https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladiator#Women

Take this for example

Roman morality required that all gladiators be of the lowest social classes, and emperors who failed to respect this distinction earned the scorn of posterity. Cassius Dio takes pains to point out that when the much admired emperor Titus used female gladiators, they were of acceptably low class.

Some regarded female gladiators of any type or class as a symptom of corrupted Roman appetites, morals and womanhood. Probably as a result, he banned the use of female gladiators in 200 AD.

Doesn't this mentality look familiar to you? Say modern morality?

Its completely moral for female spectator sitting in the comfort of auditorium and watch male slaughtering each other, but its immoral if reversed

Women never needed a movement for their privilege in the first place, gynocentrism and the disposability of male went as far as when societies and civilizations begun.

Not to mention general labory, slavery, warfare in ancient times were mostly all bond to the sacrifice of male, female mostly had the best protection and comfort it could have at the time. If anything its the lack of technology that contribute to the low quality of life women have back in time instead of social problem, put it simple: if the time is bad for women, then its even worse for men.

If you are a male slave in ancient time, compare to a female slave, who do you think would have a better chance of surviving? When feminists points out patriarchy, they ignore all the other factor that comes into play, comparing low class female to high class male is a gimmick they use all the time.

The funny thing is, from every source, let it be books, movies, tvs, games, when people point out the example of patriarchy, i see gynocentrism. There really are two sides to everything afterall. The entire foundation of feminism is built on the belief of predominance of the patriarchy, but that is just one-sided view, without addressing view-point from both angle, there will never be equality.