A woman can't respect a man who commits monogamously to her.

Because it goes against his nature. A woman asking for monogamy is asking a man to repress his masculinity. Furthermore, he can only do so if he doesn't respect himself. He would be changing himself to earn her acceptance. And she can't respect that either. The woman would also know that she is the best he can get. And what about her is so special and so great that he should commit to her 100%? Exactly. She doesn't respect him when he does that either. She doesn't respect a man who commits to her exclusively because she knows he is lowering himself to do so, again going opposite of his masculinity.

Also a man who commits exclusively can never be totally honest with her. A man can only be honest when he has options. Otherwise his communication is manipulative, like a bitch's, because she is his only option to get his needs met and he knows he has to play his cards right. Whereas a man with options can afford to be straightforward, upfront and honest because he is willing to walk away and take a loss if it doesn't go well. Again, the man she respects is the man who doesn't commit to her.

So she can only actually have a real connection or relationship with the man who is polygamous. Because he is his natural self, he is honest, he has intregrity and he is credible. The man who doesn't commit exclusively can, contrary to cliche, be open. And the monogamous man can't - the monogamous man is like the Nice Guy, indirect, deceitful and anxious.

Women respect the dominant, polygamous male who leads, even though they may say "I don't share dick". They don't know how they actually feel towards these issues - we know women better than they know themselves. We also know the world better than they do, and we're better than them - the average chump, no; but the credible, dominant man is better than average woman who lives in the matrix. Meaning, they need guidance and leadership to be happy and for own good. They live in the chaos of their emotions and we love them for who they are, we understand who they are and take care of them. That's why we can't commit.

They don't want committment and nobody respects it - except for the tier of beta losers of society, which is the pool from which they are selecting their mates for monogamy. Or they get the alpha and then break him down because he wasn't insightful enough to not commit to begin with. See, we can't listen to them at all - the neanderthal is more respectable than the husband, but that's not obvious to society.

Ask her, Whats makes you so special and great that a man should commit to you exclusively? Exactly, nothing she does that another bitch can't do. And they know that deep down. How are they special? It is not a hard question. But the fact is, unless they are red pilled like one of us, she's quite ordinary. The extraordinary woman is that rare soldier who Gets It. And she learns that from a dude, just like you. Who introduces the truth to her so she has options, as Patrice O'Neal would put it (Rest in Pimp). Options as in, another way of seeing and thinking and feeling rather than the by the chaos of emotions and basic conditioning (you know how it is trying to logically communicate with a woman, they're different. We introduce options and they can learn to be better.)

I say all that to say again, females can't actually respect the man who, especially eagerly and pathetically, commits to them because it triggers all the red flags that go counter to his masculinity as noted above. She tests him and breaks him down realizing through the way what I illustrated and the respect is gone. Really, it was never there to begin with - just a shell which is hollow. Is it theoretically possible to be credible, masculine AND dominant maintaining respectability throughout an exclusive relationship? I say Yes. But it is not the instinctual masculinity to do so - it usually must be triggered by that extraordinary woman or by preference and consciously developed.