The top comment under this post (both comment and post have been deleted)-- Misandry and Misogyny Both Exist — Why Is That So Hard to Admit?:

Misandry is a real concept and can be personally hurtful, but it just hasn’t been nearly as impactful on our current society as misogyny.

The top reply to that comment:

Exactly. Someone holding negative opinions about your gender and it hurting your feelings isn’t the same as many someones, with power and influence and connections to policy makers, holding negative opinions of your gender that they then codify into government or at least social policy.

I’ll let ‘em have a little think about the gender that has historically had the overwhelmingly most access and connections to political power.

Why doesn't it occur to these people that men in power can as easily hold negative opinions about members of their own sex, especially those who belong to the working class, or to a different race/ethnicity/religion?

It's absurd how the male sex is said to have greater access and connections to political power when only a small fraction ever enjoy it, while the wives, sisters, mothers of powerful men and hypergamous women are ignored. The bourgeoisie is replaced by the male sex.

The top comments are a good illustration of the gamma bias: the effects of misandry are reduced to a few people hurting feelings, while the effects of misogyny are exaggerated as a large group of evil, powerful men specifically hurting women.