When a Feminist is talking, she insists that her understanding of the situation and how it appears to her is a valid contribution to the debate: it's "her experience."

But when a man tries to contribute his own lived experience to a debate, it's labeled "mansplaining" and dismissed.

This is someone reviewing Warren Farrell's "Why men are the way they are."

"Well, actually... you can travel back in time and have a mansplainer mansplain to you, by redrawing playgirl cartoons, and writing nonsensical screeds using gratuitous Cathy comics as visual aids. In Farrell's world; comic strips are valid research materials and accusing a man of molesting a child is just sexism.

I bought this for a class. It wasn't even a class on the ridiculousness of the MRA "movement".

I'll have fun burning it in my firepit." (Reviewer "EM" on goodreads)

Still straining at gnats and swallowing camels, I don't doubt.

I've read Farrell's "The Myth of Male Power" and found him OK, but a bit dated. I've now ordered the above book out of sheer irritation.