Thoughts?

TheUltimateThug · 2019-06-16T05:59:21+00:00

Wrong. I have a problem providing for a women who think she’s entitled to my resources.

I have a problem with providing for ungrateful sluts.

Why provide for someone who can never be satisfied?

Don’t provide for anyone but yourself.

RealBiggly · 2019-06-16T08:19:27+00:00

I have a problem with the fact that the more a man provides, the more he is then legally obliged to keep on providing.

What sick scrotum came up with THAT stupidity?

TheRealEyesWideOpen · 2019-06-16T06:02:23+00:00

I have a problem providing for women. What do they bring to the table beside vagina? Fuck that. Let them provide for themselves.

ice_piercer · 2019-06-16T06:07:08+00:00

This still suggests that a man should be the one providing for woman, mgtow is about liberating yourself from that agenda and live life to the fullest. Just my two cents.

marcopoloman · 2019-06-16T06:15:59+00:00

If I am working full time and she isn't. She better take care of everything at home. Otherwise the man is just a drone for a lazy queen.

roflcopt0rz_returns · 2019-06-16T10:54:09+00:00

I don't have a problem with women because I'm allergic to vaginas or anything like that

I have a problem with shitty people, regardless of if they're a man or woman

It just so happens that the percent of women who are shitty is higher than the percent of men who are shitty

In addition to that, women have ridiculous and unlawful power over men that they can use with zero consequences, which only corrupts them further (if they're not already corrupted, unlimited power will eventually corrupt them) and makes them even more dangerous and shitty to interact with. If you interact with women at all you are required to at least have one witness you have complete trust in who can vouch for you ("Mike Pence Rule") and that's the bare minimum. This immediately rules out anything sexual with women, since sex requires privacy (unless you both like being watched or something, idk i'm not judging) which means you have no witnesses to vouch for you.

remmuh1985 · 2019-06-16T11:05:47+00:00

I'm willing to take the responsibility, but only after I can have total authority over that which I'm responsible for.

Vorobubumgtwanyan · 2019-06-16T14:43:42+00:00

I have a problem with being NEGATIVELY motivated to take responsibility for something I have NO authority over.

By negative motivation I mean we are punished if we don't provide for a woman.

Instead of positive motivation, which would be rewarded for providing for a woman.

Cheese-bo-bees · 2019-06-16T06:41:53+00:00

Screw that, after the millennia we've kept them alive, women should provide. Now they're so full of themselves that they want to be in the workforce, they should care for their men how they should!

RedPilledLife · 2019-06-16T09:36:20+00:00

Wrong, i have a problem with women...

eduardkoopman · 2019-06-16T11:09:15+00:00

Men don't have a problem with providing for a woman.

I do have a problem with that myself.

I have only 1 exception, that i wouldn't have problem with it and that one is:* if a woman has our child/children, for like the first 5-8 years after the birth of the child/children. So that she can take care full-time of our child/children and everything around that.

Since I don't want children, above exception doesn't apply for me.

Also, I would only do above mentioned exception, if the government wouldn't have the power to fuck me over afterwards. And that is nowadays possible in most Wester countries that the government will fuck me over; becasue where the woman often has to option to go to family court and get child-support which will largely be hidden alimony. Like, family courts making fathers pay $1000/month on child support for 1 child, while in reality it "only" costs her $400/month to take care of the child, and thus the other $600 is basically just hidden alimony for her to spend on her own (under the false pretense of being "child support").

hakoonamatata9 · 2019-06-16T12:26:20+00:00

AWALT.

Wharfcat · 2019-06-16T13:03:09+00:00

I don't provide for a woman therefore, no problem.

gerykelf · 2019-06-16T13:31:58+00:00

No. They are pretty much fine with that. But not really fine providing only to be lectured on everything, be told how useless they are, being called potential rapists, being made fun of all the time and being thrown out when they are no longer interesting.

julianleung · 2019-06-16T13:39:12+00:00

Dont quote tradcon please.

MiddleAgedMGTOW · 2019-06-16T13:42:33+00:00

Her provision isn’t my problem. It’s hers. They are all “strong and independent” so they can take care of themselves

TheAnarxoCapitalist · 2019-06-16T13:42:54+00:00

I think I'd have a problem with a woman I'm providing for with absolutely no authority on her life or my family + a legal system rigged to trap me into paying for her for the rest of my life as a slave.

MrSouthernGothic · 2019-06-16T16:02:54+00:00

Completely agree

Edgar_c619 · 2019-06-16T19:28:35+00:00

Men are great providers and that is what we are designed to do.

However, what kind of person would like to keep providing for someone ungrateful for months,years , or even decades?

I truly believe that if women did their part... which includes being respectful, clean, and loyal... a lot more men would be willing to share their resources with the woman.

Do not provide for any entitled people. No one is entitled to anything in this world.

Hanz_64 · 2019-06-16T21:54:05+00:00

Men i want a women that does housework stays at home and looks after kids and then u get this shit pls make up ur mind mf

GateKeeper7665 · 2019-06-17T00:39:00+00:00

I could not have said that better!

Title	Thoughts?
Author	thatfedoraguy
Upvotes	224
Comments	26
Date	June 16, 2019 5:52 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/c16s3m/thoughts/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/thoughts.446047 https://theredarchive.com/post/446047

Comments