Men, do not be fooled.

63daddy · 2026-01-16T17:46:01+00:00

I think you are preaching to the choir here. Most here realize feminism isn’t the movement of equality it claims to be but rather has lobbied for policies disadvantaging men and to that end has also released a great deal of anti-male disinformation including revisionist history.

Sadly, many people just buy into this disinformation never even considering the fact it may not be true. As I said in an earlier post I think this is gong to get even worse with AI which is already citing such disinformation while ignoring more objective information out there.

Imaginary_Group4052 · 2026-01-16T17:43:19+00:00

They know what they are doing. They know we suffer. They know it’s wrong. And they are enjoying themselves. Do not make any mistake about it.

We know they know. They are also excellent at when one needs to be silent. Lol

_WutzInAName_ · 2026-01-16T18:21:45+00:00

Those of us who have been paying attention to what feminists say and do aren’t fooled. We’ve got lists of their misandrist, female supremacist quotes. We’ve seen them shut down programs to help men. We’ve seen them promote programs that jail men based on false accusations. We’ve seen them infiltrate the media to drum up hate against men.

Each of us needs to publicize the misconduct of feminists as often as we can to discredit them and their man-hating agenda.

From u/MounatinGoat:

Misandry Kills

I’m a scientist. I build arguments from evidence, not ideology. So when I say misandry kills, I’m not being hyperbolic - I’m counting bodies.

49,000 men died by suicide in the US last year (www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/suicide.htm). That’s one every 11 minutes. Men die by suicide at four times the rate women do, and that gap keeps growing.

Here’s what nobody wants to talk about: when we examine the systems correlated with these deaths, we find feminist fingerprints everywhere.

The Duluth Model - created by feminist activists Ellen Pence and Michael Paymar in 1981 - arrests male domestic violence victims when they call for help. It was explicitly built on the theory that domestic violence is “patriarchal terrorism” by men against women (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model). When male victims get arrested instead of helped, that’s not a bug. That’s the framework working exactly as designed. Pence herself later admitted: “We created a conceptual framework that didn’t fit the lived experience of many of the men and women we were working with.”

Family courts separate fathers from children at rates that correlate directly with suicide. Divorced men have double the suicide risk of married men (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1731658/). When states adopt joint custody laws, male suicide rates drop 9% (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14652268). That’s roughly 4,400 lives per year that policy could save. But we don’t, because acknowledging it would require examining whether feminist advocacy for maternal custody preference contributed to the problem.

Men die at work at nine times the rate women do - 5,041 deaths versus 445 in 2022 (www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfoi_revised22.htm). Yet workplace safety advocacy focuses overwhelmingly on getting women into boardrooms, not reducing male occupational mortality. When men are dying in logging, fishing, and construction at rates that would spark international intervention if they affected women, and nobody’s talking about it - that’s not oversight. That’s systematic devaluation.

Criminal justice gives men 63% longer sentences than women for identical crimes (papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002). That’s larger than racial sentencing disparities. Women are twice as likely to avoid prison entirely. But there’s no movement demanding we address this gap, because the framework we use to identify injustice doesn’t recognize men as potential victims of systemic bias.

Title IX procedures removed due process protections for accused students in 2011. The president of the Association of Title IX Administrators admits 40-50% of campus sexual assault allegations are “baseless,” yet the system uses a 50.01% evidence standard. Black men are disproportionately targeted - at some schools they’re 4x more likely to be accused despite being tiny minorities of the student population. Hundreds of lawsuits have been filed by wrongfully accused students whose lives were destroyed on allegations alone.

Governor Newsom issued an executive order in July 2025 addressing California’s “alarming rise in suicides and disconnection among young men and boys.” He noted that California has extensive infrastructure for women and girls’ wellbeing, but virtually nothing comparable for boys and men - despite one in four young men having no close friends (up from one in twenty in 1990), despite male unemployment exceeding female, despite boys failing at every educational level.

Even a Democratic governor in a blue state now recognizes the crisis.

Here’s what’s telling: when you search academic databases for “gender bias in research funding,” every single study examines bias against women. Not one investigates whether men’s issues are underfunded. When men try to advocate - Warren Farrell at University of Toronto (www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0), campus men’s groups at Ryerson - they get physically blockaded by feminist protesters or banned entirely. The Canadian Federation of Students officially opposes men’s rights groups as “misogynist” in policy.

The research gap isn’t an accident. It’s suppression.

I’ve been told these harms are all caused by “patriarchy” or “toxic masculinity” - that men did this to themselves. But the Duluth Model wasn’t created by patriarchy. It was created by feminists, based on feminist theory, and implemented as policy. Family court presumptions didn’t emerge from toxic masculinity. They came from feminist advocacy starting in the 1800s. Title IX procedures weren’t designed by male power brokers. They were implemented through feminist lobbying.

When feminist-designed systems correlate with male deaths, and the theoretical framework says it’s still men’s fault, that framework exists to make feminist culpability invisible.

Men are dying at epidemic rates. Boys are failing at every educational level. Fathers are being systematically separated from children. Male domestic violence victims are being arrested. Men receive massively longer criminal sentences. Prime-age male labor force participation has collapsed from 98% to 89% since 1954.

And when anyone tries to discuss it, they’re told they’re playing “oppression olympics” or engaging in “whataboutism.”

At what point does systematic indifference to male death, combined with active opposition to anyone trying to address it, become functionally equivalent to causing it?

I’m not asking you to stop caring about women’s issues. I’m asking you to acknowledge that men are dying under systems that feminist ideology built, and that dismissing those deaths as “patriarchy backfiring” is just a way to avoid examining whether the movement that claims to want gender equality has caused catastrophic harm to half the population.

The bodies are real. The policies are documented. The correlations are measurable.

Misandry kills. And we’re not allowed to talk about it.

reality_upside_down · 2026-01-16T18:26:50+00:00

The best way to fight this is to ignore them out of existence and close your wallets to anything that enables them. Choose your battles with them wisely because we live in a society with favours them over us.

Lanky-Attempt-2086 · 2026-01-16T18:00:25+00:00

Just by the number of testaments to this that are out there, I agree.

Play acting: dressing up, talking, advanced story telling techniques, expressions, lies

fabrication: phony calls, emails, theft of data, text messages made to compromise your position,

Social media campaigns: job termination, cancellation in general, soliciting your previous girlfriends to turn on you or risk being punished, coaching people who didn't identify as victims to identify, coaching what should be said, group stalking: taking pictures of you in public and spreading the lies whereever you go in hopes people hurt you in whatever way (putting things in your food, ruining access to whatever)

These are all actions of a deliberate offense. This much technique demands a lot of clear thought. Someone who studies these cases/situations had to come up with them.

If you wanted to argue that they're able to achieve all this out of the need for justice I have a question. If you spent your life as a good person and something like this hits you, PTSD should be there. Mental inability/ etc.

With strange circumstances and precise offense like this, would it reflect PTSD? The fact that someone can run around and "tell their truth"? No. It's already been stated by professionals that it's extremely hard to share details of something truly devastating. Much less trying to make an HBO special out of it everywhere you go. Reveling in the attention.

True victims hate talking about it because it hurts to do so. We all have things we don't like to talk about for that reason.

As a special side note, I've seen a special type of person that can't bring themselves to think about these things. They see red and all they want to do is attack whatever perceived transgressor. Lawyers/detectives like this will do untold damage because they can't muster the clarity of thought. And given their privileged/protected position all a person can really do is hope for a heaven and hell to truly exist, where punishment for their thoughtless actions will be given.

TL/DR: if they are displaying advanced techniques of offense it is probably not a victim/good person.

Hefty-Rip-5397 · 2026-01-17T01:18:23+00:00

Yeah.... I hear you but I have to fight my war differently because im still married to the woman that caused me to search and find this sub. I will not raise my kids from afar, as a weekend dad. Its almost come to that but im holding on. Not saying theres anything wrong with it when men choose to separate, but my children need ME... not me on the weekend and some step-dad through the week simping for my ex.. im standing my ground on many things and trying to make her see that I love her and the kids more than she'll know. But I saw it too late.. she didnt show her radical side until way AFTER we married. So.. I will stick this out at least another 13 years. (My youngest is 5) and most importantly I need to show my daughter not only what to expect from a good man, but HOW TO TREAT A GOOD MAN. Thats my battle for the foreseeable future and I will not just leave. Stay strong gentlemen.

GarlicFalse3779 · 2026-01-16T19:20:00+00:00

Start by consulting your workplace's legal department and see if you can install cameras in all the areas where you are at work, and also have a body camera. Having proof of innocence is necessary because humans are not presumed innocent in practice.

ExcitementRealistic7 · 2026-01-16T18:44:47+00:00

That's due to simps, cucks and beta males and those who you are not allowed to criticize. If you know you know, if you notice you notice.

Contribution-Horror · 2026-01-17T06:51:49+00:00

A lot of these feminazi women are either about to get to the age of less fertility or already are and yet continue to complain they haven't found their man yet... Gee, I wonder why?

FrequentPotato6116 · 2026-01-17T11:25:34+00:00

Well said. Men need to stop giving their power to women. We give those kinds of women to much attention. I realized in 2025.

Some women won’t change their behavior even if they see it’s wrong because it benefits them and us talking will never be impactful because of the way we do it now. We speak in hope that women will listen and understand but they don’t speak words. Action is the only thing those women understand. If you can leave the workplace because they’re not listening to your concern about one or multiple women then leave. If you have to leave your relationship, prepare yourself and leave. If there’s a woman in front of you arguing for nothing just ignore her and leave. If the situation doesn’t benefit you, leave.

Long story short, I’m not telling men to flee or avoid women, I’m saying we entertain them too much and it makes them feel important. Also we don’t fight for the right things. We eleveate our voice to argue with them but we entertain too much of the laws, gender roles that only benefit them and behavior that only benefit them too much. As the OP said, speak up when you can and keep your boundaries up

jack_avram · 2026-01-19T11:32:24+00:00

They hatefully disregard the idea that our existence right now was collaboration between men and women for millions of years. Nope, just mass catastrophic population decline is their future prospect and vision for the species, amongst mostly ego stroking of some pathologically individualist empowerment. Psychological operations for decades to reprogram a perception that men are subhuman, not the collaborative half of humanity. Empowerment is a clever encapsulating label for the perception, indoctrinating through insecurities - only fading in lonely elderly years, realizing the lack of family, children, collaboration - is a painfully real void in the final years.

Ok-Bed-4064 · 2026-01-20T02:33:24+00:00

I wish you the best, but our worst enemy is in our own home. It’s your relatives who sabotage your life repeatedly, un-impededly. Remember those who were born here and have left the world young.

Global_Rate3281 · 2026-01-16T18:36:34+00:00

Did you just say that women and feminism are responsible for homelessness? Bro no offense you sort of deserve to be made fun of….

Title	Men, do not be fooled.
Author	vessel94
Upvotes	210
Comments	29
Date	January 16, 2026 5:35 PM UTC (7 months ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1qemiup/men_do_not_be_fooled/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/men-do-not-be-fooled.1571294 https://theredarchive.com/post/1571294

Comments