The Red Pill does not primarily value character, morality, or relationship quality. It values female inexperience and lack of knowledge.

Imagine two 18-year-old women.

Woman A:

- Harvard graduate

- Successful career already underway

- Strong family relationships

- Deep community involvement

- Volunteers regularly

- Well-liked by everyone who knows her

- Honest

- Loyal

- Emotionally mature

- Demonstrated history of good character

- Has had several healthy long-term relationships

- Is sexually experienced

- Knows what she likes and dislikes

- Comfortable discussing sex, boundaries, consent, and expectations

- Comfortable saying no

- Comfortable asking for what she wants

- Knows exactly what she expects from a partner

- Has had a couple of long-term relationships

-Has had casual sex with trusted friends and acquaintances

-Has a healthy, comfortable relationship with her sexuality

Woman B:

- Virgin

- No accomplishments

- No meaningful life experience

- No history of contributing to anything

- Manipulative

- Dishonest

- Cruel to people around her

- Emotionally immature

- Demonstrated history of poor character

- Abusive toward friends and family

- Contributes nothing to her community

- Very submissive

- Has never dated

- Has virtually no understanding of relationships

- Has virtually no understanding of sex beyond what she has been told by others

My observation is that a surprising number of Red Pill men would still choose Woman B.

If that is true, then claims about valuing virtue, morality, family values, loyalty, character, or relationship quality are largely post hoc rationalizations.

Because once every meaningful measure of character is stacked in Woman A's favor, the only remaining advantages Woman B has are virginity, submissiveness, and inexperience.

A value system that consistently ranks those traits above kindness, honesty, maturity, competence, loyalty, and demonstrated moral character is not selecting for virtue.

It is selecting for inexperience.

And if inexperience outweighs every other indicator of whether someone would actually be a good partner, then character is not what is being valued.