TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Conservatives and so called progressives have one thing in common: being misandrists

gratis_eekhoorn

October 15, 2020
32 upvotes
/r/MensRights

​

https://preview.redd.it/9oe8hjf36bt51.jpg?width=1100&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=26f8ce9ad2dfff5f2377bb2515d2cd65705c40e1

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Conservatives and so called progressives have one thing in common: being misandrists
Author

gratis_eekhoorn

Upvotes 32
Comments 27
Date October 15, 2020 7:17 PM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/jbu852/conservatives_and_so_called_progressives_have_one/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/conservatives-and-so-called-progressives-have-one.1194427
https://theredarchive.com/post/1194427
Top posts by gratis_eekhoorn

man brutally mudered by two women and nobody talks about it

236 upvotes
February 2, 2020
/r/MensRights

Reminder about generalizing language

160 upvotes
September 6, 2024
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

''We shouldn't let refugees in because they are mostly male''

138 upvotes
August 11, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

They have zero empathy

128 upvotes
March 18, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

Happy international men's day! (+LWMA lounge)

104 upvotes
November 19, 2023
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Profile of a random user replied to my 2 years old comment.

91 upvotes
August 26, 2024
/r/EverydayMisandry

I'd like to talk about the state and future of this sub

90 upvotes
July 27, 2023
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Reminder about posting

76 upvotes
September 18, 2024
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Comments

[–]Waterman_619 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I agree with your point in general. But not in this context.

Here they are forced to show off their progressive ideology by saying cliched dialogues like this. It is RBG's seat that she is taking afterall. A few theatrics is the minimum she will have to do.

[–]gratis_eekhoorn 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's ''progressive'' to say boys are inferior what a time to be alive

[–]kanray86 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's not a theater lmao. barrett has no problem refusing to answer the most basic questions and saying roe should be be a superprecedent.

women regardless of political leaning often hold these misandric views. just go look at tomi lahren lose her mind about men. that's why notorious misandrist andrea dworkin wrote a book dedicated to working with conservative women. this is not as much of a political issue than a women issue

[–]Long-Chair-7825 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Misandry isn't a left-wing issue. It's a societal issue. And to claim otherwise reduces our impact.

For anyone who considers themselves left-wing, or even just wants another place for logical discussion, check out r/leftwingmaleadvocates

[–]gratis_eekhoorn 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

never said it was

[–]Long-Chair-7825 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know. I was using your post as evidence of my statement. Sorry for any confusion.

[–]DignifiedAlpaca 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Misandry is not a left-wing issue, but 95% of the people I see actually fighting back against it have been right wing, so it is kind of hard for me to ignore that.

That being said though, I support the sub you are linking to. Obviously not all left-wing people are ignoring the misandry in society, and it is good that there is a subreddit that promotes this fact.

[–]Long-Chair-7825 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I actually think Andrew Yang generally agrees with us, or at least with Intactivism, since he originally said he was against circumcision before back tracking. However, he knows he'll become public enemy number 1 if he acknowledges that, and recognizes that he can do more good as president than as a wannabe. I think and hope he'll run again in 2024, and might even win next time

[–]DignifiedAlpaca 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I think Yang started out that way, but then he took a wrong turn somewhere, and went insane. It was very sad to see.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/eeb1vf/our_country_is_deeply_misogynist_and_most_all_of/

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/eedzw9/andrew_yang_we_all_that_know_when_men_get/

[–]Long-Chair-7825 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I've seen the second part and didn't think it was that bad, but the first link... Oh well. He's still pretty much the only candidate supporting UBI in any form, though, so it may be worth it anyway.

[–]DignifiedAlpaca 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I can't prove this, but I have a hunch as to what happened to him. He once sent out a message on Twitter pointing out that white people are the ones most likely to be impacted by the opioid crisis, and after he did that, he started getting tons of endorsements from white supremacist groups. Lots of left wing news outlets that preferred other candidates in the Democratic primary started to use this against him, even though he disavowed the white supremacist groups several times.

And it looks to me like that was the point at which he started saying tons of weird things against men and white people, in order to "prove" to the woke crowd that he is not on the side of far right hate groups.

This is what makes me really sad about politics. It seems that because the truth can be used against you, as a politician, you have to say the things that work out the best for you politically, regardless of whether it is true or even whether it is morally right.

On a positive note though, it might just be a function of the current political environment. It's possible that in better times when people are more able to work together, a candidate who was like what Yang was would have been able to do a lot better without bowing down to the SJW hate mob.

[–]Long-Chair-7825 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's a shame. But yeah, I'm thinking a more stable political environment would help. We are currently in a world where it's an argument of who's worse, not who's better.

[–]DignifiedAlpaca 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well stated.

[–]EvilLothar 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But the left wing are pretty much anti-logic.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're confusing main stream liberals and neo libs with the actual left wing.

[–]Long-Chair-7825 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As shown by the linked sub in the very same comment he was responding to.

[–]ConcernedRobot -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I mean the rabid sexists are primarily on the left. The left is to males what the KKK was to black people at this point.

[–]Long-Chair-7825 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So there are/were KKK members who don't hate black people?

[–]ConcernedRobot 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The point was that the left actively hates, degrades, and has made themselves the enemy of males. There might be some good people in the party, but if the right did just 1% of what they do to males to females, they would instantly become the enemy of women, and a gender based version of the KKK according to the left. Hell the right doesn't even do that and are already called that by the left. When is the last time people on Fox wrote articles about sexual abusing and mutilating women's genitals in public in front of laughing males? When is the last time they advocated for hating females, and ridiculed victims of sexual abuse, genital mutilation, and murder? When is the last time they tried to downplay females getting raped as not really being raped, or tried to say that women getting shamed for their sexual performance, genital appearance, or cheated on was justifiable and a man's right? It didn't happen. But you can not say the same of the Washington Post, the New York Times, and CNN. Their side is neck deep in sexism, and people have every right to hate them for it.

And btw, just for arguments sake, I remember one of my teachers in high school who was for civil rights during the movement, talk about how there were a lot of people who were for segregation that switched sides when violence started happening, notably a famous incident in which a church was bombed which killed several children. The way he described it, it sounded like those people didn't hate black people, but had some idea of being socially/culturally incompatible with each other, or thought that it was improper. It sounded like they believed that in order to co-exist, it would be better to interact from a distance, and if we did that everyone would be happier. And you need to remember that integration hadn't really been tried, or at least was pretty new at that point, so it is easy to see why they thought that. There were black people who also believed this. For example, Malcolm X was a very strong advocate for segregation during the Civil rights movement, and believed black people should be separate from white people. He actually ended up butting heads with the leader of the Nation of Islam, Elijah Muhammad, who wanted Malcolm X to calm down. This also escalated when Malcolm X notably said that JFK get his head blown open was karma for racism, which he later regretted. He eventually made a pilgrimage to Mecca and left the nation of Islam. When he came back from Mecca, he said it had changed him, and he became more open to integration. I don't know if some of the pro segregation that became pro integration were in the KKK or not, but it wouldn't surprise me.

[–]rabel111 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the casual misandry that decades of feminist influence in education and media have normalised.

The casual misandry of ACB suggests that the religious conservative population may be better served by the Supreme Court balance, but men and boys will not.

[–]PurplePlatypusBear20 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That is generalizing.

[–]DignifiedAlpaca 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I can't believe people are willing to generalize about an entire gender like that. It's extremely ignorant.

[–]PurplePlatypusBear20 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I’m saying the post generalizes conservatives.

[–]DignifiedAlpaca 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh. Well, I agree with you then that it is wrong to generalize conservatives as well.

[–]DignifiedAlpaca 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here is an article with more info on what she said: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/anything-boys-can-do-girls-can-do-better-amy-coney-barrett-reflects-on-motto-she-lived-by

[–]shinbet 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In this context it is misandrist, but not generally, it's unusual for a concervitive to say something like this

[–]Lion_amongst_gods -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Congratulations, you have now applied feminist technique to men's rights.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter