex and males the competitive or energetic sex (for proof of this just see how many joules of energy each member consumes), these roles always emerge whenever there is one sex that invests more in reproduction (i.e. women), then the other must "do" or "achieve" which manifests by men being active in and handling the external environment (womens specialized role is more internalized, hence, a protracted pregnancy).

The takeaway is that men's role is to be more active and their programming is driving them to do things like hunt, fight, build, and mate.

When a male fails his biological prerogatives, he feels just as shitty as females do when they fail theirs, however the reasons we end up feeling bad are totally different for men than rhey are for women (because we have totally different goals and roles). In humans our goals are often conflicting or at odds with one another.

All that trauma and despair and all those destructive chemical reactions that take place when things go badly for you, on a neuronal level the exact same negative mental and hormomonal events are happening to men when things go badly for them. Just remember though, the definition of "going badly" will be wildly different for each of you. Most often people are just blind to this concept because its not remotely in their nature to positively consider, understand, or feel good about things they were programmed to feel extrmely bad about. Maybe you like eating excrement, because thats the diet nature gave you to seek out and you cannot fathom how someone else finds it repugnant. This conundeum happens between men and women all the time. Women cannot empathize with men and men cannot empathize with women because we see and feel so much differently about everything.

However there is a bias in society that the "doer" is the more immoral entity, but this really is just human bias and not a fundamental rule of the planet or of ethics. What really matters are the underlying or resulting feelings. Actions dont matter. Actions are generalizations. Sometimes it is okay to kill someone like if its in self-defense--we all are aware and accept this. But usually we believe killing to be wrong. An action inherently is never right or wrong, but again, we are as humans need to create generalities for efficiency sake and thats where the biases are created. In most scenarios in nature the "actor", and the kinetic energy, is the worse, immediate threat. Thus, over millenia we have developed this bias against the "doer", but that doesnt speak to, on the most fundamental level, feelings... ultimately the only thing that matters is how someone feels, and thats actually where morality stems from. An example would be this, whats worse, stealing a banana from the supermarket or from a billionaire as a starving man, or deciding you dont want to act to save a busfull of children roll off a hill when lets pretend you could have easily saved them by pressing a button. There isnt a law against the bus situation but clearly its worse to allow that yo happen than to steal a banana, also the bus is a more "passive" event... its failure or refusal to act... its inertness or stagnation. There is also another bias in nature I failed to mention but when one party really wants something done, and another doesn't want it done, ultimately its likely to end up being done bec in nature things must be done to move forward. Nature is always flowing and energy and aggression are rewarded. Things don't halt or exist in perpetual stalemate. Do you think the baby zebra thinks its good when a lion rips its face off? No, whats good for you, isnt whats good for someone else. For the lion this is the best thing in the world and for the zebra its the worst. I think sometikes humans think about this as a bit of an equation. Like at least one side must benefit tremendously if theyre going to do another harm, for example, asome places its illegal to kill animals if youre not going to eat them. Why kill a bird and do it harm if that negativity doesnt get balanced out as positivity on the other side of the equation (for your stomach and health).

Basically everything women in this sub say can be summed up as the following: "This thing other people are doing is suboptimal to my biological mission and therefore it is wrong."

The same goes for men, things that are good for them may be terrible for women. But neither side can claim the moral highground. You might get a lot of sympathy in your sub or even society (due to that bias against kinetic forces), but that doesn't at its core mean you are correct.

And to conclude, I want to reiterate... what these twoxchromosome posters are invariably saying is:

"I have the right to feel bad about the things that make me feel bad, but men arent allowed to complain about the things that make them feel bad."

[–]aeorimithrosFDS Newbie 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]lireralminkatrd 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link