Women expect to be provided for by men. In domesticity, this forms the basis of Briffault's Law. Withdrawal of sex and affection is the crude control mechanism whereby women ensure that they'll get their own way. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/

Then, women made incursions into the realms of male-dominated employment...where they still expect to receive preference & provision. It's the basis of EEO, AA, ESG, DEI and all the other BS. Yet, the ladies continue to use sex, the promise of sex, or the suggestion of sex, to seek advantage and smooth their path. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/

Yet, if their aims are unfulfilled, and they don't get that big promotion, or they don't get that part in the producer's next film, the male patsy can probably look forward to a 'sexual harassment' rap. This is no more than Briffault's Law in the workplace.

Now, it seems that they even expect election results to be foregone conclusions in their favour. After the US Presidential elections of 2024, there soon followed feminist calls for women to deny men sex, to hold a sex strike. Until what...? Until we see sense, and the result is rescinded, because women didn't get what they wanted and expected? This is peak female entitlement and delusion, that they can use the same tired old trick to get what they want. Briffault's Law in the wokeplace. Enough, already.

As the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer opined, back in 1865: "Women have only one kind of business."