That should be obvious to most people here, but it is another nail in the custom-sized feminism coffin.

TL;DR: Girls don't like boys, girls like cars and money.

According to feminists, all sexual behavior is shaped by society. They constantly trot out the debunked argument that the body type we find sexually attractive has changed throughout history, implying that it has no valid relevance to partner choice. They especially like to point to the paintings of the artist Rubens as proof that chubby women were once sex symbols, because his paintings featured chubby models.

Unfortunately for them, all this proves is that Rubens had a fatty fetish, because other artists from the same era were not that way inclined. Even the word coined to describe overweight women—‘rubenesque’—shows that he was particularly known for this fetish. If everyone had been into it they would have called it ‘normal’.

Researchers recently studied 10,153 men and women from 37 different cultures in 33 different countries to see what men and women find attractive when choosing a mate. People were studied from strongly feminist places, like Sweden and Norway, and also from places with strong traditional gender roles, such as Zambia and Iran.

What the researchers found was that culture (i.e., society) had nothing to do with mate preference. In every culture around the world men liked the same things about women and women looked for the same things in men.

Mate preferences were also predictable by sex. So, if the researchers read someone’s mate preferences they could predict whether that person was male or female at an accuracy of 92.2%.

What men and women sought in mates only overlapped by 22.8%, meaning men and women were 77.2% likely to look for different things in their partners. Here is a quote:

“According to the study, men favor mates who are younger and physically attractive. Women seek older mates with good financial prospects, higher status and ambition … Of the 19 mate preferences that researchers considered, five varied significantly based on gender: good financial prospects, physical attractiveness, chastity, ambition and age. Four other preferences—pleasing disposition, sociability and shared religious and political views—were not sex-differentiated.”

Since social influences have virtually nothing to do with mate preference, that means it is biologically determined. Men like what they like because of their biology and women like what they like because of their biology.

There are two things to take away from this. Firstly, feminism is the denial of biological reality. Secondly, being sexually attracted to hot, young women is not being sexist. It is, in fact, your biological duty to the human race.