Is feminism a hate movement?

bigeyedbunny

April 20, 2016

33 upvotes

/r/MGTOW

Archived from /r/MGTOW

r/MGTOW is a community for men going their own way by forging their own identities and paths to self-defined success; cutting through collective ideas of what a man is.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MGTOW archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Is feminism a hate movement?
Author	bigeyedbunny
Upvotes	33
Comments	29
Date	April 20, 2016 7:54 AM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/4fmalg/is_feminism_a_hate_movement/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/is-feminism-a-hate-movement.635940 https://theredarchive.com/post/635940

[–]ransay327720 points21 points22 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 10 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Let me change that for you, undesirable women. There's plenty of beautiful femenist but they all have horrible personalities most of the time. The "reasonable ones" are just gaming the system even harder. There's even a split among femenism pushing back against the lower class femnazi.

[–]Genetiks273 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WakingUpAlice1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]nb4hnp6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]thrownaway_MGTOW2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]User-31f64a4e2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 10 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Jesus.. these crazy ass bitches got that hitler vibe going on.

[–]lostapwbm1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]unappreciatedgenius 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]legault88[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Bartand-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Griever114-4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]the-tominator-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The point of this post is to show that there was a hateful streak long ago.

I don't think the suffragettes were 'feminists' in any way like the modern sense. For a start, they had a clear focused purpose, reflected in their name "suffrage -etts/ists". Neither did they call themselves feminists (as far as I know), although the word "feminist" has existed since way before then.

Looking at feminism, there is no clear objective or purpose in the name. The only thing it implies is "female -ist", which is telling because it's hard to pin down exactly what feminism as a whole is, except for 'pro-female'. Individual feminists and strains/subgroups of feminism sometimes have one or more clear goals, but overall there isn't one clear, practical goal that unites them all.

For example, while a feminist in an Islamic country might have the goal of equal rights, a feminist in the West won't have that goal (although they think that's their goal) because they already have that and more here. Their goals move, to providing shelter for female domestic violence victims, to campaigning against manspreading and mansplaining, to whatever objective they think will help advance women in general - sometimes noble (like DV shelters, if they don't exclude men or campaign against male ones), sometimes not.

The suffragettes were a focused "single-issue" group (these groups are the ones who normally get the most success because they'd focused on one thing, and don't normally "overstep their bounds"). Feminism is really an umbrella term, like conservatism or liberalism, that includes quite different groups but are loosely united in some way. For feminism this is the benefit of women, for conservatism it is the preservation of tradition, and for (classical) liberalism it is choice - to continue with the previous examples.

[–]thrownaway_MGTOW0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[removed]

[–]Jaeryth 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]RfrankieR2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]bigeyedbunny[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Botanical-Concepts0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Bus9ja2d 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 10 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

Men would be 'gathered' for reproduction at 33%

[–]bowie747-4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well your not wrong. Pimps have on average 2-4 ladies. And im sure if jesus came down here and told women to spread it they would. But 33% men in the world. There would be wars breaking out over dick. Plus those women would be manly as fuck lol!

Plus those women would be manly as fuck lol!

You haven't seen Russian women, have you?

That's what happens when there's a lack of men. It has led to competition among women, which leads to them putting effort into their appearance and themselves.

[–]Happen_On_A_Ciggy1 point 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Comments