Many of the San Franciscan women admire men of aptitude in the tech industry while New York/London women admire financial consultants. While luxury merchants like myself don't do too bad.

But are there more metropolitan women than metropolitan men? At any rate, can it be that, in general, women have more metropolitan values than men?

Many men find the highly fashionable ladies of the city to be both a beauty and a bane due to their high maintenance. Hence, the comedians find it amusing to portray a bumpkin man with a savvy woman rather than vice versa.

But what can be more shocking than to portray an intelligent city gentleman dating a clumsy airheaded woman? Yet the vice versa is considered comedy. I mean imagine James Bond with an Arkansas girl who grew up in a trailer park. But if she dated one of her neighbors, it's sweet and sentimental.

I've seen bumpkins couples, metropolitan couples, and couples where the woman is more metropolitan while the man is a total oaf.

But I never came across a couple where the man is a metrosexual dandy and the woman is quite ignorant. Except special cases like John Rolfe and Pocahontas, Charbonneau and Sacagawea, etc...

And some folks say that DiCaprio is of this kind because he is always philandering with more naive women.

Why does this gap exist? What's the reason for it?