~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
TheBananaKing
[removed]
[–]MantusPlantus19 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Although I don't agree with using tax payer money to fund services that exclude the male homeless population, here is some context from their website.
So the government required these shelters under new policy to compete for funding. They give most of the money to the "big four" religious charities who are now the main non-government providers of homeless services. The table scraps are given to a couple dozen other "specialized" shelters to compete over which is no where near enough to maintain all of them.
They are trying to save their shelters from being shut down due to insufficient funding. I'm not sure what benefits are made by excluding men, and they don't really elaborate on the website other than marketing it as "specialized" care for women and children.
Probing deeper they seem to belong to what they term the "Women's Refuge Movement", being a collective of different refuges across the Sydney area that were more or less established around 40 years ago. They are women only, women-run, and they operate on feminist principles.
I found this article.
By focusing on homelessness – and ''families'' – we lose sight of women and the women-centred vaues [sic] that have informed the establishment and running of so many services. And the tender simply ignored them. As a result more than 60 such services statewide have lost their funding (a combined total of $5 million) and are set to close.
I'm confused, aren't women part of families? Women homeless aren't considered homeless? I guess this leaves us with more questions than answers.
My speculation based on my reading is that because the majority of women are homeless due to domestic violence, their intent is to seperate them from men and offer specific counseling to accelerate their recovery. So basically, it's specialized care for female homeless victims. I cannot say I agree with excluding tax dollars as long as there are still men sleeping on the street, and their justification would lie in trying to prove why women are a special case. Although, I maybe overlooking something.
[–][deleted]21 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is a documentary that discusses feminist run, women's only shelters. It's not a positive thing. Sweden is a rather extreme example but the concept is similar. Rarely do these women recieve the kind of care they need and often are just fed ideology in lieu of therapy or other necessary services.
[–]EJSpurrell12 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This reminds me of those missionaries who raise money from the congregation in order to fly to Africa to help starving children... by bringing bibles.
[–][deleted]3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Off topic but, I've met those people on many occasions and the whole idea is disgusting to me. The people they try and convert need clean water and medicine, not Jesus.
[–]speedisavirus2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So they are a cesspool for male discrimination...
[–]Steampunk_Moustache13 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah, because if there's anything we need, it's even more women-only services. 90% of homeless are men, but let's pump all of our resources into helping that small fraction of women!
[–]TheThinMan341 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is the first thing that came to my mind. And then people wonder why there are still so many homeless out there.
Edit: so really, in the gender fights, homeless guys get the shortest end of the stick.
[–]philosarapter12 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Can you imagine if someone posted "fight for white only services"?
[–]notacrackheadofficer3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What the fuck is that crown symbol?
[–]Redskull6735 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"princess entitlement mentality"
[–]blueoak93 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
KEEP CLAM AND WHINE.
[–]ThePigmanAgain1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Keep clam?
[–]blueoak91 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I guess it's a Seattle joke. There's a chain of fast food seafood restaurants around here that joked off the Blitz-era posters "Keep Calm and Carry On" as "Keep Clam and Carry Out".
Oh, i see. I apologize for thinking you had gone insane.
[–]MuzakNinja1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The crown with the female symbol says it all. Those poor, lonely bitches...
Boo fucking hoo. You want to know what "shelters run on feminist principles" means? It means a sign outside the shelter saying that no boys 13 years or older are allowed to stay with mom and the rest of the kids, that's what it means. Fucking worthless animals.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]MantusPlantus19 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]21 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]EJSpurrell12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]speedisavirus2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Steampunk_Moustache13 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheThinMan341 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]philosarapter12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]notacrackheadofficer3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Redskull6735 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak93 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ThePigmanAgain1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak91 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ThePigmanAgain1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MuzakNinja1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ThePigmanAgain1 point [recovered] | Copy Link