How often have we heard this line from feminists about how Feminism or Equality "Isn't a zero sum game"?

And how feminists condescendingly say "Getting women more rights / protections does not come at the cost of men's rights / protections"

Yet the actions of feminism / feminists clearly point to the opposite being true?
A few key examples:

  • The Duluth Model of DV a model which was drafted, composed and pushed by feminists, a model which is still in use / informs police decisions TODAY a model which assumes at the outset that in ALL cases of domestic violence involving a man and a woman, the man is ALWAYS the aggressor and the woman is ALWAYS the victim..
    In short, a piece of policy created by feminists to benefit women at the cost / expense of men's rights / protections.

  • Or when FEMINISTS campaigned the UN to have Female Circumcision reclassified as "Female Genital Mutilation" (FGM) and for the practice to be outlawed..
    Yet these same feminists couldn't be bothered to ask for Male Circumcision to get the same treatment?
    Once again, Feminism / Feminists pushing for policy / change which benefits / protects women but at the cost / lack of protection for men.

  • How about The National Organization for Women (NOW) and how it constantly campaigns against men's rights advocates pushing for 50/50 split custody to be the default / norm decision in family courts?
    Its not like men are pushing for men to be assumed the default career / get custody by default.. but once again they are pushing back to continue benefiting women at the cost / expense of men.

  • Or how feminists in the UK are pushing for Misogyny to be classified a hate crime but not Misandry
    Or how they want to make 'staring' a sexual crime punishable akin to rape
    Or how they want to stop sending women to prison / close women's prisons.. sending men to prison however is still fine / expected apparently..

I could go on with examples but I think the above get my point across.
The point is, Feminism is absolutely a "Zero Sum Game" in which the only focus is on how women benefit. If men get harmed / lose out on rights / protections in the process then it is seen as either necessary or an acceptable outcome..

TL;DR: If feminists tell you that "Equality isn't a Zero Sum Game" ask them to prove it by showing what tangible benefits feminism has won for men and then compare it to the tangible rights / benefits it has won for women..

Then laugh as they can only come up with one or two examples for men but can list nearly 20 things that feminism has done for women.