FEMINIST ACADEMIC FRAUD: How feminists unpublished a valid scientific article by harrassing the author and campaigning against its publication - leading to its defunding and removal | Intereting read, reveals tactics used

79johnsmith · 2020-06-03T01:08:15+00:00

Primary Analyses Consistent with the Greater Male Variability Hypothesis

“Greater male than female variability is found in behavioral and morphological traits in an- imals...Variation was significantly greater among men than women in 5 of the 6 former data sets and was similar for men and women in the latter 2 data sets, broadly supporting the predictions. A further analysis extends the theory to intellectual abilities” [3, p. 219].

“By age 10 the boys have a higher mean, greater variance and are over-represented in the high tail. Sex differences in variance emerge early – even before pre-school – suggesting that they are not determined by educational influences” [4, p. 26].

(https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.04184.pdf) - An Evolutionary Theory for the Variability Hypothesis - Theodore P. Hill

2020-06-03T01:17:21+00:00

The only people who can be surprised by this anymore are the ones not in academia. Inside the ivy-covered buildings we have all known about this sort of stuff for decades.

CMSpike · 2020-06-03T00:43:05+00:00

“Half his board, he explained unhappily, had told him that unless he pulled the article, they would all resign and “harass the journal” he had founded 25 years earlier “until it died.” Faced with the loss of his own scientific legacy, he had capitulated. “A publication in a dead journal,” he offered, “wouldn’t help you.””

We used to die for scientific truth

Moronic-Simpleton · 2020-06-03T01:49:06+00:00

Isn’t this an old topic, though? What makes this groundbreaking, or a threat to feminists? There have been lots of studies and articles about that hypothesis before. https://qz.com/441905/men-are-both-dumber-and-smarter-than-women/

Alx1775 · 2020-06-03T03:59:13+00:00

You have to understand that blind gender and racial equality in all issues is religious dogma, and you are committing blasphemy by publishing something that challenges it.

We are in the middle of our own Inquisition, folks, and it’s just starting.

mhandanna · 2020-06-02T23:36:22+00:00

The feminist even said look we undertsand the article but women maybe too stupid too understand the nuance of the article and maybe affected lol

marchingrunjump · 2020-06-03T12:01:56+00:00

I wonder how the paper would have been received if it supported that women in some aspect had an advantage over men.

This would still challenge the social constructivist paradigm, but not the female superiority paradigm.

It seems like men and women are equal unless women are better.

Slade_Riprock · 2020-06-03T03:59:05+00:00

Believe Science.... Except when it hurts your feelings

yoshi_win · 2020-06-03T04:04:11+00:00

Great article, but the author specifically said it's not academic fraud. Paranoid, censorious zeal is different from fraud.

Covered-in-Thorns · 2020-06-03T02:00:50+00:00

Of the ‘others’ you only see those who stand out, which often happens to be those you hate. In consequence, we judge all of a group based on the worst among them. In men they only notice those who assault them, so they think we’re all bad.

Rex9 · 2020-06-03T13:57:19+00:00

Feminism is the equivalent of the Catholic Church of the Dark Ages.

spookybooki23 · 2020-06-03T19:36:02+00:00

So they’re controlling the media? That sounds illegal

azazelcrowley · 2020-06-04T00:12:51+00:00

They did the same thing with domestic violence studies for over 30 years. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment

L1F3THROWAVVAY4GD · 2020-06-04T00:43:23+00:00

There are psychological concentration camps in the United States that disguise themselves as mental health facilities, but are in fact neoliberal reprogramming companies that cater to the feminist agenda and take a lot of hypocritical actions to “validate” and “empower” women while demonizing and undermining men whenever they try to explain WHY their anger exists. Where women are allowed to advocate for themselves... men are said to be “making excuses”

They are all over, but one example of these is Dragonfly Transitions, and it was co-founded by a woman who uses her “academic credibility” to push an ideological agenda at the expense of ACTUAL mental health. Places like this need to be investigated for corruption and psychological abuse.

jinladen040 · 2020-06-11T15:55:48+00:00

Feminist bias in academia. They're against any proposed idea or thoery thats in direct conflict with their agenda.

Comments