We all know here that sexual partner count in women is an indicator of her slutiness and her being "LTR" material or not. But we also know that all women lie in their count so it's pretty difficult for guys to make an accurate assessment. Lately I've been experimenting with an indirect approach to the issue: Just out of curiosity, I ask them how many LTRs, and for how long, they've been on. (Note that these are girls looking to settle down.) You can be conservative and estimate 2-3 different dicks per year of not being into a LTR since 17 y.o.

I've been extremely surprised to see how common it is for girls in the 26-30 y.o. range to not have been in any serious LTR lasting more than a year. In my opinion, this is a huge red flag, and women may not be aware of that since they are so kindly acknowledging their lack of LTR experience to me. Also, since LTRs are somehow "public" in their social environment, unlike (generally) their previous sexual experiences, it is a red flag that can be easily spotted during your due diligence.

I tend to think that lack of LTR experience in girls nearing the Wall indicates a lot of negative stuff regarding their character, that basically can be boiled down to their inability to put their hypergamy in a minimum check sacrificing short term AFs in the CC for medium to long term satisfaction, by seeking to cash out their beauty and fertility on time. No LTRs in their resumes may also indicate inability to stay around a guy while keeping herself attracted to her, or to keep him around by limiting the amount of shit testing.

But then they hit the Wall and suddenly feel they need to commit and settle down. They are way more picky with giving away sex (even though the value of their vagina is dropping per minute) and believe that despite having no LTR experience they will be able to settle down and get married and live happily ever after. With no LTR training there's no way those marriages can survive, on average, in the long term. That's why I think that any guy looking for a LTR should assess his girl's previous LTR experience instead of just focusing on the uncertain sexual partner count.

Similarly, it is the girls that have been in LTRs the ones I've generally found to be less slutty and most attractive for long term mating.

Any similar experiences around?