TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

walterwallcarpet Archive

View 85 posts and 3,000 comments by walterwallcarpet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
426

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights24/10/23 08:47 AM
260

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights20/11/23 09:05 AM
178

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:54 AM
177

Marriage/Childrenwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights15/05/25 02:08 PM
176

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:33 AM
156

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:22 AM
148

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:47 AM
145

Healthwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:47 AM
143

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights19/03/25 07:33 AM
142

Discriminationwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:24 AM
130

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:11 PM
128

Legal Rightswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights06/03/25 09:42 AM
126

Legal Rightswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights24/10/23 08:32 AM
117

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights29/03/25 05:13 PM
111

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights26/03/25 05:08 PM
107

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights05/07/24 07:15 AM
107

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights05/11/24 12:34 PM
99

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:22 AM
99

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights05/04/25 12:03 PM
99

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:30 PM
99

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:43 PM
96

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights10/07/24 05:36 AM
96

Legal Rightswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights15/01/25 08:51 AM
96

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights13/06/24 09:54 AM
90

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights27/12/24 01:50 PM
90

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights24/06/24 01:22 PM
88

Marriage/Childrenwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:25 AM
84

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights24/07/24 08:43 AM
81

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:14 AM
75

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:17 AM
72

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights01/02/25 11:10 AM
70

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights10/12/24 10:27 AM
68

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:36 AM
66

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:25 AM
65

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights02/06/25 11:58 AM
60

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:33 AM
60

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights04/06/25 06:42 AM
57

Legal Rightswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights07/01/25 08:50 AM
57

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:21 AM
56

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights29/11/24 03:19 AM
54

Healthwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:34 PM
53

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:54 AM
52

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:03 AM
50

Marriage/Childrenwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights25/07/24 09:11 AM
49

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights21/01/25 12:27 PM
44

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:21 AM
44

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights24/11/24 09:31 AM
42

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights22/11/24 11:37 AM
42

Marriage/Childrenwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:02 AM
41

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights13/02/25 06:35 PM
38

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights01/03/25 09:17 AM
35

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights12/03/24 12:25 PM
34

Progresswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:43 AM
32

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights23/07/24 09:32 AM
32

Progresswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights28/09/23 08:20 AM
30

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:49 PM
30

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:29 AM
30

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights12/04/25 07:32 AM
29

Generalwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights13/06/24 08:25 AM
28

Edu./Occu.walterwallcarpet/r/MensRights01/07/24 03:26 PM
28

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights03/02/25 11:25 AM
27

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights04/07/24 05:17 AM
27

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights05/12/24 05:14 AM
25

False Accusationwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights26/11/23 10:21 AM
25

Generalwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:32 AM
24

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:40 PM
23

False Accusationwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:01 AM
19

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights26/07/24 10:25 AM
18

Generalwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights09/10/23 04:54 PM
15

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights22/10/23 10:10 AM
15

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights22/11/23 01:36 PM
15

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:15 PM
14

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights23/11/24 08:15 PM
13

Discriminationwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights24/08/23 06:51 AM
12

Humourwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:08 PM
11

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:08 AM
10

Activism/Supportwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:27 AM
5

Humourwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights25/02/25 08:54 AM
3

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights16/01/24 06:34 PM
2

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights16/01/24 06:42 PM
2

Social Issueswalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights08/02/25 09:30 AM
1

Red Pill Theorywalterwallcarpet/r/TheRedPill24/02/25 03:11 AM
0

Generalwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights09/08/24 02:41 PM
0

Sciencewalterwallcarpet/r/TheRedPill24/02/25 04:59 AM
0

Feminismwalterwallcarpet/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:48 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,000 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

At the end of 'Gone With the Wind', Clark Gable, as Rhett Butler, says: "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn!" He was ahead of his time, that bloke!
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:24 PM
1

"mostly just a matter of social vanity.." https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html ...the main, utilitarian motivator of the oestrogen-sensitive left brain. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/ hint: the right brain is testosterone sensitive... (McGilchrist, 'The Master & His Emissary' , page 33). Whereas, the left brain runs on dopamine, and is oestrogen-sensitive. In fact, dopamine receptors atro…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:46 PM
3

It has long been known (and suppressed) that women tend to initiate DV as part of mate-guarding, then can't deal with the consequences. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/ https://stevemoxon.co.uk/partner-violence-femalepredominant-aetiology/ Anecdotally, can even vouch for this. My old man, after handing over his wages to mum on a Friday, was forbidden from going into town on a Saturday to meet his friends. She was af…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:25 PM
40

Through extensive studies of previous civilisations, the collapse will take around three generations, and we're well on the road to ruin. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture It's women who defaulted from the social contract. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma Pussy and truth mix like oil and water. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:10 PM
3

Women have a HUGE advantage in their 'moral' crusade against men.... babies. Babies are living, breathing, flesh and blood clubs with which a woman can beat a man down to the ground, and compel him to toil for her. A baby is both a strategic, long-term weapon, and a tactically-useful tool in everyday battles. Perhaps many a woman would avoid baby-making altogether, were babies not invaluable in tying a man down to supporting her, even after separation and divorce. - Anatomy of Female Power https…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 12:48 PM
16

Male competition built civilisation and ethics. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Not only that, but women make men take risk in order to gain access to....women. Faint heart never won fair lady. They use it as a measure of 'reproductive fitness', at no risk to themselves. Testosterone is the fuel for risk taking. Women convert it into oestrogen, by the enzyme aromatase in their fat cells. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase
/r/MensRights07/06/25 11:43 AM
1

Agreed, they don't consciously think 'let's get 'em, uterus!!' It's subconscious. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1462 For both men and women. With oestrogen being the programming agent for both sexes. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf "As eugenics machines, the female role in life is that of judge, jury and executioner. SHE will choose whose genes are sel…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 11:35 AM
24

Exactly! Do they want the male gaze..? Don't they want it..? They don't seem to know themselves. What they really want, what they really, really want is for the top 10% of men to faun over them, and for the rest of us to go away, build infrastructure and homes for them, defend them with civil police forces and state armies, while keeping our eyes steeply averted in the presence of milady.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 09:51 AM
12

AI has woke built-in. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-68412620
/r/MensRights07/06/25 09:47 AM
19

We know this is just a movie. The problems arise when women confuse an entertainment with real life.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 09:45 AM
4

Post WW2, since women made incursion into business, commerce, politics and jurisprudence, female moral bias has been normalised. Problem is, female moral principles are a sham, based on deception, and aimed towards material gain for women. https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_Destructivists.html?id=VZzuzgEACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y It's male morals which are deontic, and attempt to be idealistic, as a result of male competition. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 09:40 AM
20

Because she is very pretty and fertile, she believes the world is at her feet, forever. After she hits the wall, nobody gonna give a fuck. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2j0jy7lreo
/r/MensRights07/06/25 09:11 AM
9

Whether it's A, B, C or D, they'll apply the universal female strategy. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ They've got to 'win' at all costs. Truth doesn't matter. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ They live their whole lives in the knowledge that they aren't quite good enough, and are both fearful and envious. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment#:~:text=The%20concept%20was%20of%20particular,of%20blame%20for%20one's%20frustration The ones w…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 08:47 AM
16

At the end of this article, the author makes a convincing case that the myriad of man-shaming tactics used by women are because they feel themselves evolutionarily entitled to judge men. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1462 Obviously, back in cave-dwelling days, there were no mirrors. Or 'beauty' filters.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 08:39 AM
10

The final paragraphs of 'The Jury' by Dan Murdoch: In the words of John Stuart Mill - 'War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that believes nothing is worth fighting for is far worse'. Well, for men, that's almost where we're at. Back in WW2, Bob Hope was fond of touring Pacific theatres of war with attractive actresses in tow, Rita Hayworth was a favourite. He'd exhort the troops: "Never forget - THIS is what you're fig…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:51 AM
1

Try this one. https://www.academia.edu/38028322/Database_of_Sources_for_Mispaternity_Rates
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:39 AM
12

Child support is typically framed as state intervention on behalf of children. In reality, it is an alternative to marriage for women. Pretty much like welfare, where men, at 72% of the income tax base, are taxed to cover the poor life choices of women, and the children of other men. As for cuckoldry within marriage/partnership..? Consigning the genes of another human being to history, by deception, is deliberate genocide. Making him pay for it takes it to a whole new level.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:33 AM
1

I did e-mail Mike Buchanan at 'Justice For Men & Boys' asking him to put it on his j4mb site. https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/06/04/pm-warned-more-funding-needed-to-halve-crime-against-women/ Warren Perkin - crusader against injustice towards men - at your service, sir! https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/
/r/MensRights07/06/25 06:49 AM
3

The Japanese call this kenjataimu, which is 'wise man time'. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Kenjataimu
/r/MensRights06/06/25 10:10 AM
3

We used to vet for emotional stability and long term compatibility, in a way which was subtle, and enjoyable for both sexes. It was called dating.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 09:43 AM
1

"Never seen a woman crying that it's offensive..." Well, you can learn something new every day. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/#:~:text=Melanie%20McDonagh%20is%20an%20Irish%20journalist%20working%20in,tests%20can%20do%20the%20job%20with%20scientific%20certainty https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf Glad to help. Here are some accurate mispaternity figures, and the female mechanism which facilitates. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 Again, glad to be of assistan…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 08:24 AM
2

Hey, don't let me stop you posting. I know you want to help (stifles uncontrollable laughter). Facing up to the truth is better than living a comfortable lie, designed to ultimately exploit. And I haven't even seen 'The Matrix'. Dealing with false accusation doesn't require AI. It simply requires women to tell the truth. Maybe you girls should face up to it more often, rather than always arguing to save face, and resorting to GSRM when you know you can't win. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019…
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:12 AM
1

Damn, they're attractive!!! /s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_%282013_film%29
/r/MensRights06/06/25 06:22 AM
1

There's a strong argument that it takes only 3 generations for the 'female emancipation' cancer to kill the entire body of society. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture We're probably well past the stage where the cancer can be excised, or treated with chemo. Instead, as OP says, AI will simply accelerate the process. AI isn't really 'intelligent'. It repeats what it's been told. It's been told that feminism is good. AI and feminists will get along just fine. …
/r/MensRights06/06/25 05:54 AM
3

With regard to children being made wards of the State, I live in Scotland, where we almost had this 'Named Person Scheme' foisted on us by the Scottish National Party (which is 70% female in its Members of the Scottish Parliament). https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-49753980#:~:text=The%20Scottish%20government%20has%20scrapped%20its%20controversial%20plan,was%20due%20to%20be%20introduced%20three%20years%20ago Jurisprudence and legislative power has passed into women's hands…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 11:12 AM
2

Glad you enjoyed it. Although it's from 1965, it's saying quite a lot about the system, especially the ultimate female power behind it. Am very fond of motorcycles and music, as both of them can set a person free, for a time. Especially in a current system where we're often forced to express (for our own welfare), like the Red Hot Chili Peppers, that we're No Chump Love Sucker.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 10:54 AM
2

Ken Jataimu here! You'll know what that means, with your knowledge of Japanese. You might be interested in my book, which has a special interest in sex differences in the human brain. It's called "We Won't Need Gillette When the Taliban Arrive - Oestrogen Thinking & Its Consequences." Edit: Don't buy it, I've just made it free on Kindle for a couple of days, starting tomorrow! Not interested in monetising, I'd just like the ideas to be out there, and read by an expert, like yourself. Jaa Ne.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 09:43 AM
1

https://www.amazon.ca/-/fr/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7 "As eugenics machines, the female role in life is that of judge, jury and executioner. SHE will decide whose genes are selected for the next generation. And, as soon as the hormones kick in, we men will line up, trying to impress them, like performing seals. Jumping through hoops, hoping that the object of our affections will throw us a piece of fish. Obviously, with all the risk we must take, there will be an attrition rate. Hence, mo…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 09:36 AM
3

"I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more..." https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/bobdylan/maggiesfarm.html
/r/MensRights05/06/25 08:49 AM
7

I've got more than half an idea that the breed / labor / SERVE / die use of men as a resource is how ALL women see us. Without the castrations of course. Not so sure about the eugenics. Women are eugenics machines. They decide which genes will make it into the next generation, and openly revel in their role (as Arthur Schopenhauer indicated in his essay 'On Women'). It's also why they are so self-assured that they are already 'perfect' and seek only the very best genes. Not uncommon for a female…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 08:44 AM
25

Women look out for their own interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 And men defer to them. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ A combination of these dynamics mean that just a single woman on a decision-making committee can influence the outcome in female favour. With 50/50 M/F representation, men are screwed. Forever. Initially, women needed male politicians to get gynocentric policies through. This was easy, as women became the majority of the electorate, as soon as t…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 08:08 AM
6

She sees the male role as breed / labor / SERVE / die https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn The block capitals are hers.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 07:46 AM
13

They haven't got enough sense not to ruin their own business model.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 02:15 PM
2

Women are more likely to 'help' when someone is watching. It's virtue signalling. They'll also help other women 4x preferentially than someone of the opposite sex Research indicates that men more likely to assist someone of either sex, independently of an audience.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 02:09 PM
19

The 'mom' cult was exposed during the 1940s by Philip Wylie in his book 'Generation of Vipers'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_of_Vipers Of course, it gets slated by feminists, but it contains many truths, all of them still relevant. "American women are inculcated with a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy-tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activities, but merely because they are female. This has defeated husbands in America, making homes i…
/r/MensRights04/06/25 11:23 AM
85

Don't worry, it will be recorded in the official statistics as being violence against women and girls. http://empathygap.uk/?p=551 I wish I were joking...
/r/MensRights04/06/25 09:01 AM
3

The very word 'bachelor' was removed as an accepted term by the Registrar General of England and Wales, around 2004, as part of an assault on 'marriage' as being between a man and a woman. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4141996.stm It was supposed to be replaced by the term 'single'. However, it wasn't long before women required a derogatory term for those whom they spurn. All of the 'hate' comes from one side.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 08:35 AM
15

There used to be lies....damned lies....and statistics. Then, feminist statistics were invented. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights04/06/25 07:12 AM
20

That's how the educational system has been corrupted also. It forces feminism down the throats of young boys, tries to feminize them. Obviously, they'll resist this. Then, the teachers scream "Toxic masculinity!!" and double down on the feminist brainwashing..
/r/MensRights04/06/25 07:10 AM
1

Have just come across this one today, saying that more funding is required to halve crime against women & girls. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8e6jjpn8p7o Well, maybe if they didn't include statistics for violence against men & boys in the VAWG statistics.. http://empathygap.uk/?p=551 https://dadsmatter.org.uk/2024/12/28/violence-against-men-in-the-uk/ There! Fixed it for him. This is gonna require a separate post, now.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 06:33 AM
8

It's like a coercive wife who cares only about herself, trying to convince you not to leave her...attempting to sweet-talk you into another cycle of abuse.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 09:46 AM
70

"A generation of boys disappearing into a vortex of hatred and lies..." ...through ramming feminism down their throats. And what's the 'answer'? What's the 'solution'? It appears to be doubling down on the feminist lies & hatred, to make boys feel even less valued as worthwhile human beings. As someone else pointed out, the very definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing and expect a different outcome. And perhaps someone should point out to him that he's getting all worked up about …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 08:58 AM
2

He'll be ditched by the feminists, once he has served his purpose. Starmer, Macron, Trudeau, Carney have all got where they are by pandering to women. They know it does them no harm, as women are the majority of the electorate, and tend to vote left. But, feminist politicians have an end game in mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5abU03jPWU
/r/MensRights03/06/25 06:48 AM
2

Try this one for the full story... https://www.amazon.ca/-/fr/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7
/r/MensRights03/06/25 06:37 AM
4

"Breaking free from the illusion.." may not be so easy as the content creator suggests. It's not all about sight. And, with what you see, the illusion may be subtly amplified. By the female. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1474704916643328 This is like 'beer goggles'. When you're sober. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bmz71TSZ_Ro
/r/MensRights02/06/25 06:29 PM
21

Some entrepreneurial type should be selling cats and wine boxes at the exit.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 06:13 PM
6

Gravitational field filter.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 05:55 PM
5

"Why did he trust her with $3.6 million? Yeah, sure, she sucks..." Got your answer right there.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 06:34 AM
5

This is Briffault's Law on steroids. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ She got her benefit, he's never going to be able to better it, so it's time to move on. Every M/F interaction is simply a potential benefits system for F.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 06:32 AM
3

Oh....I see....do be good, don't be bad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPsY_nhTtxg
/r/MensRights02/06/25 06:23 AM
8

The situation appears to be far from rare. https://www.orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2025/04/castrating-boys-symbolizes-the-castration-of-america/
/r/MensRights01/06/25 08:22 PM
3

You're probably correct, although I don't think our own elites are blameless. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/
/r/MensRights01/06/25 01:30 PM
5

"...relationship dependency is a bigger reason for collapse than female freedom." Welfare, the taxing of men (who represent over 70% of the income tax base) to support the poor life choices of women, and the children they've had with other men... this represents an alternative to marriage for many women. It therefore weakens relationship dependency. No fault divorce, where a man may find himself kicked out of his own house on a female whim, then forced to pay child support for kids whom he sees …
/r/MensRights01/06/25 01:28 PM
7

It's worse. They're on the committees making the rules about how they see masculinity should be.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 01:10 PM
7

To be fair, your book 'The Empress is Naked' provided the material which got me thinking, three years back. Kudos to you, sir!
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:17 AM
10

Fine. You can't blame men for opting out, either.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:15 AM
5

In order to be visible to women, men need to have a 'good' job. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf EEO, AA, ESG, DEI... these 'progressive initiatives' render more and more men invisible. What was wrong with meritocracy? The best person for the job (man or woman) makes more sense. Also, as soon as women begin to run the judiciary, it doesn't take long before men are excluded from the right to a fair trial (for male specific crimes) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 While …
/r/MensRights01/06/25 10:58 AM
3

The first link, on the critique of J D Unwin's 'Sex & Culture' indicates graphically (page 29/37) that there was a collapse in Y-chromosome diversity, a few millennia before the 'modern' epoch. This was due to a tiny fraction of powerful societies conquering the others, killing or enslaving the men, and mating with the conquered women. There was no corresponding collapse in mitochondrial DNA, which is matrilinear. Maternal control of mitochondrial DNA is achieved by actively assassinating sperm …
/r/MensRights01/06/25 08:27 AM
13

Women don't LISTEN to male concerns. Over time, this screws men up. https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/
/r/MensRights01/06/25 05:43 AM
8

Me too. The guy appeared to offer some hope for the future, but he has capitulated before the battle for the next election has even truly begun.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 05:38 AM
13

In the feminist approach to oppressor/oppressed (which is really a botched reworking of Marxism), they don't seem to realise that women are the oppressors. Being the majority of the electorate, politicians of every flavour will chase the female vote, and will relegate male issues to bottom of the pile. It's just that one side is particularly egregious about it.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 04:20 AM
27

How can a man shine at anything these days..? When is he afforded the opportunity to show what he can do? 'Progressive' policies smooth the path for women in education (70% female graduates) and the workplace (AA, EEO, ESG, DEI). Women are handed the 'good' jobs on a plate. In the sexual marketplace, having a 'good' job is a man's main trading card. It is being systematically removed from our hand, and no new cards being dealt. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf And for the women who c…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 07:03 PM
5

Why do you reckon there was a bride and groomed..?/s
/r/MensRights30/05/25 08:07 AM
1

War was a HUGE factor. There was a near collapse in Y-chromosome diversity a few millennia before Christ (see page 29 of 37 in the attached). This was due to a tiny fraction of men conquering most of the rest, killing or enslaving them in the process. Women from these weaker societies were taken, but still reproduced. https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture There are looming wars over resources. The situation in Ukraine is about oil. The European Union wants oil-…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 08:01 AM
14

We men use our creativity and tenacity to develop technology, then hand the benefits over to women, making our own lives worse in the process. We'd have waited a long time for women to develop smartphone tech (apologies here to Hedy Lamarr) but here's how it goes: The average guy finds the average woman sexually attractive. This is not reciprocated. For most young women such apps bring enormous attention & power. For most young men, they lead to frustration and loneliness. In the past, that down…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 01:39 PM
6

"No-one reads to understand, just to shame, deflect and silence..." A more accurate representation of the true picture is this. Men read to understand. An exposure to the experiences of other men is always helpful, in placing things in perspective on introspection. The more you explore your own personal depths, the more you realise that you are entering a world which is common to all men. Women read to shame, deflect and silence. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/
/r/MensRights28/05/25 12:51 PM
7

From women, and female-centred culture, sympathy and empathy are unlikely https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:01 AM
1

'Testosterone as a fuel for risk taking...' which the female can convert to oestrogen at any time, due to the enzyme aromatase in fat cells (including the brain) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase Females use the more thermodynamically stable oestrogen to programme male brains for subsequent male behaviour. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 It's well understood now. https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:13 AM
1

Women look out for their own interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Men defer to women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ These dynamics have operated forever in the domestic sphere. Where they begin to cause real problems is when women make incursion into business, politics and jurisprudence, as they have done post WW2. Just one woman on a decision-making panel will skew the outcomes in female favour. 50/50 M/F representation will endure that men and men's rights wil…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 09:19 AM
3

Now in her 30s, her kayak has gone, taking the smiling mankind in their 20s with it. The bloke has a less paranoid woman he can canoodle with. Meanwhile, the vendor has sold out the promise of her past, and is looking at a future as a cat lady, up shit creek, without a paddle.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:26 AM
25

She should have been chemically castrated. After all, that's what feminist politicians advocate must happen to men under such circumstances. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crmkv3jezzdo Have long believed that the underlying dynamic in the tsunami of female teachers grooming and sexually assaulting raping underage male children in their supposed 'care' is one of power & control. The entire Duluth model is one of feminist projection. Like so many of their supposed 'theories'. This shoving in …
/r/MensRights26/05/25 05:10 PM
111

Equality should mean that chemical castration should be applied to female teachers who have inappropriate sexual relationships with underage male kids. Chemical sauce for the goose should also be sauce for the gander. When these feminist politicians get on their little pulpits, they must be constantly be reminded that Kant's Categorical Imperative hasn't, somehow, been misspelt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative
/r/MensRights26/05/25 04:33 PM
1

Can't be certain, but more than probable.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 11:27 AM
5

"They tell you it's your duty, but they don't fulfil their part..." That's why men are walking away. It's the only sensible thing to do in a zero-sum game where a partner (who should be cooperating with you) wants you to have zero. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma
/r/MensRights24/05/25 12:14 PM
33

Men are known to be more romantic https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/men-actually-crave-romantic-relationships-more-than-women-do/ https://www.psypost.org/men-value-romantic-relationships-more-and-suffer-greater-consequences-from-breakups-than-women/ Women aren't particularly noted for either sympathy or empathy. As was noted by another woman. https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html Everything is transactional for women. And sex is her cryptic currency…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 08:16 AM
11

The templating occurs much, much earlier than puberty. It occurs in the womb, after 7 weeks' gestation, when our own testosterone is hijacked for conversion into the more thermodynamically stable oestrogen, which does the templating. This was first reported in 1994. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 The entire process is fairly well understood now. https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 06:31 AM
9

If a man isn't economically viable, he's not even visible to women unless he's a genetic demi-god https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf This was known long before Baumeister's 2004 theory of sexual economics. V C Wynne-Edwards (died 1997) the originator of the theory of Group Selection said this: "A man's job is his licence to breed." That licence is in the process of being slowly revoked. The people who brought you AA, EEO, ESG, DEI and all the other BS knew what the results would be.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 06:16 AM
7

"we will have a truckload of spiteful, disenfranchised, fighting age men with nothing to lose, an axe to grind, and a bone to pick with society..." The rich elites will utilise them to fight the coming wars over resources (oil, minerals, semiconductors). Back in 2004, it was recognised by a feminist, Valerie Hudson, that the East had an advantage in the disenfranchised men arena....men who had no chance of finding a wife and forming a family, therefore had little to lose. She called them 'Bare B…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 08:16 AM
0

Companies do spend money on relocation as a punishment. There were several horrible women where I used to work in the 1990s and 2000s, Chemical Engineers and Chemists who were riding the first wave of female incursion into STEM, and enjoying the attention of infatuated male staff. One of them was caught with her knickers around her ankles with a manager, and she was transferred to Holland. She already believed that she could do what she liked, and had ended the career of a bloke who'd had the au…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:59 AM
23

If she'd been a man, in GB, she'd now be chemically castrated. https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/world/serious-sex-offenders-could-face-chemical-castration-under-new-plans/ar-AA1Ff6vd
/r/MensRights22/05/25 04:06 AM
1

OK, take your point....ultrasound machines facilitated the decisions which were taken. These decisions weren't taken by me. Please don't shoot the messenger. If you can't see the defensive/offensive advantages in a vast reserve of untapped masculine behaviours, you're being wilfully blind, or seeing the world through a female lens. In which case, there's little point in me saying any more. Other than this: Take a look at Ukraine. It doesn't matter how willing/unwilling families may be to allow m…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:05 PM
1

Well, it was actually the introduction of portable ultrasound machines. Under the years of the 'one child' policy, from 1980 to 2016, when people in rural areas found they were expecting a female child, these tended not to be taken to term. The work that a male child could do in an agrarian society made family survival (in the short to medium term) a better bet. However, it makes it MUCH more difficult to expect to have grandchildren. For a dirt-poor family, a baby girl is always a better bet in…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 11:22 AM
11

Always make it obvious that you are taking notes of feminist microaggressions, with a view to sharing your documentation with HR. Of course, you won't really, but it shits them up and shuts them up.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:56 AM
1

Let me tell you a story. I went to a Led Zeppelin tribute concert with some friends. Great time, Then, we went to Earl's, a really rough pub across the street from the venue. I know it well. There was a band playing there, too. When their audience numbers were suddenly swollen by the exiting concert-goers, they realised what was happening, and began playing some Zep. The dancefloor was empty. We beckoned to some women to dance. They refused. So, we began dancing among ourselves... a charleston..…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:40 AM
6

Oh, it really 'takes it out of them' to degrade themselves to this point, the poor dears. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/porn-star-breaks-down-during-training-to-sleep-with-1000-men/news-story/0d367692b784692dd4d180f7947a939b https://metro.co.uk/2025/01/13/bonnie-blue-sex-1-057-men-a-day-photo-shows-shocking-aftermath-22347344/
/r/MensRights19/05/25 12:15 PM
20

"The man needs to have a house, a car, an engagement ceremony, as well as pay a bride price, but I don't need to provide anything..." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-64973186 (scratches head). "Well, actually, sweetheart, there is one prerequisite..." And, of course, in China as elsewhere, it goes without saying that the man should have a JOB. Not just any old job, a 'good' job. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf Obviously, here in the west, we've been giving away these job…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:42 AM
22

"It was seen as a trophy if they broke up the home..." Back in 1993, at a certain Eurocamp site, the female childrens' couriers would latch onto married men who were picking up their kids, would flatter these men beyond belief. For the duration of the guests' holiday, they'd come and 'accidentally' visit them in the vicinity of their caravans. After being invited to join for a few drinks, they'd make physical contact with the men while the wives weren't looking (rubbing bare foot up inside thigh…
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:39 AM
4

"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." - Friedrich Nietzsche Women can't hear the music I dance to, just as I can't hear theirs. I need to redefine fuck all.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:46 AM
2

Amen to that.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:38 AM
2

"People were going to throw their daughters at wealthy men.." The origin of 'a good catch', I suppose.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 03:53 PM
8

The WEF are in disarray. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/international-geneva/downfall-in-davos-klaus-schwab-fights-for-legacy-after-wef-whistleblower-claims/89325206 Their new leader, Christine Lagarde, has a chequered and questionable past. Trudeau and Macron (both previous 'young inspirational WEF members' are out of favour. Trudeau's successor, Carney, has been trying to scare people into buying an EV for years. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-55944570 Bottom line - their big 'progressive' …
/r/MensRights16/05/25 12:11 PM
2

Whoever would have thought of men being thought of as 'rightful property of one or other of their daughters'..? Men as property? That goes against the usual narrative. Well, that's Austen dealt with. Got much to add about the cooperate/default model of modern marriage, where women are the defaulters, and initiate 70% of divorces?
/r/MensRights16/05/25 11:55 AM
4

"All the women conspired with each other to have me do the worst jobs, and when I refused, the female boss fired me." That sentence encapsulates male life in a nutshell. Women make themselves the arbiters of society. They coordinate to give themselves an easy life, at male expense. If we agree to maintain their comfort, they may deign to offer a temporary reward, to keep us on the hook (as per Briffault's Law). If we refuse, we become society's outcasts. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briff…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 11:49 AM
3

Went into STEM in 1980, all male labs, everyone working towards truth. By 2003, female quota intakes had made the environment a nightmare. Tears, accusations of bullying (and worse), which saw two men sacked. Undeserved female promotion through flirting. After her promotion, she left her husband (and their two kids), to take up with a manager who could keep her career on track. Another woman was fiddling biological results in favour of her (married) boyfriend, who'd promised her he'd leave his w…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:16 AM
4

Yesterday, someone pointed out that female 'agreeableness', usually seen as a positive, is actually a gateway to herd mentality, groupthink, conformity, and fear of heterodoxy (therefore bad for STEM). Personally, I feel that researchers have missed out the most fundamental point about female 'agreeableness'. They only agree with other women. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Then, the part of the dynamic which is fatal to male interests...after the girlie conclusions have been reach…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:00 AM
10

'Truth is overrated. Just say what best accomplishes your goals..' Feminists openly revel in this one. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ Of course, it helps that women are hard-wired to be unfamiliar with objective truth in any case. Their preferred methodologies for... (ahem)....argument...or just getting through life in general, depends on well-developed strategies which they brought with them from the domestic sphere to the workplace when they began making hostile incursion …
/r/MensRights16/05/25 09:51 AM
1

Forgot 'em already!!
/r/MensRights16/05/25 09:30 AM
2

But....but...the gender pay gap!
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:31 AM
1

Your point is more than fair.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 10:02 PM
3

I had a mate who was sacked from work, due to the machinations of a female colleague. I went round to see him right after it had happened. It was mid-90s, and he was on the dating services which existed back then. The telephone rang twice while I was there, dating agency candidates on the line. As soon as he told them he'd just been sacked, the conversation from the other end was directed towards closure. This guy was a member of MENSA. Yet, he was taken by surprise! Bad enough back then, but it…
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:20 AM
31

"MGTOW, MRA, hell, even being a conservative, all smashed together into the pot, as if they were the same things...." Yep. According to this feminist, if men don't 'take the knee' and bend to women, it's all mysoggyknee.... all men who hate women. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Who_Hate_Women_(Bates_book)) Unfortunately, she didn't stop at this book, and is now in the realms of utter, utter fantasy. https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/05/10/laura-bates-needs-psychiatric-help-now/
/r/MensRights15/05/25 08:47 AM
5

We can learn a lot from sticklebacks. Males need to 'own a territory' where females can spawn, otherwise they're not interested. https://www.earthgardeners.it/en/2022/10/31/the-three-spined-stickleback-and-tinbergen/ The book I got this from 'The Bacterial Origins of Femininity', by Baxter Basics, is actually free on Kindle today. The implications (if correct) are a bit scary, inasmuch as all women see us in pretty much the same way. Some, like Leighanne Milburn, are outspoken (or stupid) enough…
/r/MensRights15/05/25 08:35 AM
2

Kids with no critical reasoning faculties are being brainwashed by feminist teachers. https://menaregood.substack.com/p/from-eye-color-to-gender-how-jane It's a form of child abuse.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 04:07 PM
60

GSRM - the subtle art of doing violence by getting someone else to do it for you, thereby pretending that your own hands are clean. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ Edit: This has poisoned the workplace. And, female aversion for objective truth is doing science no favours.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 09:50 AM
32

With women making significant inroads into politics and jurisprudence, the situation for men is likely to deteriorate still further. 'The pen is mightier than the sword.' This is what women do. They take systems which were built by men, then attempt to co-opt them to their own advantage, destroying them in the process. The justice system was built on men attempting to be fair. Women don't know the meaning of the word. To them, 'fair' is when women benefit. Justice was built on male, deontic reas…
/r/MensRights14/05/25 08:29 AM
1

I'd be really interested in your recommendations. The book which got me interested seems, at first sight, to be very tangential to the problem. It was Professor Iain McGilchrist's 'The Master & His Emissary', a 2009 book which I only got around to reading in 2020. His premise is that left-brain hemisphere ways of thinking have become much more prevalent in corporations & institutions during the past 50 years. Presumably because he wished to retain an academic career, McGilchrist has been very ob…
/r/MensRights14/05/25 08:16 AM
4

This is an excellent analysis, and God knows why you've been down-voted. Please accept an upvote.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 06:06 AM
41

Analysis of the currently-prevailing risks and rewards for both males and females using evolutionary game theory indicates that the west has slowly moved from a cooperate/cooperate marriage system (where both men and women made sacrifices to gain the security required for childbearing), to a cooperate/defect environment, where men are expected to uphold their side of the bargain, in exchange for..... NOTHING. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/human-reproduction-as-prisoners-dilemma This author la…
/r/MensRights14/05/25 06:02 AM
13

The opening line of 'Pride & Prejudice' by Jane Austen, published 1813. "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife..." Rough translation: Women are gold-diggers, seek the easy life, and can't admit this, least of all to themselves. https://www.forprideandprejudice.com/2017/11/what-does-opening-line-of-pride-and.html
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:41 PM
124

As a 69 year old bloke who has lived a bit, my experience is this. At all stages of your life where you are not providing for some woman, you are not seen as a fully-integrated member of society. Can trace this all the way back to adolescence, when aunts, sister and mother would be asking "Not got a girlfriend yet..?" when I was too busy trying to play the cards I'd been dealt (born working class, nose badly broken at aged 11, neither of which made me a fanny-magnet). The key was education and a…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 09:31 AM
22

They wouldn't have the ingenuity to survive being 'Home Alone.'
/r/MensRights12/05/25 11:29 AM
7

I'm not even sure they could explain properly. My old man knew that he'd been trapped, but could never quite get his head around the 'why' and 'how'. There was a mainstream narrative of constipated conventionality which worked to female benefit, and it didn't earn friends to go against it. In the days prior to the manosphere, could he have figured it out for himself, swallowed his pride, and offered advice..? Will never know. But, I do know why women are against men chatting with each other in t…
/r/MensRights11/05/25 11:42 AM
3

Yes it is. But check out moral usurpation. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/William-Collins-ebook/dp/B09XB5W74H/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1WR247LRVDPXP&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.4WHR_3jRSlDjPq3ke5sdyg.d0VvQUZq8zNrAcciIXI5KVJQxMo6jeJoLYJDb17YwGQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=william+collins+destructivists&qid=1746859855&s=digital-text&sprefix=william+collins+destructivists%2Cdigital-text%2C125&sr=1-1
/r/MensRights10/05/25 06:52 AM
23

In some western 'democracies', the stage has now been reached where female law-makers have decided that due process will not be extended to men who have committed crimes which can be conveniently labelled as 'male specific'. That includes no juries for rape trials, and giving excess weighting to female evidence. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo Meanwhile, there's an epidemic of sexually abusive female teachers, authority figures who…
/r/MensRights10/05/25 05:24 AM
5

"She must continually evaluate whether you are her optimal choice..." Demonstrate any weakness, or personal needs, and that re-evaluation process is initiated. https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/
/r/MensRights10/05/25 04:48 AM
7

Yes, there's no escape from propping them up, really. Women don't pay for their own programs, as they contribute only 27% to the income tax take, through their preference for shorter hours, or not working at all. Men are thereby forced to support the poor lifestyle choices of single mothers with multiple kids by multiple fathers. The annoying part is that these women look down upon the anonymous men who are propping them up. But, at least, if we refuse to touch them with a bargepole, it's more d…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 02:56 PM
40

I was born 69 years ago in a run-down mining town, where privilege was in short supply. Earned a place in grammar school. My nose was (badly) broken aged 11, the girlies wouldn't even look at me, a boy from the wrong side of the tracks, with a busted face. Earned a place in University. Earned a first class BSc. Earned a PhD (not so common in the 1970s). Earned a great job in STEM. But, what's this...? Suddenly, I have to beat women off with a shitty stick. Women wait by the finishing line for th…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 07:43 AM
2

Take a look at the 'plot' of the film 'Wild'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_(2014_film)) The 'heroine' (who has destroyed her marriage through heroin and whoring, aborting an unwanted baby), decides to trek the Appalachian trail, to 'find herself'. Men help her, all the way. But, the big drama..? A couple of hunters make suggestive remarks. That's all. But she, too, feels that she was 'almost attacked on the Appalachian trail....'
/r/MensRights09/05/25 05:29 AM
2

I find that their attitude gives me strength to say 'fuck off' every time Wiki asks me for a financial contribution.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 05:19 AM
18

If you don't play the game, you can't lose. Women's lives will be shit when we're not their fucking financiers.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 05:13 AM
19

Once a man talks about his feelings to his female partner, the ball will definitely start rolling towards divorce. https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/
/r/MensRights09/05/25 05:10 AM
2

The female sex always looks out for its own interests, and they stick together like something sticky. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007
/r/MensRights07/05/25 08:48 AM
5

Way back in 2004, South Park were very prescient on aspects of this!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-kgb1QtSnU "They took 'r jobs!!"......... "Oh well, it's back to the gay orgy.."
/r/MensRights29/04/25 09:07 AM
19

This may be far more pertinent to Men's Rights than it appears at first sight. The pen is mightier than the sword. Radical Feminists are embedded at all levels of decision-making, and have been slowly heating the cauldron containing anti-male legislation for the past 40 years. Their powerful allies in the UN and WEF utilise feminism to achieve their own aims. This sort of "will we - won't we?" crackdown on certain behaviours in the park may not seem relevant to the fact that the human race is ab…
/r/MensRights29/04/25 08:17 AM
10

You're right, the typical feminist isn't 'conventionally attractive' in any way. This means that she cannot attract a man, and have him bend to her will, like an attractive woman can. It leads to a brooding ressentiment towards men (and attractive women). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment#:~:text=The%20concept%20was%20of%20particular,of%20blame%20for%20one's%20frustration Meanwhile, attractive women go through life believing that they can walk on water, living in a haze of Dunning-Kruge…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 07:21 AM
17

There are 100+ baby deaths annually in the USA through circumcision. https://circinfo.org/USA_deaths.html The procedure originated in Abrahamic religions, so that young men would be more likely to get married. Removal of the foreskin, a natural roller bearing, makes it unpleasant to self-pleasure in the absence of lubricant... increasing the chances that he'd stick it in crazy, and would thereby go forth & multiply... thereby increasing the followers of that religion. Maybe it's time to end the …
/r/MensRights28/04/25 05:22 AM
47

Not only are we being asked to believe all women, they want it written into law. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo And, managed to do so... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0g8y290jgo Next step, the kangaroo courts.. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540
/r/MensRights27/04/25 04:00 PM
7

"Never, never marry, my dear fellow! Marry when you are old, and good for nothing - or all that is good and noble in you will be lost. It will all be wasted in trifles...if you marry expecting anything for yourself in future, you will find that all is ended...all is closed except the drawing room, where you will be ranged side by side with a court jester and an idiot." War & Peace, book1, chapter 8 https://www.marxists.org/archive/tolstoy/1869/war-and-peace/book-1-chapter-8.html
/r/MensRights25/04/25 08:10 PM
13

When women got the vote, a sea of 'male, pale, stale' politicians bent over backwards to them. This from 'Generation of Vipers', written by Philip Wylie in 1943: "Mom is organisation-minded. Female organisations, she has happily noted, are intimidating to all men. They frighten politicians into snivelling servility. Mom has many such organisations, the real purpose of which is to compel an abject compliance of her environs to her personal desires." Men built civilisations through the deontic rea…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 07:32 AM
2

Have enjoyed the conversation immensely. "They have twelve different scenarios running through their mind, where they end up with the better end of the deal." What a brilliant way to express women's obsession with utilitarian outcomes which will be of female benefit. And they stick together on it, too. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Utilitarian outcomes are desired by that oestrogen sensitive left brain. Whereas, men tend to prioritise the opposite end of Scheler's Pyramid of Huma…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 07:59 PM
2

I had a bit of further thought - regarding your observation that women already control the entire biological outcome of the species. That particular rabbit hole goes very, very deep indeed...all the way back to our origins as eukaryotic species, derived from a synergy between aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in a planet Earth which was becoming hostile to the latter, as the Earth became oxygen rich. One of these bacteria became the mitochondria of eukaryotes. Mitochondria are the energy factories …
/r/MensRights23/04/25 05:39 PM
2

The unrestrained left brain is notorious for lack of self-awareness and delusions of grandeur. This has been known since WW1 non-fatal brain injuries. The left brain is known to be oestrogen sensitive. The main neurotransmitter is dopamine, whose receptors atrophy and die in the absence of oestrogen. https://medicine.yale.edu/news/yale-medicine-magazine/article/estrogen-deprivation-associated-with-loss-of-dopamine-cells/ Dots aren't being connected, nonetheless. The closest I've seen is 'The Mas…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 05:05 PM
2

The left brain runs on dopamine and is very sensitive to oestrogen. In the absence of control by the testosterone sensitive right brain, it is extremely selfish, solipsistic, materialistic, has a desire for power, and has an inordinately high opinion of itself. It is also prone to denial, even if the facts are obvious. This has all been observed in subjects who have suffered right-hemisphere injury or stroke. Why would Nature do this..? Well, it raises the bar on reproductive access. But Nature …
/r/MensRights23/04/25 02:53 PM
46

Why women cheat. Page 4 of 10 in the link, beginning: "Nature has made it the calling of the young, strong and handsome men to look after the propagation of the human race, so that the species may not degenerate. This is the firm will of Nature, and it finds its expression in the passions of women." https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html Women see this as their 'right'... https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/#:~:text=Melanie%20McDonagh%20is%20an%20Irish%20journalist%20w…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 12:06 PM
4

When you know the rules, you can use your knowledge to filter the dross. Let me explain: I was born working class. At age 11, my nose was (very) badly broken. Girls at Grammar School wouldn't look at me. And University women all believed they would earn at least as much as me, once we were released into the outside world. But, by the time I'd completed a PhD (it wasn't so common in the 1970s), and had a great job, I had to beat women off with a shitty stick. I knew what was happening, and my pre…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 11:35 AM
5

All of the women who whore themselves out on t'internet will inevitably face results which are disappointing. The ladies' minds all work in the same way, and mirror their 'romance' novels, all of which share the same plot - the handsome, dashing, high-status, extraordinarily wealthy 'hero' is so smitten with the heroine's beauty that he simply cannot live without her, and she is thus free to control his resources for the rest of his life. There are, however, a few factors working against her des…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 10:39 AM
3

Women simply dupe men into doing the wet work for them. In their tiny minds, their own hands are clean.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 10:11 AM
11

Men don't systemically lord it over women. Men defer to women. And women expect this behaviour. Not only that, the vast majority of domestic violence is initiated by women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/ Then, the ladies can't deal with the consequences of their actions. That's what was found by Erin Pizzey, who founded the world's first DV shelter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey So, those peace-loving …
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:34 AM
7

Although not a fan of organised religion, am forced to concede that it was religion which held it all together, keeping women 'marriageable', and hence maintaining men in production mode, providing for wives & family. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_Culture
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:22 AM
17

The social engineering is occurring in plain sight. For every woman who is given a job instead of a man, there goes another guy who will never attract a woman and form a family. Employment - 'good' employment - is the main male trading card in the sexual economics market. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf That's bad enough, but the true situation is even worse. For each woman arbitrarily assigned a good job through 'progressive' policies, there are entire strata of men whom she now se…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 06:34 AM
12

"Men contributed 30 seconds of effort for their sperm, men didn't risk their health or sacrifice their body..." After fatherhood, men will spend the rest of their lives risking their health and sacrificing their bodies for their families. Women don't attempt dirty, dangerous, demanding jobs. Men comprise 91.4% of workplace fatalities. Only a couple of generations back, women would have contributed almost nothing to the tax take which maintains civilisation. Now, they contribute 27%, while consum…
/r/MensRights22/04/25 09:06 AM
162

Feminist herstory would be much more impressive if women were stepping up to the plate to be steel workers, or bin-ladies in Birmingham, or volunteering to be cannon-fodder. Or just being nice when there wasn't an audience they could play to.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:13 PM
1

No, they don't. https://hermoney.com/earn/careers/why-women-don-t-want-a-female-boss/
/r/MensRights16/04/25 09:02 PM
2

Translated from the German: "The problem with all men is that none of them fancy me. Therefore, I can't attract one, and have him bend to my will. Also, I quite like ladies...especially those exotic migrants.."
/r/MensRights16/04/25 06:20 PM
10

Florence Nightingale agrees with you. https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html
/r/MensRights16/04/25 01:17 PM
6

Women's looks are what predominately attract men. Men's achievements are what predominately attract women. In the F/F pissing contests, the female arms race, looks will be the area of comparison. Males will brag about achievements to gain status. The latter pissing contest is much more spectacular. The former is simply a puddle of wet feet and ankles.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 01:10 PM
10

Deny a man a job, and his sole trading card in the dating market has been destroyed. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf 'Progressive' liberal policies favour women in employment. They took 'r jobs. Each time it happens, there's another man who'll never attract a woman and form a family. Not only that, there's another woman who now sees an entire strata of men as 'beneath' her.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 08:00 AM
19

When meritocracy has been replaced by AA, EEO, DEI and other BS, then wouldn't it be fair to say that, courtesy of 'progressive' policies, feudalism has returned in any case? Instead of merit, status is conferred by accident of birth, determining one's place in the Oppression Olympics. Sex, skin colour...
/r/MensRights15/04/25 07:01 AM
25

Our biggest mistake... https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Michael-Steane-ebook/dp/B0041HXPHS/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3BY4MPC999DTL&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9._cYMyJr0TadUoZ0AWsGm3w.PuKBsw9iTrHFwh4nKGsS0CfS5XmhLzfEpjtMU4hQgak&dib_tag=se&keywords=michael+steane+rape+male+mind&qid=1744697663&s=digital-text&sprefix=michael+steane+rape+male+mind%2Cdigital-text%2C90&sr=1-1 But, it gets worse. The vote is just the beginning. Females in politics and jurisprudence takes it to a whole new quantum level. Women always look out for t…
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:24 AM
11

"It's not women making these laws against men. It's other men.." As soon as women make incursion into the areas of politics and jurisprudence, it's all over for men. This is due to a combination of two factors. First of all, women always look out for women's interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Secondly, men have an inbuilt deference towards women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ This means that just one woman on a decision making panel will skew the outcome in fe…
/r/MensRights14/04/25 06:56 AM
3

My old man was free to work himself into an early grave, supporting his two kids, as mum didn't work. Every Friday, he'd hand over an intact pay packet, to receive his few pounds of 'pocket money'. Not that he was allowed to spend this as he pleased. Irrationally fearful that he'd 'meet another woman', she forbade him to go into town to meet his friends on a Saturday. If he ignored her diktat, he'd be slapped around on his return. On the one occasion that he'd had absolutely enough, and retaliat…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 06:34 AM
5

"You can't oppress the oppressor." Guess the identity of the real oppressor. A woman confesses... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manipulated_Man
/r/MensRights08/04/25 08:53 AM
1

"What makes a man?" This pretty much nails it. https://poets.org/poem/if
/r/MensRights08/04/25 08:44 AM
1

Doing anything, anything that will interfere or interrupt normal steroidal development will fuck with the brain. This includes introducing steroids of the opposite sex, or giving aromatase inhibitors for F -> M, or 5-*alpha-*reductase inhibitors for M -> F. Drug companies market the latter for male pattern hair loss FFS. Yeah, you might keep some of your hair. But, you'll lose your sanity if that brain is now being told you're a woman by a reductase inhibitor. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles…
/r/MensRights08/04/25 08:31 AM
3

Damn right. The illusion of the happy family life, white picket fence dream is founded on female bad faith interaction. That interaction will not take place unless there is ongoing female benefit. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:41 AM
2

There's social benefit, too. Because men built systems based on hierarchy and merit, they attempted to be fair. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Women, being physically weaker, gain most evolutionary advantage by subverting deontic systems, to female, utilitarian advantage. DEI is just one of the many, many ways. Ester Vilar's 'The Manipulated Man' might be an eye opener. (if you can get it, removed from Kindle a few years back... can't hav…
/r/MensRights05/04/25 08:41 AM
4

The statistics are wrong. MALE victims are included, to fudge the figures, pretend that there's an epidemic of violence against females, and hide the facts about male victims. http://empathygap.uk/?p=551 Also, women are prone to initiate domestic violence. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/ Then, they can't deal with the consequences. This is what was found by Erin Pizzey, who founded the first ever domestic shelter. …
/r/MensRights05/04/25 06:33 AM
1

"If my school decides to show 'Adolescence' to my children, I will show them 'Baby Reindeer'." Let's imagine a really Machiavellian Netflix executive, a few months back. "Hey, I see how we could double profits by stirring up controversy..."
/r/MensRights03/04/25 06:43 AM
30

It's going to become pretty difficult to cut through the hysteria (great etymology, that word) and have meaningful 'conversations' around the 'issues' raised by this stupid, fictional programme, when feminist law-makers will allow only one-way expression. http://empathygap.uk/?p=4651
/r/MensRights01/04/25 07:39 AM
11

The Guardian gushes that it could save girls' lives. Reality check. The number of female victims of knife crime in the under 19 years of age category is almost non-existent. https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/03/27/tom-golden-netflix-adolescence-entertainment-or-propaganda-chatgpt/#comments It's boys who are dying. Are we to believe that this is happening because Tate is instructing them to do so?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 07:23 AM
1

That is how I have lived my life, and am now quite old. I try not to interfere with anyone, but have never suffered gladly when people believe that they can walk all over you. My responses would be somewhere beyond post-conventional morality. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg%27s_stages_of_moral_development
/r/MensRights01/04/25 06:56 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 09:04 AM
20

https://posthillpress.com/book/xx-v-xy-the-final-world-war With regard to that work of fiction, it's interesting that the far east perspective crops up in this factual 2004 book by Valerie Hudson, seeing the 'excess male population' therein as a threat. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ She, and her feminist co-authors, have been Government think tank advisors for two decades, and sure like their security concerns to be attended to. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 07:56 AM
1

What women want is rotating temporary monogamy. They've got it now. It's described as some kind of interesting carousel. Previously, it was serial marriage. Women always get what they want. They always make the choices. Men always pay. It's founded in female utilitarian, materialistic 'ethics'. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf Hint: the left brain is oestrogen sensitive. There are consequences. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 07:46 AM
9

The legal fetters, chains and leg-irons are being prepared for us, even as we speak. http://empathygap.uk/?p=4651 They won't win. They can't jail all of us.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 04:48 AM
1

Financial independence for women should lead to vast reduction in cheating, as it has removed the 'justification' you propose. Not sure that's the greatest conclusion either.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 04:19 AM
1

"A woman cheating because she wants to, and a woman cheating because she can't have a job and needs to get away from her man is very different." Actions have consequences, and in the west at least, she chose the man (who has now been betrayed). A cheater is still a cheater. You'll find that those who are willing to cheat with you are willing to cheat on you. The leopard doesn't change its spots. Neither does the cheetah.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:31 AM
1

"I guess what is frustrating is knowing that money is not needed for a relationship. That I could be in a great relationship without much money." Unfortunately, there are a wealth of facts which would suggest otherwise. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:58 PM
5

When we do, they infiltrate, take over, and co-opt onto feminist issues. This happened with MOVEMBER. This article suggests that they are much more afraid of the lone wolfs, and their ability to connect with other men through the internet. http://empathygap.uk/?p=4595
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:22 PM
3

Downwards pressure on wage and salary bills, by doubling the workforce. Doubling of tax revenues. More compliant workforce, readier to toe the line and take orders. Especially attractive to weak management, and can be hidden under the banner of being 'progressive and enlightened'. Upwards pressure on asset prices, like houses. Multiples of double incomes now required. If you're an investor, what's not to like? No fault divorce means that men get kicked out of their own house, and need a new plac…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:18 PM
15

Time to call out their BS. If equality is to replace complementarity as the overriding principle in the division of labour, then both genders should be equally drafted into infantry platoons. We should not rest until there is a 50/50 representative workforce in mining, construction, sewage and general infrastructure. If it is seen as fair to reorganise the centres of male power to accommodate women (apparently through quota, and regardless of actual merit), then the centres of female power shoul…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 07:55 AM
4

They all seem to believe that he's going to 'commit' to them, and them alone. Ha, ha, ha ha!!! What they fail to realise is that top men have just as many choices available as women do. He's sought after. I'm very, very far from that 10% envelope myself, but have kept my eyes open, and my brains haven't been addled by romance novels or Disney dreams. They'll be used and abused, like Anastasia Steele by Christian Grey, then tossed to the side. (disclaimer: Haven't actually read '50 Shades of Grey…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 06:24 PM
35

Most men know that we'll never understand women, while women will insist on coming up with universal 'models' for male behaviour, all based on how women think. It's women who are hungry for power and control. They use their sexuality to control men, and this used to be confined to the domestic sphere. Then, they took it to the workplace. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ When used on kids, there are so many lines crossed, I wouldn't know where …
/r/MensRights29/03/25 05:30 PM
90

Power and control of someone weaker, of the opposite sex. The 'Duluth Model' is pure projection. And it sure explains all these female teacher/juvenile male student scenarios which are spilling out from under rocks in a landslide.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 04:20 PM
1

The arch enemies of feminism in the 1960s and 70s weren't men, but the vast majority of women, at that time, who wanted to retain their traditional privileges. But, slowly, they succumbed to the propaganda, believing that they could have their cake, the female version, and eat it too. They believed that earning their own money would simply add to their existing privilege. Were they right..? Having a job doesn't make a woman any better looking, and men don't care how much you earn. However, it do…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 04:12 PM
345

This hit me when I was a kid in the early 1960s, and most women were stay at home mothers. From 8am until 5pm it was women's world, chatting, gossiping, putting the world to rights, totally relaxed. All stress had been delegated to the invisible men.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:11 PM
2

Just makes it easier for me to tell Wiki to do one when they start asking me for money.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:06 PM
73

Why not be respectable, get married instead. Once that has happened you could Be denied sex by your wife if she doesn't get her way Be divorced Be forced to pay alimony to support your ex-wife and her new lover Endure the humiliation of being ousted from your house Be convicted of DV or worse on the basis of false accusation, making it more likely you'll lose the kids Never see your children again Pay the penalty of losing half your estate, meaning you'll never get life back on track Lose social…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:53 PM
12

In GB, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves was discovered to have faked her CV. https://order-order.com/2024/11/18/media-pressure-grows-on-reeves-after-cv-fake-claims-revealed/ And, in her retail banking job, she was lucky not to be sacked for abusing expense accounts. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg75jr5284o She's still Chancellor... because....vajayjay.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:23 PM
6

The Scottish National Party have had their hands full recently, thanks to misappropriation of funds raised by supporters for a second Independence Referendum. £600,000 went adrift, some of which seems to have ended up as a luxury £120,000 motorhome, owned by Nicola Surgeon, former First Minister of Scotland, and Head of the SNP...and her husband, Peter Murrell, Chief Executive of the SNP. Yet, strangely, only her husband is facing the law. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c99n25y8gklt So, we are …
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:04 PM
3

"I wouldn't let him near my kid without me ever again.." OUR kid, sweetheart. OUR kid.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:47 PM
14

"If some group is pointing fingers, it's rarely true, more about pushing an agenda.." Feminism raised such mendacity to an art form. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:12 PM
1

Conflation of Men's Rights with Red Pill is a common and fundamental female error, popularised by Laura Bates and her (truly awful) book 'Men Who Hate Women'. Men know that they'll never understand women. Women, however, seem to believe that they are party to privileged, omniscient insight & access to the male psyche, while knowing nothing whatsoever about the male experience. While some double standards are inherent in the complementarity of male and female, there are many which are not. The la…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 09:36 AM
12

When the tick of the biological clock becomes impossible to ignore, it would appear that some feminists bow to the inevitable and succumb to the biological imperative. Mary Harrington is another one. Having lived most of her adult life in a lesbian feminist commune, she suddenly decides to get some undiscerning bloke to wife her up. Now, she writes articles about how wonderful it is to be a mother, and how tolerable it is to be a wife. Also books about how feminism didn't get things entirely rig…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 10:03 PM
26

Many thanks for this pdf. Will read this today, but, from pages 10, 11, it is obvious that the definition of matriarchy has already been fulfilled. Matriarchy: a social system where FAMILIAL and POLITICAL authority is wielded by WOMEN. The FAMILIAL aspect was already known through Briffault's Law. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Don't be taken in by the attempted Bowdlerisation of Briffault's Law in sources like Wikipedia. Briffault meant his observations to apply to the huma…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 10:18 AM
1

Rudyard Kipling understood what it meant to be a man. One of his other poems, 'Tommy' shows how men can be mocked and ridiculed by society...until there is danger in the offing. "For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' 'Chuck him out, the brute!" / But, it's 'Saviour of his Country' when the guns begin to shoot..." https://www.poetry.com/poem/33632/tommy
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:45 PM
5

"There's a case in Canada where teen girls collected on Facebook to kill a homeless man for no good reason. Tell me again how the internet and cellphones are toxic for young boys only." Oh, the horrible stuff which can be found on the cellphones of young girls...like a 12 year old girl encouraging a 14 year old boy to kill an 80 year old man in GB. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79802en4p8o
/r/MensRights24/03/25 06:16 PM
16

Remove the excesses of feminism, and Tate ceases to be relevant. Instead, the response is to double down on feminist indoctrination of young boys.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 08:26 AM
51

Universal suffrage for all is only fair. But men's biggest mistake was allowing women to become Members of Parliament. Women have a 4x preference for the views of their own sex. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Men, meanwhile, far from lording it over women, have an inbuilt tendency to defer to women https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ This means that even one woman on a decision-making panel will influence the outcome in female favour. With 50/50 M/F representation, men don…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 07:38 AM
2

Thanks for this, I've now made a note of the further three forces you mention, the Cantillon effect, Triffin's dilemma, and the bullwhip effect. I think I may have come across the last one in the context of Max Scheler, or Friedrich Nietzsche, and how to treat women, but am not sure without checking. I have used something similar myself though, by reference to the Scythian men returning from war to find that their women had intermarried with their slaves. "At last, one of them addressed the rema…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 12:08 PM
29

Reality check on the motivations and MO of the writers, right here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2tU7tyceAM
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:41 AM
0

In utero, the brain only has a few weeks to be programmed to align with gonadal sex. https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf This can go out of synch. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:32 AM
1

You're spot on. This is the best critique I could find on the 'Adolescence' shitstorm, one which is very balanced and informed on the underlying narrative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2tU7tyceAM
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:26 AM
1

That's the truth. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:19 AM
5

Don't worry mate, this sort of thing has been going on in the west, forever. Take the opening line of 'Pride and Prejudice', written by Jane Austen in 1813: "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife." In other words, women are interested in that good fortune, and how it can make for an easy life for themselves and the kids they hope to have. Not necessarily with you as the father, though. That's something else that was spo…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:15 AM
3

There's a couple of self-reinforcing dynamics which have been going on. The most fundamental one was noticed by Roy F Baumeister. "Lacking the male sex drive, female sexuality is more easily influenced by social and situational factors." For the past fifty years, more and more women have been attending University, often exposed to 'Gender Studies' courses, which were founded by the radical lesbian feminists Sally Miller Gearhart and Mary Daly. Here's what was reported in the book 'The Social Org…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:11 AM
-3

You could say that, if they have agreed to marry someone, they do owe them sex, otherwise the marriage has not ben consummated.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 07:50 PM
-2

Charity/duty sex from a woman doesn't exist!! Just like men, they'll attempt to optimise their choice of 'permanent' partner, although the criteria are somewhat different from the female perspective, with much more emphasis on ability to provide resources if they can't get that and good genes in the one package. They're never going to provide sex as a charity, that would be ick beyond ick. Until fairly recently, most men would have paid the lion's share of a mortgage, or would have paid it exclu…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 07:49 PM
3

Thanks for the references to Gresham's Law and Thier's Law, was unaware of both. Briffault's Law explains such a lot. Sources have been bowdlerised over the years, including Wikipedia, and 'Psychology Today', the latter of which now hides behind a paywall. This is one of the best remaining articles. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Totally agree with your assessment on Commander Karen. About four years ago, wrote an e-book, called 'We Won't Need Gillette When the Taliban Arriv…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 02:58 PM
13

Note to Gareth Southgate, who's on the bandwagon. Any role model would automatically exclude YOU, who is all to ready to 'take the knee' on all issues, including feminism, without really understanding them, mate. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqjpzg0qwno
/r/MensRights22/03/25 02:15 PM
7

Prior to posting this, had just read your post about 'undesirable' men being abducted for military service, based on lists complied by the 'authorities', targeting men with illness, irregular employment, or alcohol problems. Horrifying.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 11:34 AM
7

Having racked what passes for my brains as to how such a society could keep men in production mode, there would have to be 'citizenship credits' for being 'good boys', redeemable at state-run brothels.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:55 AM
5

Lest we be in any doubt about his intentions, the writer of 'Adolescence', Jack Thorne, has given a BBC interview. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0egyyq1z47o Apparently, "pointing the finger at incel culture" (unquote) is only part of it, and he calls for 'radical action'.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:49 AM
27

"What do these women think society is going to look like in 20 years when the men they've alienated have abandoned them, and they're sitting eggless and psychically ravaged in their apartments..?" It's gonna look like this. And they'll all be reciting "inspirational quotes" to each other. https://liveonlineradio.blog/inspiring-quotes-by-andrea-dworkin/ We all get one chance at life. Why waste it? Feminists are not your friends, ladies. They hate men for the simple reason that they were too fat &…
/r/MensRights21/03/25 07:19 AM
11

Perhaps the lady should apply Kant's Categorical Imperative. Would she be impressed if she were the abandoned party? In any case, she appears to be a right Kant.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 06:51 AM
4

The human pair bond is asymmetrical. With our much higher sex drive, it's males who have to spend money on courtship displays and offering resources. When marriage was the only socially-acceptable way to have sex, women only gave something back after marriage, the most tangible evidence of which was a child. And her emotional bond is to the child. Unlike fathers, she can always be sure that the child is hers. All she requires, now, is a provider. They can't hide how their minds work, even in the…
/r/MensRights20/03/25 07:00 AM
40

It should be balanced by a series called 'Young Adulthood' showing the effect of false accusation on young men. And then 'Middle Age', where a bloke loses everything he's built, home & family, through no fault divorce.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 06:45 AM
44

This case is far from unusual. When women don't get what they want from cultivating a 'relationship' with a boss at work, then, basically, the prostitute hasn't been paid. Hence, she feels that she has been wronged! Ha ha ha!!
/r/MensRights20/03/25 06:25 AM
8

It might happen after they have kids. By necessity, women are then temporarily in a position which more resembles their 'traditional' dependence on a male. Suddenly, it's easier to see that his female colleagues are being promoted past him (probably having been given his efforts on a plate), and that they could have him sacked, should they choose to do so, by their eyes welling up with tears on false accusations of bullying/harassment. When a woman depends on a man's income, she might appreciate…
/r/MensRights20/03/25 06:02 AM
10

Jesus is part and parcel of male conditioning, the unattainable 'ideal male' who has unthreatening values, and doesn't require sex from women. This allowed women and the Church to paint normal male behaviour as 'sin'...with the implication that sex was purely for procreation. And, that once we'd had our fun, we should work for a lifetime of peonage to pay off our 'debt'. If life everlasting can only be 'earned' by faithfulness and slavery, this was obviously in the interests of women. As OP corr…
/r/MensRights19/03/25 07:08 AM
6

Mike Buchanan did this in the UK, with the political party Justice For Men and Boys, fielded candidates in the 2015 election, and produced a manifesto. https://j4mb.org.uk/2015-general-election-manifesto/ His efforts were met by a wall of apathy, but he may have been ahead of his time. Things haven't improved for men in the past decade, quite the reverse.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 05:21 PM
10

Grew up in west of Scotland mining village where male values, camaraderie, and role models were still prevalent. The older, retired miners used to congregate in open spaces, around the village war memorial (commemorating male deaths to defend the system, hardly a monument to male privilege), and would chat about their life, which was almost over. Would go there with my grandfather or great-uncle, both retired miners, and would listen in awe at all that they'd been through...despite which, they s…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 08:37 AM
25

130 years ago, long before social media or OF, a certain Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, had this to say about her fellow females: "Women are always judging everyone and everything as a product on a social value scale that relates to their own egos." https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html Been a problem forever. Now amplified to the nth degree by men's ingenuity in devising efficient communication systems.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 06:10 AM
13

If feminism is at the crossroads, it'll simply sell its soul to the devil for an even better deal.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 07:49 AM
20

The way things are going with women, warnings of their inherent dangers should be signalled by someone waving a red flag in front of them at all times. A bit like what we used to do with motorised transport. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_flag_traffic_laws
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:06 AM
341

Overheard two female secretaries talking, one giving advice to the other. "If you get pregnant by a wealthy, older man, you're set up for life. Then you can do whatever you want with whoever you want." The year was 1982. Worked in that place until 1993. By that time, the advice-giver had taken her own advice.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 10:54 AM
10

What we're suffering at the moment is yet another manifestation of identity politics which has become widespread ever since women made hostile incursions into systems which had been built and previously run by men. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-falsity-of-identity-politics/ The most despised 'out-group' as far as women are concerned is men. We seem to be free as birds, going wherever and doing whatever we please, releasing our gametes with a great deal of pleasure, while they see themselves as lu…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 06:51 AM
1

"Lacking the male sex drive, women's sexual beliefs and behaviours can be more easily shaped and altered by cultural, social and situational factors. We found, for example, that attending college is associated with a 900% increase in women identifying as lesbian or bisexual." Laumann, Gagon, Michael & Michaels 'The Social Organisation of Sexuality' (1994)
/r/MensRights14/03/25 05:19 AM
3

Male patterned brain in female body can happen easily. And vice versa. https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.4/mmccarthy
/r/MensRights13/03/25 07:51 AM
6

The female sex are, to a certain extent, oestrogen automatons, their life, mood & behaviour revolving around release of their gamete in a predictable, orderly, cyclical fashion with progesterone cues. That progesterone can be converted to either oestrogen or testosterone, the latter raising her sex drive just as she's ovulating, making it more likely that she'll conceive. After she's had kids, it's mission partially accomplished, as far as Nature is concerned. The happy mother no longer requires…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 07:40 AM
2

All I can say is that, if you can get through life as a man, you will understand life much better than had you not been endowed with a Y-chromosome. Illogical, solipsistic, high self-regard in females might serve nature's purpose through raising the bar for reproduction. Sure don't aid their understanding. Of anything. And out there is a beautiful, calm world of understanding, if you can decouple from the insistent beat of the mating drum, and the values it imposes. Paradoxically, there's nothin…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 07:31 AM
1

"Wouldn't it be better to prevent 80% of male births, so they don't suffer..?" That's what they want you to believe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly
/r/MensRights12/03/25 07:14 AM
8

The system doesn't realise that we don't need the catch-all 'manosphere' any longer. Thanks to the all-pervasive level of feminist hostility we've endured for the past few decades, male collective consciousness is already at a level where we're motivated to respond, as individuals. To quote from the link : "Paradoxically, it is in individual, uncoordinated action that men do best, motivated not by organisation, but by a shared appreciation of reality. The strength of this proposed solution is th…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 07:06 AM
13

"Underlying fetish of powerlessness that lashes out violently..." It's called ressentiment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment#:~:text=The%20concept%20was%20of%20particular,of%20blame%20for%20one's%20frustration Women view themselves as unfairly burdened with menstruation, gestation, childbirth and weaning, while seeing men as (apparently) free as birds, going wherever and doing whatever we please, spraying our gametes around, and gaining a great deal of pleasure in doing so. Of course, …
/r/MensRights12/03/25 06:44 AM
1

All female flights have a tendency to end upside down on the runway. https://sandrarose.com/2025/02/delta-flight-that-crashed-in-toronto-was-flown-by-all-female-dei-pilots-video/
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:49 AM
34

During WW2, comedian Bob Hope was fond of touring Pacific theatres of war with attractive actresses, like Rita Hayworth. He's exhort the troops: "Never forget boys....THIS is what you're fighting for!" Let's see anyone attempt the same con trick, these days, while indicating a scowling, blue haired harpie with tattoos, piercings, a degree in 'Gender Studies' and a mountain of college debt... someone who is more likely to be favoured in employment, and has more legal rights than you. Why would we…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:23 AM
3

Let's see women stand with Ukraine. Ukrainian women could initiate the process. But, of course, they won't. https://thewordofdamocles.substack.com/p/the-war-in-ukraine-a-solution-ignored?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1005488&post_id=158545711&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=h2rw1&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:13 AM
30

"Thanks, have a G'day.." is actually the best (and final) thing you could say to them.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 07:07 AM
6

Absolutely! No sign of female conscription in Ukraine, despite the 'gravity of the manpower situation.' https://thewordofdamocles.substack.com/p/the-war-in-ukraine-a-solution-ignored?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1005488&post_id=158545711&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=h2rw1&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
/r/MensRights07/03/25 09:47 AM
2

In GB, Mike Buchanan got as far as forming a political party 'Justice For Men & Boys', putting forward candidates in 2015 elections. https://j4mb.org.uk/2015-general-election-manifesto/ His efforts were, unfortunately, met with a wall of apathy.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 09:36 AM
21

This sort of behaviour probably has identical roots to the now generally recognisable epidemic of female teachers having sex with pupils. It's flexing of female sexuality as power & control within an environment where the women have been entrusted with authority over others, who are in a much weaker position. The entire Duluth model of power & control is f*cked up. It's women who are hungry for it. It's women who are frustrated when they don't have it, or can't have it.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 09:43 AM
11

Granted. But being a sleazy bastard shouldn't carry jail time. When you're looking at ending your days in gaol at the hands of your political proteges who have flirted with you, for their own ends, that does seem just a trifle unfair. 'Technically innocent' should mean that, for all accused, until proven guilty. These days, the first thing you lose is your job, even if the liars can't take your freedom.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 09:30 AM
3

Feminism was never about equality. Its aim is to make women independent of men. Preferential employment prospects and welfare provision for women are mainstays of this. But the legal facilitation of removing fathers from the home and out of the lives of their children is vital. The linchpin in the feminist program is mother custody following divorce. Pull that pin and the feminist structure begins to collapse.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:38 AM
23

You have made an excellent analysis of how the times have changed, and how easy it is to stir up trouble in the internet age. In this famous case, fourteen alleged offences against ten different women was used in an attempted assassination of a resurgent political career. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Salmond_sexual_harassment_scandal Unfortunately for the accusers, one of the women who had accused him of rape had sent a text to a colleague, saying: "Looking forward to working with Alex aga…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:26 AM
18

"Now, of course, not all women are resentful.." No, but they are filled with ressentiment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment#:~:text=The%20concept%20was%20of%20particular,of%20blame%20for%20one's%20frustration Why..? Because they see themselves as lumbered with menstruation, gestation, childbirth and weaning, while men (apparently) go around as free as a bird, stronger, smarter and getting huge enjoyment from spraying their gametes all around. Nature isn't men's fault, sister! And, of c…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 04:55 AM
13

Not sure how much this aspect has been considered amongst all the other things going on! There's literature that all female groups perform worst, all male best. In mixed groups, all attempts at cooperation originated from male group members. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep26492 Men are good at running extended groups, and are willing to work with colleagues whom they may not personally like. But women form small cliques, from which outsiders are excluded. Even so, there is a constant need f…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 07:54 PM
61

Civilisation is civilised because of male, deontic values. These attempt to be fair, and are a result of the exigencies of males experiencing competition and resultant hierarchies. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Females are not experienced in having to live within such constraints. When they attempt incursion into the workplace, they retain the mindset of being provided for, as they would be in a domestic setting. Hence, they see competit…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:24 AM
16

How many more 'rights' do they need? It's actually time to defend ourselves. https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/7471a-230609-15-actions-for-men-to-defend-themselves-against-feminism.pdf
/r/MensRights03/03/25 08:29 AM
2

Probably power & control again. Those women will choose their victims carefully.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 07:55 AM
1

Things are gonna change. The future's bright. The future is orange. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7obzMRWrug
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:06 PM
1

"Men have actually been the ones supporting women in sports, while other women and feminists have been the ones attacking other women's success, not men." It's men who have the clear attributes of being task-centred and able to form cooperative teams... rather than personal networks, which can be used disruptively. But, many women perceive the accomplishments of others as a threat to their personal success. They'll them marshal their network against a victim, resulting in social ostracism for hi…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 11:56 AM
31

Cool. Let them build and maintain it, too. And make sure it's on the right track. After all, it's 'women only'. My guess is that it won't be so popular after a short time.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 08:57 AM
14

Keeping women scared of men since the 1970s, to reduce population growth. https://www.hli.org/resources/the-kissinger-report-nssm-200/ Things don't change much, do they? Even back in the seventies. "The US requires access to the mineral resources of other countries..."
/r/MensRights28/02/25 05:57 PM
14

'Tis a pity that it's oestrogen which programmes boys' brains in utero to exhibit typical male behaviours on reaching adolescence. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 This is all pretty well worked out now. https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf Ooooh! Who would have thought it? Males exhibit male behaviour because this will be of greatest utility to females, in enabling them to grade the…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 05:35 PM
18

According to this famous woman, the founder of modern nursing, women aren't empathetic with anyone. https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html But, they'll cock their head to one side, and pretend to be man's best friend, as long as they believe they're getting some advantage out of it. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Nature wants females to appear as though they're being nice. The perception of female altruism, rather than any true empathy on…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 09:19 AM
15

One of the originators of the Duluth Model, Ellen Pence, rejected her own model, more than a quarter century ago. "I found that the men I interviewed did not articulate a desire for power over a partner. Although I relentlessly took every opportunity to point out to the men in groups that they were so motivated, and were merely in denial, the fact that so few men ever articulated such a desire went unnoticed by me and many of my co-workers. Eventually, we realised that we were finding what we ha…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 10:52 AM
2

Male genital mutilation in the Abrahamic religions had one specific aim in mind - to create further followers of that religion. The foreskin is a natural roller bearing. Makes it easy for a young man to pleasure himself - thereby giving him a certain level of independence from the marriage trap. Remove that foreskin, and self-pleasure isn't so pleasurable in the absence of lubricant. Makes it much more likely that he'll stick it in crazy and become a father. Thereby swelling the take at the cong…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:56 AM
1

You've got a point, but I think he's totally cereal.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:38 AM
2

Males who are being dominated by women are likely to lose male respect. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/dominance-hierarchy-is-male-specific/
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:28 AM
37

According to GB Prime Minister, the problem is "massively underreported". One of his many lies, while they try to add fuel to the hysteria, with some 'victims' claiming that they must have been 'injected with a hypodermic needle'. Minister for Women's Safety, Jess Phillips, urged young men to go up to women who might appear at risk in the clubs, and ask them if they were feeling 'all right'. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm27q1366d0o Yes, Jess. That's not going to make you a 'creep', is it…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:46 AM
0

What is the position on male free will and volition when natural female substances make women appear much more attractive, and raise male testosterone levels? https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 Beer goggles might make women seem attractive... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNn-6FzTimY ....but this condition doesn't concurrently raise testosterone
/r/MensRights26/02/25 07:16 AM
12

Culturally and religiously-imposed monogamy was, in reality, a contract whereby property and resources were transferred to a female, preferably a woman of modest sexual history, in return for unique access to her fertility. It meant that men could at least be reasonably sure regarding the paternity of offspring. But, encouraged by feminism to go earn their own money, women's loyalty to a provider soon fell by the wayside. Today, men are expected to stump up towards provisioning for multiple chil…
/r/MensRights25/02/25 10:18 AM
27

Ever since men were ingenious enough to invent the birth control pill, ushering in the 'sexual revolution', that revolution has revolved around the idealised female strategy for achieving their sexual life goals - secure investment from a man, while retaining the option to trade up to a more attractive man at any time ' plus opportunistic, hidden, extra pair couplings with attractive men when she might be feeling particularly randy around ovulation. They've always done this. Take a look at this …
/r/MensRights25/02/25 08:03 AM
28

One night stand ends in 5 years jail for overdue child support, and he wasn't even the father. And she knew it. https://discuss.ilw.com/forum/immigration-discussion/460027-bill-manser-imprisoned-wrongly-for-5-years What kind of madness is this? You know, when war comes down the line, and men are told to go defend the system, the system can go fuck itself.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:58 AM
7

There's got to be a great career ahead of her as an 'entertainer', surely..? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-47718477
/r/MensRights24/02/25 03:25 AM
1

And women know it, too. Some are even indiscreet enough to openly say it. The block capitals of 'SERVE' are those of Ms Milburn. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn Mixed in with a pinch of ressentiment.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/25 03:19 AM
3

Ha! That was too subtle for me.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 01:42 AM
9

The standard feminist response to any emerging threat posed by a rival organisation is to infiltrate it, co-opt, control, and then destroy it. This is what happened with the 'Movember' movement. It got a female CEO. Then, it started to 'redefine masculinity' to make it 'less toxic'. while funnelling money to female charities, in order to assist in this 'male detoxification'. https://www.themanual.com/culture/movemberr-report-mens-health-workplace/ https://nwiot.org/movember-mens-mental-health-an…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 03:04 PM
11

Computers don't appreciate that we'll go through all of this, just to have sex. Women, on the other hand, know it only too well.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 02:46 PM
2

Think that's why paternity testing is illegal in France. Something to do with 'maintaining family peace'. https://avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/france-upholds-the-ban-on-paternity-tests/
/r/MensRights23/02/25 01:42 PM
7

Women can be certain of maternity, while men certainly can't. At least 10% of men in the west are unwittingly raising children whom they haven't fathered. http://empathygap.uk/?p=238 Women gloat about this to other women. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ And they see it as perfectly 'ethical' to raid male bank accounts for eighteen years, under false pretences. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf This is because the idealised female reproductive strategy i…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 12:47 PM
2

Female expectation that they are somehow 'entitled' to cheat. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Yet, still put their hand out for 18 years of paycheques, and see nothing ethically wrong with this. In fact, quite the reverse. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf 50% of human beings would see it as morally wrong to bang a man up in jail for five years for not paying child support to a kid she knew had been fathered by another man. And women wouldn't, apparentl…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:59 AM
33

These poor, oppressed women always have a safety net which will ensure their survival. They seem to gloat about it, while simultaneously maintaining the myth of limited opportunities. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwygdzn4dw4o With such adroit ability to inhabit parallel quantum states, it's difficult to comprehend why particle physics seems beyond them.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:27 AM
8

Absolutely! Civilisation arose from the deontic values which are a natural consequence on male competitive hierarchies. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Men try to be fair. Meritocracy is the least corrupt system. Women, being weaker, have gained most evolutionary advantage by subverting deontic values to their own, base, utilitarian needs. This has been gaining pace recently with feminism, AA, EEO, DEI, ESG. Goodbye, civilisation. It will …
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:47 AM
128

Any time that men get together as a single sex group, they soon discover that most of their problems originate from women. This phenomenon was observed in the barrack rooms during WW2, where some underlying female behaviour soon came to light. "What, you got a 'Dear John' letter, too?!!" "Yes, she left me for another man while I was away, fighting for her freedom." Women feel obliged to maintain control of the narrative, and have invaded male spaces (masons, golf clubs, private members clubs) po…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:10 AM
12

Much of the article seems to be the thesis that men are uncivilised because they ditch their friends after marriage, so I'd like to propose a possible explanation as to why this occurs. The first thing you discover about married life is that your wife hates your friends. Spending time with them becomes uncomfortable, as they're unwelcome in your own home, and there will be hell to pay if you mix with them outside the home. Saw it with my old man, but was too young to know what was going on. Expe…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 06:53 AM
136

They didn't exactly throw the book at Elizabeth Holmes, either, and we're talking $9 billion deception on blood-testing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Holmes Then, when she gets caught, the dynamic changes from powerful boss-b*tch to poor, manipulated girlie, whose abusive partner made her do these things (even though she'd been driven to be an 'entrepreneur', come what may, from the day she discovered that she could manipulate older, successful men). And, when it's apparent that some …
/r/MensRights23/02/25 06:26 AM
7

Feminist 'research' is rarely in good faith. The usual MO is to find an 'issue' which will be strategically useful to them, then fudge the results to find what they were looking for. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ Even Ellen Pence, one of the originators of the Duluth Model of domestic violence, was enlightened enough to recognise her own unconscious bias, way back in 1999. "We all engaged in ideological practices, and claimed them to be neutral observations. I found that th…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 06:17 AM
2

Being married for a long time, have had ample opportunity to suspect that men and women exist in slightly different realities, honed to the adversarial nature of M/F reproductive strategies . Being a research chemist who has been involved in neurotransmitters, premised that this was due to the effect of hormones on the neuroendocrine system. The work of Professor Iain McGilchrist was a starting point. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-rea…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:21 AM
2

It's the same for male stickleback fish. No territory..? No status...? No chance to use the pump action yoghurt rifle, then. https://www.earthgardeners.it/en/2022/10/31/the-three-spined-stickleback-and-tinbergen/ In human life, employment is the main playing card of the male in the sexual economics market. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf But, they t'k'r jobs!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-kgb1QtSnU And gave them, inter alia to women. They use this new found empowerment to cras…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:06 AM
12

Testosterone is an anabolic steroid which can build muscle and bone instead of shunting nutrients into fat production. It features a relatively unstable alpha, beta-unsaturated cyclohexenone in Ring A, rather than the much more thermodynamically stable, aromatic phenol of oestrogen. Thus, testosterone is easily converted into oestrogen by the enzyme aromatase, which is present in fatty tissue (including the brain) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase It has been known since 1994 that oestroge…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 10:49 AM
130

Well known female behaviour for the past several hundred years. https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/hell-has-no-fury-like-a-woman-scorned.html
/r/MensRights21/02/25 08:04 AM
32

He requested consent. She was holding his waist. They'd known each other for years. They'd just won the World Cup FFS. So, having requested consent, and this still happens, maybe just don't touch people. With a fucking bargepole.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:34 AM
1

'Two things seeketh the true man - danger and diversion' https://www.azquotes.com/quote/214471
/r/MensRights21/02/25 03:01 AM
35

A lipreader who analysed footage of the 'assault', perpetrated in front of millions on live TV (as you do), testified that Rubiales (who was being held firmly by the waist by the female footballer) asked if it was OK to kiss her. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2qzxdw75qo It would seem that any and all interactions with the female sex are fraught with the possibility that your career may be ended and your reputation dragged through the gutter. Despite being rampantly heterosexual, the only…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 02:54 AM
1

Maybe it's time to further men's rights through something a bit less hysterical and rather more gentlemanly. A Gentleman's Strike. http://empathygap.uk/?p=4595
/r/MensRights17/02/25 09:54 AM
3

If we can get to the root of how we are being treated as men, and who is being advantaged, and why, we can possibly do something about it. This is not the male equivalent of a crazy 4b movement. It's much more subtle. http://empathygap.uk/?p=4595
/r/MensRights16/02/25 10:55 AM
2

No problem! I'm sure you'll spot plenty of areas which I've missed and overlooked. One thing's for sure, though. Any big picture sure ain't pretty.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 10:49 AM
3

Female psychopathy has hidden in plain sight forever. The tests were designed for more typically male behaviours. But, it's starting to get noticed. https://neurosciencenews.com/female-psychopathy-psychology-25669/ The female MO is different. They get others to do the wet work. In their own minds, they have thereby kept their own hands 'clean'. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ Nowadays, because of the power they have gained in commerce (riddled with female HR), a…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 10:09 AM
5

Because of law, the pen is now mightier than the sword. This is all well and good where men are making laws, as those laws are deontic, due to evolved male competitive hierarchies. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Women, being physically weaker, have gained evolutionary advantage by subverting deontic principles to their own utilitarian female interest. This has been tolerated for thousands of years. But, only within the past human lifespan…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 09:01 AM
3

You are absolutely correct, Rory, and your observation doesn't deserve to be downvoted. If a man gets hit on by a woman, he may well capitalise on the approach as a one-night stand (with precautions, if he's sensible), but no way will he want to commit to any sort of relationship with her. The signals being sent in these circumstances are that they both know what she could be doing any time she's out of his sight. Please accept an upvote.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 08:18 AM
3

"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." William Congreve. So - what happens when they get turned down? Can you imagine the consequences of that female anger, how they'd cope with their ego being crushed? False accusation, reputation destruction, stalking and revenge for being 'slighted' would go through the roof! They'd get other men to attack you, and the white knights would be lining up to do so. After all, this could be their big chance! Women would simply be unable to cope with the levels …
/r/MensRights16/02/25 08:10 AM
20

Domestic violence perpetrated by women is commonplace, and associated with mate-guarding. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/ Being physically weaker, they're more likely to game towards ultimately lethal outcomes by using weapons, poison or attacking when their partner is helpless (sleeping, showering). Just look at the pent-up rage in that face. She's not sorry. In her mind, she was right. 'Hell hath no fury like a w…
/r/MensRights15/02/25 09:11 AM
2

Nah. Gwen Guthrie's 'Nothin' Goin'On but the Rent' is the truly romantic Valentine's Day masterpiece. https://www.lyrics.com/lyric/31844264/Gwen+Guthrie/Ain%27t+Nothing+Going+on+But+the+Rent Are we having fun, yet..?
/r/MensRights15/02/25 08:58 AM
1

"The linchpin in the feminist program is mother custody following divorce. Pull that pin, and the feminist structure collapses. Feminism was never about equality, but about making women independent of men - which, in the domestic context, means women's ability to remove fathers from the home, and from their children's lives." http://empathygap.uk/?p=4595 Happy Valentine's Day. A day to swim in the shark pool, where the sharks play the long game.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:09 PM
3

These people all demand that society must change to suit their needs - little realising that, somehow, they've been mis-programmed in utero. There's only a few weeks of gestation where the brain can be influenced by steroids to reflect the behaviours required of gonadal sex. https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf Obviously, sometimes, things will go wrong. In the case of Dworkin, it looks like quit…
/r/MensRights14/02/25 12:52 PM
12

Yes, probably not a good idea. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDlR_ccnZww
/r/MensRights14/02/25 12:42 PM
2

They'd have been queueing round the block at the dealership to take ownership of Andrea. If (according to her) woman is a 'cultural construct', she sure was a big 'un. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/john-stoltenberg-andrew-dworkin-was-trans-ally/
/r/MensRights14/02/25 10:41 AM
38

Meanwhile, her fellow feminists in Cabinet are determined that women shouldn't go to prison. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html I wonder who they're making room for..?
/r/MensRights13/02/25 11:00 AM
39

In identity politics, you're either 'in' or you're out. There's no coming back from it, either. The good news..? This is catastrophically self-destructive for feminism. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2796 Popcorn time!!
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:35 AM
44

If experience in GB is anything to go by, this spokesperson will soon be quietly eliminated from any decision-making process. Here's what happened to Sir Stephen House https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-64815863 Betsy Stanko got her claws out on Channel 4 News, Cathy Newman gave her free rein, and he was removed from Operation Soteria Bluestone. Which is a code-name, effectively, for 'Believe All Women'. https://www.channel4.com/news/exclusive-former-acting-met-commissioner-facing-inve…
/r/MensRights13/02/25 07:32 AM
10

How would control groups aid in advancement of their 'theories'? https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ Their only interest in male control groups is when it's groups of powerful men they can control!! Through them, they can subjugate all other men. Unfortunately, they achieved this around thirty years ago. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Beijing%20Declaration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action%2C%20adopted,the%20key%20global%20policy%20document%20on%2…
/r/MensRights12/02/25 10:28 AM
16

Gender parity in anything.... if you want to push one side up, you must hold the other side back. https://critiquingfeminism.substack.com/p/what-is-gender-equality?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4qudq5&triedRedirect=true Hollywood, like everywhere else in the west is run by Diana Moon-Glampers. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/harrison-bergeron/characters/diana-moon-glampers-handicapper-general
/r/MensRights12/02/25 09:02 AM
22

After you get married, a further dynamic kicks in. That handful of really close buddies you once did everything with...? Your missus can't stand most of them. And they've got wives, too. And, most of those wives can't stand you, for some unfathomable reason. The ensuing situations can stretch the strongest of bonds. It takes ages to figure out what's going on, only makes sense in retrospect. When women are preparing to commit to having a family, they want 100% of your focus and commitment on the…
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:26 AM
17

'Agender'. Is that the same as asexual? 'Reality'... and how it is constructed. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/
/r/MensRights11/02/25 10:56 AM
72

Having a good-looking, daring, socially-adept, high status boyfriend is screaming out "Good genes... I want his babies." But, he might be a bit too daring and dangerous. In this insecure world, the material girl needs all the security she can get. So, the best compromise is to marry security and play around with the good genes during clandestine trysts, where she won't take any precautions, they'll be thrown to the wind. How romantic!! Unlike all other female mammals, women have hidden ovulation…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 10:41 AM
39

You may find this difficult to believe, but, in the male universe, truth is more important than image. Whereas.... https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/?sfw=pass1739269608
/r/MensRights11/02/25 10:27 AM
2

'Kenjataimu' is known as 'wise man time' for a good reason. https://www.japandict.com/%E8%B3%A2%E8%80%85%E3%82%BF%E3%82%A4%E3%83%A0 https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Kenjataimu
/r/MensRights11/02/25 10:21 AM
8

Oh, it soon becomes your problem when they become the policy-makers. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/
/r/MensRights11/02/25 07:04 AM
62

A female CEO of an organisation which purports to defend and progress male interests is the best way to ensure that these interests are not defended or progressed. Women simply can't help themselves. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Also, there's a certain amount of Freudian truth in that cage she's holding. That's where they like to keep us. We are allowed our hours of 'freedom' only when we're out working for their benefit.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 06:43 AM
8

It's more than thirty years since seeing in 'New Scientist' that the phrase 'penetrating insight' was to be discouraged in descriptions of scientific endeavours. We've been left with too many gaping holes.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 06:34 AM
29

Gradually, the true picture will be revealed. https://neurosciencenews.com/female-psychopathy-psychology-25669/
/r/MensRights11/02/25 06:15 AM
1

The instant we decide to do so, we wouldn't be sexually attractive to any heterosexual woman, and you know it.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 06:09 AM
1

It was Valerie Hudson who wrote it. Don't believe she's Chinese. She has been deeply involved in forming American Foreign Policy for quarter of a century. https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/24/what-sex-means-for-world-peace/ I believe her beef is that Eastern armies will be more powerful than Western, as they have access to a deeper pool of untapped masculinity.... because men can't form families.....because there aren't enough women....because so many females were aborted in China, after the int…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:58 AM
44

Female violence hides in plain sight, and is generally unappreciated by males until they find themselves victims. I knew all about it when I found myself standing in the way of a big promotion for a female colleague, she began a campaign of reputation destruction behind my back. It's common phenomenon. They don't care about truth, they care about outcome, a utilitarian outcome which must be to their benefit. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ You know what..? Sudde…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:48 AM
1

Women are always on the lookout for issues which might affect their 'security'. Then, they push men to go and fight on their behalf. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827 https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/
/r/MensRights10/02/25 10:20 AM
27

It's worse. It's fucking with your head.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 10:03 AM
56

Feminists seem to think that women should be in complete control of the world, and that giving 'dangerous' men oestrogen is the answer. However, the true situation is much more complex than they imagine. Embryonic male brains are provided with oestrogen, in the womb to programme us for male behaviours later in life. This has been known for a time. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 Our own testosterone is used against us, converted into oestrogen by the enzyme aromatase in the brain. …
/r/MensRights10/02/25 08:33 AM
24

"That site doesn't deserve the clicks." Missed an 'h' from the first noun, surely?
/r/MensRights09/02/25 11:28 PM
2

Well, most people do, unfortunately. If we want to make progress from the hole we're in presently, more men must adopt your attitude, sir.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 10:13 PM
12

There are none so blind as she who will not see. https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-the-left-brains-wilful-denial/ The left brain hemisphere is oestrogen-sensitive (McGilchrist 'The Master & His Emissary', page 33) Women, and the left, are deep in their own silo. https://www.realclearscience.com/2021/06/22/the_neuroscience_of_intellectual_openness_782424.html
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:30 AM
5

Fair play to you, man. I'm Scottish, brought up working class, on a Council estate. Had my nose (badly) broken, aged 11. So - wasn't popular with the girlies at grammar school. Studied. Got a BSc, a PhD, and a great job. Girlies now beating a path to my door! Worked in STEM for 25 years, until it became polluted with quota placements. You wouldn't believe the chaos!! Now, I write books. Six of 'em, different pseudonyms. Here's a free one. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patternin…
/r/MensRights08/02/25 04:28 AM
11

Tip of an iceberg, now surfacing so frequently that it's impossible not to believe that this stuff has been going on forever.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 03:44 AM
5

Yeah, the authorities do everything in their power to stymie and conceal innate male educational aptitude, these days. Teachers have assumed the role of Diana Moon-Glampers in this prescient 1960s novel by Kurt Vonnegut. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/harrison-bergeron/characters/diana-moon-glampers-handicapper-general
/r/MensRights08/02/25 03:39 AM
16

It's not to their liking that men aren't burdened with menstruation, pregnancy and weaning. It's not to their liking that men are stronger and much more likely to be geniuses, especially in math (1). So, their frustration is expressed in illogical ressentiment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment#:~:text=The%20concept%20was%20of%20particular,of%20blame%20for%20one's%20frustration (1) https://gwern.net/doc/iq/high/smpy/1982-benbow-2.pdf Jeez. We get frustrated with women, too. For many rea…
/r/MensRights08/02/25 03:29 AM
15

It's unfortunate for men that most women don't seem to share your enlightened viewpoint. They want that money, even when they know it's not our kid. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf https://discuss.ilw.com/forum/immigration-discussion/460027-bill-manser-imprisoned-wrongly-for-5-years Not all women, but always a woman...
/r/MensRights08/02/25 02:55 AM
4

A certain concentration of estrogen stops the long bones growing, and diverts anabolism from muscle to fat. Probably for good reason. The self-regard of the adult female neuroendocrine system keeps the bar high for suitors. But, in a taller, more powerful Amazonian body, the lack of empathy in that neuroendocrine system could end in disaster for the human race.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 05:42 PM
3

Probably better not to choose Taylor Swift (or similar) if you want it to actually happen, though. Unless she chooses you.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 02:03 PM
1

Because we tend to argue for truth, rather than saving face. Females have opposite tendency. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/
/r/MensRights07/02/25 08:41 AM
14

"You are approaching this as a victim who hasn't been chosen..." Jeez. Have been married for over 44 years to a woman who's still quite attractive. And that wasn't an easy play, either, since my nose was broken, utterly f*cked, aged 11. "So a man who isn't a victim can see that certain things he does, or can do, makes him more appealing to a woman he's interested in." Yep.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 07:16 AM
19

Because women bear the reproductive burden of pregnancy, they have become evolutionarily accustomed to being provided for. As Ester Vilar pointed out in 'The Manipulated Man', if men became pregnant, they'd want to know everything about how it worked. But women's interest seems to begin and end with knowing that the chemical robotic assembly line will take care of business, and that their main role is to be good to themselves and take it easy. Back in the 1940's, Philip Wylie foresaw trouble ahe…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 07:11 AM
22

As soon as menarche hits, women become the shapely, yet solipsistic and hypergamous creatures that we all know and love. That's the problem. We can't help ourselves. As a result, we forgive them almost anything, including their entitled behaviour (which is a kind of quality control for the human race).
/r/MensRights07/02/25 06:02 AM
1

Women choose with whom they have sex. So, they get to control the direction of human evolution. We are all the result of a selective breeding programme, the selection being done by females. As children, our earliest influences are overwhelmingly female, for years on end. Mothers. Female teachers. So, ladies - every time you complain about male nature, remember this. It's your fault. If we are monsters, we are monsters which you created. Oh, and it's oestrogen which templates for male behaviour, …
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:03 AM
1

Please tell me that you didn't become a lawyer!
/r/MensRights07/02/25 03:54 AM
6

Totally agree with you. And our comments seem to have attracted the attention of the downvoting feminist trolls who like to police this sub, so we're on the right track.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:27 PM
114

What is really obscene is women 'defining' masculinity through an omniscient lens of their own life experiences. Most men know that we will never understand women. If only that were reciprocated.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 03:04 PM
11

They feel a great deal of ressentiment towards men, simply because we aren't lumbered with menstruation, gestation and weaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment#:~:text=The%20concept%20was%20of%20particular,of%20blame%20for%20one's%20frustration That's more than a little unjustified. Men aren't responsible for this state of affairs. Probably, women are also a little jealous of male creativity. But, that's a by-product of male competition and ethics. https://www.denisecummins.com/upload…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 03:00 PM
19

Women were the recipients of male largesse, as they were proxies for children, the future of the human race. Many women don't want to have children any longer. They can earn more than men. We owe such women nothing. Certainly not that we should lay down our lives for them.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 12:31 PM
5

Doesn't fit 'the narrative', so we never get to hear about it. In our evolutionary past, men had to compete with other men (mainly for women), but they had to collaborate with other men, in hunting parties, and to protect the tribe from threats. Women would have been constantly pregnant or weaning. The pregnancies would be doomed without Vitamin B12 from meat. So, they'd wait at home, and would dispense sexual favour to the best hunters. In order to protect their fertility, females instinctively…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 12:17 PM
4

Hmmm... Because of the rigours of male competition, male ethics are the deontic ones which build civilisations. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf By contrast, women gain most evolutionary advantage by subverting deontic ethics, in favour of unashamedly utilitarian ethics, designed always to work in female favour. They'll simply close ranks on you, no matter how greedy and stupid their aims. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Let's…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 11:51 AM
9

If only the social engineers could be persuaded to adopt this mindset... And just wait until your pension fund is being managed by all female investors, dropping your future income into women-owned businesses.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:28 AM
9

I don't know all that many women. Have heard of some that try to stop men talking about sport, though. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51261999 This woman is author of 'Create a Gender-Balanced Workplace'. It sounds like a really inclusive utopia for men/s
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:14 AM
9

Well women don't think it's wrong, that's for sure. https://www.scotsman.com/news/uk-news/96-of-women-are-liars-honest-2509965 Women, with their hidden ovulation, are at the very top of the evolutionary pyramid, as far as female mammals are concerned. They are the apex predators of baby trapping. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 http://empathygap.uk/?p=1462
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:55 AM
6

Less Feminism = Less War You see, they're always obsessing about threats. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827 The above feminist authors are Government Advisors. They have major influence on foreign policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/author/valerie-hudson/ Of course, it's men who will have to do the fighting for them, after they've stirred it up.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:37 AM
1

She beat a hasty retreat away from the many irate recipients of her charms, back to Wigan, whence she came. Presumably for a good dose of penicillin.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:11 AM
6

Back when I was a seventeen year old, just finished school and about to go to university, I worked the summer as a waiter in a holiday camp. The staff were a mixture of students, casual workers, and some reprobates just out of jail, who'd had kitchen jobs arranged by the Probation Service. It was a heady mix. There was a waitress there who was a casual, and was about ten years older than myself. One day, after a shift, she asked me to fetch her an ice cream from the stores, and I went to oblige.…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 04:36 PM
10

It's almost as though there were an existing agenda, and they're willing to scrape the bottom of any barrel in order to justify it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html No problems in locking men up, though. There has always been a feminist element who have desired this. Julie Bindel writes for the Guardian now, although it's she who should be behind bars for advocating this sexist, misandrist tripe. https://www.thecollegefix.com/…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 02:47 PM
11

There never was, and never has been a Patriarchy. Civilised society has always been run to female benefit. This was studied extensively by Robert Briffault in his multi-volume work: 'The Mothers : A Study on the Origins of Sentiments and Institutions.' https://archive.org/details/mothersstudyofor0001brif Briffault was a very clever man in getting to the root of female motivations and the tricky dynamic of family life. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Back in the 1940s, Philip …
/r/MensRights05/02/25 02:35 PM
31

Worked in STEM for three decades. Back in the 1990s, women Chemical Engineers were a rarity. The first came into an all-male Department where the men were drooling at the mouth. She gloried in the attention, and openly boasted that she could wind the Head of Department round her little finger. Then a second female Chemical Engineer was hired. Those women hated one another, especially as the second one was easier on the eye. Eventually, a third was hired, triggering an arms race for attention fro…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 01:32 PM
1

True. https://www.nature.com/articles/mp201066
/r/MensRights05/02/25 10:25 AM
1

A closely related post got taken down before it was possible to reply. Might be relevant here tho' https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ii447h/comment/mb2k5hc/
/r/MensRights05/02/25 07:41 AM
30

Most of the male population in theatres of war didn't choose to be there. They weren't afforded the option. They are denied autonomy over their own bodies, and shoved into a meat grinder. In the past, there may have been an illusion that we were fighting to protect something. A loving wife and family, perhaps. That is becoming a difficult sell for the meat grinder operators.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:28 PM
31

More like used products in a thrift store. Or used cars on a car-lot. "High mileage, high-maintenance. Leaks a bit of oil, and may require a rebore."
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:21 PM
8

There's something dark going on with women and bears. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_(novel)) It's not the darkest, unfortunately. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Secret_Garden
/r/MensRights04/02/25 10:08 AM
39

Eventually, their teeth rot.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 10:02 AM
2

Yeah. Gambling is a mug's game, eh?
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:18 AM
-1

What are the chances of that mold that got bleached turning into Albert Einstein, Jeff Beck, or Jack Kerouac?
/r/MensRights04/02/25 05:55 AM
2

There is no such thing as a man receiving blind, unconditional love from a woman. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ This fact is recognised by other women also (the more perceptive ones, anyway). https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html
/r/MensRights03/02/25 08:42 AM
4

"Hell, we evolved to produce more men than women, precisely because we are biologically expected to live shorter lives." After major wars, more boys are born, to compensate for the losses. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Returning_soldier_effect It's almost as though nature knows. Which might frustrate the efforts of extreme feminists, who want to reduce males to 10% of the population. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart It's not only the tax system which is redistributing wealth i…
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:29 AM
10

The internal combustion engine, jet propulsion and electrodynamics are all proud feminist achievements /S
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:18 AM
12

"Gee...thanks! I always find socks really useful for lonely nights." Watch their head cocked back, silent hilarity evaporate.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:05 AM
34

There's probably an equal number of M/F psychopaths. They just present differently. https://www.aru.ac.uk/news/female-psychopaths-more-common-than-we-think
/r/MensRights03/02/25 06:53 AM
9

Women murder more human beings than men could ever do. https://www.lifenews.com/2025/01/02/abortion-was-the-leading-cause-of-death-worldwide-in-2024-killing-73-million-people/?cmid=53696e82-d8f4-4557-8f7c-dd581c7f7cd3 The figures on female rape should be much higher. Many unwilling interactions could be more accurately defined as 'envelopment of a penis by a vagina'. Instead, the law insists that perpetrators always penetrate, which requires a penis. The sexual abuse of males by females is a min…
/r/MensRights03/02/25 06:48 AM
9

"The deeper you go in the rabbit hole, the worse it gets." The bottom of the rabbit hole... http://empathygap.uk/?p=1462
/r/MensRights03/02/25 06:34 AM
14

Yes, women don't take chances. They won't chance their arm unless the odds are overwhelmingly in their favour. When they do decide to take action, they're ruthless. It's the same pattern they exhibit in domestic violence. They attack men when helpless (sleeping or showering), and are more likely to use lethal force with a weapon or poison. They're also noted for victimising members of the opposite sex who are relatively unable to defend themselves as compromised by age (very young or very old) o…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 12:58 PM
4

How bears see feminists. https://www.amazon.in/Bears-Going-Their-Own-BGTOW-ebook/dp/B0D57MCD1G
/r/MensRights01/02/25 12:41 PM
8

"There's a club if you'd like to go / You could meet somebody who really loves you / So you go and you stand on your own / And you leave on your own / And you go home and you cry / And you want to die https://genius.com/The-smiths-how-soon-is-now-lyrics Yeah. Experienced it. Some context. My nose was broken, utterly f*cked, aged eleven. It was the kid sister of a mate. She'd been told she couldn't join in on our swordfighting game. So, when we were done, she walked up behind me with one of the n…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 12:34 PM
7

Or other women. https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html
/r/MensRights01/02/25 10:58 AM
7

"Men can go to places that they wouldn't go to with a gun if they are horny..." In December 2020, Dale McLaughlan, from Ayrshire, purchased a jetski and used it, for the very first time, to make an utterly perilous, 25 mile journey from southern Scotland to the Isle of Man, braving 8 foot waves on a crossing which took five hours. Arriving in Ramsey, he then had to walk 15 miles to her home in Douglas. Where he was arrested and thrown in jail for breaking Covid restrictions. The reason? He wante…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 10:54 AM
2

Oh, they've got their uses. If you want to be happy for the rest of your life... https://www.songlyrics.com/jimmy-soul/if-you-want-to-be-happy-lyrics/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBO_10GVf74
/r/MensRights01/02/25 09:33 AM
11

"I am human, and I need to be loved...just like everybody else does." 'How Soon Is Now', a 1980s song by the Smiths. The main problem is that women simply can't access the life experience of the opposite sex. This makes them entirely unsuitable as psychologists/therapists for men. The reverse is true also, men can't offer much valid advice for women's problems. But, we're a little better at empathising, walking a few miles in the moccasins of others. Imagine living in a world where everyone want…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 08:35 AM
10

This can all be traced back to US Government initiatives, in the 1970s, utilising feminism to counter population growth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRPCXaE7QHw A video which is almost one hour long is a big ask for anyone. Nonetheless, it's there, if you want to watch. But, basically, if women are favoured in the employment market, then they become unattainable for most men, due to hypergamy. A man's main asset in the sexual economics market is a good, well-paying, secure job. This has been…
/r/MensRights31/01/25 09:29 AM
4

"They see any group related to men as automatically dangerous and misogynistic." This is indoctrinated into them during their 'Gender Studies' courses. "The real danger to female-led social change is the phenomenon of male bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other - whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation or a competitive sport." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:57 AM
7

The themes of unrealistic female expectations covered in the film have been a century-old problem for husbands: "American women are inculcated with a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy-tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activities, but merely because they are female. This has defeated husbands in America, making homes into centres of disillusionment. It long ago became associated with the notion that the mere act of bearing children entitled women t…
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:36 AM
8

"We fucking create life, we are so powerful..." Men create life. In the absence of sex with men, or interaction with the medical science created by men, women have periods. Subsequent to male input, they become a robotic assembly line, with little knowledge of how the factory works, beyond that they must be good to themselves and take it easy.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 04:16 AM
6

Fair point.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 05:37 AM
11

Keep 'em in jail, and they can do it in cells.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 05:31 AM
18

It's strange how GB Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and the pussy posse in Government never mention the crazy feminist ideas which lie behind the announcements. It's always 'overcrowding crisis' and stuff.. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html From the OP article: "Abolition is the only way we will be free from oppression." Yeah. Not 'Abolition Feminism', though. How about Abolition of Feminism?
/r/MensRights30/01/25 05:29 AM
5

Try listening to 'I Hear You Knocking' by Dave Edmunds. Loud. https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/daveedmunds/ihearyouknocking.html It'll help develop a certain mindset. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMjwb13TFCo
/r/MensRights30/01/25 05:14 AM
2

Labelling it is easy. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ They marshal others to do the wet work for them, while believing that they are keeping their own hands 'clean'. Opposing it is much more difficult.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 07:57 AM
2

Although this is being downvoted, it's actually true. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Rachel-Wilson-ebook/dp/B09NK9TNYD/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1D7PN6X6ZU4N1&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.HPe_zISzvQVuu-omhf8CCdH9h5aYiIRaRezqz5IKpmAM8ZKYC2fqJMu0znL_PRvmS0IbfTSNYh1MTj443FGAG0t1Ob9ZUbDjIbyDmMdRGHJbKBm4b9VUqwjzePYgViKYojqVEAvA9044HbrenShWnr_RMiW6af_xCskurPiJU9W_pPcNQIylUk9YXhr7CNNxhVRjYp_eJyS3kL5p9lkrYR7zI9TB7fjpZR6VvlS3JTYKb7fsSGqQl_CxmvaMGCbT.UcDOrWK--V7D-wA43lwJ95k0y4gwQ8Pyf2HfQszlqT0&dib_tag=se&keywords=rachel+wilson+sec…
/r/MensRights29/01/25 07:02 AM
1

I try not to look at any of them these days. Attractive or not, I simply look the other way.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 04:01 PM
6

"Feminists turn a blind eye to this abuse of 12yo girls." This could be the biggest mistake they have ever made. The feminist Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, wants to equate misogyny with terrorism. And fellow feminist Jess Phillips, who is the 'Safeguarding Minister' is constantly coming up with initiatives to 'help women spot perpetrator behaviour'. Yet they have thrown young girls to the wolves in order to protect their feminist narrative that all of society's ills stem from white male power. …
/r/MensRights24/01/25 05:56 AM
12

There can only be one sex of perps. There can only be one sex of victims. No lie is too big.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 11:15 PM
8

Yes, if they are so concerned about protecting vulnerable girls... https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/01/23/the-grooming-gangs-scandal-is-far-worse-than-you-think/ But the feminists in the Cabinet (Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, and Home Office Undersecretary Jess Phillips - the latter with responsibility for 'safeguarding women & girls) refuse a national enquiry. Why? Because they know that the outcome would go against their feminist orthodoxy of 'dismantling' a particular 'power base'. https://…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 11:08 PM
16

Self policing of males: https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-falsity-of-identity-politics/
/r/MensRights23/01/25 10:34 PM
2

U.... sure don't know me. Brah.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 04:39 PM
59

The VAWG reports are lies, which include violence against men and boys. http://empathygap.uk/?p=4007
/r/MensRights23/01/25 03:34 PM
22

Shame that all the women are pear shaped.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 03:28 PM
10

Spot on. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights23/01/25 03:23 PM
25

Women look out for their own interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Men defer to women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ And, if all else fails, women can fall back on feminine wiles. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ These starting conditions have been honed by eons of evolution, and are impossible for men to emulate.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 03:21 PM
3

I, too, would have believed her ranting to be the thoughts of an isolated and resentful woman. But, one day, I realised something.... Most men know that we'll never understand women. On the other hand, most women believe that they already know all there is to know about men. They know that we can be controlled through sex. And they honestly believe that's all they need to know about us. To women, everything in the world, animate or inanimate, is simply a tool. Things which aren't part of the que…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 03:12 PM
18

"Wedding Ring Effect" https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333245606_Do_women_truly_want_a_man_they_can%27t_have_The_wedding_ring_effect_revisited#:~:text=The%20wedding%20ring%20effect%20or%20mate-choice%20copying%20in,romantic%20relationships%20as%20their%20partners%20over%20uninvolved%20individuals
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:13 PM
14

Why feminists don't want men to have male-only spaces... "The real danger to female-led social change is the phenomenon of male bonding - that commitment of groups of men to each other, whether in an army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation, or competitive sport." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart
/r/MensRights23/01/25 10:13 AM
1

Your points are excellent. It's becoming increasingly clear that Angela Rayner immediately attempted to deflect attention away from the mass immigration aspect, despite awareness, as a Cabinet member, that the suspect was a son of immigrants and had already been referred to anti-terrorism authorities three times. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-daily-telegraph/20250123/281492166986720
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:43 AM
3

Congratulations, you're the new 'romantic hero'. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170629/282351154789813
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:04 AM
1

Just wanted to add that, after we develop testicles at 7 weeks' gestation, that it's oestrogen which templates our developing brains to show male behaviours later in life. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf Our own testosterone is used against us, courtesy of the enzyme aromatase. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase It means that, as adults, we'…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 05:44 AM
6

Feminism wishes to destroy the nuclear family. https://www.azquotes.com/quote/692702 This aim also aligns with 'Big Government' as a means of subduing the population into docile workers, dependent on their security & guidance from a highly-paid public sector bureaucracy. Male wish for a family and male prioritisation of freedom over security are blocks to their aims. So - male status and rights in society are subtly and slowly destroyed. Feminists don't realise they're being used.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 05:19 AM
6

Thanks for this. Just as a parallel area of male concern, but in a slightly different area, the Levitt Report, co authored by Alison Levitt QC and Sir Keir Starmer when he was Director of Public Prosecutions, claimed that the rate of false accusation for rape was 0.6%. Wrong. The figure of 0.6% is the percentage of women who ever find themselves in the dock as a result of false accusation. Both Levitt and Starmer knew, from a range of studies, that the actual rates were unlikely ever to be below…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:15 PM
6

Looks like yet another case where, when a man requires assistance from a female emergency responder, and she can't do diddley squat, the excuse is that he "got himself into the wrong place." https://www.dailywire.com/news/lafd-asst-chief-if-i-have-to-carry-a-man-out-of-a-fire-he-got-himself-in-the-wrong-place
/r/MensRights22/01/25 04:44 PM
20

The Duluth Model originated from Ellen Pence and Michael Paymar in 1993. Ellen Pence herself rejected it in 1999, recognising the confirmation bias in her 'research'. "By determining that the need or desire for power was the motivating force behind battering, we created a conceptual framework that did not fit the lived experience of those we were working with. We all engaged in ideological practices and claimed them to be neutral observations. I found that many of the men I interviewed did not s…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 03:27 PM
12

Starmer and his pussy posse are behind the curve and hang onto some pretty fcked up ideas. https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/10/04/labours-foolish-embrace-of-blm-ideology/
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:16 PM
28

Ford Motor Company should sue her too.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:10 PM
14

"No crime of rape was deemed to have been committed, since the victim was male."
/r/MensRights22/01/25 09:48 AM
7

Blimey! Who'd have guessed that their fantasies can be reduced to polynomial equations with variables? And they call us geeks....
/r/MensRights22/01/25 09:38 AM
3

If the aromatase inhibitor balance isn't closely monitored with T, it can all go horribly wrong. And aromatase can be pretty localised. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase That's a practical reason why T-replacement hasn't been encouraged in the same way as boosting oestrogen in post-menopausal women. The main female sex hormone is much more thermodynamically stable, offering less possibility of unwanted side effects. But, totally agree with you. The will to improve male life by circumventin…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 07:26 AM
2

Yes, an 'epidemic' seems to require some sort of en masse shared experience, and is typical of how feminists seem to believe in uniformity of the human condition. In my own experience, it tends to sneak up on you when compartmentalised and not sharing anything with anybody (and not by choice, either).
/r/MensRights21/01/25 05:00 PM
78

"I choose the bear.." Rape fantasy is the most common female sexual fantasy. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201001/womens-rape-fantasies-how-common-what-do-they-mean Won't comment on this, beyond it being written by a woman in the 1970s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_(novel))
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:45 AM
23

Krista Leighanne Milburn merely expresses what most women probably think. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:32 AM
2

Even the smell of a woman causes an increase in testosterone levels and an increase in her perceived attractiveness. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 As a result, when the clothes come off, it's probably going to happen. Ever seen this as a perfectly natural explanation for male behaviour? No, me neither.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 09:47 AM
13

Women control men's metabolic processes from the moment of conception. https://www.nature.com/articles/46466 As a result, we're always thirsty, and women have the inbuilt belief that we can be controlled through sex. They inherently feel that men exist only to serve. This feminist states overtly what most women probably believe in the depths of their psyche. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn Prostitution lowers the price of pussy, and porn facilitates a similar experience, break…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 08:59 AM
16

Conflating 'feminist' with really, really unattractive woman might cause women to be more averse to identifying with the cause. It's not as though there isn't a large element of truth to it. Let's make feminists an object of ridicule. Like their attempts to slur men as 'inc*ls' if we don't find the Plantation appealing.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 08:34 AM
4

There's no one more alone in the entire universe than the post-ejaculatory male. The Japanese word 'Kenjataimu'. Wise man time. The excitement of the chase was all a waste of time. The tristesse is even worse for the onanist, after a 'one in the bed' romp. https://takashionary.com/kenja-taimu/
/r/MensRights21/01/25 06:42 AM
1

Much of creativity is frustrated sex drive. Women have no evolutionary need to be creative, as they know that the boys will come calling anyway.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 04:49 AM
1

Women's 'empathy'. Women can't hide their true nature from another woman. https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html How this female mental programming comes about, and what the advantages are to the human race, by setting the bar high for reproductive access. Chapter 2 of this pdf. https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf I guess that 9 months gestation, followed by weaning and child rearing was no joke, especially under evolutiona…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 04:38 AM
33

It doesn't help that the official statistics on 'Violence Against Women & Girls' includes data where the violence was actually against men & boys. Since 2016, the Crown Prosecution Service reports on VAWG have been forced to have a footnote 'includes violence against men and boys'. That was their response to pressure to come clean. An asterisk. A footnote, in small print. Why not do it the other way round? Let's pretend that all violence is unidirectional, and males are the only ones to be affec…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 04:04 AM
9

Feminists actually need men to deal with the threats they see around them all the time. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ Conflict could be used to cull us, making feminist wet dreams come true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly Let them fight their own battles. With their own armies. It won't be like their little 'Gender Studies' courses.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 03:39 AM
3

"Every man deprived of a relationship means that women are deprived of one too (unless we alter society to embrace polygamy)" Lifelong monogamy, which offered most men an opportunity, is now dead. In its place, we have ultra short-term rotating monogamy, also known as some kind of interesting carousel, as a result of female choice. Men have been increasingly disadvantaged in the employment market. This makes us increasingly disadvantaged in the dating market. Those who initiated and implemented …
/r/MensRights21/01/25 03:30 AM
6

She's trying to do it with 1000 men now. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/shame-on-the-men-exploiting-lily-phillips/ So - Lily Philips is monetising her sluttish behaviour, and the writer of this article, Julie Bindel, thinks men should be ashamed? Mind you, she's a radical lesbian feminist who previously advocated for men to be locked up in concentration camps. https://www.thecollegefix.com/feminist-research-fellow-put-all-men-in-some-kind-of-camp/ It tells you all you need to know about mod…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 03:13 AM
9

It's even more complex than that. Courtesy of the enzyme aromatase, we are templated into male behaviours as our brains are developing in utero by oestrogen, produced from our own testosterone. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf Oestrogen is much more thermodynamically stable than testosterone. So, there's always the danger that testosterone replace…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:42 AM
5

Women can use sexuality to further their career, and can be shameless about it. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ This is one way traffic, of course. The opposite direction is a serious traffic offence, which'll cost a man his job. The modern wokeplace is a feminist nightmare for men. This woman is Head of the Chartered Mangement Institute. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51261999 Women made hostile incursions into the workplace, and soon f…
/r/MensRights20/01/25 10:57 AM
46

Her progesterone can be converted to oestrogen or testosterone, the latter when she's at the most fertile period of the month, making her more receptive. After she's had enough kids, Nature sees this as having 'done her job'. Her testosterone levels, never high, pretty much disappear, and she loses interest. Takes about another 30 years before men 'lose interest'. In our evolutionary history, men who survived to that age had good genes, and it was in the interest of humanity to pass them on.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 10:49 AM
111

'Some industries exist solely because of it.' Divorce lawyers, just for a start. Then, woman walks away with kids, house, cash & prizes, gets new bloke, has more disposable income than ever. Spends it on high cost, largely unnecessary frivolities. Previous bloke needs now needs another home (probably rent), household appliances, car. None of them quite so good as what he previously had. Props up the sub-prime market in worldly goods.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 10:42 AM
1

Just following the pattern set by Ms magazine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ms._(magazine)) Founded by Gloria Steinem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_Steinem Who worked for the CIA https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/feminist-was-spy Who used feminism to degrade the value of males in society. https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2002/03/25433.html The manufacturing economy was surpassed by the service economy, mid 1950s onwards. Flooding the workplace with women halves labour costs, doubles the …
/r/MensRights20/01/25 07:22 AM
1

This all started with the VAWG reports issued by the Crown Prosecution Service. It was only after 2016 that they were forced to add a footnote, stating 'includes data on men & boys.' That's the sole concession to date. A footnote. How can anyone justify a deliberate concealment of offences against men and boys? It makes it appear as though offences are a one way traffic, men can only be perps and women can only be victims. It's pandering to a feminist fantasy world by deliberate obfuscation of o…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:14 PM
38

Women see threats everywhere. And these feminists have been Government advisors for decades. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827 https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ This has an effect on foreign policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/author/valerie-m-hudson/ Oh, these damn, warmongering men!! /s
/r/MensRights19/01/25 11:12 AM
3

And the UN https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Beijing%20Declaration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action%2C%20adopted,the%20key%20global%20policy%20document%20on%20gender%20equality
/r/MensRights19/01/25 09:12 AM
1

"Building bridges..." Oh, this couldn't be because the political landscape is changing, could it? One thing's for sure. The male Trojan Horses will be offering up their 'building bridges' excuses. Bad actor Richard Reeves offers the following olive branch: "This is definitely not the fault of women..." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-support-among-men-reshaped-the-political-landscape/
/r/MensRights19/01/25 07:45 AM
4

Comprehensive overview, with stats and references. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/William-Collins-ebook/dp/B0998VC9RY/ref=sr_1_1?crid=180L6226T76YY&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.eLJtC65WBLV55jlqg9mo_qqujTlMdy-JkIBQOoBVNJGztdjJfLGcDLSPVorLpemrzs7Hnt4f2dgVCxUfHHRFgopfPSOccxRqQT0DSR9skzBi3kLQrw4u-N7pdxqqGgWEHWmeog6Vm1BGIcYbv6SAmiA3hRFwjHAx1TqV2-gfR8uvVDO0zJ_dCkpocAZ3i5k5kfMxHbvrhuJEHw9P5SGUUYE1iz3YxaQ142Qt82uoyNx_XXKfr-zCBdLkfTYWU3XL.oXp6pZ-0LaHR0O---IbqojpVZm5YH8JtTAivOjdOHO4&dib_tag=se&keywords=william+collins+em…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 07:37 AM
13

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise." https://www.literateape.com/blog/2016/9/3/who-you-cant-criticize
/r/MensRights19/01/25 06:47 AM
7

McCarthyism had an iron grip through the 1950s, but it went too far. And, if there's one thing we know, feminism doesn't know when to say "ENOUGH!" They will be agents of their own downfall. It's in the math. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2796
/r/MensRights19/01/25 06:42 AM
4

Male deontic values of honour came about through male competition (now derided by feminism as 'toxic masculinity' TM ). We always attempt to be fair. It's the foundation of civilisation. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Lacking the strength which was so important in our evolutionary history, women gain most advantage by subverting deontic values. They win by being sneaky. Their values tend towards utility rather than honour ("What's in it f…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 06:34 AM
36

If you are falsely accused, your chances of committing suicide or becoming a victim of vigilantism just went through the roof. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2176 146 cases... 16 deaths http://empathygap.uk/?p=2176#_Toc504898470 Of course, even if you survive, you've already lost your job, even before the case came to trial. Difficult to put your life back together under such circumstance. At least ten years imprisonment for false accusation might offer some sort of deterrent to women who believe that …
/r/MensRights18/01/25 11:56 AM
5

How soon is now? https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/smiths/howsoonisnow.html But, gotta be on the 'guest list'. https://genius.com/Eels-guest-list-lyrics
/r/MensRights18/01/25 10:23 AM
5

Oh, how feminists like to believe that male and female brains are identical. Because, then women should be running STEM, as well as everything else, right? Unfortunately, even low levels of testosterone in the neuroendocrine system confers huge advantages in higher mathematical reasoning, scientific aptitude and pattern recognition. When mathematically gifted kids between the ages of eleven and thirteen were tested, out of a possible score of 800, the results were : Score 420+, boys outnumber gi…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 07:59 AM
3

And the kids go home to a house with no fathers. Then women believe that they have completely 'won' in what they believe to be a zero-sum game. They'll be right, in a way. Everything will crumble. Men will lack any incentive to rebuild. The 'prize' for winning is zero.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 07:39 AM
6

"Some young men may also resent what they see as affirmative action boosting women at their expense." If a man can't get a job, he becomes invisible to women. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf The people in charge of implementing the 'progressive' programs know this.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 07:24 AM
4

Oh, they're so ethical. They even write papers in the Journal of Medical Ethics about paternity fraud, telling men that they should be happy to pay up for the swindle of unknowingly raising another man's child. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf The rabbit hole of Clown World runs very deep. It'll only get deeper with more women in jurisprudence and politics.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 07:16 AM
6

Young women may genuinely feel that they live in a 'rape culture' because they're often allowed to get away with it when women are the perpetrators. Maybe some stiffer sentencing could change their minds. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1i2yddt/usa_female_teacher_began_sleeping_with_boy_when/
/r/MensRights18/01/25 07:03 AM
2

That's a pretty good point.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:48 AM
4

There should be no way for women to hide behind the convenient legal definition of rape as 'penetration by a penis'. Here, the penetration was by a groomed child. Can a child be a rapist? Statutory rape of a minor by an adult in a position of authority, responsibility and trust is rape. Not 'beginning sleeping with' if the perp is female.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 09:04 AM
5

All the EEO, AA, ESG, DEI and the rest of the BS is thinly-disguised warfare against men. Particularly of one variety. They know that a man without a job might as well not exist. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf Here's where the madness has brought us to... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EK9YpcOACk https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/01/14/the-la-fires-are-the-horrifying-consequence-of-democratic-misrule/
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:57 AM
2

Bettina Arndt and her 'Arndt Army'? https://j4mb.org.uk/2025/01/15/the-arndt-army-changing-the-lives-of-men/
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:35 AM
9

It wasn't for lack of trying by feminists who wanted to kill her. Her dog was actually killed as a warning, and she had to leave the country. https://honest-ribbon.org/domestic-violence-law/refuting-40-years-of-lies-about-domestic-violence/
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:26 AM
1

Fair enough. Managing the risks is all good. Believe me, I'm not trying to lecture. The risks would be too high for me, but it's a matter of personal choice. I like riding motorcycles, where the risks can't be monitored, so which of us is being reckless?
/r/MensRights16/01/25 05:15 PM
13

Confirmed here. https://www.scotsman.com/news/uk-news/96-of-women-are-liars-honest-2509965
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:46 PM
10

All indications are that 1) They really are that dumb 2) Their hate really is that strong 3) The male academics are a bunch of asshats. Both feminists and academics are being used as useful idiots by the woke industrial complex. The plans were laid by the Stanford Research Institute back in the 1960s, and were reported on page 216 of 'Future Shock' by Alvin Tofler, back in 1970. To paraphrase: "Hey, the manufacturing economy was surpassed by the service economy in the 1950s. The service economy …
/r/MensRights16/01/25 12:30 PM
15

What puzzles me is that those 'academics' seem unable to envisage that, as men become increasingly driven into a corner, the ideologies of incoming cultures might seem increasingly attractive. In an unusual display of perception, this light bulb moment does seem to have permeated the cranium of one feminist. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday/20210829/282114934670307 This feminist, Mary Harrington, lived in a lesbian commune for most of her adult life. Then, with her biol…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:04 AM
2

Simpsons.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:27 AM
52

Female 'medical ethics' appear to be a licence for fraud. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf Also, they see nothing wrong in throwing you in jail for five years, even when they are fully cognisant of the identity of the biological father. https://discuss.ilw.com/forum/immigration-discussion/460027-bill-manser-imprisoned-wrongly-for-5-years
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:25 AM
4

Jean Piaget was a pioneer in the field of cognitive development. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Piaget His view, unsexist at a time where it was expected that men should make lifetime provision for women, was this. "The principle role of education is to create men who are capable of doing new things, not simply repeating what other generations have done - men who are creative, innovative and discoverers." https://www.creativitypost.com/article/the_educational_value_of_creative_disobedience T…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 08:00 AM
20

Women were provided with resources by men as a proxy for the children they produce. They confused our provision and protection with patriarchy. At the end of the day we wore out our bodies to earn money and women spent it. Now, women can earn their own resources. Children aren't so important to them. In which case, we owe them nothing. That solves quite a few men's issues.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:49 AM
8

Back in the days where differences in M/F abilities weren't biased by being filtered through feminism, it was obvious that boys showed higher abilities in mathematical reasoning, scientific aptitude and pattern recognition. In the tests, which had a maximum score of 800, the boys prevailed in these ratios. 1.5 to 1 on scores of 420+ / 2 to 1 on scores of 500+ / 4 to 1 on scores of 600+ / 13 to 1 on scores of 700+ https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/001698628202600208 Those sex differenc…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:29 AM
1

Aromatase occurs throughout the M/F body. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039128X11003175 How many folks monitor the levels? How useful would any monitoring be? The levels are pretty organ-specific. And oestrogen, derived from testosterone by aromatase, is essential for the testes to function properly. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3286233/ The counter-intuitive complexity of what's actually going on can easily lead to unintended consequences.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:00 AM
12

William Collins 'The Empathy Gap'. Over 700 exhaustively researched pages, chock full of statistics on all the sh*t that men must tolerate from 'the system', every day of their lives. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/William-Collins-ebook/dp/B0998VC9RY/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3RBEXQMU7K21Y&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.eLJtC65WBLV55jlqg9mo_lrajI2HyyNjigZwGjS8boHxBnwtXDviIhF4ZBjmc8DL_4FPY6feKsEYZeIRNPwU3PKZXI66GSkn9tkoFleKhFX1HtHjItCqdNCvwZg3yyHmVTaFtWbIxtpf4MBa6w33goiODO5GuPGV5yrCdNE91fPV9f0P44ahsJ4hagSbhQfKqwFnPrXOY9nvps…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 04:54 PM
4

Civilised human society has always been, ultimately, matriarchal. See Robert Briffault 'On the Origins of Sentiments and Institutions'. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Philip Wylie spotted that matriarchal power was getting way out of control in the USA, way back in the 1940s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_of_Vipers "American women are inculcated with a distorted version of the Cinderella fairy tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of vir…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 04:36 PM
28

Well, in Scotland, they're trying to arrange it so that the woman's word for what happened no longer requires corroboration. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo Oh, and there won't be a trial by jury for rape cases in future. Convenient that the legal definition of rape requires that the perpetrator be male, isn't it? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 This combo is a state licence for false imprisonment.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 03:49 PM
12

Female collective: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Saw this quote from Frank Herbert "Children of Dune" on this sub yesterday. It was by r/DecrepitAbacus on a post about the Male Erasure. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1i0qaum/male_erasure/ The quote offers a unique insight into female nature. "When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom, because that is according to your principles. When I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom, because that is according…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 12:15 PM
3

Stunningly accurate. Documented since at least 1865. https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
/r/MensRights15/01/25 11:52 AM
3

Sometimes, they allow this to slip... https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights15/01/25 09:55 AM
6

When will women learn that masculinity isn't a new set of rules to benefit women in the civilisation we now live in. It's an old set of rules, as old as evolution, which benefitted women during previous tough times. Men can't just 'overwrite' these because there's now welfare support, EEO, AA, ESG, DEI and assorted other BS. It was female choice which made men what they are. They select who to breed with. They could have made us more docile, like Pavlov did with the selective breeding of dogs. B…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 09:52 AM
5

Previously, she could be found towards the middle of Scunthorpe.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 06:07 AM
3

'feminists will eventually make it illegal to criticize them under 'hate speech' laws' This is already well underway. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o
/r/MensRights15/01/25 05:57 AM
3

Reform GB might be in with a chance at next election, especially after this lot, who aren't even bothering to disguise their agenda.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 05:53 AM
8

They could even build more prisons. The population in GB has gone up by 1 million in the past decade through immigration alone. Overall, the GB population of 68 million bears little resemblance to the 30 million who were around when the majority of prisons were built. A building programme would also provide jobs. Male jobs.. Oh, I see why this is an insane concept as well.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 05:51 AM
17

\_("/)_/
/r/MensRights14/01/25 10:58 AM
132

Civil courts, as opposed to criminal courts, exist so that the plaintiff can seek financial redress. That is, they offer the opportunity to 'gain financially'. It seems a bit rich that Ms Hand wishes to suppress CCTV indicating her untroubled state on entering and exiting a hotel, so that the accused might 'gain financially'. Ms Hand should get a job.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 10:14 AM
2

Makes you wonder how the Greeks achieved this, in the days before the aromatase inhibitors, commercial inhibitors of cytochrome P450 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase_inhibitor Drink grapefruit juice, avoid smoking, and sculpt naturally. https://gpnotebook.com/pages/surgery/cyp-enzymes-cytochrome-p450-enzymes
/r/MensRights14/01/25 09:53 AM
2

worth a read: https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf
/r/MensRights14/01/25 07:11 AM
4

It's only gonna get worse. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens
/r/MensRights14/01/25 07:07 AM
15

This seems to be 'The Invisible Blue Taboo'. https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/ No use talking to psychologists, they're 85% female these days. Masculinity is a parallel universe, which they'll never understand, any more than men can truly understand women. Would be hesitant with the chatbots, though. They're being trained to spot our weaknesses, so that society can f*ck men over even more.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 07:04 AM
20

Jeez, other people might be interested! From your solipsism and general lack of empathy, it's possible to make a few deductions...
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:56 AM
4

If you wanna be happy for the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBO_10GVf74
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:49 AM
27

Any excess of T will be converted into oestrogen by the enzyme aromatase. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase Taking shots of T without concurrent aromatase inhibitors will cause gynecomastia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase_inhibitor This fine balance can also mess with your mind. https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:35 AM
58

False allegation ruins male lives, and can cause death by suicide or vigilante action. Time this was taken into account. An object most sublime / We will achieve in time / To make the punishment fit the crime / The punishment fit the crime
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:25 AM
2

I do see what you're saying, and admire your courtesy and consideration. When in these situations personally (1970s) the self-preservation aspect was less of an issue. Therefore, it was all a matter of reading signals. An overt statement of intent...? Would have seen this as a bit of a passion-killer. "And when the clothes are strewn... don't be afraid of the room" Bowie, very early 70s. https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/davidbowie/ladygrinningsoul.html
/r/MensRights13/01/25 04:41 PM
16

Males have been used in advertising by such people simply to emphasise out-group 'characteristics'. Such as the infamous Gillette campaign, commissioned by Carolyn Tastad, and shot by Kim Gehrig (previous adverts 'This Girl Can' for Sport England, and, ...ahem... 'Viva la Vulva' for feminine hygiene products).
/r/MensRights13/01/25 01:49 PM
1

Jeez, if I'm a bot, I'm 69 years old, so hats off to the system developers, well ahead of their time. What, exactly is the use of a female troll, setting the 'boundaries' on a MensRights sub? I believe the response indicated the difficulties in trust with regard to M/F relationships within the Judeo-Christian tradition, right to the present day. In common with other Abrahamic religions. Obviously, this includes Islam.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 11:04 AM
1

Placing trust in women, 1865 style. "Nature has made it the calling..." Page 4 of link. https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html Placing trust in women, 21st Century. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Placing trust in women, 21st Century. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf Female 'medical ethics'. Previously known as fraud.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 08:38 AM
22

Usually, they are resolutely against DNA testing. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Therefore, it can be guaranteed that she believes she has something to gain. It's tragic when kids are used as pawns for the queen (the most powerful piece on the board) to force checkmate on the king, whose moves are restricted.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 08:27 AM
2

Cheers, man! Please keep up the work on your book, because the insight you have in the educational arena needs to get out there.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 05:14 AM
6

Most of the books of Jack Kerouac, a lonely Catholic who wrote about what it was like to be male in the 1950s, early 1960s. "This is the first time I've hitch-hiked in years, and I soon begin to see that things have changed in America. Sleek, long stationwagons sleer by smoothly, all colours of the rainbow, and pastel at that. The husband is in the driver's seat with a long, ridiculous vacationist's hat with a long baseball visor making him look witless and idiot. Beside him sits wifey, the boss…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 04:12 AM
29

It's really frustrating that women attempt to define masculinity, a life experience which will remain a parallel universe for them, forever. Masculinity isn't a new set of rules to be imposed on men for female benefit during this brief and fleeting period where society has favoured women with employment advantages and welfare safety nets. Masculinity is an old set of rules imposed on men for female benefit by evolution. We can't simply overwrite that programming overnight. Oh, and by the way, la…
/r/MensRights12/01/25 04:34 PM
1

AI doesn't reflect reality. 100% of heterosexual men are slaves. We chase after women, all of our lives. Meanwhile, Ms Milburn here has helpfully summarised what women think of us. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn Her succinct analysis of why men exist may seem rather extreme for some. However, one can, at least, suspect that all women hold such views to a greater or (hopefully) lesser extent. Think back to episodes which have caused pain, grief and upset in dealing with the op…
/r/MensRights12/01/25 04:01 PM
10

It would appear that whenever men attempt to reveal the reality of male life, women recoil. https://menaregood.com/the-invisible-blue-taboo-the-burden-of-boys-and-men/ Women much prefer the opinions of other women. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 This gives them the comfortable illusion of omniscience. They don't want male reality intruding on the comfort zone.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 08:40 AM
1

"pharmaceutical industries could not have whole lines of medicines just pushed aside, so they started inventing new uses for them." Like Thalidomide, a useless drug that was sold to Distillers Company. They then began to promote it as being of use against morning sickness in pregnancy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide_scandal This drug is still being marketed, against a range of spurious 'benefits'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide
/r/MensRights12/01/25 07:02 AM
42

The BBC (an organisation which has been corrupted by feminism) prefers to spin biased scare stories that there may be a burgeoning backlash against feminism in South Korea. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2621gzvkdo
/r/MensRights12/01/25 06:01 AM
3

"Destroying due process all over the world, one legislation at a time..." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540
/r/MensRights12/01/25 05:54 AM
33

Doesn't this 'spoil the moment' somehow? Verbal consent isn't going to hold up anywhere, least of all in my country, a first world democracy. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo Unless the consent is written, dated, signed and witnessed by a lawyer, it'll still be your word against hers in any case. And you'll still be guilty in the eyes of the kangaroo courts which are being planned. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:52 PM
2

He never managed to buy it. She saw the opportunity to end the marriage before his business profits had been turned into the bricks & mortar of an investment house. But, he was able to hide most of the money with expenses involved in winding up his business. That's probably why he employed an accountant.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:29 PM
68

Hiding assets from a woman may have become a survival strategy, against the day that you are perceived as no further use to them. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ A true story. My sister-in-law (really overweight) married a short, hard working guy. This man built up a successful business, took him about fifteen years. At that stage, his accountant told him to purchase a second house as an asset. His lazy wife had been attending slimming classes, and her attractiveness had jump…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 11:17 AM
60

The world is changing. LA won't rebuild itself. Time for Barbie to realise that she's been living in LA LA land.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:20 AM
10

When we've got an aching nostalgia for meritocracy, that's when you know that things are beyond fucked.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:00 AM
18

Barbie doesn't understand how Barbieland works.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 08:57 AM
5

Woman: "I need HELP because of fire/flood/bears/men/poor life choices." Man: "Looks like you got yourself in the wrong place." (walks on) World proceeds to melt down...
/r/MensRights11/01/25 08:54 AM
1

They sure do... https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:51 AM
3

Mr Fink likes to rent it out, these days. https://truthout.org/articles/asset-management-firms-are-gaining-power-over-housing-hospitals-water-and-more/
/r/MensRights10/01/25 02:59 PM
84

The room full of enslaved men is within a wider room full of enslaved men. It's the size of the world. That's why no-one notices. A reminder (should one be required) as to how women see men. Most of it is unconscious. Maybe Leighanne Milburn deserves a medal for actually stating it and allowing men to open their eyes. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Krista_Leighanne_Milburn
/r/MensRights10/01/25 10:42 AM
1

In their 'theories', they're not gonna worry about silly things like truth. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights10/01/25 10:25 AM
1

So, they first snag the ugly doctor for security, then cavort with the 20 fitness models. Women, the apex of female development, evolved for this sort of behaviour, through hidden oestrus, pretty much unique in the animal kingdom. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484
/r/MensRights10/01/25 10:23 AM
5

No one can speak about it, or Ms Phillips will feel 'threatened' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn7r0pzz57vo Conveniently, Labour is introducing laws which mean that no-one can speak about it. https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/01/06/banning-islamophobia-would-be-a-gift-to-grooming-gangs/
/r/MensRights10/01/25 09:11 AM
2

Work in any environment with a quota of women and you'll find out.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:55 PM
11

They get caught out eventually. Jobs lost due to 'poor performance of the incumbent.' https://salespop.net/leadership/are-women-failures-as-ceos/ Interestingly, the guy writing the article throws a lifeline, saying that it's because women have difficulty juggling jobs and families. It's almost as though men didn't have families, too. In fact, he throws many lifelines. All of them laughable. Basically, he insists that women 'at the top' need to be propped up. That isn't leadership. It's farce.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 10:57 AM
27

False accusations kill. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2176 http://empathygap.uk/?p=2176#_Toc504898470 http://empathygap.uk/Rape%20Case%20Histories%20modified%2017_8_20.pdf
/r/MensRights09/01/25 09:48 AM
9

If you don't want to engage, by their rules, they can't use you. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ They'll flirt with you to get promotions, then accuse you of sexual assault when it's your job they're after. When they realise that they can't use these strategies, you become the enemy. At that point, they'll simply make something up. Fabrications, fibrications, it's all the same to them. They remain strangers to truth for their entire existence…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 09:12 AM
21

Kick a docile, friendly dog enough times, it will become a mean dog. The pendulum is bound to swing eventually, because women don't have enough sense to know when to stop their demands.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 08:56 AM
14

Every day is International Women's Day. Feminists control the organisations which matter, right to the top. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Beijing%20Declaration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action%2C%20adopted,the%20key%20global%20policy%20document%20on%20gender%20equality How does this happen so easily? Following the mass incursion of women into the workplace, post WW2, there are two dynamics at work, previously confined to domestic environments. 1) Women look out…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 08:48 AM
133

If she hates men so much, why not try to break their bones (and see what happens). Instead, she targets the innocent and defenceless. The feminists who founded 'Gender Studies' advocated for this sort of thing, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly First, they came for the babies. And I did nothing, for I was no longer a baby...
/r/MensRights09/01/25 08:07 AM
21

The balance missing is that the capacity of women for doing evil has been underestimated. https://neurosciencenews.com/female-psychopathy-psychology-25669/
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:51 AM
21

This has gone far enough now.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:47 AM
6

Women and science should be kept as far apart as possible. https://netwar.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/feminist-epistemology/#:~:text=In%20a%20passage%20reminiscent%20of,is%20a%20'sexed%20equation' Can say that, quite confidently, as someone who worked in STEM for three decades, watching it go to shit after female 'quotas' were introduced. The labs became drama theatres. Women became the main players, propped up by woke management. Projects were sequestered from men to prop up failing female 'career…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:41 AM
3

There are a couple of sad facts in life. Women don't care about the truth. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ And, women don't care about the truth. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:22 AM
11

"Our closest relatives, the chimpanzees, live in promiscuous societies in which females seek as many sexual partners as possible*."* Matt Ridley 'The Red Queen - Sex & the Evolution of Human Nature', page 5. Ooops. The content creator seems to have missed that bit. And the part where the females in oestrus attempt to sneak out at night to visit the males of different tribes. And the section where females are just as violent, to male and female alike, but only where they can take on a weaker adve…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 12:10 AM
56

You somehow get the feeling in GB that when they send women to jail, their heart isn't actually in it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html
/r/MensRights08/01/25 06:12 PM
9

"While a man will address others, even those inferior to himself, with a certain feeling of consideration and humanity, it is unbearable to see how proudly and disdainfully a lady of rank will behave towards one of lower rank when she speaks." Arthur Schopenhauer (1865) https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html (on page 4 of 10)
/r/MensRights08/01/25 04:39 PM
19

Men aren't "attracted to submissive women because they see them as inferior." When will feminists get it through their thick skulls that when a man has been competing against others all day, the last thing he wants is to come home and start competing all over again. It will undoubtedly surprise feminists that if a woman can make a man feel good at the end of the day, make him believe that the day has been worthwhile from the point of view of the family, the small team that bears your name...in f…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 04:26 PM
28

Tell me about it!! Tends to happen when they didn't get their own way. Oh wait...didn't this just happen..? https://nypost.com/2024/11/08/us-news/liberal-women-vow-sex-strike-in-protest-over-trumps-win/
/r/MensRights08/01/25 12:45 PM
8

If the behaviour of Ms Moore with a minor is acceptable, while the celebratory single kiss of Luis Rubiales with an adult athlete is 'sexual violence', then society has become a blinkered, handicap race. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/66633123
/r/MensRights08/01/25 11:50 AM
18

There's a line in the sand at 15.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 10:27 AM
179

It's a power trip, flexing the muscles of sexuality to show who's in control. Same dynamic with the epidemic of such behaviour with female teachers and prison officers.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 09:46 AM
2

What happens when the founders of AI make enough money? Will that money be siphoned off by a woman making the most salacious claims imaginable? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz6lq6x2gd9o Looks like we don't need AI to predict female nature.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 09:38 AM
6

People will trust 'the black box' of AI. Because they don't understand how it works, and it can be filled to the brim with bullshit 'definitions' of masculinity, to feminist advantage. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20539517231155060
/r/MensRights08/01/25 09:10 AM
8

There's a lot of truth in the maxim "Treat 'em mean and keep 'em keen." Women don't need to learn it. As soon as they reach adolescence, oestrogen exerts strong effects on their neuroendocrine system. Their self-regard reaches almost psychopathic levels of narcissism. This is the molecular basis of their hypergamy. It once served a purpose in keeping the bar high for reproduction. Even a female '3' on a decile scale believes herself worthy of a male '10'. Unfortunately, testosterone pushes in th…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:58 AM
1

Article title 'Why the 'Family' Is Under Threat' Then, some male-blaming BS. Alternative explanations: https://www.azquotes.com/quote/692702 One from the Spectator itself: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Something about bodies and choices (not available to men) https://www.lifenews.com/2025/01/02/abortion-was-the-leading-cause-of-death-worldwide-in-2024-killing-73-million-people/?cmid=53696e82-d8f4-4557-8f7c-dd581c7f7cd3 who is really destroying the nuclear family? https://a…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:34 AM
3

From the earliest possible age, the aim is to 'normalise' environments where males are constantly under female scrutiny & supervision, setting the standards of 'acceptable' behaviour.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:19 AM
5

Sickos like this are probably the tip of an iceberg that remains invisible. Looks like there's a lot of frustrated ladies out there. Another few years of men walking away from the plantation, and the market will open up for men to charge for their services.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:13 AM
4

Well, the book dissects all the points above (and more!!). I wrote it! But, I don't have a website. I'm an old geezer. It's on Kindle, and can make it free for a couple days. But that would have to be from tomorrow onwards. If I had my way it would be free all the time. Hence the public pdf.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 06:02 AM
3

Oestrogen has weird effects on the brain post menarche. Their self-regard goes through the roof. Once, this was a way to keep the bar high for males to be granted access to reproductive opportunities (it's the mechanism of female hypergamy). The problems were limited to the domestic domain for eons. Then, these narcissistic creatures were handed political and economic power, and the ability to influence jurisprudence...
/r/MensRights08/01/25 05:53 AM
3

https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf
/r/MensRights08/01/25 05:36 AM
5

On higher mathematical reasoning, scientific aptitude and pattern recognition, boys aged 11-13 beat peer group girls at a ratio of 1.5 to 1 on scores of 420+ out of a possible 800. At scores of 500+ the ratio is 2 to 1 Scores of 600+ the ratio is over 4 to 1 At the very highest scores, of 700+ boys do better than girls at a ratio of 13 to 1. The sex differences become even more pronounced as the sexes mature. Testosterone enhances visio-spatial skills, oestrogen suppresses them. https://journals…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 01:59 PM
72

Women actually impose masculinity upon men. Behaving in a typically masculine manner is the only way you'll get your leg over. Women programme men to be masculine in utero. No many ways round that one. https://neuronline-uat.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf Women are the ones who benefit from masculinity. They enjoy the benefits of a status-stratified society without having to compete for status themselves. https:/…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 10:56 AM
19

Just further evidence that a man without resources isn't seen as a man, either by women or wider society. Ironically, it's women & the system who have asset-stripped him. To my mind, the entire swindle operates as an application of Briffault's Law, on a wider scale. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Once men are of no further use, they are told to fuck off. No one gives a damn.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 09:08 AM
5

How male competition created civilisation. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:54 AM
4

"A society that puts equality - in the sense of equality of outcome - ahead of freedom will end up with neither freedom nor equality. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests." Milton Friedman 'Free To Choose' (1980)
/r/MensRights07/01/25 12:40 AM
2

Yes, men are more likely to make lifetime use of their qualifications in their careers. Women see college and a subsequent short career as a means of putting themselves within the orbit of higher-earning men. As soon as they've safely snared one, they'll stay home, bleating about all the things they 'could have been'.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:50 PM
12

Many 'Gender Studies' lecturers had murky sexual preference. Predatory possibilities galore. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly Some of them get jobs with 'The Guardian' eventually...where their outspoken beliefs will be an asset. https://www.thecollegefix.com/feminist-research-fellow-put-all-men-in-some-kind-of-camp/
/r/MensRights06/01/25 11:24 AM
9

"Somehow things just happen." = Barbieland. Who made Barbie's Chevvy V8? Was it Repetitive Strain Injury Barbie at the factory? Who mined the mineral resources? Was it Black Lung Barbie? Women are so used to being provided for by men that they don't give a second thought to the unpleasant processes which sustain their pampered lifestyle. Yet, despite this, feminists want to reduce the male population to 'more manageable' levels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart "Somehow things…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:53 AM
8

GB has given up even the pretence that there's equality in the Criminal Justice System. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html
/r/MensRights06/01/25 09:23 AM
6

Good background material and explanations for this behaviour. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/false-rape-reports-to-police-form-a-very-large-proportion-of-cases-and-is-amply-explained/
/r/MensRights06/01/25 08:49 AM
1

Men who don't out-earn women are invisible....because they are poor targets for exploitation. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ If we don't have a job, we won't get a girlfriend. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf Gee...I wonder what the effect of EEO, AA, ESG, DEI will be? (scratches head) Equality?? A woman won't even look at a man she views as her equal. The number of divorces I witnessed during my working life, initiated by female colleagues after they received 'b…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 08:46 AM
21

She had a cunning plan. There's definitely a female etymology in the word cunning.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 08:17 AM
14

"Lacking the male sex drive, female heterosexuality is more malleable to social and situational factors." Roy F Baumeister, 'Is There Anything Good About Men?' "Attendance at University is associated with a 900% increase in women identifying as lesbian or bisexual." Michael, Gagon and Michaels, 'The Social Organisation of Sexuality'.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 08:15 AM
26

Female ethics = self interest Male ethics = outcomes which benefit society Without male competition (now tarnished with the sobriquet of 'toxic masculinity' TM ), there would be no civilisation as we know it. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Presently, that civilisation is being torn down to its very roots by female self-interest. Hope that they've put some thought into version 2.0
/r/MensRights06/01/25 08:04 AM
9

If Nigel Farage and his UK Reform Party have the bollocks to keep this issue in the public eye, they get my vote.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 07:54 AM
7

Men aren't getting much empathy from modern women, and our search for meaning has been bubbling under for quite a time. Two movies caught the drift. In 'The Man With Two Brains' (1983), a neuroscientist tires of his cruel and unfaithful new wife (whose life he saved), and falls in love with a brain in a jar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_with_Two_Brains In 'Her', a guy falls in love with an AI operating system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_(2013_film)) Things have gone badly wrong in…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:46 PM
56

Then, there's not enough college-educated men that they can leach on for the rest of their life, and they become very sad. Talk about hoist with your own petard!
/r/MensRights05/01/25 02:06 PM
20

They truly have no shame, and not a shred of concern about how these issues affect men. They see absolutely nothing wrong in deceptions which consign a man's genes to history, while committing him to supporting a cuckoo in the nest for 18 years. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf Oh, and putting him in jail for five years if he doesn't pay up. Even though she was perfectly aware of the identity of the biological father. https://discuss.ilw.com/forum/immigration-discussion/46…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 02:01 PM
42

Human females represent the absolute apex of female evolution. They have developed hidden ovulation as an aid to cheating. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 They see it as their 'right'. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ When any situation doesn't benefit them, they lose their shit. And, they're constantly suspicious that their own tactics might be applied against them.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 12:11 PM
30

Gee... as if anyone has to teach the songbird how to sing!
/r/MensRights05/01/25 09:20 AM
1

Women only communities..? Sure. But let them build them and maintain them by themselves. Oh.... it wasn't such a good idea after all, was it, sweetheart?
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:51 AM
6

"We can't go on together, with suspicious minds / And we can't build our dreams, on suspicious minds" Elvis has left the building. Thank y' very much.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:46 AM
3

We're being gaslighted by the actual manipulators. Started in the Garden of Eden.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:04 PM
1

Exactly. As recidivism rate for women is less than 3%, this barely statistically significant difference is used as an excuse to justify harsher punishment for men.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 09:48 PM
4

What does going on about choosing the bear mean..? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_(novel))
/r/MensRights04/01/25 09:30 PM
7

They do reoffend. But, as the recidivism rates are low, the system tries to use this as an argument that males should be punished more severely (I kid you not!) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1079063210372142
/r/MensRights04/01/25 05:07 PM
6

Conveniently for women, rape is defined in law as requiring a penis. Vaginas are just as common as penises. Enforced envelopment of a penis by a vagina does happen. But, the law appears not to recognise this. Sexual assault is the maximum rap. The criminal justice system doesn't even apply sentencing guidelines for sexual assault by a female https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1079063210372142 Then, the media attempts to 'normalise' the crimes of female perps (romantic liaison, tryst et…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 04:57 PM
15

Who the fuck said I was white?
/r/MensRights04/01/25 04:38 PM
16

Check out the classics. 'War & Peace' and 'Anna Karenina' by Tolstoy. There's a lesson there for the ladies. Men can live, quite happily, on very little money. It's you LADIES who lust after wealth, power & status. Back when Tolstoy was writing, you'd have to snare a man to put him to work and enjoy the fruits of his labours by proxy. Now, you've been given the right to earn it yourself. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 12:36 PM
11

This: https://www.academia.edu/43468811/Using_Platform_Signals_for_Distinguishing_Discourses_The_Case_of_Mens_Rights_and_Mens_Liberation_on_Reddit
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:28 AM
16

Isn't that the plot synopsis for 'Fifty Shades of Grey?' /s
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:16 AM
80

Females favoured in education and employment, preventing men from building businesses and careers. Meanwhile assets are stripped from successful men. The "Increase in Women's Wealth" section of the link says it all. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens What happens when they've got the f*cking lot? Will they be happy then, when the world is a harem to the few men who have any money left? Maybe Angelina can run an adoption agency.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:12 AM
0

Anytime you see a 'happy' couple, spare a thought for how much the man in that couple has sold his soul and been forced to abandon the dreams he had as a kid.... in exchange for a few orgasms, the 'approval' of society, and signing his life away in blood, effectively giving power of attorney to his SO. Here's what is going on behind the scenes... https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ In return for a no-limit credit card through life, she'll make minimum monthly repayments in the be…
/r/MensRights03/01/25 04:02 PM
29

Women are happy to be sexualised if they can benefit from it. It's their business model. Previously confined to domesticity, it has now spilled into business. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ Bit of a one-way street, though. If men do this, they are guilty of a traffic violation.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 10:39 AM
2

Spare a thought for the male children who find themselves in such 'families'. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-36333032
/r/MensRights03/01/25 09:39 AM
6

It's impossible for a bloke to know what's going on in a woman's head. By inference, they seem to live in a world of imaginary threats. They demand systems whereby they are treated like precious bone china, wrapped up in cotton wool. The feminism embedded in our political systems has influenced the treatment of women as princesses and men with indifference for decades. The problem today is the amount of political clout which women wield. Women look out for themselves. And male politicians will i…
/r/MensRights03/01/25 09:05 AM
18

Women have only ever needed men to obtain what they couldn't get for themselves... money, status, security, resources. good genes for designer babies. But men built systems which favoured women in education and employment, family law courts which transferred assets, together with fertility clinics which allowed them to circumvent all of the sexual nitty-gritty, providing babies to women who aren't even attracted to men. The education gap means that the proportion of female politicians and legisl…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 07:29 PM
8

Women have only ever 'needed' men to get the things they want. Status, security, guaranteed income and 'good' genes for offspring. Men have bent over backwards to give them what they want. But, the system has been short-circuited. Women are favoured in education and the cushier employments. Men must now acquiesce to being taxed to the hilt to provide life comforts to women they don't even know. In return, they are treated with contempt and derision. Female politicians and judiciary haven't a shr…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 06:58 PM
58

The 'Greens' hate men, no matter what country you're in. Every 'Green' organisation has its roots in ecofeminism, whose bible was Mary Daly's 'Gyn/Ecology'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly Unpick what's going on, and you'll find that feminism and big business form an unholy alliance. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40404269 Don't let them send you to war, so that we can drive electric cars, and women can feel 'safe'. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ Join up the dots, an…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 11:01 AM
12

Worth reading: https://stevemoxon.co.uk/false-rape-reports-to-police-form-a-very-large-proportion-of-cases-and-is-amply-explained/
/r/MensRights02/01/25 09:32 AM
49

Truth isn't important to them. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ Basis of feminist 'theory'. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ Never expect female morals and 'ethics' to overlap with male values. These are separate universes.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 08:54 AM
1

"Women have only one kind of business...." Arthur Schopenhauer (1865) https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
/r/MensRights02/01/25 08:26 AM
1

The problem that men have is that most of us are already working flat out to support our families, often for precious little thanks in the process ["You are such a workaholic, etc, etc] By contrast, there are armies of women whose job it is to go into work each day, actively favouring women and making conditions worse for men. Like the Head of the Chartered Management Institute. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51261999 Such women have become embedded, all the way to the top, for decades. htt…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 08:23 AM
12

Wealth transfer gap. See 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens What is the end game, here..??
/r/MensRights02/01/25 08:08 AM
5

A man whose dreams have died isn't the same man.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 09:30 AM
9

"At a stroke, the one thing that women had going for them has been taken away, the one respect in which they had the last laugh over their husbands and lovers. Uncertainty allows mothers to select for their children the father who would be best for them..." That seems to be an engrained entitlement on behalf of the author to see female deceptions as a 'right'. Swindling a bloke doesn't even enter their consciousness as being morally wrong. All for the benefit of the child, of course. How selfles…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 12:54 PM
16

Extrapolate this complete lack of empathy for men's perspective to all female politicians. I know.... scary, isn't it?
/r/MensRights31/12/24 10:19 AM
39

Women see this deception as a female 'right'. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Human females represent the apex of female evolution, and their hidden ovulation is a unique enabler of cuckoldry http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 Wanna see absurd arguments/logic and complete lack of empathy towards swindling males? While 'justifying' their behaviour as 'ethics'? https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf A "distorted and thin view of fatherhood" if a man doesn't particul…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 10:16 AM
1

Some proper jail time might wipe that look of smug entitlement from her odious face.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 10:06 AM
10

Reputation destruction is how women are 'violent' towards others, without having to lift a finger. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ The scary thing is, they are doing this all the time and it hides in plain sight. False accusation is simply a manifestation where it breaks cover, and it's visible only to the falsely accused.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 08:17 AM
131

The 'unique selling point' of the female is her ability to give birth. All of the social benefits she reaps are because of this. To gain unique access to her fertility, men must spend money on courtship, making a display of wealth, status and power, and China is no exception. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-64973186 But today's women fail to realise that all the male resources provided to them are as a proxy to the child she is expected to produce. All the effort in human pair bondin…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 08:00 AM
0

Women believe that they have exclusive rights to the homes that we built for them, and paid for. Family courts have normalised their entitlement to the title deeds. How about men never allow co-habitation? Sure, we'll have sex with you. But you go back to your own domain. The one which you pay for. Ever bring a cuckoo under a man's roof, that cuckoo gets clocked.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:51 AM
16

It's long overdue time for decenter women. There's no decent ones about.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 07:59 AM
1

Soylent (=soy + lentils) originated from a good book though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Room!_Make_Room Written in 1966, it predicted the overpopulation problems caused by a world population of 7 billion. Presently, it's 8.2 billion. Maybe female fertility (previously highly prized) has become one of those inconvenient facts that certain people like to lecture us about. It's gonna become particularly inconvenient for us since women believe that they have exclusive rights to all the house…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 07:22 AM
14

No, they believe that they are more likely to be targets of violence, and see threats everywhere. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827 Even far away.... Oh, the threats posed by these surplus males..!! https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ When this begins to influence foreign policy, it has gone beyond a joke. These feminists have been Government advisors for two decades. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/what-sex-means-for-world-peace/
/r/MensRights30/12/24 07:14 AM
1

Pretty sure that the other case I was thinking about was this one. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/kent-prison-tunbridge-wells-pregnant-b2204664.html Who knows? There's so much of this going on.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 09:41 AM
3

"Believe all women..." Yeah. Right.... https://www.scotsman.com/news/uk-news/96-of-women-are-liars-honest-2509965 https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ https://www.riverfronttimes.com/news/missourians-sue-lab-for-apparent-paternity-test-error-that-cost-man-30k-and-jail-time-2900854 But this swindle is all 'moral' and 'ethical' say women. Why...? Because we say so. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf
/r/MensRights29/12/24 09:35 AM
1

It occurred to me that I must qualify the peace & contentment that I find so valuable. Most of it comes from seeing our two adult sons make their way through life. In this way, I feel as though I've been reproductively useful, and Nature provides an endorphin reward to me. The counter side is watching the pain and losses they must soak up from the women who pass through their lives. The Paisley Pattern of life is easily recognisable, slightly different for each generation, but basically the same…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:19 AM
1

I honestly can't answer. All I ever experienced, while younger, was that feeling of intimidation by beautiful women, and a desire to please them. Now that I'm much older, they don't intimidate me in the least. I want nothing from them (and, of course, they want nothing from me). I watch the games they play with some amusement, and feel grateful that will never be tempted to fall into the traps they set. Been there and done that with the best I could attract. Present peace and contentment are val…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 09:58 AM
1

This could be wrong, but I think it fits the facts. When our asymmetrical baby brains are developing in their hormonal cocktail, the testosterone-sensitive right brain processes information differently from the oestrogen-sensitive left brain. The testosterone side processes Max Scheler's Pyramid of Human Values from top to bottom, with beauty and aesthetics at the top. Meanwhile, the left side processes from bottom to top, with values of base utility being more important (money, resources). So, …
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:29 AM
1

She has only just been caught at it. I had an article from less than six weeks ago, detailing a similar incident where a young female prison officer was sacked after having sex with an inmate, and she took her ex-employer to an employment tribunal. She claimed lack of training, and was awarded remuneration. But, I've got articles all over the place, which I access by key words, and I couldn't remember her name, to find and link the cases. To be fair, I did refer to yesterday's fresh incident, in…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:50 AM
1

I think it all comes down to Nature having two, independent tasks to coordinate in utero. We have to develop male or female gonads. At 7 weeks' gestation, the SRY gene ensures that male foetus will develop testes. The ensuing testosterone prevents any further development of the female reproductive system, which would be the default development in the absence of that testosterone. The second task is to try to ensure that each sex is attracted to the opposite sex. This requires that the brain be p…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:39 AM
1

I see you might be a bodybuilder. Make sure you take aromatase inhibitors, if using T. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromatase https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002
/r/MensRights27/12/24 11:08 AM
6

After some close shaves where things could have gone horribly, horribly wrong, through naive ignorance of female nature, met someone that I knew was unique. Been married 44 years. Not all of that time was blissful. Had two years around 2000 - 2002 where she'd barely speak to me, all because I wanted to make some fairly profound changes to my career, and she (apparently) knew what was good for me better than I did. We now had two kids who were in their early teens. She was undoubtedly concerned t…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 10:59 AM
4

I thought I'd answered it, and I certainly didn't mean to be disrespectful to your question, which is a fairly profound one. Most of us fall into the female man-trap engineered by Nature, when our testosterone levels are exceptionally high. They're through the roof when we're about 17 years old, and will remain at those levels for a decade or so. That's when we're most likely to have kids. Testosterone is also responsible for female sex drive, but it's at much lower levels, and highest around ov…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 10:01 AM
6

You do it when you're young, and don't know any better!!! We've all done it!
/r/MensRights27/12/24 09:37 AM
6

"I want to learn their dark sides and inner thoughts, to avoid getting hurt.." It's extremely unlikely that you'll ever fully fulfil this mission. They are masters of deception, even to themselves. Their thought processes are impenetrable, even to themselves. Women are eugenics machines, filtering information on males of the species, using sequential analytic logic to assess which male qualities will serve the best interests of themselves and any children they are likely to produce. They deceive…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 09:32 AM
3

Feminist 'researchers' are well aware that the effort required to disprove their bullshit is orders of magnitude greater than that associated with their sloppy work. https://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2016/02/the-unbearable-asymmetry-of-bullshit/ Even in some harder sciences, like biology, the entire peer review system is being hijacked to the propagation of feminist mistruths, which are called out only rarely (at risk of loss of academic employment for those telling the truth) For example, h…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 08:03 AM
4

Yes it has. https://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/30th-july-1927/22/the-mothers-a-study-of-the-origins-of-sentiments His work is the basis of Briffault's Law https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights27/12/24 07:39 AM
2

There are some women who are led to believe (by privileged female idiots such s Taylor Swift) that all you have to do is put on male clothes, then you can indulge yourself in harsh, combative behaviours. https://people.com/music/taylor-swift-the-man-music-video/ This does women no favours in relationships, career or family life. Their misguided pantomime reveals how poorly women understand what it means to be a man. True masculinity isn't about belligerence. Men constantly lead by example, balan…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 10:56 AM
7

In the weird world of the female neuroendocrine system, they honestly believe that men exist only for the benefit of women. It's programmed into them by oestrogen. Meanwhile that same hormone is utilised on male foetuses, in utero, to keep men sexually thirsty, for life. Figure 3 of the link, and the aromatisation hypothesis. https://neuronline.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 09:23 AM
30

With identity politics, you always find yourself in the 'out-group' eventually. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2796
/r/MensRights26/12/24 07:24 AM
12

More common than you might imagine..... in real life, and on both sides of the pond. https://nypost.com/2024/10/17/us-news/dc-teen-reveals-reggie-brown-beating-death-done-because-they-were-bored/ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5ywp7ez4q0o
/r/MensRights26/12/24 07:16 AM
8

Here is how 'transparency' works in the UK. Appoint a 'Family Justice Panel' of eleven members. Don't tell everyone that ten of them are women, including radical feminist academics, a senior executive for Women's Aid, and a male judge who takes guidance from Women's Aid. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2913 Then, guess what the 'impartial outcomes' will be? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c047zq01z0ko You see..? 'Parental Alienation' doesn't exist, but domestic violence exists. M -> F only, of cours…
/r/MensRights25/12/24 09:41 AM
5

Gee, I wonder why her husband was 'prone to outbursts of anger'...?
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:51 AM
54

"they are OK with men raising other men's children for decades." https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:42 AM
1

This author made the prediction that the misandry bubble might burst during the 2020s. https://misandrytoday.com/the-misandry-bubble/
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:37 AM
64

Women don't give a damn even if they get caught out. They even write 'ethics' papers about it. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf Their outlook was spotted by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, way back in 1865. The passage on page 4 of the link, beginning "Nature has made it the calling...." https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html Women evolved for cuckoldry, through the very advanced biology of hidden oestrus. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 They see their …
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:31 AM
22

"The actual laws of attraction..." https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ Source: Working class kid, badly broken nose. No woman looked at him until he had two STEM degrees, and a f*cking good job...... then, he had to beat them off with a shitty stick! "They only want your money or your body if you hit jackpot, ideal genes." They can't always get everything they want from one man. Women actually evolved to cheat. Their hidden ovulation p…
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:16 AM
22

Men don't make a habit of 'micro aggressions' against women. The only time we'll be hostile is when we are forced to send a warning signal that they have gone too far. Our stereotypical behaviour with women is to defer to them. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ This is why we have bent over backwards to ensure that women have been included in the first place. Reality Check -That female 'empowerment' is only possible through our deference. Don't abuse it.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:04 AM
4

How would OFs 'digital creators' find an outlet if men hadn't invented the digital medium?
/r/MensRights24/12/24 11:10 AM
46

It's a female power trip to pit guys against one another. Hard-wired into them. That's how they made an assessment of who had the better genes. If only we could come to some bro pact that would leave them on their scheming ass.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 11:06 AM
1

Tell me there isn't some insane, underground TikTok thang going on..? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5ywp7ez4q0o Please....
/r/MensRights24/12/24 07:43 AM
6

For men, it's a go to jail free card. https://discuss.ilw.com/forum/immigration-discussion/460027-bill-manser-imprisoned-wrongly-for-5-years
/r/MensRights24/12/24 07:23 AM
15

If we could flush the UN, a blatantly feminist, sexist shower of shite, down their f*cking World Toilet, life for men would be healthier. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Beijing%20Declaration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action%2C%20adopted,the%20key%20global%20policy%20document%20on%20gender%20equality
/r/MensRights24/12/24 05:44 AM
5

The kind of 'equality' that men will never gain access to.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 05:37 AM
2

Very true. It's all just tricks played on both men & women by Nature, in order to get genes into the next generation. When it's high tide mark for hormones, we might as well be Battle-Bots, taking part in Robot Wars. Florence becomes a Machine. The effects of oestrogen are particularly pronounced, and are used to programme masculinity into men as well, in utero. https://neuronline.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf h…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 12:04 PM
4

1. If only women were so discerning in not applying sweeping generalisations to male nature and masculinity. Be sure to apply Kant's Categorical Imperative. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative 2. Nobody 'socialises' women to be female. Or men to be male for that matter. It's all taken care of chemically. https://neuronline.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:51 AM
25

Better never than late.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 07:23 AM
15

Women aren't stupid so much as cunning. There's definitely a female etymology in that word.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 07:16 AM
14

"females in defense are troublesome...." Not least because they care only about women and see threats everywhere. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827 https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ Both of these feminist authors are advisors to Government. Their bias has an effect. https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/24/what-sex-means-for-world-peace/
/r/MensRights23/12/24 07:12 AM
10

Men have been alienated from society to such an extent that our values and interests are no longer those of the system which wants us to lay down our lives for it. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday/20210829/282114934670307
/r/MensRights23/12/24 07:01 AM
2

But not a tiny amount.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 06:35 AM
5

These are Florence Nightingale's own words, and they used to be much more widely available across t'internet. Just like articles on Briffault's Law, about the transactional, unemotional nature of women's 'romantic' relationships were once open access in 'Psychology Today'. But, feminists and their admirers are very good at cleaning up behind them, these days. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights23/12/24 06:34 AM
38

Yes, Ms Phillips refuses to acknowledge the fact that it's women like her and their insane power grabs which puts men in a position where they seek something which makes sense. She refuses to debate male issues. https://www.buzzfeed.com/emilyashton/jess-phillips-rape-threats She and her colleagues wish to equate 'misogyny' with terrorism. While refusing to define 'misogyny'. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o The justice secretary wants to close female prisons, to create more room …
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:02 PM
80

Despite the narrative we're supposed to believe, women simply lack empathy in general. https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html They will support other women. But, this is the action of an automaton. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Precipitated, post menarche, by oestrogen. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Ken-Jataimu-ebook/dp/B09FM7S5ZP/ref=sr_1_1?crid=22MBYAPB7742I&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.rdVkOmW-aWZ84lmEF9bakdX6SlEODkXfswEzmrxseI8.IfYsBG3k3_Yt7Fwk0dgGYWRFdg…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 01:28 PM
5

Pity the poor male child who finds himself within the confines of some lesbian 'families'. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-36333032
/r/MensRights22/12/24 01:18 PM
24

In GB, the crime of 'infanticide' exists specifically to offer leniency to mothers who kill children under one year of age. The sentence is never imprisonment, even a suspended sentence would be extremely unusual. The usual outcome is a hospital sentence, probation, or a supervision order. Even the threat of stiffer sentencing has women up in arms about the 'unfairness' of it all. https://theconversation.com/infanticide-vulnerable-mothers-who-kill-their-babies-can-be-granted-leniency-so-why-is-t…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 01:14 PM
1

Of all the misandry which inevitably comes men's way, women actually reserve their deepest and most heartfelt contempt for male feminists. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Michael-Steane-ebook/dp/B0041HXPHS/ref=sr_1_2?crid=3MKDYMU0RXQ27&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.TO3bAz-9eqYECcfh_OBYcI-11WTr9fMKzRPNiWCWSHHD0NKPtomHN_MSI6AXuXB3aBcLRrJ8DuwHFdY2B8n95diX79eDz9GRVlpNFD_75ybTpKMO6LNVN5ib79uGHVmxywqWdS4S6jWa2uDeXIvZKPHfvxEgN2pBDSotv2pQnVdgpzBERfAzGEIe852KlHKHHy25NFsVweBcByCVapN2UNu69c3TovXVefHt41UfhA8.2XtI6sYhf4TfUuJg…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 10:50 AM
8

'Lack of education' also means "Why bother with this boring nitty-gritty, when I've got a pussy, and men lining up to do things for me? Oh, I've burned my fingers on this hot potato which is still too hard to eat, why didn't you tell me, you uncaring brute?"
/r/MensRights22/12/24 10:44 AM
13

'Educated' women are actually the least equipped with any life skills. Real life, I mean.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 10:25 AM
3

Kevin Spacey wouldn't have been interested in young girls in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 10:22 AM
4

"not as a means to gain money by alleging a criminal activity that hasn't been proven, and in which no financial loss is shown..." Fully agree with your analysis. Nonetheless, this is what it has become, due to the much lower burden of proof in civil courts. That's despite the bar for acceptable evidence in criminal court being set pretty low in some western countries. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo As a result, women are empowered to financially ruin men, then ensure that they…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 10:19 AM
47

My sister was given a brand new car by her husband. She never changed the oil or had it serviced. Eventually, it seized up. This is what they do. At the moment, society is at the stage where women are being given the keys to the new car. The keys to preferential employment, generous welfare, cash & prizes through no fault divorce. They believe that, without men, they'll have this wonderful Barbieland which simply runs itself, and pink Chevvy V8s build themselves and never need maintenance. They'…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 08:30 AM
3

Being discriminated against in getting a job. And, without a job, no chance of forming a family. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
/r/MensRights22/12/24 07:15 AM
2

They honestly believe that this is how they're going to take over the world - by social exclusion of men. Social exclusion is the tyranny of female world. They're terrified of it. They need to feel that they fit in. And, they use it against enemies when they feel threatened. The supervisor and her girly crew probably saw OP as a threat, having higher competence, and useful ideas. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797611402511?journalCode=pssa But, most men don't give a toss. Once …
/r/MensRights22/12/24 07:10 AM
2

Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, was onto them. https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html
/r/MensRights22/12/24 06:52 AM
22

I saw it on jury service. Three women wound eight men round their little fingers, cherry-picking and outright ignoring evidence to get the result they wanted. When I protested, the labels came out. Oh, I must be sexist, oh, I must be racist.... The latter is a trump card. Any support I'd garnered in favour of common sense and evidence simply melted away.... Edit: And, to put this in context, this was a serious sexual assault on a 14 year old girl by three grown men in their early twenties. Two o…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 10:11 AM
7

Women can teach men something. They can teach us the realisation of the full extent of their callousness. Thank you for the lesson. What goes round comes around.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:57 AM
61

Any time you interact with a woman, keep this in mind. Here is someone who wants power without responsibility. She is already assessing whether or not you can be 'useful' to her. If you are not high status or physically attractive, you have already been mentally discarded, unless you can perform some dirty, dangerous or menial task for her. This dynamic was kept under control in broader society, because women's influence over men was once limited to the domestic sphere. But, in the west, the ser…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:52 AM
21

I didn't conflate psychopath with paedophile. What I said was that the less savoury aspects of female nature were being examined in greater detail. 'Less savoury' has been hiding for a long time as 'sweet'.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 09:38 AM
1

"I don't want to belong to any club that would have me as a member." Groucho Marx If men are a bit non-conformist, they might be more likely to snag a woman who suffers less from female hive mind. Don't allow women to set the standards.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 09:25 AM
33

No, what's happening is that women have been making such ridiculous claims to be lily-white for so long, flying in the face of evidence, that people have been starting to look more closely at that evidence. https://www.emmottsnell.co.uk/blog/female-paedophiles-how-prevalent-are-they In fact, they're beginning to examine the less savoury aspects of female nature in greater detail. https://neurosciencenews.com/female-psychopathy-psychology-25669/ Judgement Day may be coming sooner than expected, l…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 09:15 AM
175

Women placed in positions of authority over others are immediately on a power trip. They just don't know when to rein it in. Kiddie fiddling is simply a particularly disgusting manifestation of a female behaviour which actually hides in plain sight everywhere.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 07:59 AM
7

Women evolved for cuckoldry. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484
/r/MensRights20/12/24 06:12 AM
31

There was an experiment which measured how the sexes would offer assistance to a 'victim' in the presence or absence of observers. Men were the most concerned, empathetic and genuinely helpful, every time. Women put on a show of faux empathy if other people were watching. The original research on the 'bystander effect' was not to the liking of feminism, or social science 'theory'. As a result, data from, for example, Eagly & Crowley has been bastardized, bowdlerised, re-interpreted into books (F…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 06:03 AM
5

No surprises. In UK, the Justice Secretary for the new Labour Government has stated her intent to close women's prisons so that they can be converted into prisons for men. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html
/r/MensRights20/12/24 05:34 AM
7

So brazen that they revel in it. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/
/r/MensRights19/12/24 06:16 AM
19

For massive financial gain, if they can leave the wet work to a flat-fee patsy, they will. Post WW2 cinema was wall-to-wall with these scenarios. All precipitated by men coming back from the war to find another mule kicking in the stall, and getting a glimpse of true female nature. Take a look at 'The Postman Always Rings Twice', 'Double Indemnity', and plenty more.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:42 AM
4

"If you wish upon a star, your dreams come true..." https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday/20210829/282114934670307
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:52 AM
34

If the present is female, what is there for them to be proud about..? It's shit.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:48 AM
7

The stated aim of feminism is the destruction of families, the fundamental unit of society, so that feminists can seize power. Families contain children. Any political movement which is overtly against children is doomed to failure. So feminists have concentrated their vitriol on men. The many 'successes' of feminism, all of which have been detrimental to society as a whole, have been achieved by isolating men from their children, so that, over time, the family unit becomes synonymous with a wom…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:39 AM
5

"Men with heightened beliefs in a dangerous world believe in harsher sentences for women with previously unrecognised psychotic tendencies." https://neurosciencenews.com/female-psychopathy-psychology-25669/ You know... the ones who make a habit of false accusations. The teachers in positions of power who kiddie fiddle. The ones who initiate domestic violence, but it's the end of the world if it becomes reciprocal. That type of thing. Oestrogen has some weird effects on the CNS, and the resultant…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:57 AM
175

Yes, the female perps are getting younger, right across the world. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ywp7ez4q0o
/r/MensRights17/12/24 10:27 AM
9

Never had a sanction applied to your behaviour, because of vagina? Hey! Let's try that again.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 10:22 AM
2

Yes. After the info has been harvested, next thing will be a bowdlerising and sanitising of reviews involving these films on Wikipedia. It has already happened with the Wiki entries for Briffault's Law. Also, searching for GSRM a couple years back, would have got you this little gem. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ Now, you'll be swamped with spurious info on 'Gender, Sexual and Romantic Minorities'. AI is gonna re-write everything for us to the greater glory of…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 09:27 AM
62

"You don't have the right to know the truth." Female 'medical ethics' in a nutshell. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf This attitude has hidden in plain sight in the west, forever. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Not surprising, really. Women's biology evolved to facilitate this sort of behaviour. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484
/r/MensRights17/12/24 09:16 AM
8

Mike Buchanan has been fighting an uphill battle against indifference for fifteen years with his 'Justice For Men & Boys' political party. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Buchanan_(politician)) Presently, he advises men to vote for the 'UK Reform' party, led by Nigel Farage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Farage
/r/MensRights17/12/24 08:58 AM
22

Male deaths associated with false accusation are far from uncommon. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2176#_Toc504898470 In more detail: http://empathygap.uk/Rape%20Case%20Histories%20modified%2017_8_20.pdf Overview: http://empathygap.uk/?p=2176
/r/MensRights17/12/24 08:52 AM
9

This woman was a radical feminist, living for years in a lesbian commune. Then, with her body clock ticking, she decided she wanted a baby, and got some dude to wife her up!! Now, she writes mainstream pieces about how rewarding it is to be a wife and mother. But, she's very much afraid of what would happen should men decide to adopt the principles of Islam. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday/20210829/282114934670307 That's a good starting point to build on any anti-woke …
/r/MensRights17/12/24 07:02 AM
19

She also writes for The Guardian. Before that, she made a bit of a name for herself by suggesting that men be locked up in concentration camps, while she heroically and single-handedly set about eradicating heterosexuality. https://www.thecollegefix.com/feminist-research-fellow-put-all-men-in-some-kind-of-camp/
/r/MensRights16/12/24 01:18 PM
6

The family courts are destroying both families and any possibility of justice for fathers.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 01:10 PM
6

Yes. Progressives believe that they are encouraging women to take themselves out of the domestic sphere, where they were provided for by men, and to 'stand on their own two feet' .....while simultaneously demanding protection.... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-65311346 ...and preference & provision (EEO, AA, ESG, DEI)..... and welfare, where single mothers are supported by the taxes of men whom they'd never consider as a partner. So, these men can now indirectly pay for the 'privilege' of h…
/r/MensRights16/12/24 11:20 AM
24

If she does this, her 1,000 men 'ordeal' will only take half the time.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:54 AM
18

Truth was never high on the agenda for those developing their grandiloquent feminist 'theory'. https://toxicfeminism.blog/2021/10/16/kelly-oliver/ Really, it's just an extrapolation of how women simply behave in real life. They don't argue for 'truth'. They argue in order to save face... often by the most convoluted and self-defeating 'logic', were they only self-aware enough to realise it. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/ Dunning Kruger syndrome is probably wide…
/r/MensRights16/12/24 10:44 AM
4

The validation from women is to be expected. They evolved to cheat. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484
/r/MensRights16/12/24 06:48 AM
307

The 'objectification' that they tarnish men with..... pure projection. All this bleating that "Women don't owe you pretty." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_Don%27t_Owe_You_Pretty Men don't owe you successful, sweetheart.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 11:17 AM
12

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise." That quote certainly caused feminists to blow a gasket. There's been a concerted attempt on 'tinternet to remove its provenance from Voltaire and to smear it as originating from neo-Nazis. The way things are going in GB, with a feminist Home Secretary, it will be seen as misogyny if men don't keep their heads steeply inclined and eyes averted in the presence of m'lady. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0l…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 08:43 AM
13

It's utterly amazing, the number of women who seem to suffer from Dunning Kruger syndrome - a combination of poor self awareness and low cognitive ability, making them omniscient in their own eyes (and, often, among their female peer group, who reinforce it). https://www.verywellmind.com/an-overview-of-the-dunning-kruger-effect-4160740 Used to see it all the time at work (STEM) amongst the female quota intake. Too dumb to realise that they were being propped up. Calling male co-workers stupid. O…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 08:18 AM
63

The Family Justice Review Panel:- A body of eleven members, ten of them women, including radical feminist academics, a senior executive from Women's Aid, and a male High Court judge, who takes guidance from Women's Aid. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2913 This is the problem faced by men everywhere, these days. On the face of it, everything seems nice and fair and above board. In reality, it's rotten.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:02 PM
9

Yes, can you imagine any guy being taken to one side, and asked: "Did she baby-trap you? Are you totally sure that it's yours?" After all, it's not like these things don't happen. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ With 18 years of financial consequences, while men are forced to support female 'ethics' https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf
/r/MensRights14/12/24 01:42 PM
2

The people who are using gynocentrism to their own ends are certainly intelligent enough. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/rockefeller-feminism-enslaved-humanity/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/40404269?read-now=1 https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf But the comment on feminist and intelligence probably stands.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 12:02 PM
27

She's morally insolvent.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 10:29 AM
20

The guy seems thoughtful, sensitive and intelligent. He has been genuinely hurt by the implications of the line of questioning. The 'professional' staff who can do this so callously, without concern as to the consequences of their words and actions, are truly ugly inside. Comments are beneath contempt.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 09:19 AM
1

Feminists have embedded themselves politically through pressure groups, Non Government Organisations, Charities, and media contacts. They've been influencing political outcomes, all the way to the top, for fifty years. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Beijing%20Declaration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action%2C%20adopted,the%20key%20global%20policy%20document%20on%20gender%20equality Let's not forget the World Economic Forum, and the 'investment community'. https://w…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:41 AM
167

How are we supposed to read her mind? The quantum physics of female mental processes, where every statement has several simultaneous eigenvalues, can easily lead to further trouble down the line as the date progresses. Let's imagine that he paid the bill, so she is temporarily satisfied... Her: "Wanna go back to my place?" Him: "Sure." Her (next day with her friends): "I didn't feel comfortable."
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:46 AM
8

They probably see an equal and opposite reaction as being oppressive. Law of Starfish. Probably.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:17 PM
48

It's been just as bad in physics, with aspersions cast on Newton's 'Principia', and the speed of light accused of privilege. https://netwar.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/feminist-epistemology/#:~:text=In%20a%20passage%20reminiscent%20of,is%20a%20'sexed%20equation' It's almost as though feminists have one-track minds.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:59 PM
1

Jeez. Asset stripper? Paint stripper..? Nitromors would be a better name.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:42 PM
2

"Women deserve women's only spaces.." ...in jail, if convicted of a criminal offence. Not in GB, apparently. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c243650gj07o Women's pressure groups have been pushing for this, for years. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13666066 We badly need a Justice Taskforce For Men.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 12:03 PM
1

'Emotions are Nature's logic executors." Robert Wright, 'The Moral Animal' (1994). What is actually happening is a cold blooded, left-brain hemisphere, sequential analytic logic analysis as to which suitor is in her best interests. The evidence for this is scattered everywhere. Three good sources are 'What Men Know That Women Don't' by Rich Zubaty, 'Sexual Utopia in Power' by F Roger Devlin, and 'The Master & His Emissary' by Prof Iain McGilchrist. Then, there's this especially good one, written…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 11:44 AM
5

They'll be happy to share one man... as long as there's enough money to go round. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny_threshold_model
/r/MensRights13/12/24 09:42 AM
1

Feminists have a sneaking fear that, one day, we may come to our senses. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday/20210829/282114934670307
/r/MensRights13/12/24 09:23 AM
3

Yes, I've read it. Had to get a copy on Google Play, as the title isn't available on Kindle. The book didn't tell me anything I didn't know (been married 44 years!!!), but it was interesting to see the female MO and business plan disclosed by a woman. You can see that I'm not a bot. However, here's an interesting link. https://voices.uchicago.edu/jlockhart/2022/12/21/because-the-machine-can-discriminate-how-machine-learning-serves-and-transforms-biological-explanations-of-human-difference/
/r/MensRights13/12/24 09:14 AM
10

They don't. And feminists make it their business to chase them forever, trying to ensure they'll never get another job. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-60214769 This man has never been found guilty in a criminal trial. His harasser took him to civil court, where the burden of proof is much lower. Not that it's high for criminal proceedings against rape in Scotland. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:56 AM
31

Back in 2012, the Levitt Report was co-authored by Keir Starmer QC and Alison Levitt QC. This report claimed that the rate of false accusation for rape was 0.6%. Keir Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions at the time. He weaponised the failings of the DPP. The figure of 0.6% represents the number of women who find themselves in the dock, to answer relatively minor charges which are consequent to their lies.... perjury, or perverting the course of justice. In actual fact, the DPP knew, from…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:43 AM
2

That name!!! Was she trying to be 'sophisticated', by association with champagne, Chrystal Magnum? Well, it's all gone pop for her since she bottled it on her lies.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:24 AM
4

Arthur Schopenhauer spotted this one track mind back in 1865 : "Women have only one kind of business." https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:17 AM
3

Today's society even makes it more difficult for a man to actually get a job (EEO, AA, ESG, DEI and general BS). In doing so, our main trading asset in the sexual marketplace is denied us. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:10 AM
3

Unfortunately, we've been programmed, by women, in utero, to remain 'thirsty' all our lives. The aromatase enzyme is supremely important. https://neuronline.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf Good evolutionary biology reasons for those M/F differences. And, as women are in control of the process during gestation, they always end up on the winning side. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:27 AM
33

Strangely, most men don't seem to feel the need to film themselves dressing, or changing the oil in their motor.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 01:09 AM
10

That one had already been written by a woman. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manipulated_Man
/r/MensRights13/12/24 01:01 AM
20

"It is utter hell when you are surrounded by people and feel lonely." You, sir, have just said it all. Thank you.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 12:41 AM
14

"If she will try to have a career, she'll get what it's like to be a man..." Hmm....not necessarily. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ Getting to the top with your knickers round your ankles isn't a strategy open to men, by and large. Whereas, by contrast.. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-willie-brown-mistress/
/r/MensRights13/12/24 12:27 AM
27

Radical feminists believe that if men can be reduced to a 'manageable' % of the population, that a feminist utopia will spontaneously arise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly They don't actually want to be responsible for the construction of utopia, though. They don't even think about it. Somehow, it just miraculously 'appears'. Like Barbieland. https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/modern-utopia-inside-londons-women-only-housing-1610224 You know wha…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 12:19 AM
1

"....a very, very high bar." One which might be overcome by the female through first snaring a provider, then sneakily seeking the genes of a higher status male. Hidden oestrus in the human female probably evolved for that very purpose. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 The male interest in females is templated by females in utero. We are what women make us. And they use the thermodynamic stability of delocalised electrons to do it. https://neuronline.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 11:48 PM
18

Fellow Chemist here. The oestrogen-dependent, dopamine driven aspects of the left brain hemisphere aren't conducive to free speech. https://www.realclearscience.com/2021/06/22/the_neuroscience_of_intellectual_openness_782424.html https://medicine.yale.edu/news/yale-medicine-magazine/article/estrogen-deprivation-associated-with-loss-of-dopamine-cells/ Chapters 2 and 3 of this pdf may surprise you. https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf
/r/MensRights12/12/24 04:47 PM
8

They'll eventually tear down every construct that men have provided for their benefit, believing that some kind of feminist 'utopia' will magically arise from the ashes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly Nope. It'll just be ashes. Even spirit levels, plumb lines and set squares will be beyond them. Angular spin momentum will have to wait for a time...
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:08 AM
5

I think you'd enjoy this. Actually a very good book, despite its obscurity. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Michael-Steane-ebook/dp/B0041HXPHS/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3VQRRDNTN71R6&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9._cYMyJr0TadUoZ0AWsGm3w.rSZXB89lFhZGOyacbdLRyDzM-bm8WSqQuClIYht8eqY&dib_tag=se&keywords=michael+steane+rape+of+the+male+mind&qid=1733985169&s=digital-text&sprefix=michael+steane+rape+of+the+male+mind%2Cdigital-text%2C109&sr=1-1
/r/MensRights12/12/24 06:34 AM
3

Well, made me laugh, but I see the trolls are here with their downvotes.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 06:25 PM
2

No sense in asking me! It's your missus you need to ask. As I wear the trousers at home, I now realise I've been conned.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:51 PM
10

"I'd love to see a constant stream of new business that openly and proudly cater to men and men's needs." Meanwhile, back in the real world, the investment money is going in the completely opposite direction. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:44 PM
17

The high status of women in western society is given a subliminal nod by the trailing robes worn by kings and higher clergy. Only the most powerful of powerful men could wear such dress, and have pampered, manicured hands to complement their high status lifestyle.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:40 PM
18

Extending 'franchise' in 1832 to small landowners, tenant farmers and shopkeepers meant that the vast majority of men remained excluded. That vast majority weren't excluded from fighting in wars which weren't of their choosing, though. While women, who were excluded from fighting, handed out white feathers for male 'cowardice'. Which was, quite literally, brought about by sexism.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 02:31 PM
68

In a traditional courtship, men must first have sufficient resources, a good job, and be physically attractive enough to make approaches to women without being rebuffed. That can represent a huge investment in their time and effort (education, work, gym). Then, they must spend money, a courtship ritual which indicates their status. It's in female interest to hold out. The more time and money the suitor has spent, the more significant his investment, and the less inclined he'll be to want to go t…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 01:14 PM
11

Men will always defer to women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ Therefore, just one woman on a decision-making panel will skew the result in female favour. With more than one woman, the female in-group preference allows them even more leverage. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 With 50/50 M/F representation, men don't stand a chance. George Orwell's '1984' ends with "a jackboot stamping on a human face, forever." Those boots now have heels.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 09:52 AM
14

The advertisers will pull out eventually. Except maybe Gillette and Bud Light.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 08:56 AM
37

In GB, when women weren't allowed to vote, men were sent to die in the trenches of WW1. Those men weren't allowed to vote, either. Enfranchisement for women piggy-backed on the drive for universal male suffrage post WW1. Women were never prevented from driving in UK. Agree 100% on the present position.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 08:54 AM
17

Feminism 'jumped the shark' decades ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark
/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:32 AM
11

In some western democracies, a female jurisprudence class are ensuring that due process for male-only crimes will be denied. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo Effectively, a liar's charter.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:27 AM
2

Probably sponsored by Gillette/s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Best_Men_Can_Be#:~:text=The%20campaign%20title%20is%20a%20play%20upon%20a,including%20bullying%2C%20sexism%2C%20sexual%20misconduct%2C%20and%20toxic%20masculinity
/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:20 AM
1

"Emotions are Nature's logic executors..." Robert Wright, 'The Moral Animal' (1994) When a woman gets all 'emotional' about some hot, rich guy, that's because her left brain has done all the sequential logic calculations about how useful he will be to her in terms of resources, including gametes. 'Emotions' are also used by women to get men to protect them. They will feign a lack of agency (when it suits them), and make a big display of how upset they are, hoping to attract a temporary protector…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:57 AM
1

Yes. Therefore, they keep us 'thirsty' all of our adult lives. Women template the future behaviour of male children (the workers and slaves for women of the next generation) in the womb, by oestrogen. This has been suspected since 1994. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002 The 'aromatisation hypothesis' gives clues as to what's happening. https://neuronline.sfn.org/-/media/Project/Neuronline/PDFs/2019/How-to-Study-the-Origins-of-Sex-Differences-in-Brain-and-Behavior.pdf Control of our m…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:45 AM
6

....designed to level the playing field. Take a look at the 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link, where the 'investment community' is being encouraged to invest in female-owned businesses. That playing field hasn't been level for quite a time, and it's men who are playing uphill. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens
/r/MensRights10/12/24 10:48 PM
2

Due to prerogatives such as efficient hunting, then development of complex systems, men evolved to be better at competition and cooperation. Holds good to the present day. All male teams have better performance by significant margin. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep26492
/r/MensRights10/12/24 10:39 PM
6

Has the pushback started? If so, can we keep the momentum going?
/r/MensRights10/12/24 11:05 AM
11

Spot on! And feminists don't seem to realise that they, too, are being played. https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf
/r/MensRights10/12/24 09:57 AM
15

Men and women did NOT evolve to compete with one another. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/competitiveness-is-a-male-domain/ Male competitiveness is for female benefit. They wait at the finishing line for the winners. Male competitiveness (now called 'toxic masculinity' by feminists), is responsible for the deontic values which built civilisation. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Any complaints about 'toxic masculinity' can be directed squarely bac…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 08:24 AM
7

Life today does get you like that, doesn't it? Anyway, I was a bit careless with my comment, I really meant 'the outcomes of feminism' will be bad for everyone. Please accept an edit to the comment, and good wishes, mate! Don't let them grind you down.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 05:32 AM
5

Here's a further study (GB). http://empathygap.uk/Rape%20Case%20Histories%20modified%2017_8_20.pdf These 146 cases of false accusation led to 16 deaths. 12 of these were suicides of the falsely accused. One was the suicide of the mother of the falsely accused. One was a homicide due to vigilante action, and one was the death in prison of an innocent man. One false accuser offed herself.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 05:22 AM
39

The eventual outcomes of feminism will be bad for everyone.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 05:03 AM
2

I'm no religious expert, but am fairly certain that there's a plethora of recommendations/diktats for circumcision in the Old Testament. If you want a more informed opinion: https://stevemoxon.co.uk/only-male-genital-modification-is-control-female-is-competitive-ploy/
/r/MensRights10/12/24 04:49 AM
2

Thanks for this! The formatting in the Kindle version of the book is abysmal.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 04:42 AM
11

The use of the suffix 'phobic' is merely a way for someone to close down an argument. It tarnishes those of opposing viewpoint as supposedly suffering from a mental illness. Anyone using such a tactic betrays their closed mind, and it's not worth wasting time on them.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 11:14 AM
3

This has been brewing for a time. The feminist fear could be smelled a few years back. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday/20210829/282114934670307
/r/MensRights09/12/24 11:02 AM
5

The penis mightier than the sword.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 10:42 AM
25

"Foreskin has a gliding function, that acts like a lube..." They'll never admit it, but that is the perverse, historical reason behind its recommended removal by all Abrahamic religions. The foreskin is a natural roller bearing. Makes it easy for a man to pleasure himself (thereby rendering him somewhat beyond the ability of women to manipulate and control through sex). Remove it, and he's more likely to stick it in crazy... generating more followers for the 'pay now, live later' scam. 'Go forth…
/r/MensRights09/12/24 10:25 AM
11

https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html
/r/MensRights09/12/24 09:08 AM
3

"Oh my love, if I reveal / Every secret I've concealed / How much of my pain would you feel? Tom Petty 'Rhino Skin' https://genius.com/Tom-petty-rhino-skin-lyrics
/r/MensRights09/12/24 09:05 AM
1

Ha! Keep up the good work!!
/r/MensRights09/12/24 07:26 AM
56

Her face is quite magnetic. Oh, wait.... that's because of all the metal.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 07:25 AM
19

Julie Brindel said this. https://www.thecollegefix.com/feminist-research-fellow-put-all-men-in-some-kind-of-camp/ Then, she became a reporter for The Guardian. No surprises there, then.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:54 AM
7

Can we still call them broads?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:48 AM
11

"No matter how big a splash you make in this world, whether you're Megan Fox, or a talking teddy bear... eventually nobody gives a crap." Intro to film 'Ted' (2012). Ok, mildly modified.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:44 AM
45

Women and jurisprudence do NOT mix. It is a female power trip which will always end badly for the male sex. All they have to do is pass laws which makes it legal to push men around, and deny them human rights. Far fetched...? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:11 AM
7

Testosterone enhances visuo-spatial skills on which maths and science depend. Female hormones depress those skills. Differences in higher mathematical abilities become even more marked on reaching full maturity. Before everything became skewed by 'quotas', the predominance of males in STEM subjects was known to be partially caused by the brain patterning induced by testosterone in utero, an environment where 'socialisation' to prefer such subjects seems an unlikely premise. https://books.google.…
/r/MensRights09/12/24 02:53 AM
25

"In my years of working with couples in therapy, I have very rarely seen a woman who routinely listened to the emotional pain of her male partner. Women claim they want a man who is in touch with his feelings, but, if you scratch and sniff, you find this means that he should be in touch with HER feelings. Yes, women will claim that men are cold and unfeeling, but give her a chance, in therapy, to listen to his pain, and what I have seen, repeatedly, is that she RECOILS." Adam Leonas: 'The Empres…
/r/MensRights09/12/24 02:40 AM
6

The situation hasn't gone away. Only paused. And it's a travesty for the justice system that they ever got to a stage where they were even being discussed. The same old pressure groups are working away in the background. https://www.sfjp.law.ed.ac.uk/
/r/MensRights08/12/24 11:07 AM
20

Spot on. When women are in a weaker position, they appeal, for their safety, to male, deontic ethics, based on principles of fairness. These, in turn, arose from male competitive hierarchies. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf Yet, women gain most personal advantage by subverting deontic values through cunning and stealth, directed to their own utilitarian advantage. When they have finally gained the upper hand in society, they impose utilita…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 10:51 AM
11

Fuck 'em.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 10:34 AM
9

I'm an old geezer, but we really need to do something about this. Here, in Scotland, the bias is blatant. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo NO JUSTICE.... NO PEACE. How do you like your own slogan, now, ladies?
/r/MensRights08/12/24 10:32 AM
3

"It's a Great Big Shame" : Song from almost a century ago.... 1931, by Gus Elen. https://lyricsplayground.com/alpha/songs/i/itsagreatbigshame.html#google_vignette "He hadn't been married not a month nor more, when underneath her thumb went Jim / Isn't it a pity that the likes of her can put upon the likes of him?"
/r/MensRights07/12/24 09:32 PM
6

https://archive.org/details/mothersstudyofor0001brif
/r/MensRights07/12/24 07:53 PM
34

Male 'self-improvement' always has the hidden agenda that someone else should ultimately benefit. We are advised to study hard in a biased educational system, get a great job in a biased employment market, get ripped so that we can attract women, then be confident to approach them in a biased sexual harassment market.... spend our money on them while they decide whether or not we are 'worthy' of being allowed to support them in a biased marriage contract. Female self-improvement. Don't get too o…
/r/MensRights07/12/24 07:59 AM
6

Yes, it was always possible to guess from his lyrics that ol' Leonard was very fond of women, and that this could cloud his judgement. But there's a song from an unexpected source that says it all about M/F relationships. 'Rebel Yell' by Billy Idol. "I'd sell my soul for you, babe / For money to burn, for you / I'd give you all, and have none babe / To have you here with me Basically, the premise is that men will hand over everything they've got in exchange for sex, especially if that sex is ent…
/r/MensRights07/12/24 07:49 AM
10

Well, they killed those sort of interactions stone cold dead, on their way to a fun-free world. But, they shot themselves in both feet. Those first flirtatious moves were the way in which they sharpened their claws while they assessed a man's resources. Was he 'worthy' of further interest or not? Now, that man simply strolls on, and remains a free man. So, in order to extract resources, women are now forced to practice their wiles in the workplace. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/…
/r/MensRights07/12/24 06:16 AM
5

When women actually disclose what goes on behind their dance of the seven veils it becomes clear that they don't actually do empathy. Esther Vilar has quite a bit to say about it in her book 'The Manipulated Man' and Florence Nightingale spilled the beans nearly two centuries ago. https://machomag.blogspot.com/2020/04/women-arent-capable-of-love-says.html That doesn't bode well for men in particular, when you consider that women have a 4x preference for the views of other women. https://psycnet.…
/r/MensRights06/12/24 06:21 PM
3

Hope she has informed the taxman.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 03:26 PM
5

You're right on all three points.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 02:36 PM
15

They're aware of it as an issue. Now. https://archive.is/AKyOZ Not so perceptive before the election. There has to be a real fear that they'll simply pretend harder in future.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 02:24 PM
15

They still expect us to pay, even though they've been garnering all the money for the past couple decades. The 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link is outrageous. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens
/r/MensRights06/12/24 02:18 PM
65

In Scotland, a Western democracy, the female judiciary have arranged a 'Go To Jail With No Evidence or Proper Trial' card for men, in the new game of Female Monopoly. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59151540 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977d35l7mjo What could possibly go wrong..?
/r/MensRights06/12/24 09:43 AM
247

This 'new model' looks traditional, but with a whorey twist.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 09:34 AM
1

Got a theory on this, with quite a bit of evidence. "Did you know that, due to the oestrogen-initiated denial of right brain resources, women treat men with the same callous indifference as a male psychopath or right-brain stroke victim might exhibit towards women? As a result, men are always alone - even within marriage, whose primary function is to provide female security..." This book is the story of three generations of male struggle, written from the point of view of what women hoped to gai…
/r/MensRights06/12/24 08:06 AM
4

The Goodwin & Rudman paper you mention is referenced here: https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-falsity-of-identity-politics/ And here, reference (4): https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf
/r/MensRights06/12/24 06:26 AM
2

They're aspiring to a new work/life balance. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0j1wwypygxo Looks kinda traditional, but with a whorey twist.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 06:17 AM
2

Your being 'different' has excluded you from the mainstream. You are now 'self-policing' to a certain extent. You may be surprised how much identity politics is associated with control of males. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-falsity-of-identity-politics/ Of course you yearn for intimacy. The male sex drive exists to maintain the species. It's also the driver of creativity and progress. Unfortunately, it's the mainstay of the female business model. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0j1wwypygxo …
/r/MensRights06/12/24 06:11 AM
11

These two dynamics work against us. 1. Women empathise with other women. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 2. Men defer to women. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ In fact, in the workplace, the latter is expected as the only sort of 'acceptable' professional behaviour, otherwise the female may read it as flirting. The consequences of (1) & (2) combined are immense. Place just one woman on a decision-making panel, and the outcome is assured to be of female benefit. 50/50 M/…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:29 AM
9

If we choose to actively withdraw from our 'provider & protector' role, that 'empathy' will come flooding back, out of pure societal self-interest. No stronger force will ever be available.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:16 AM
2

You're never going to overcome the fact that women control the genes for mitochondria. Only maternal mitochondrial DNA is conserved. The egg kills the sperm mitochondria with ubiquitin, almost at the moment of conception. That puts her in charge of the Krebs cycle....which puts her in charge of sex steroid synthesis.... which keeps men sexually thirsty..... which keeps men working for women. https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Baxter-Basics-ebook/dp/B0DJ2DM6N7/ref=sr_1_1?crid=WJEXU78RBO7N&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:08 AM
33

More common than we care to think. https://neurosciencenews.com/female-psychopathy-psychology-25669/
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:47 AM
4

"Every month he gives me a salary from the money he made.." Surprised they don't frame this as some kind of 'financial abuse'!
/r/MensRights05/12/24 06:17 AM
11

The 'lazy girl' jobs will be hit hard by AI. Suddenly, those women will have to 'date down'. Except, they'll be unemployed, and will actually be 'dating up'. As usual.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 05:00 AM
23

It's the veterinarian mindset. Once a beast of burden is of no further utility....
/r/MensRights04/12/24 10:02 AM
7

Predicted in the 1950s? First couple of minutes.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNa1N_amCB8
/r/MensRights04/12/24 08:16 AM
6

Even the French call it 'Petite Mort' or 'Little Death'. Whereas the Japanese call it 'Kenjataimu' - 'Wise Man Time'. Freed temporarily from the yoke of the sexual drive which keeps men under the thumb of women.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 08:00 AM
6

Who is going to be affected most by the implementation of AI? College-educated women. They'll be dating down before too long. Except, by then, they'll be unemployed and dating up.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 07:15 AM
13

Men know that it's difficult to understand women. But we try. It's a near impossible task. That cocktail of oestrogen/progesterone is having a different effect on the neuroendocrine system, every day of the month. Women, on the other hand, believe that they already know everything there is to know about men. They know that we like sex. They know that they can use this to control us. "A woman has no problem in forming multiple cognitive dissonances, as long as it benefits her life. As such, a wom…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 06:56 AM
6

This is the inevitable result of men being under the yolk of feminism.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 06:35 AM
24

It's a power dynamic. The hidden subtext is this: "You may be more physically powerful than we are. But, never, ever forget that we hold the sexual power." The (completely discredited) Duluth Model, based on some mythical male lust for power & control over the female is nothing more than female projection of their own motivations. Where this behaviour is completely unacceptable is where it is imposed on minors, where male sex drive is not yet fully developed, or even absent. The females who do t…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:47 AM
108

Imagine women losing their shit because men demand meritocracy.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 05:20 PM
2

Argentina is taking steps in the right direction. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/12/01/argentina-confronts-a-crisis-of-false-allegations-justice-minister-pushes-for-reform/
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:03 PM
1

I'm not mad at anyone I don't even know. Your mom would fit comfortably within the boundaries of that Venn Diagram. "We don't need to erase women's issues to talk about men's issues." If only the converse applied.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 10:52 PM
9

Due to a spate of false allegations, Argentina has taken the initiative of changing their penal code, raising the penalty for false allegation from one year to six years. Stricter measures on perjury also. https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/12/01/argentina-confronts-a-crisis-of-false-allegations-justice-minister-pushes-for-reform/ Let's hope this gains attention.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 12:10 PM
11

Maybe those who are in charge of "assuring fairness & due process in schools" should be asked to comment. https://www.saveservices.org/about/mission/
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:57 AM
1

He's a voice in the wilderness. Most are still in denial. https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/11/30/the-kamala-campaign-is-in-total-denial/ When women reach critical mass in an organisation, the ability for introspection / overview / willingness to change path is completely lost. The female groupthink will be amplified as men will know that they must defer to women, or lose their job. Meanwhile, the female politicians will simply double down on the narrative, and blame others. Popcorn time.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:27 AM
42

On seeing it, thought it was a comparative of the adjective 'decent'. But, these people have no idea of the meaning of this word.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:02 AM
1

Yeah. During those valuable 30 hours, please use these to demonstrate to kids that the correct possessive pronoun is 'their' and the correct adjective is 'societal'. These are valuable hours, Don't waste them.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 10:51 AM
2

Some wisdom from a German philosopher, back in 1865 : "Women are inferior to men in matters of honesty and conscientiousness. The fundamental fault in their character is that they have no sense of justice. Nature has destined them to be dependent not upon strength, but upon cunning. This is why they have an ineradicable tendency to lie. Nature has provided woman, for her protection, with the faculty of dissimulation, just as she conferred man with bodily strength and reason. It is natural for wo…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 09:03 AM
1

A newspaper article from the 2000s. Lying about the real father of their babies is dodgy... https://www.scotsman.com/news/uk-news/96-of-women-are-liars-honest-2509965 Whoops! They see this as their 'right'.... https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Gossip and reputation destruction is a useful tool for them in the workplace. Personally, have seen this used to end the careers of two men who were standing in the way of female 'career trajectories'. It's how women carry out violence a…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:20 AM
47

Women want to have things done for them. They don't want to do the grunt work to improve their own lives.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 07:23 AM
4

"Let's teach the future generation of boys that they mean something..." Single mothers aren't going to disclose the secrets of the female business model.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 07:19 AM
4

Men are the romantic gender. Women are transactional in relationships. There was a good article about this in Psychology Today (2016) by Dale Harvey MBA PhD. He emphasised that Briffault's Law very much applies to the human condition. The article is available only to professionals now, but here's an alternative source. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ The lovelorn man will do anything to attract a woman. That's what keeps the economic wheels turning. She won't commit until he …
/r/MensRights01/12/24 07:13 AM
2

Thank you for your feedback, it is greatly appreciated!! Women are always very sure of themselves, courtesy of the effects of oestrogen on the neuroendocrine system. Their self-regard helps maintain a high bar for potential suitors, a sort of quality control for the human race. When pregnant, I think they're even more sure of themselves, as they're now well on the way to fulfilling the mission they've been programmed for. Female bosses tend not to notice inefficiency in staff of their own sex, b…
/r/MensRights01/12/24 06:30 AM
1

The loss of that dream is gut-wrenching. I don't know what to say. After that glimpse of insight into your situation, can begin to understand why you feel the way you do.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 08:19 PM
2

You might like this article: https://counter-currents.com/2015/06/back-to-africa/
/r/MensRights30/11/24 08:06 PM
3

Hold onto your job, income and integrity. If it makes sense to you..... it makes sense. Other people will notice that you plough your own furrow. Some of them will be women.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 07:59 PM
3

"Feel like I'm in prison, but I still have to pay for it..." It's a bit like after serving 17 years for a rape which you didn't commit. https://metro.co.uk/2024/08/09/wrongly-jailed-man-forced-pay-back-100-000-bed-board-fees-21392715/
/r/MensRights30/11/24 05:07 PM
2

Basically, what you said! They'll start fighting one another, viciously.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 05:03 PM
7

When women fail as CEOs, the excuses are trotted out, that it's difficult for them to balance work & family. https://salespop.net/leadership/are-women-failures-as-ceos/ It's almost as if men didn't have families too....
/r/MensRights30/11/24 05:00 PM
9

This will happen. It's in the math. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2796
/r/MensRights30/11/24 04:56 PM
15

Norah Vincent, a lesbian, thought that she'd be 'empowered' by living as a man. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-Made_Man_(book)) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norah_Vincent Instead, as a (not very masculine) man, she was treated by women like sh*t on a shoe. She eventually committed suicide.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 12:09 PM
5

I'm truly sorry to hear about your ongoing situation. I know that it rips the heart from you when your creative work is appropriated by others as their own. Ideas are our brainchildren. It saddens us to see them taken from us, and put up for forced adoption by uncaring parents. I also know what you mean regarding the requirement for job and income in order to get a girlfriend. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf I can vouch for the accuracy of Baumeister's theory. It was only after land…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 10:17 AM
16

Are you kidding? You are seriously advocating that we should be passively cheated and robbed by them? That's just what they want, they see such behaviour as normal.... when they are doing the cheating. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ When they are doing the robbing. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf Twenty years ago, I was the victim of workplace discrimination. Had projects, on which I'd expended blood, sweat and tears, sequestered from me, in order to…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 08:44 AM
1

Harris' handlers were well aware of deficiencies in the skill set of their candidate. Basically, she isn't very good at thinking on her feet, or even while sitting down. That's all very well in a podcast such as 'Call Her Daddy', where Harris and Alexandra Cooper can sing from the same song-sheet, with women's issues front and centre... but, even here, she put her foot in it, outrageously ignoring male draft issues, and informing men that there are no instances where the state holds control of m…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 07:43 AM
7

They view life through a prism where everyone wants to f*ck you, rather than fight you. Gives a different perspective, I guess.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 10:40 PM
18

All violence has two-way M/F traffic. Women initiate much of it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey https://stevemoxon.co.uk/how-and-why-partner-violence-is-normal-female-behaviour-but-aberrational-male-behaviour/ Female violence is characterised by the victims often being relatively defenceless, compromised by age. Juveniles, as here, or elderly and infirm. The element of surprise is used... sleeping or showering. The odds are skewed by using a lethal weapon... guns, knives.. or poison. …
/r/MensRights29/11/24 09:04 AM
12

It's been a problem for centuries. https://www.public-domain-poetry.com/james-kenneth-stephen/thought-39177
/r/MensRights29/11/24 08:49 AM
6

Breaking news: She has resigned. At the time, she didn't want to lose face, lose property. Easier to blame someone else. Easier to blame violence. This 'terrifying' offence against a 'vulnerable woman' never happened. How many more like this? Or worse....
/r/MensRights29/11/24 07:41 AM
46

Before you know it, men can't even talk around the watercooler, in case women feel 'uncomfortable'. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51261999 Women come into male areas, then find fault in men for being there.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 02:59 AM
74

As soon as one woman joins any workplace, it becomes a female dominated area.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 02:29 AM
4

It's still here. https://www.advocate.com/voices/4b-scissoring-out-patriarchy Still trying to gain recruits, and women's lower sex drive means that they'll have some success. "Lacking the male sex drive, women's sexuality is more easily influenced by social and situational factors." - Roy F Baumeister: 'Is There Anything Good About Men?' "Attending tertiary education is associated with a 900% increase in women identifying as lesbian or bisexual." Michael, Gagon & Michaels: 'The Social Organisati…
/r/MensRights28/11/24 10:33 AM
13

Surely, an advertising contract with the European equivalent of Bud Lite must be beckoning...?
/r/MensRights28/11/24 03:29 AM
22

You're right. I was so cross that I wasn't thinking properly! Hell, I'd take that option for sure. I'm not going to fight and possibly die for a system that despises me, and puts artificial barriers in the way of meritocratic progress.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 01:05 AM
2

Similar issues covered in 'The Disappearance' by Philip Wylie, in 1951. https://www.librarything.com/work/365716
/r/MensRights28/11/24 01:00 AM
28

Serve women with enrolment papers, with the proviso that they can avoid the draft if they relinquish their right to vote. Legally binding. This is the only way that things will ever get better for men, politically.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 12:46 AM
5

Thought it was a bit wet. With women, it went down well, though.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 12:35 AM
8

Of course they'll justify it, especially in shows written by women for women (where there's a special, subliminal connection). They evolved for this behaviour. It's what hidden ovulation (a human female speciality) is all about. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 They see the behaviour itself as a 'right'. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Making us pay is also viewed as their 'right'. While our genes are consigned to the dustbin, and our bank accounts rinsed. https://jme.bmj.com/co…
/r/MensRights28/11/24 12:31 AM
20

My sister had a car. She ran it until it had no oil, and seized up, ignoring the warning lights. Her husband wasn't mechanically minded, so didn't give her any sound advice. Made me think... When women get a bit of power, they seem to rinse it, without understanding how it all works. Most of our politicians who make such women-only funds available (probably up to the armpits with the WEF) are driven by dogma, and have never held a proper job in their lives. Male politicians won't rock the boat, …
/r/MensRights27/11/24 01:04 PM
17

When is enough?? (see increase in women's wealth section of link) https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens These 'initiatives' are everywhere. https://thegiin.org/gender-lens-investing-repository/ 'Equality..??' Are we nearly there, yet?
/r/MensRights27/11/24 12:40 PM
3

Some might have been manipulated into having sex with other women. Many 'preachers' were scissor sisters, trying to gain new recruits!! https://www.advocate.com/voices/4b-scissoring-out-patriarchy
/r/MensRights27/11/24 06:46 AM
21

You're right, the first stirrings were around 2010, and this 2019 follow-up indicates that it might be starting to happen. https://misandrytoday.com/the-misandry-bubble/
/r/MensRights26/11/24 02:01 PM
5

Yes they were. Not enough room to give examples. But this lot are pulling feminist policies out of their ass. Policies that no man in his right mind would have voted for. There's a bit of unrest. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/700143
/r/MensRights26/11/24 01:55 PM
8

UK Government policy. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-everyone-can-do-something-for-womens-equality Meanwhile, EEO, AA, ESG, DEI make it more difficult for men to get a job. Without a job, men have no card to play in the sexual marketplace. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf Male loneliness doesn't happen by accident.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 01:43 PM
12

Meanwhile the Poms have just voted the fckrs in. Full of feminist policies that they kept up their sleeve. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-everyone-can-do-something-for-womens-equality https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o https://metro.co.uk/2024/08/18/extreme-misogynists-treated-terrorists-government-plans-21443590/ And in some parts of the UK feminist hell-hole, like…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 01:39 PM
9

At the WEF: "Yes, I think we can give you a business loan for that, as it follows our approved model. We'll even make it easy for the takeover..." https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/10/04/labours-foolish-embrace-of-blm-ideology/
/r/MensRights26/11/24 10:27 AM
44

They're good with shovels. Been using them for BS for decades.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 10:24 AM
16

They've been getting away with stuff like this for too long. https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/a35379486/why-does-the-world-reward-mediocre-white-men/ Their aim is to change the Overton Window about what is and isn't politically acceptable, and they've been very successful up until now. It's how EEO, AA, ESG, DEI get incorporated into everyday life, and nobody bats an eyelid. It's how 'harassment' legislation gets introduced, and everyone looks the other way. Suddenly, men, especially a p…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 10:18 AM
3

Who wants to sacrifice their integrity to be part of a stoopid club? https://wesaythedarndestthings.com/groucho-marx-i-refuse-to-join-any-club-that-would-have-me-as-a-member/ NB Female minds work in the opposite direction
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:42 AM
13

The unbearable asymmetry of bullshit. https://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2016/02/the-unbearable-asymmetry-of-bullshit/ Brandolini's Law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law There's a whiff of panic in the air from feminist quarters. Things aren't quite going all their own way at the moment... That accounts for this BS, and it's likely to be just the start.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:32 AM
21

The situation in the UK has become ridiculous now. The Liebour cabinet is chock full to the brim with feminists, including Home Secretary Yvette Cooper (make misogyny a crime on par with terrorism), Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood (no more women to be sent to prison), Jess Phillips (no more violence against women & girls) and deputy leader Angela Rayner (tw\t). The leader, Sir Keir Starmer, co-authored the Levitt Report back in 2013, when he was Director of Public Prosecutions. It contains the…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:19 AM
57

Yes, she was a wrong'un, in the company of other wrong'uns, normalising what we witness all around today. https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/08/06/the-olympics-celebration-of-queer-hid-a-sinister-truth/ To feminists, anything is fair game, as long as it helps break down the family unit. https://www.azquotes.com/quote/692702
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:45 PM
1

'The Empress is Naked' by Adam Leonas 'What Men Know That Women Don't' by Rich Zubaty 'The Woman Racket' by Steve Moxon 'Is There Anything Good About Men?' by Roy F Baumeister 'The Rape of the Male Mind' by Michael Steane 'The Rise of Men' by Manhood Shitty Shit 'The Manipulated Man' by Esther Vilar (unique, this one, in that it's a woman disclosing the female MO) All of these books provide fragments of a jigsaw puzzle. The cover picture is on a box of games - the big compendium of ugly challeng…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:54 AM
1

Then read the United Nations Beijing Declaration and Platform For Women. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Beijing%20Declaration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action%2C%20adopted,the%20key%20global%20policy%20document%20on%20gender%20equality Ask yourself two questions: "Is this biased in a way where I could easily find myself discriminated against in my everyday life?" And the even more fundamental: "Which sex will be expected to lay down their lives to defend this bi…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:30 AM
37

Yes it's a real problem which affects men, too. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-47718477 Whoops! The law in GB, under Liebour, is likely to be blind to female perps. Not that women will end in prison anyway. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html Speak up about gendered laws, you'll be accused of 'misogyny'. They'll find space in prison for YOU. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o Jess Phillips is "encoura…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:47 AM
11

When are the CPS going to stop adding the figures for violence against males into the stats for VAWG, to bolster the numbers, and hide the facts? http://empathygap.uk/?p=4007
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:42 AM
1

Yes, folks like that Baroness Mone (a one-time Labour supporter) need all the financial help they can get. Her 'businesses' didn't really help the human condition much. It's all gone a bit quiet on her. She should be languishing in jail. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Mone,_Baroness_Mone Ooops, I forgot. There's to be no jail for women now, either. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/shabana-mahmood-labour-prison-women-close-b2618123.html
/r/MensRights25/11/24 07:05 AM
10

Some of them have piston slap, and really require a rebore.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 08:52 PM
86

"I don't need to provide anything, but the man needs to have a house, a car, an engagement ceremony, as well as pay a bride price. I felt like I'm at the very top of this marriage market." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-64973186 And, after all that, they don't want to have children! When will women realise...? Resources flow from a man to a woman because she's the proxy, the intermediary. Resources are really being provided for the children he hopes to have with you. When women don'…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 08:35 PM
3

Are things anomalous today? Just asking.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 01:30 PM
7

Yes, women seem oblivious to the fact that masculinity is a result of their shopping lists for the 'ideal' man. All too often, that ideal can never be fulfilled in just one man. Which is why they cheat. This article hits the nail on the head. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 "Males are the result of a selective breeding programme - the selection being done by females."
/r/MensRights24/11/24 01:27 PM
14

Women need to control the narrative, or they feel insecure. They cannot abide all-male spaces, because these allow men to discover, in a very short space of time, that most of their problems stem from trying to satisfy creatures who have a different chromosome. So, they come here and exercise their voting rights. Anytime the conversation strays too close to the truth, there will be a torrent of downvotes. If the post/comment is absolute truth, it will be removed.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 12:11 PM
5

For a very small % of women, they sure have access to a lot of air-time, column inches and op-eds. The oestrogen group-think is well enough known. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 Having an anti-male tantrum will affect some other women. Otherwise, they wouldn't do it. Men's Rights activists are afforded very little publicity on mainstream media (other than being tarnished by women, who will never understand male life in a million years. But, they think they understand us. They know…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 12:03 PM
10

Yep! Have a look at this 'empowerment' celebrated by the BBC yesterday. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwygdzn4dw4o As for the workplace.. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ And if she doesn't get what she thought she would, that big promotion, or a part in a new film? Sexual harassment suit, incoming.... "There's someone called Asia Argento here to see you, Mr Weinstein..."
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:46 AM
8

There's also the double standard that they attempted to conflate MGTOW with terrorism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Who_Hate_Women_(Bates_book)) Not what you want with Yvette Cooper (a notorious feminist) as GB Home Secretary. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c15gn0lq7p5o https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/extreme-misogyny-to-be-treated-as-terrorism-under-new-government-plans-381387/
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:15 AM
5

Agreed. Nonetheless, the group manifestation of a dynamic that was previously confined to a domestic environment (men can be controlled by women, through controlling access to sex) indicates how women see this as their superpower. It's interesting that there are probably mitochondrial/neuroendocrine origins to their feelings of universal entitlement.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 11:09 AM
23

When husbands supported wives to have families, houses were available at much lower multiples of income, and a working man could pay a mortgage/rent on a single income. Feminism (the Rockefeller Foundation) encouraging woman into the workplace, is roughly equal to downwards pressure on salaries and an upwards pressure on asset prices by a factor of 2. Make it more difficult for a man to get a job (EEO, AA, ESG, DEI) and that man loses his main trading card in the sexual marketplace. https://asse…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 10:53 AM
1

Women expect to get their own way in return for sex. There are rumblings of discontent in the west that this may have gone too far. Pushback is visible in the US election result, where the manosphere may have played a part. https://angryg.substack.com/p/the-manosphere-elected-donald-trump As a result, women are furious. They feel that withdrawing their asset will bring men crawling back into line. Women have controlled men through the male sex drive since the dawn of time. Male mitochondrial DNA…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 08:12 AM
1

Yes! Ol' Sherbert is following the typical xx pattern of arguing to save face rather than seek truth. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/
/r/MensRights24/11/24 07:10 AM
1

Abstaining for a day isn't exactly 'self-destructing'! Methinks you have overvalued your asset.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 07:06 AM
1

That'll be handy for their cat lady futures.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:56 AM
2

The manosphere made a difference. https://angryg.substack.com/p/the-manosphere-elected-donald-trump
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:30 AM
19

"in over 95% of cases, it is men who murder." That's not correct. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10610-021-09492-5 The elephant in the room is that women often manipulate men to do the wet work on their behalf. https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/murder-redcar-beach-wicked-wife-29311748
/r/MensRights24/11/24 06:22 AM
1

Women may already have out-manoeuvred us on that one. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-everyone-can-do-something-for-womens-equality https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens In the (near) future, our choice of male-owned businesses might be restricted.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 05:25 AM
1

"She's not saying to feel bad if you worked hard..." Pass on my thanks and gratitude to her, will you/s?
/r/MensRights23/11/24 07:57 PM
4

Sometimes, I wish we didn't actively assist feminism, though. Although, it's difficult when the ladies hide their true intent until it's a fait accompli. Catches us out, every time.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 07:55 PM
6

"We're gonna need a bigger boat...."
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:00 AM
5

Well worth it.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:45 PM
9

You've got to hand it to them, their campaign was excellent. https://www.amazon.in/Bears-Going-Their-Own-BGTOW-ebook/dp/B0D57MCD1G
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:20 PM
31

Sadly, this isn't an isolated example. In 'A Return to Modesty' by Wendy Shalit, she describes a 1am visit she made to a summer camp counsellor's bedroom when she was fifteen. "One evening, I suddenly FOUND MYSELF in the bedroom of my instructor. I don't recall exactly the circumstances under which I had alighted there...." Maybe by putting one foot in front of the other, Wendy? The emphasis in her statement is courtesy of F Roger Devlin, who dissects similar BS in Chapter 3 of his book 'Sexual …
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:11 PM
1

Totally agree. Might have been difficult for Bob to paraphrase into a witty one-liner, though.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:35 PM
9

I grew up white working class, mate. Worked my bollocks off for two degrees and earned a decent job. Only at that stage did I find the girlies beating a path to my door. Now, I'm expected to feel guilty? I see people getting jobs because of accident of birth (sex, race) rather than merit. Even while I worked in STEM, I was expected to hand over projects I'd conceived, in order to prop up the failing 'careers' of female quota placements. Men fought for years to get rid of a feudal system. Who are…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 05:17 PM
2

Almost inevitable that one, but thanks for the reminder!
/r/MensRights22/11/24 05:09 PM
14

Women work less hours / take time off to have babies / aren't so driven towards promotion / aim for a better work-life balance, especially if they have a husband in full-time employment. Didn't some woman get the Nobel Prize in Economics, this time last year for saying all this? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67045408 Talk about 'Tales of the Blindingly Obvious'.....
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:34 PM
33

This post seems to have attracted more than its fair share of feminist lurkers with their downvotes at the ready.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:28 PM
14

Guess who everyone is encouraged to look down on these days..? Didn't you get the memo? https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/culture/a35379486/why-does-the-world-reward-mediocre-white-men/
/r/MensRights22/11/24 02:16 PM
2

Our masters are revolting. https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/11/22/the-rage-of-the-entitled-overclass/
/r/MensRights22/11/24 12:48 PM
8

Here's a resource which still exists. http://empathygap.uk/
/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:09 AM
8

Probably the best document which already indicates the need for male advocacy is 'The Empathy Gap' by William Collins. It contains a thorough analysis of the areas in which men are disadvantaged in society, and it's still pretty much up-to-date. https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_Empathy_Gap.html?id=0fA3EAAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y Since around 2010, Mike Buchanan, a retired British businessman, has been attempting to bring such issues to public attention. He formed a …
/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:04 AM
13

Getting pregnant is their superpower. It creates a force-field that makes them untouchable. Where does it fit in the 'equality' narrative, again..?
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:08 AM
1

It gets even worse for males when in the intimate company of females. Like beer goggles to the power of ten, but with increased testosterone. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704916643328 Gee.... I wonder what will happen now?/s
/r/MensRights21/11/24 06:23 PM
3

Nice one! Honestly, I don't want to post backup references, but, otherwise, it can look as though it's just stuff made up out of nowhere, (like Noho 2.0). Oestrogen is involved in the sequential analytic logic of the left brain. The female is much more callous than she portrays, and it gets hidden behind 'emotion'. Her female analytic logic allows her to sift potential suitors with startling accuracy, working out which ones are of most use to her with micrometre precision. More in this pdf. Chap…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 02:18 PM
4

"Emotions are Nature's Logic Executors" Robert Wright, 'The Moral Animal' (1994) page 109
/r/MensRights21/11/24 12:09 PM
69

...financially destroyed by their wives over a divorce that the woman initiates for being "unhappy". Here's what was happening, over 80 years ago: "American women are inculcated with a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy-tale, that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activities, but merely because they are female. This has defeated husbands in America, making homes into centres of disillusionment. It long ago became associated with the notion that the mere act …
/r/MensRights21/11/24 12:02 PM
5

Let's see the attitude of the ladies when they speak for themselves. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf Then, there's always the scientific, male approach to understanding. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1484 Yep.... you're getting sth wrong.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 11:53 AM
89

Women feel themselves less powerful than men, and dependent on them to a certain extent (much less so than 50 years ago, due to female preferencing in certain employment areas, backed up by AA, EEO, ESG, DEI). Nonetheless, they still need men if they want to have kids naturally, and they need financial assistance during child-bearing & raising, either through men directly, or through taxing them. This has helped build a festering resentment of the type known as ressentiment by Friedrich Neitzsch…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 10:13 AM
1

I think the poor dears are feeling a bit hurt at the moment. They threatened a big sex strike, and the world kept turning... Probably unsurprisingly, the main advocates for women to stop having sex with men came from..... (wait for it)...... lesbians. https://www.advocate.com/voices/4b-scissoring-out-patriarchy
/r/MensRights21/11/24 09:09 AM
2

There's plenty which struck home: "A single man does not need much in order to survive. Most single men could eke out an adequate existence by working for two months of the year. But, he must attract a wife amidst a competitive field, finance a home and a couple of children, to achieve status as a pillar of the community.... Women are programmed to extract resources endlessly, and most men are programmed to oblige.... These days, instead of reaching children, resources funnelled towards women no…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:18 AM
32

The catastrophic nature of identity politics... http://empathygap.uk/?p=2796 Heroine to zeroine because a change in groupthink places you now in the out-group.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 04:03 PM
2

"American women are inculcated with a distorted vision of a Cinderella fairy tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, not because of virtuous activities, but merely because they are female. This has defeated husbands in America, making homes into centres of disillusionment. It long ago became associated with the notion that the mere act of bearing children entitled women to respite from all other physical and social responsibility." Philip Wylie 'Generation of Vipers' (1943) As you s…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 02:52 PM
2

Excess male population makes feminists really twitchy. These two are Government policy advisors. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827
/r/MensRights20/11/24 02:31 PM
3

"Anything men enjoy is evil. The end." Well, that saved me from having to read the Bible.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 09:15 AM
6

Romance novel = materialism porn for women
/r/MensRights20/11/24 09:10 AM
6

'Charlotte Gash'. It's almost as though these women feel that they must draw attention to their most important asset.... in a similar manner to the all-girl bands 'The Slits', 'Hole', 'Pussy Riot', 'Wet Leg'. Yet, how dare men have the audacity to objectify them?/s Fortunately, Charlotte has now gone off-grid.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:54 AM
2

More familiar with UK. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14058537/Cat-calls-wolf-whistles-fines-1-000-east-London.html https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-65311346 Yet, women seem to believe that they can use their sexuality to smooth their 'career'. Note that this book is filed under 'inspiration & leadership'. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ And, if she doesn't get the promotion she expected..? Sexual harassment rap, incoming...
/r/MensRights20/11/24 07:20 AM
3

"Do men still dare to seduce...?" If a man of 'low status' approaches a woman socially, he is seen as a 'creep'. The most important element of male status, in female eyes, is that he should be employed, preferably in a well-paying, high-status, white-collar job, where he doesn't get 'dirty'. Deny men such jobs through AA, EEO, ESG, DEI and he has no card to play in the mating game. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf Then, there's the 'sexual harassment' legislation which has proliferat…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:51 AM
2

Most phenomena follow a Gaussian Distribution. There are always outliers. To confirm, or otherwise, ask if they believe in Affirmative Action for women in the workplace. There's every chance that will cost a man a job or a promotion.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 05:22 AM
2

If you can get past the 'professionals only' firewall for the article on Briffault's Law by Dale Harvey, MBA, PhD in 'Psychology Today' (2016), you'd find that he disagreed with you. This was once openly available, but, surprise, surprise..... Also, the law originates from Briffault's three volume work 'On the Origins of Sentiments and Institutions' showing that society has always been matriarchal. Yes, human society.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 10:27 PM
10

In such a situation, women are the sex less likely to starve.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 03:41 PM
17

It's like the birth control pill had never been invented. Here's a reminder of male reproductive rights (lack thereof). http://empathygap.uk/Control%20of%20Mens%20Fertility.pdf
/r/MensRights19/11/24 03:35 PM
11

So, the price of pussy will fall? Will there be a dead cat bounce..?
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:17 PM
6

I think that might have been the author's point. The fact that feminists took a long discredited philosophy, with a history of utter, abject misery and failure, tried to shoehorn it to their own aims in a completely unoriginal manner, and didn't even recognise that women, themselves, are the exploiters. He also emphasises that they only get away with this bullsh*t because of some very fundamental templating of men, by women, in utero. No easy way around that one, so far.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:12 PM
13

"Women have failed to recognise a couple of very fundamental aspects to life. In the botched feminist rediscovery of Marxist politics, they do not appreciate that women are the exploiter class. They are blind to the reality that masculinity is not a new set of rules to be imposed on men, for female benefit, during this brief, and possibly fleeting period where society has favoured women with employment advantages and welfare safety nets. Masculinity is an OLD set of rules, as old as evolution, i…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:55 PM
1

No - the world needs every day to be International Men's Day. After all, that's what women believe. https://theweek.com/67041/why-is-international-mens-day-so-controversial If we were to make it so, they might appreciate how good they've got it.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 09:08 AM
26

Things can, indeed, change at the speed of light. During tougher times to come, we'll be shovelling snowflakes, or nothing will change. The woke way we were headed, feminists reckoned that even the speed of light had special male privileges. https://netwar.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/feminist-epistemology/#:~:text=In%20a%20passage%20reminiscent%20of,is%20a%20'sexed%20equation'
/r/MensRights19/11/24 08:55 AM
158

Now that women can support themselves financially, they reckon they don't need men any longer. Until they do. Money isn't everything.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:14 AM
8

On the tone and content of this article, Kane Jackson, the author, comes across as a particularly odious person, willing to sell himself out to gain female favour. The sort who'd be applauding the Gillette adverts. In noticing that he also hosts a 'Chasing Financial Equality' podcast, does he realise that it's men who are behind in the paperchase? Not because we lack the abilities to win such a race, but because we have been handicapped by the shackles of EEO, AA, DEI, ESG in employment legislat…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 06:16 AM
7

This excerpt is of some concern: "Mom is organisation-minded. Female organisations, she has happily discovered, are intimidating to all men. They frighten politicians into snivelling servility. Mom has many such organisations, the real purpose of which is to compel an abject compliance of her environs to her personal desires." And so it came to pass... https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Beijing%20Declaration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action%2C%20adopted,the%20key%20…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:59 PM
88

Back in the 1940s, a guy called Philip Wylie wrote 'The Disappearance', about a world where men and women suddenly became invisible to one another, living in different dimensions, and how they failed to cope very well. Haven't read it yet, and it's probably a bit dated, but some of his other work is interesting. In 'Generation of Vipers' (1943), he's got this to say: "American women are inculcated by a distorted version of a Cinderella fairy tale that conditions them to expect material wealth, n…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:51 AM
48

First time seeing that film, rewound the slapping scenes, asked my wife what she thought. She didn't see anything offensive, and thought I was 'making a fuss about nothing.' Multiply that dynamic by the female population of the world, many of whom now hold powerful positions in politics, law and jurisprudence, and the uphill battle for men's rights can be seen in perspective. Our cards have been marked, and we're playing in a rigged casino. Women only think about themselves and female issues. Ma…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:12 AM
10

Oh.... she knows. Don't you think that making it overt might spoil the ambiance, just a little? Songs which indicate typical M/F behaviours might tend to indicate that these sort of dynamics have been operational forever.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:00 AM
1

Men process Max Scheler's Pyramid of Human Values with the higher values (truth, beauty, ethics, values beyond oneself) at the top. Due to how the female brain works, the pyramid is inverted for them. A solipsistic drive towards material values of base utility results. Chapter 2. https://j4mb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/240904-ms-patterning.pdf Before AA, EEO, ESG, DEI etc, they required men to get material goods for them. The process has been short-circuited.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:56 AM
28

If all those guilty of 'controlling & coercive behaviour' were jailed, the streets would be predominately male.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:42 AM
28

Pretty sure they wouldn't find it amusing.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:29 AM
64

In the 1993 film 'Made In America' Whoopi Goldberg slaps Will Smith around the face, hard, every time she doesn't get her own way. There's at least three scenes of this..... comedy.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:25 AM
1

You need rhino skin, if you're gonna begin to walk through this world / You need elephant balls if you don't want to crawl through this world / Oh my love, if I revealed every secret I've concealed / How many thoughts would you steal / How much of my pain would you feel? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jijAPsFRzQk
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:17 AM
20

Not a new problem. This song from the 1980s references the 1960s... Another Saturday, another date / She'd be ready, but would always make them wait / In the hallway, in anticipation / He didn't know the night would end up in frustration / He'd end up blowing all his wages for the week / All for a cuddle and a peck on the cheek https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13r7AJO6-Js
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:04 AM
34

Ellen Pence, one of the originators of the Duluth Model, expressed her own doubts about its validity, twenty-five years ago. "We all engaged in ideological practices, and claimed them to be neutral observations. I found that many of the men I interviewed did not seem to articulate a desire for power over a partner. Although I relentlessly took every opportunity to point out to the men in groups that they were so motivated, and merely in denial, the fact that few men ever articulated such a desir…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:03 AM
267

When you're a kid, you're being trained by women to be dependent on their praise and validation. This all takes place while your sexual drives are absent. As soon as you reach adulthood and the hormones kick in, women expect you to be a support unit to a baby-making machine, willing to hand over the rewards for your creativity and hard work for your sexual reward, and a pat on the head. Don't disappoint them, or the 'gentle sex' will show their true colours.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:52 AM
9

If there are no more male podcasts, there won't be any more kids.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:43 AM
3

It all started with this book by Ijeoma Oluo. https://www.amazon.in/MEDIOCRE-PB-DANGEROUS-LEGACY-WHITE/dp/1529353831/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2IUA0850ZTYCN&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.3ckZo3rjl7_HCPVCK0g8lg.kCGMD76lw7x-lyiPbfJV_yYttZ5PQCPzYChKdQrNa4w&dib_tag=se&keywords=mediocre+dangerous+legacy+white+male+power&nsdOptOutParam=true&qid=1731828299&s=digital-text&sprefix=mediocre+dangerous+legacy+white+male+power%2Cdigital-text%2C98&sr=1-1 It's easy enough to see the people praising this hatred, the ones who have wri…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:35 AM
37

Sir Keir Starmer is a politician who'd throw men under the bus to further his own career. When he was Director of Public Prosecutions, he knew that the rates for false accusation in sexual offence cases are at least 10% (from a range of meta-studies where some were as high as 47%, but never lower than 7%). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228150098_False_Allegations_of_Rape Despite this, he co-authored the Levitt Report, with Alison Levitt QC, in 2013. Here, it was claimed that rates of …
/r/MensRights16/11/24 10:26 AM
7

Biting the hand that feeds you. Just like the regular gals.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:58 PM
11

Willie Brown is an old Democrat. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-willie-brown-mistress/ From the article, looks like he's been out of touch with Kamala for a time. In fact, ever since she got what she wanted. In politics, as in domesticity for the girls. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:34 PM
5

'The Guardian' sees this as a huge threat, with men quaking in their boots. Most other newspapers view it as a huge joke and an own goal. Ooof!
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:19 PM
16

No rights were actually being denied by the President Elect. But this sounds like a major incentive.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:10 PM
6

Identity politics always eats itself. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2796 This may have started.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:28 AM
9

Why do I feel that I'm being lectured and talked down to, like some kind of Kamala ad?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:24 AM
10

My old man handed over every penny of his pay packet, every Friday, to receive a pittance of 'pocket money'. He couldn't even spend this as he pleased. If he went into town to see his old friends on a Saturday, he'd receive a slapping when he returned. One Saturday, he slapped her back. 28 days in jail followed, and he lost his job. With nothing more to lose, he told her he was leaving. She'd be forced to get a job, bring up two kids, aged 10 and 12, by herself. Nine months later, my elder broth…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:02 AM
3

Yet women can use their sexuality to 'make progress' in the workplace. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/41184/seducing-the-boys-club-by-nina-disesa/ This book is filed under the 'Inspiration & Leadership' banner. Inspirational!! And, if she doesn't get the rewards she was after..? Sexual harassment rap, incoming....
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:45 AM
0

"Addicted to their own dopamine..." Those receptors die in the absence of oestrogen. https://medicine.yale.edu/news/yale-medicine-magazine/article/estrogen-deprivation-associated-with-loss-of-dopamine-cells/#:~:text=Estrogen%20deprivation%20leads%20to%20the%20death%20of%20dopamine,and%20why%20it%20increases%20in%20women%20after%20menopause Oestrogen & dopamine are scarily intertwined. https://www.absoluteadvocacy.org/dopamine-and-estrogen-a-surprising-relationship/#:~:text=Estrogen%20has%20a%20s…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:31 AM
25

'Men build things up, and women move in...' Then we have to hand over what we've built up when we're served with the divorce papers.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:03 AM
3

Michelle Terry, the female CEO of Movember needs to be sacked. And all her female cohorts. What is happening here, in plain sight, is a metaphor for the rot which is happening to civic structure everywhere. Men built society through competition. https://www.denisecummins.com/uploads/1/1/8/2/11828927/cummins_2019_encyc_ev_psy_sci.pdf The same competition that women like to sneer at.... while they use it to judge us, and wait at the finish line for the winners. Women gain most advantage from subve…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:00 AM
1

Jeez! Women are so collectivist, they thought they could just collect our vote.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 05:47 AM
2

Maybe you just haven't lived enough. Hope the White Knighting works out for you. Bye...
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:50 PM
2

You could get the 'gist' of the books from the summary, which is in the link. Coupla minutes. Women tend to 'see' (anticipate) threats everywhere. That's a common life experience. Men tend to be the ones who have to sort it out. That, too, is a common life experience. When feminist fears begin to inform foreign policy decisions, causing friction that drafted men will have to fight... https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/24/what-sex-means-for-world-peace/ .... that's just wrong.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:34 PM
3

Maybe have a look at the gist of Valerie Hudson's books...? After you've stopped laughing at your hilarious witticism, obviously.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:33 PM
2

"Made so afraid of the dangerous outside world..." Also ramps up fears to a stage where it can cause wars. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:56 PM
13

Well, there's this big institution called the United Nations... https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995#:~:text=The%20Beijing%20Declaration%20and%20Platform%20for%20Action%2C%20adopted,the%20key%20global%20policy%20document%20on%20gender%20equality And this other big one, called the World Economic Forum https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/02/women-matriarchal-society-improved-health-patriarchy/ And things called Non-Government Organisations, and Charities, and shadowy organisations …
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:37 PM
14

Karen and the girls aren't going to be doing much work in the office today, are they? Just wait until those husbands/partners get home!! Then, the girls are going to withdraw a commodity which is handed out sparingly in any case. If at all. Even within marriage. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/03/18/japan/society/japan-sexless-survey/
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:27 PM
3

Fact checked for you. Project 2025: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025 "Project 2025 outlines four main aims in its 'Mandate For Leadership'. Restoring the family as the centrepiece of American life. Dismantling the administrative state. Defending the nation's sovereignty & borders. Securing God-given individual rights to live freely." What's not to like..? Personally, I'd be a bit more afraid of Project 2030, brought to you by the UN/WEF, without anyone voting on it. https://medium.com/…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:02 PM
5

They brought this with them to the workplace, which is why it's now so toxic. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/
/r/MensRights07/11/24 10:00 AM
1

Thanks for the info. Try this one. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2021/07/20/neuroscience-of-free-thinking-political-correctness-free-speech-and-the-biological-functions-of-the-brain/
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:35 AM
1

Fair enough, mate. What I don't want to see is ADIOS men, as advocated by Daly and Gearhart. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart Also on their stumping block. It's a concerning statistic that Greenpeace reckon that a world without oil can support only 1/5th of the current population. https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/15239/does-human-scale-matter/ Wonder which sex has been earmarked for the 'adjustment bureau'? It sure ain't women. https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/2…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:01 AM
1

The Greens have a dodgy history, rooted in ecofeminism, as in Mary Daly's 'Gyn/Ecology'. Pretty sure it wasn't reparations for bad treatment of men she favoured. Just the bad treatment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:33 AM
1

Some very solipsistic, turbo-smug and self-entitled people have just been dissed for the first time. Ooooh! That smarts.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:26 AM
16

Desire for safety can become extreme when only one sex is asked forced to fight. You might consider changing your username to AWhiteKnight
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:18 AM
7

Women are power hungry. Women are resource hungry. Women are predicated on their own safety & security. They stir it up with their wants and their fears, then point men in the right direction to sort it all out for them. These feminists have been Government advisors for two decades. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231204750 https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ Oh, looks like Government have bought the message! https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/24/what-sex-m…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:45 AM
1

If you start a 'discussion' with someone calling herself evil eco fem, it's probably only going to go one way. It's unfortunate that most 'green' organisations are rooted in eco-feminism. Mary Daly's 'Gyn/Ecology' is their bible. She was a rather nasty piece of work... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:30 AM
4

When they start talking about reparations for men, I'll believe them.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:02 AM
5

It's women who are power hungry. It's women who are resource hungry. It's women who are predicated on their own safety. These are the factors which cause wars. Wars which they will get men to fight. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231204750 https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ Valerie Hudson here has been a Government advisor for two decades. What is she so scared of? The 'women start wars' dynamic was recognised, decades ago, by Rich Zubaty in his book 'Wh…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:23 AM
1

Poor Taylor Swift might think about reissuing 'Deja Vu' or 'Castles Crumbling'. Though 'Karma' might be the most appropriate.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 11:00 AM
8

Let's hope that there's some trickle-down equality in how kangaroo courts have been weaponised, all the way from Title IX, through family courts, to false accusation, to political annihilation of opponents.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:41 AM
2

This no notification of replies seems to be a thing today.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:33 AM
3

"Women have only one kind of business." Arthur Schopenhauer. Middle page 4 of link https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:18 AM
3

Willie Brown..? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kamala-harris-willie-brown-mistress/
/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:16 AM
16

It's both. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-world-peace/9780231131827 https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:52 AM
20

There's a few 'real men' choking on the 'carburettors they eat for breakfast' this morning/s.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:45 AM
4

Don't know why, but I've got Cindi Lauper's 'True Colors' playing in my mind....
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:30 AM
42

Women DON'T have a particular talent for working with others. All male groups do best, all female worst. In mixed groups, all attempts at co-operation came from the men. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep26492 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001691817305917 Women attempt social exclusion of other women if they don't follow the 'hive mind' https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797611402511?journalCode=pssa
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:27 AM
3

Kenjataimu!
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:15 AM
38

This is Briffault's Law, taken from the domestic to the political arena. https://mgtowsolution.wordpress.com/briffaults-law/ "Despite the fact that you've given us everything we wanted up until now, you didn't give us THIS, so WAAAAHHH!!!" (cue sound of world's tiniest violin, as man walks off to seek sensible company...)
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:39 AM
39

For a strike to be effective, women would have to be providing a commodity that would be missed. In some countries, they may have played that hand too soon. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/03/18/japan/society/japan-sexless-survey/
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:34 AM
44

How would she bear it, unless there were male input somewhere? Did this feminist build her own house? Services her car? Has a life supported by infrastructure and medical/judicial systems built by men (who, unlike women, attempt to be fair). These women are utterly delusional.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:34 AM
2

It's all about Amber. With her kid as a matching accessory. A bit like the South Park episode where Paris Hilton wanted to adopt Butters.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:32 AM
2

Slept in her own bed.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:30 AM
54

The figures for girls who'd never been kissed in the article are pretty similar, although they were phrased differently (in an attempt to conceal?) Even more revealing is the article's disclosure that nearly HALF of marriages in Japan are sexless. So - a man signs up to a contract where a woman can walk away with half of his assets. And, what does he get in return..?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:16 AM
0

Walking into a job where you aren't the BEST candidate shouldn't be a 'right' either.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:32 AM
1

And investments. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens The 'Increase in Women's Wealth' section of the link suggests that they don't know where to stop.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:25 AM
0

No job = no girlfriend. The dynamics have been known for decades. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf One demographic is discriminated against particularly in the great AA, EEO, ESG, DEI, BS. Also, being 'socially bashed' doesn't augment anyone's life.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:22 AM
90

That this was in the pipeline was hidden in plain sight. The female CEO, Michelle Terry, 'Pledged collaborations which would impose healthy masculinities.' [The Tin Men Blog: 'Movember Has Gone Woke', September 2024] Note that this type of behaviour is no more than a metaphor for what's happening everywhere... politics, jurisprudence, business, commerce, It is the end product of two simple dynamics. Women always look out for their own interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 And …
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:36 AM
1

"Long ago, the notion became prescribed that the mere act of bearing children entitled women to respite from all other physical and social responsibility." Philip Wylie: 'Generation of Vipers' (1943)
/r/MensRights05/11/24 05:57 PM
3

Thanks, I will!
/r/MensRights05/11/24 05:39 PM
6

'It takes almost a lifetime to realise that little girls are all women in the making, while most men remain little boys at heart. But he is manipulated, by sex, into forgetting his dreams." Dan Murdoch 'The Anglerfish'. Let's be honest, how many of us are living lives which aren't all that dissimilar to the Jim Carrey character in 'The Truman Show'? Everything he does is an illusion, for the benefit of his 'wife', his 'mom' and the system. And all the poor schmuck really wanted was to be an expl…
/r/MensRights05/11/24 09:53 AM
4

The priest celibacy thing was so that the Church didn't have claims on its estate from dependents. Protection of Church wealth was the main issue, but sold to the believers as ascetic other-worldliness, true belief, etc, etc. Also, someone should tell robo-Jesus not to mix up possessive with plural. He keeps going on about 30's.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:39 PM
1

Just about to....
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:10 AM
5

I worked in a STEM environment for three decades. Initially an all male meritocracy - all good. Then, quota placements started. Eventually, I found myself 'encouraged' to hand over projects (on which I'd expended blood, sweat & tears) to prop up the failing careers of female scientists. When this became ridiculous, I dug my heels in, and the verbal warnings started. Then, the written warnings, because I wasn't a 'team player'. This wasn't team play, this was plagiarism, pure and simple. Everyone…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:41 AM
2

Everything you need to know is here, grasshopper. Eventually. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZU6OmSK5v9g
/r/MensRights04/11/24 08:07 AM
1

Yes, Ken Jataimu. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Kenjataimu
/r/MensRights04/11/24 07:58 AM
8

That photo which accompanies the article! Implying that we all go to the doctor with our wives to act as mommy and stand behind us reassuringly to explain the big words which the doctor is saying. By the way, isn't the phrase 'female academics' an oxymoron? In fact, skip the oxy.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 07:39 AM
5

This 'strategy' of egg freezing is madness. It used to be that a bloke had to look at his prospective mother-in-law to appreciate the full horrors of what lay ahead in a couple of decades once his future wife's fertility had fallen off a cliff. Now, it's women who are almost at that stage who are attempting to 'entice' them. How will they do it? "Riding the carousel didn't give me the results I deserve, so would you like to inseminate the eggs I had frozen? Then I can use you to extract resource…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 01:44 PM
1

It's not even necessary for the male politician to have internalised misandry. Men simply defer to women. Especially in a political/business situation, where a bloke standing up to a woman can be misinterpreted as flirting. https://stevemoxon.co.uk/the-sexual-divide/ This guy also gets it: "After women got the vote, the modern male tragedy became inevitable. Politicians at odds with each other on every other issue fell over themselves to pander to the female vote, as this was now the majority of…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 01:17 PM
3

They're STILL banging on about how cruel and unfair it is that women are 'forced' to freeze their eggs (conveniently omitting the fact that this is due to their own, totally unrealistic 'standards' for Prince Charming). Yet ANOTHER article on today's BBC website. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g7x5kl5l8o The real reason why this won't go away is an underlying campaign to have the taxpayer foot the £18k bill. We had the same article back in May of this year. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/arti…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:56 AM
5

Old Employer: "Sorry, I'm going to have to let you go. And, I'm going to keep most of the benefits you earned. Bye." One year later... "Hey, I'm really in the shit here. Do you think you could come in, on your own time, at your own expense, and do some coding? It would really help me out..." The answer would be f*ck off. That's what it should be for anyone who has treated you badly. Otherwise it gives them a licence to go through life with no consequences.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:14 AM
3

Femcelia should be a cuntry in its own right.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:03 AM
1

Oh, we've got those sort of jobs in GB, too. Preferential awarding of Government contracts... https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/10/04/labours-foolish-embrace-of-blm-ideology/
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:48 AM
5

Oh, it's much more complicated than that... https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97461-002
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:44 AM
3

Harris refuses to acknowledge that there are any laws which deny male bodily autonomy. https://thehill.com/video/kamala-harris-on-call-her-daddy-podcast-no-laws-apply-to-men%E2%80%99s-bodies%E2%80%94fact-check/10108576/ Even some feminists are more enlightened! https://nique.net/opinions/2023/10/27/drafts-defy-bodily-autonomy/ Having selective blindness/ignorance on this issue isn't a great attribute in the sex which is so obsessed with their own safety. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/sex-and-wor…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:36 AM
2

Thanks! I wish I'd spotted that myself, and made a more accurate transcription.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 12:47 PM
26

An endless narrative from women: 'Vote for the WOMEN-FAVOURING candidate, or you won't get your leg over.' Women don't understand men. Men are willing to endure any hardship on points of principle, and self-respect. The booty is worthless if we must abandon our principles and self-respect to gain access. We aren't dogs on a leash.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 12:35 PM
9

They know what they're doing when they make it difficult for men to get a job, and preferentially promote women. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf Having a job allowed men entry into the mating casino. He could play some of the rigged tables. Now, women have the jobs, and they've still got their sexuality. Their hypergamy bouncer won't even grant us entry. This is no clumsy 'mistake' on the part of those who arranged EEO, AA, ESG, DEI...
/r/MensRights02/11/24 09:44 AM
2

They seem to be part of GIIN. https://thegiin.org/gender-lens-investing-initiative/
/r/MensRights02/11/24 09:38 AM
6

Jeez! Valerie Hobson has been an advisor to Government for over two decades. Her books (written with her feminist chums) are of that vintage. If she's been yapping for that amount of time, somebody's been listening. Her audience isn't the man in the street. It's men with power and resources. And 2xglobal obviously exists as an organisation. Part of GIIN. Buddies with the WEF, and the rest of the Davos set. They get away with hiding in plain sight, as nobody seems to care.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 09:36 AM
3

Yes, one side may not be doing much for you, but at least it's not actively against you.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 09:28 AM
10

Many, many more men can see that the domesticity dream has gone, we've been conned, and there is nothing worth fighting for. We'll still be rounded up and enlisted, though.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 09:25 AM
18

She's just bought her own house! So, of course she don't need no man! She'd rather slit her wrists in a bathtub than go near one again! Until she needs a plumber for that bathtub.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 05:33 AM
21

Ultimately the choice is the old South Park one. One candidate is a Giant Douche, the other is a Shit Sandwich. Neither of them gives a damn about men's rights. One side is more active in trying to erode them.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 05:29 AM
97

"Mom is organisation minded. Female organisations, she has happily discovered, are intimidating to all men. They frighten politicians into snivelling servility. Mom has many such organisations. Their purpose is to compel abject compliance." Philip Wylie: 'Generation of Vipers' (1943) Men are getting pretty sick of being told what to do by mom.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 05:23 AM
16

The way things are going, they're gonna need cannon-fodder again real soon. These Government advisor girls like to feel safe. https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/24/what-sex-means-for-world-peace/ So - they arrange domestic conditions which make it difficult for men to find a female partner. These men will have frustrated masculinity, no family of their own, and less to lose. They can be rounded up in a draft. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262582643/bare-branches/ Preferentially giving jobs and wea…
/r/MensRights02/11/24 05:09 AM
32

In an overcrowded world, female fertility is rapidly becoming one of those 'inconvenient facts' that we used to be lectured on.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:32 PM
11

The investment climate for men looks hostile. https://www.2xglobal.org/new-to-gender-lens-investing/why-invest-with-a-gender-lens The 'Increase In Women's Wealth' section is insane. In fact, it all is.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:16 PM
10

Everything you say is true. However, law, medicine and high finance probably aren't what they were, even a decade ago. The more women in an environment, the more hostile that environment becomes for men. You're forced to swallow 'the narrative' or you become 'the enemy'. STEM labs, where I'd spent three decades, became intolerable for me when I was having projects sequestered to prop up female quota 'scientists'. In fact, female tears in managers' offices (all done behind the scenes) effectively…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 03:29 PM
3

Houses are probably the final mass-market items which need to be hand built. Construction & trades are probably the way of the future for young men to earn a decent income, and make the 'elites' pay, if they want a roof over their head.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 03:19 PM
1

I went from being a confident, unafraid research chemist to being without a job, aged 47. It's amazing what female tears in a manager's office can do. And I wasn't even the first person she'd done it to. If you don't believe me, read this. I'll even make it free tomorrow. https://www.amazon.in/Creating-STINK-Britains-Largest-Manufacturer-ebook/dp/B08KSK1C9K/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3PKJYH6QEQZ1Z&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.oiretKE21BuONIkrmoaOFkZYALJ_RyW3ODfVyeRR2ZPRGYkEVe625MsrUEwh8JWjDo3WNVCrerAoMkVs1gDRig.laQPqn…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 03:08 PM
14

AI will supplant most of the 'lazy girl jobs' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_girl_job It'll also make it more difficult to ascertain what's going on, apart from the narrative. Meanwhile, things like increasing National Insurance contributions, as happened this week in GB, stimulates manufacturing employers towards automation & robotics. We're all going to be forced encouraged to buy (premium priced) stuff we've already got, like cars and domestic heating systems, to keep the economy staggeri…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 02:22 PM
26

You're absolutely correct. The aim seems to be for a political and jurisprudence class composed of the 70% female graduates..... then a mainly female administrative middle class, similar to the 'freemartins' in Aldous Huxley's 'Brave New World'. Most men will be in grunt roles, infrastructure, trades, police, soldiers. The elites and freemartins won't look at them, as they'll be trying to tie down the male elites who have actually engineered all of this. Harems will be back in town. Women have l…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 01:06 PM
6

If women want to be the consumer society and the dupes of the elites, I'd rather they were bought with their own money than with my money.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 12:47 PM
69

"Young men are going through 'male malaise' - whereby they don't understand their role in society." They understand this.... EEO, AA, ESG, DEI = no job for men. And no job = no girlfriend. The people who engineered this state of affairs know this, too. https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf V C Wynne-Edwards said that, for a young man, having a job was equivalent to having a licence to breed. That licence is in the process of being revoked.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 12:43 PM
20

How disrespectful to our former queen, Elizabeth II. Not once did she display camel-toe like this to Heads of State, either.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:59 AM
7

It seems that they all want to do it. https://www.azquotes.com/quote/578604 They don't realise that they can't all be Sharon Stone. Try it offstage, and we just walk away.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:48 AM
5

It's become noticeably worse since women made hostile incursions into the workplace post WW2. Their predominance (70%) in tertiary education make them more likely to be the future political & jurisprudence class.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:43 AM
5

It's only a guess, but probably wasn't in the cheerleader clique at school.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:19 AM
7

This sort of behaviour is taking over the world the west. Safe space is the order of the day. https://www.realclearscience.com/2021/06/22/the_neuroscience_of_intellectual_openness_782424.html
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:15 AM
18

"The real danger is the phenomenon of male bonding, that commitment of groups of men to each other, whether in the army, a gang, a service club, a lodge, a monastic order, a corporation, or a competitive sport." Gearhart identifies the self-perpetuating, male-exclusive reinforcement of power within these groups as corrosive to female-led social change. Thus, if "men were reduced in number, the threat would not be so great, and the placement of species responsibility with the female would be assu…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 10:09 AM
4

I was going to say that. Lonely self-actualisation isn't a brilliant life choice, either. Especially if it's imposed. Which it often is, these days.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 09:56 AM
5

I was going to say that. Lonely self-actualisation isn't a brilliant life choice.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 09:56 AM
8

Her fear of male bonding is embedded in her Wiki page.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 09:54 AM
3

Well, those are the limitations of two word phrases.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 09:52 AM
19

Imposed collectivism, not so much. "New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organised, but from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his effort on one single point, which is his entire world at that moment." Max Planck Problems also arise in collectivism where women are involved. They look out for their own interests. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19340-007 And men always defer to them. http…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 09:51 AM
2

You can be completely confident and unafraid in all that you do. Or, you can toe the line and keep your job. This is the binary choice open to males in today's society.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 09:05 AM
61

Women are collectivist. As they can rarely see beyond themselves, they believe that men are collectivist, too. As a result, feminism is terrified of male bonding. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:52 AM
4

Male feminists = sneaky f*ckers Was it Jordan Peterson said that?
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:50 AM
3

There have been quite a few attempts by authors/screenwriters to force an examination of men and women's separate struggles. Many of these works have been ignored or forgotten. Back in 1951, Philip Wylie wrote 'The Disappearance', a book about what happens when women are forced to get along without men, and vice-versa, as the opposite sex have disappeared. It'll be dated AF by now, but you can already see how he's thinking from his earlier book 'Generation of Vipers' (1943). Here, he argues that…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:50 AM
2

The pattern continues, all the way back to its probable source. If the right brain hemisphere is deactivated through injury or stroke, then most processing is done by the left. The results are scarily female typical. Left hemisphere behaviours are increasingly taking precedence in the western world post WW2. I wonder why..? https://channelmcgilchrist.com/master-and-his-emissary/ It's becoming impossible to ignore. https://www.realclearscience.com/2021/06/22/the_neuroscience_of_intellectual_openn…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:30 AM
14

There have been rumblings against leniency for false accusation in Texas. https://www.chron.com/culture/religion/article/christian-pastor-rape-accusations-death-19848806.php
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:15 AM
86

MeToo didn't help Jimmy Bennett, either. Jimmy Bennett was a child actor, who played the son of Asia Argento in a 2004 film. When Argento was 37 years of age, and Bennett was 2 weeks past his 17th birthday, Argento had sex with him in a California hotel, leaving him 'confused and hurt'. The age of consent in California is 18. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-45281595 Argento went on to become the first accuser of Harvey Weinstein, thereby starting the MeToo movement. Fearful of her …
/r/MensRights31/10/24 05:48 PM
3

"Is this a precursor for demanding that the govt pays for more IVF (single women)? Sure looks like it. All the signs are there. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0w4d21yz73o
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:48 PM
49

Maybe we got sick of being 'studied' over expensive dinners, and the eggs went bad while she procrastinated. The first two minutes of the video indeed tell the whole story. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1g8lvs0/the_first_two_minutes_of_this_video_are_pure_gold/
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:07 AM
10

This most notorious, misandric feminist shows fear of male bonding... as the biggest potential impediment to the feminist project. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart
/r/MensRights29/10/24 09:10 AM
25

"With DNA testing, it is coming to an end..." ....kicking and screaming https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/who-s-the-daddy/ Don't worry, they'll write 'ethics' where you've still got to pay for their 'indiscretions. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf It's only for eighteen years, while your own genes have been consigned to the dustbin, so why would men be upset at this/s?
/r/MensRights29/10/24 08:42 AM
8

Female experience is of a world where most men want to f*ck them. Male experience is of a world where most men want to compete with them. For female approval. After which, most women still don't want to f*ck them. These two worlds are manifestly different to negotiate.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 08:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter