[FR] A factor we've been missing. Categorization of women.

Edits: working on formatting (still a newb).

I'm no red pill master, but I think I've stumbled upon an idea that we've overlooked so far. That is the categorization of women based on their individual sex drive. In general psychology, we can assume that all humans operate based on a very rough framework of likely habits. There is some truth to it, but it is much easier to predict a person's most likely actions when we understand him or her based on a basic profile.

So here's the example.

I was pursuing a wonderful woman. Gorgeous, smart, sweet, supportive, etc. She was at one point a Victoria's Secret model. Her number was low, a mere 3. We clicked better than anyone I've ever seen. So my hopes were high. Keno was working, and everything was going well until the first night. That's when I found out that she doesn't even kiss until the third date. I dug deeper, only to find that she very likely has almost no libido. She doesn't like sex. It's possible that the three dudes she's been with were terrible, but it's still a huge red flag. Things quickly deteriorated between us. I prefer LTRs, and sex is a vital part of a healthy one. (I could go further into this, but that's another post). So I nexted the unicorn. I'm not going to live the rest of my life with a lingerie model that won't sleep with me. Nope.

As soon as I realized things weren't going to work, I checked my unattended dating site accounts. Tired of putting in any effort at chasing women, I mentioned that I'm not chasing women anymore in my profile. If they want me, they'll have to do the chasing for once. No shit, the day I added that, a nympho started talking to me on the site. A few hours later, phone number. Then pictures and sexting. She lives a whopping 4 hours away. I'm not driving that far. But she is willing to visit for a weekend and fuck like rabbits. Obvious safety concerns aside (yes, I'm mitigating those), we see here two totally different sex drives in two totally different beautiful women.

Low libido: 1) very conservative (virgin at marriage, no kiss till 3rd date) 2) no kids 3) friendly, but little sexual tension 4) doesn't actively pursue men 5) "high value"

High libido: 1) less conservative 2) two kids, got pregnant very young 3) tons of sexual tension, moves quickly into it 4) needs dick 3+ times per day 5) "low value"

That's where they differ. You can see why we should look at signs of a woman's libido before we choose to pursue her or not. I have to add a caveat though. There is an intersecting spectrum here, and that is femininity. Both of these women were very sweet, kind, caring, and would make genuinely great mothers or housewives. They are both the type that would love to see their man come home dirty from a hard day's work and would gladly cater to his needs. A less feminine woman wouldn't give a shit about you and would be well... feminist.

So all of this shatters the idea that all women are the same. Much like how we have alpha and beta males, we have four quadrants of women based on two spectra: Femininity and Libido.

TRP teaches us to go for the FyHl, but that we should expect the behaviors of a FyLl. This just isn't going to be the case. If she loves sex, she's going to have had a lot of it before meeting you. So you really have to choose which quadrant you want to involve yourself with if any at all. I say black night all the Mys, sleep with the Hls at any occassion, don't bother with Lls, and only date Fys.