TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Why Sluts Make Bad Wives

[deleted]

August 22, 2013
26 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Why Sluts Make Bad Wives
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 26
Comments 38
Date August 22, 2013 6:49 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1kw3ng/why_sluts_make_bad_wives/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/why-sluts-make-bad-wives.233322
https://theredarchive.com/post/233322
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill

Comments

[–]projectself 37 points38 points39 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

in the words of a great modern day philosopher, Dr Dre: "you can't make a ho a housewife"

[–]James_Coook 24 points25 points26 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know where this man got his doctorate from but he appears to have a keen understanding of human behavior :)

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper 19 points20 points21 points 12 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Getting married, even to a virgin, is a sucker's game.

Why do it?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Probably because you want kids

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper 26 points27 points28 points 12 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Sucker move #2.

Seriously, we treat "wanting kids" like a sacred cow around here. Like no matter how stupid a move it is, it's okay because you wanna.

If somebody just wanted to pick up women by "just being himself", or telling them how beautiful they were, or buying them flowers or something, we'd explain to him that this was a bad move and wouldn't work, and if he "really wanted to do it", then he would just have to adjust his wants, because the universe doesn't care.

But if a guy wants kids, oh, well, then go ahead and get married. Just make sure you get a prenup, because divorce courts love a good laugh.

I'm sorry, it sucks, but if you want to have kids, what you should do is not have kids, because that's still the better route to life satisfaction. Yeah, it's dumb, it's a measure of how fucked our society is, the lunatics have taken over the asylum, etc.

But it's not your job anymore to worry about where the next generation is gonna come from. There's no sense in taking one for Team Western Civilization, because Team Western Civilization ain't gonna take one for you. Not anymore.

The smartest thing men can do to win back control over this ship before it smashes into the rocks isn't "learning game". Making 20 year old girls' vaginas tingle isn't going to get you any political power. The smartest thing men can do is stage a marriage strike, and a baby strike. Yeah, some men, who want kids, they'll suffer. But they won't suffer anywhere near as much as women with baby rabies.

Let those women find a way to restore men's place in society.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TRP Vanguardss_camaro 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

strike = power

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TRP Vanguardss_camaro 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

They'll need but

One

Blue Light Special

Of Dildos

'N sauce

To thwart

Planetary Depletion

[–]kukul 21 points22 points23 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Having kids is more than just another way to make your life more enjoyable, some people see more value in raising their offspring to be happy people than they do in their own happiness.

Dismissing the idea so casually makes you look arrogant and ignorant.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Right, but the conditions for having kids have deteriorated substantially, making it often a losing proposition due to the risk and the fallout being loaded against the man.

I think he's completely correct. If we are to look at the system before us objectively, detaching ourselves from the desire to reproduce, it's easy to see that the best move is not to marry and procreate in the US (or any other applicable country). A 'strike' is the only way to regain power; no domestic wives or children. Import or leave the country.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't pretend like TRP is something other then explaining the truth/dangers associated with interaction with women.

[–]JoshtheAspie 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In my understanding, "The Red Pill" represents truth that people find hard to swallow, which can cause huge changes in their lives once accepted, whether for good or for ill.

Given our current culture in the west, a large aspect of this is the dynamic between the sexes, but it also includes things like dominant behavior, whether you are interacting with women, or not.

It includes social skills that, if talked about openly will get you upbraded, but used will get you success. It includes prompting peoople to make better choices (get up off the tube, stop watching opra, and go get some meat, eggs, and weights to lift).

As such, pointing out how people can better achieve their main objectives, unfettered by the lies told by society, seems to be very much in line with "The Red Pill" to me.

The question here, is whether a man is seeking children as a strategy to "achieve a satisfactory life", or if leaving a genetic legacy is actually one of his primary objectives.

In the first case, it's a bad move that for a large number of men in the west won't pan out. It's a high risk strategy, and there are better ones available.

In the second case... well, if leaving a genetic legacy is one of your primary objectives, then having kids pretty much is the objective, and providing them with a stable home, and advantaging their upbringing as much as you can is a good strategy to maximize that objective's success.

[–]PinkfloydPurplefloyd 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, some men, who want kids, they'll suffer. But they won't suffer anywhere near as much as women with baby rabies.

I am all for the mass oncoming hysteria of women when all the 'good men disappear', but you seem to be forgetting that there are other options for men who desire children, namely the fact that both surrogates and au pairs exist in other countries.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Expating is a viable strategy for fixing this problem, if your career/income source is mobile, yes.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know a few couples that have kids without being married. As far as I know, they have great relationships, but marriage just isn't for them.

Marriage does not make your relationship suitable for having kids. Chances are, if your relationship is good enough to have kids with the person, you don't need marriage to begin with.

[–]rdesktop7 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I do not follow.

Please clarify.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Male power lies in non-participation, starve them of our attention and resources, women very much desire male companionship, although ironically they're trained to hate the fuck out of us, the cognitive dissonance between biological and social forces is insane.

They have little a positive thing to say about us nowadays, the majority of women are man haters in the west, there's some cute girls out there, and they will fuck you because of their libidos, but they have a lot of hate for men/masculinity and that's why the climate towards men in family and dating is so hostile. That's why women are so untrusting of men, they were trained not to like you or view you as a person with character and quirks, you're not really a person to them, they just view you as a personified symbolism of evil on a subconscious level, "men aren't people, men are patriarchy" is probably the association going on in the subconscious minds of most women, even if she doesn't know the word patriarchy, replace that with a word which is something bad/negative/evil in it's superlative form. Because women have dehumanised men, they find it easy to exploit them, just a cock she fucked, just a cash card that can be potentially divorce-raped etc. They don't care about your hopes or dreams, they've lost that loving femininity, they've had that innate nurturing side beaten out of them because of "equality" and this very reality disgusts most of us men, we don't want to marry men in women's bodies, it's ugly.

When men stop participating in big enough numbers, when a woman can't have her cake (the carousel) and eat it (divorce rape a beta/land a beta provider) and the fertility rates get even lower, the women will cry even louder how men are dropping out (lets face it, even if guys spoke up, nobody would listen, men are giving no respect or legitimacy as a group, we are actively discriminated against, nobody gives a fuck about our complaints and complaining alone is seen as unmanly so many guys rather suffer in silence) maybe then, someone, somewhere with some power will say hey, maybe hating on men to the point of vitriol, ambivalence and hostility isn't good for society, maybe we should give the entire gender we demonised it's position back, hey let's go crazy and admit we even need men let's show some fucking appreciation? Let's give fathers respect, authority and relevance and stop feeding the masses bumbling jokes like Peter Griffin and Homer Simpson as examples of everyday men. Maybe this crazy day will come someday but probably not in my lifetime.

TLDR: feminism ruined the most technologically advanced civilizations of the world by creating social ruin via the destruction of family, marriage doesn't work under feminism

[–]mustdotosucceed 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The myers-briggs is a piece of garbage.

[–]Endorsed Contributor30303030303030 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Heartiste is always on point but the answer is so obvious I can't really force myself to read it.

And frankly, after taking rp course for months now, I really don't see the point in marrying at all. What's in it for me? Nothing. Only eventual problems. How is that different from ltr? Tax benefits aren't that great. I'll live alone far cheaper than I ever get in return.

[–]psycho-logical 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This article is full of holes and terribly bias. The article fails to define slut and the dichotomy that women are either virgins or sluts is simply retarded. Virgin women are definitely not at the top of high social value unless you live in an ultra conservative, religious compound. Virgin brides are much more likely to stay in an unhappy marriage. Also claiming that the lowest divorce rate correlates with the happiest life is like saying the best driving experience correlates with the safest ride. The article also provides no data for divorce rates compared with the number of partners men have (relevant).

I can definitely see how somebody with a high partner count (not more than 1) is more likely to be a less ideal, long term partner. It correlates with low self esteem, commitment issues, lower social value, mental instability etc... However, I don't see how it is gender specific.

I wonder if any of you can actually articulate beyond downvotes.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If your idea of a good marriage is that it is happy or entertaining 100% the time, then I suggest you don't get married.

TFA is not drawing arbitrary distinctions between "sluts" and "nice-girls". It is presenting objective data that shows that marrying someone with a high sexual partner count increases your chance of divorce-rape. I know that blue-pillers are allergic to facts, but try staring at the graphs again.

[+]Jamesshrugged -6 points-5 points-4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As long as it puts women down in some way... It's ok with TRP, logical fallacies be damned!!!

[–]5 Endorsed ContributorStayinghereforreal 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If feminism's adherents had control over cruise missiles, I would be telling you to get out of your dwelling right now, because distributing this information is tantamount to murderous terrorism in their eyes. And you would get a missile in your window, to protect the world from your treacheries.

[–]JoshtheAspie 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

glances in the general direction of the white house Uuuuuuummmm......

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it something inherent to being a woman or is it about promiscuity? Is there a study with men?

[–]Jamesshrugged -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Define "slut."

[–]psycho-logical 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Apparently anyone that isn't a virgin, by this article's standards.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]FascistComicBookHero 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

...we have an open/poly relationship.

So, you let her sleep around?

[–]kukul 12 points13 points14 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There are a lot of great sex-positive women out there who would make great marriage partners. Just learn to avoid the crazy ones.

Nice try, SRS.

[–]Wolfwoodd 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Edited original post. I'm not a huge fan of marriage either. However, I still stand by the fact that they are good candidates for long-term relationships.

[–]PinkfloydPurplefloyd 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What do you define sex-positive as?

[–]LaserSoundMusic 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

There is sex positive and there are sluts. The line is fine but i know it when I see it.

[–]kukul 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's the same difference as between sipping cognac in your orangerie and chugging malt liquor behind the liquor store, if it's 9 a.m. on Monday, you're still a fucking drunk.

[–]LaserSoundMusic 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not sure I agree but the analogy cracked me up!

[–]htororyp 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Could you define how you see sex positive and sluts please?

[–]LaserSoundMusic -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't define it. But I know it when I see it.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter