I got to this subreddit by clicking random ended up on RedPillWomen and clicked over to TRP and from there to here, because I heard something about red pill on the radio.

I read a whole bunch of the intro stuff and now I am even more confused.

So that I don't get accused of concern trolling, I am openly saying that I am a male feminist, mainly a religious feminist because of how I see the millennia of exclusion of female leaders and voices in religion and religious texts as something harmful that needs correction. Having said that, I came in with an open mind and don't understand why men's rights and feminism have to clash any more than Lesbian rights and Gay rights have to clash. I am sorry if I seem hostile, but I really want to get to the essence of my questions so I didn't hold back.

1) It seems like the difference between an 'alpha' and a 'beta' is the dark triad (DT). Cultivating the DT and trying to get society to value the DT doesn't seem like a recipe for a productive society. Am I missing something?

2) Is getting love, affection and sex the main goal? If so, what if you are able to get all of those without being classically 'alpha'? If you have girls throwing themselves at you but are kind to people in general and are feminist(we'll get to that later), would that be a bad thing?

3) Why is feminism so derided? There are so many types of feminism, but it seems like it is used here as a codeword for all the things that people don't like. Is the problem with feminism that it teaches that there are a multiplicity of ways to approach the world besides the stereotypic 'alpha' mentality?

4) How is the red pill not just another way of forcing men to behave in ways they don't naturally want to and telling people to fit the cookie cutter? It looks like everyone is told that to be a success they have to be 'alpha' which is a narrow band of dominating actions and body shape. Isn't this just the substitution of one tyranny (the one that seems to be called 'feminism') for another?

5) I would think that women aren't all the same, just like men aren't are all the same, so what would be appealing to one woman wouldn't appeal to another and vice versa. This would mean that either what is considered 'alpha' needs to be re-examined or the very concept of 'alpha' needs to reassessed. I am thinking that maybe you would disagree with the concept that women have different likes, but considering how in your own experiences some people like some foods or some sports more than others, why would this not apply equally to a female's taste in men?

I have so many other questions, but these are the ones that confuse me most.