https://preview.redd.it/qudl0bworylg1.png?width=1166&format=png&auto=webp&s=decf6d3a09ebb7a417e44e1349023852b53ba8f0

This was in a feminist subreddit.

You could swap “men” with “women” and tweak a few terms and it would read exactly like the kind of crazy red pill rant they claim to despise. This is also hilarious.

Same structure. Same generalizations. Same essentialist claims about biology and motivation. Same moral superiority. Same resentment. Same reduction of complex social dynamics into sex and status.

They criticize red pill ideology for dehumanizing women and reducing them to shallow evolutionary caricatures. Then they do the exact same thing in reverse and call it analysis.

If you believe it is wrong to reduce women to sexual strategy machines, it is also wrong to reduce men to ego driven libido bots. Collective guilt logic is just still collective guilt logic.

"Revolution" what a joke. This is funnier when you remember that historically most proponents of socialism were men.

What’s really annoying is that in many instances we’ve shown that the statistics they obsess over tend to converge between genders in large datasets at the group level, which is kind of the whole point of the MRA argument.

Found this kinda funny, so I wanted to share. Nothing shows the motivated reasoning and outgroup homogeneity bias in tribalistic communities clearer than this.