TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jazzlike_worth_9908 Archive

View 35 posts and 2,473 comments by jazzlike_worth_9908 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
66

CMVJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 10:22 PM
54

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:16 PM
41

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 12:11 AM
38

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 06:40 AM
34

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 09:20 AM
33

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 05:04 PM
29

CMVJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 11:33 AM
27

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:53 AM
24

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:05 AM
19

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:01 PM
13

Jazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 11:08 AM
10

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 07:27 PM
9

CMVJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/23 09:06 AM
7

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 04:16 PM
6

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:26 AM
6

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:04 AM
5

Jazzlike_Worth_9908/r/AllPillDebate11/10/23 09:52 AM
5

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 08:29 AM
4

Jazzlike_Worth_9908/r/AllPillDebate05/10/23 12:03 PM
4

Question for RedPillJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 11:08 AM
1

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 03:03 PM
1

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 06:40 AM
1

Jazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 08:10 PM
1

CMVJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 01:43 PM
1

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:27 AM
1

Question For MenJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 02:41 PM
1

Whitepill DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 09:19 AM
0

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:54 PM
0

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 11:13 AM
0

CMVJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/23 01:57 PM
0

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 05:13 AM
0

DiscussionJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:18 PM
0

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 12:21 PM
0

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:42 AM
0

DebateJazzlike_Worth_9908/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 10:27 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,473 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why would anyone want to be with you ? It's a great thing that your kind gets erased from the genepool overtime
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 06:29 AM
4

The thing is you're only fooling yourself with this tactics. No you're not a victim and it's not name calling. That's being super nice with you. Most piece of shits would spend 30seconds to call the police to help stop a crime. You're not even there.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 09:54 PM
4

Let me set this straight I never wanted to fit in Yes 👍 you're just unhappy with the consequences of your choices. No one is bullying you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 09:33 PM
1

It's fine he wanted an easy way out and he can leave so long he takes care of his child
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 09:21 PM
–

Yeh guns are cool if you want. The real question is why wouldnt you spend 30 second to give a hand to a drowning person ? Is it because that person should have had a life jacket ? Why do you find it hard to imagine someone like this to be seen as an absolute piece of shit by most (most likely worse)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 09:17 PM
–

Why are you talking about guns ? Respond to the points. You said there are suicidal men who could get better simply by getting some sex. I said it costs 50+€ it's affordable and that definitely doesnt cure suicidal tendancies otherwise they would just do that
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 09:04 PM
4

Anyone who wont bother for 30seconds to save from great harm will be considered a piece of shit by the extreme majority because the extreme majority would obviously give those 30sec to avoid such tragic consequences. We do this because we also expect someone to spend 30seconds to call the police the day we might need it. It's really not that complicated and only you struggles to get it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 08:49 PM
–

Sex price starts at around 50€ it's affordable and him buying it wont solve his suicidal tendancies
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 08:36 PM
–

The common opinion is that if you can avoid great harm by doing very little then it's seen as the ethical thing to do. Exemple : if a man is about to die of thirst then the ethical thing to do is to provide him water as it costs almost nothing and would save a life and avoid great harm. Same logic here If someone is attacked , to spend 30seconds to call the police is seen as the ethical thing as it costs nothing and prevents great harm
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 05:50 PM
-3

Yes but do you see the connexion between theeir hatred for women and their struggles with them
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 12:27 PM
1

Many world governments. Your understanding So basically a bunch of people? And then you have the audacity to type This is how far up your own ass your head is. You're insisting that I don't know what a government
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 05:51 AM
2

Im serious , that type of shit where you cant show accountability and admit wrong will make anyone just move away from you. It's okay you tried a lame tactic where government would be equal to a bunch of people , you got called out for it , it happens now take your loss laugh about it and move on. The way you keep digging your grave is hilarious and pathetic
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 05:45 AM
-6

Im not sure what's your point ? Yes there are popular preferences and if you describe a very masculine personnality for a woman it's just not attractive to most men as well. Also a man that is calm has a good situation and is conflict avoidant doesnt struggle that much tbh. Usually it's a matter of being too introvert to trigger occasions
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 05:41 AM
-4

Do you ever behave the same with women ? The way you try to deflect would dry any pussy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 05:20 AM
-1

Why isnt the comparison equal ? No one says anything about the hard worker who doesnt want to become a father. In your example it's just a matter of being usefull to society or not that is stigmatised.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 05:08 AM
0

I proved the straw man
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 08:37 AM
1

Your argument is basically there's a 4 bills, 2 of 100 and 2 of 50; the man received the two bills of 50 and the woman the 2 bills of 100; both received 50% of the bills therefore is equal. .... In your example 4 bills 50+50+100+100=300 50+50 = 100 men get 100/300 100+100=200 women get 200/300 That's 33.33% vs 66.66% This is not 49.2 vs 50.8 Are you able to understand your mistake or will you go the stubborn road
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 09:44 PM
8

You're wrong they're described as shy and gentle. They solve issues with display of force rather than actual fights and they care for the family well being. https://www.ugandarwandagorillatours.com/safaris-blog/silverback-gorilla-facts.html#:~:text=Despite%20they%20are%20strong%20mammals,forage%20for%20food%20and%20sleep.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:11 PM
6

Funny how in almost every species the "Alpha" is pro social and more empathetic than the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:03 PM
1

It's alright i was busy with a woman while your kind was analysing how much money is needed to make up for being redpilled
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 06:18 AM
1

Iy's alriut but do kot complain ever, tale responsiboloty for choosl g celibacy and not being compatoble with other humans. You chose your path it's fine
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 12:04 AM
0

It's alright feel free to jail yourslef into redpill ideology, in the end youre almost only harming yourselflf and you make the. competition much lower. In one way i thabk you for being that bad with women, you make it so much easier to. We all need losers like you to win the comparison, keep doing gods work
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 12:00 AM
1

Why do you think it's not happening right now, been progressively getting worse every year. I think the only thing happenong is women who used to be forced to be in a relationship because of monetary issie are not anymore. I consider it a good thing as everyone should mate begause of compatibility instead pf necessity
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 10:01 PM
1

That's the only way you have to feel like you're keepong your head up. Im sure you googled the definition and realised you were wrong. You wont admit it bit it's fine it's expected from redpill. Men
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 09:59 PM
–

Hmm interesting so you'd be a simp but an informed one?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 05:11 PM
–

From birth, women are told that they automatically have inherent value. From birth, men are taught that they have no inherent value, and that they have to spend their entire lives striving to be "worthy" of a woman, who in turn has done literally nothing to make herself "worthy" of you. Would you say this description is closer to equality or trad/conservatives ?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 05:01 PM
–

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 04:51 PM
2

Yeh you're allowed to have your preference. Im just making fun of rhe fact that when a woman says the exact same thing as you do saying all her 15 options are bad and that she complaons about dating overall, it's viewed... Differently
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:52 PM
1

Yeh indeed my date just told me how excited she is to meet me tonight
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:41 PM
1

A diet isnt that hard it's the first two weeks that are then it's okay and the motivation is fed by the pride and seein results. I lost 25kg
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:34 AM
1

Slim + hairs + decent arms and good posture and almost anyone becomes attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:11 AM
3

I made the mistake to try first without mentioning it on my profile and it lead to bad experiences where the conversation was going well and ended at the job question so yeh now i want the rejection to be as invisible as possible so even before we match. I care about my mental health, dating apps can be damaging for confidence by swiping so many profiles. So i decided to never swipe and instead i pay tinder + and navigate through the likes i receive instead. It's not much maybe 1 every other day…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 10:01 AM
1

Not even that,last year i chose a poor lifestyle for a few years and started a college degree. I expected to struggle a lot with women because of that. I made my profile clear about being a student so it filters out women that would be an issue for and it leaves me with really nice women who are understanding about it and who suggest most of the time to split the bill by themselves or even offer to treat me sometimes. Women are honest about their intentions if they want something short term they…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 09:45 AM
2

I agree i had a blast during highschool, but at that age there's no online dating and i forgot to specify i was talking about it
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 09:31 AM
1

Dating at 30 for men is golden age so much easier it's a blessing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 09:26 AM
1

Im sure you feel like you dodged it like a pro but you're only fooling yourself. This type of shit is why women walk away from you then you dont understand and seek refuge into the redpill that keeps feeding you excuses making it about women society and shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 08:09 AM
1

You'd pull more if you had the honesty to admit being wrong sometimes. Or maybe it's a cognitive issue and you dont get my point we'll never know
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 08:01 AM
0

Ppl dont even pay 1.7M in taxes in their lifetime, how would you want men to pay enough tax to sustain their own costs and to also make up for 1.7M for every women. This is absolutely absurd and concerning that you're unable to see why. You are easy to trick and would believe anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 07:51 AM
12

He's clearly hypergamous he will ride the simp stacy train for a few more years before he will settle for the beta betty
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 06:42 AM
2

That's exactly the reason im writing it. Loving the irony of rules for thee not for me
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 06:36 AM
3

I'd suspect men who say they dont care about zbout being "besties" in addition to sexual attraction to be struggling to find any woman so anything will do and winnthe comparison. On the other hand women dont rly have that issue so they overwhelmingly say they want to be bestie with their man
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 06:08 AM
–

Bluepill means mainstream or not redpill. As pointed out in another comment redpill is the group of meb overwhelmingly single who make fun of the group overly dating for allegedly being bad at dating
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 05:56 AM
5

It's hilarious how you guys have zero consistency it's always rules for thee not for me
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 05:53 AM
10

He got 15 girls in 2 speed datings , it's just his standards that are too high
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 05:51 AM
3

Yeh you won with those 40+ pages in norwegian in a pdf i cannot even translate and have no idea what information you're referring to. Not spending hours on debunking your absolutely absurd claim. Ppl dont even pay 1.7M in taxes in their lifetime, how would you want men to pay enough tax to sustain their own costs and to also make up for 1.7M for every women. This is absolutely absurd and concerning that you're unable to see why. You are easy to trick and would believe anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 06:55 PM
3

How could it be any more free ? It's as free as it gets, everyone gets to choose for themselves and to deal with whatever match they want
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 06:40 PM
2

Why do you refuse the actual definition and go the stubborn road where free would mean absolutely no rule. What's your point by going the "no free market exist" road
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 06:03 PM
3

You should google the definition before typing all those crap. Literally no market fits your new definition of free markets.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:08 PM
7

What happens in 20 years when half that workforce becomes retired and no new people appear to replace them? Lol why would that happen ? If women opt out and refuse to be available to men, then suddenly being paid to work is not nearly as sufficient. Well that's a huge IF. They're not opting out
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:05 PM
1

You bastardise the définition into something that doesnt exist. Name a few free markets fitting your absolute no rule definition The rules are mostly against men. Anyone is free to late with anyone they want. That's what everyone is referring to when they say free dating market
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:31 AM
7

Send your source that’s so much faster and easier
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 06:07 AM
6

Alright let’s shut down schools defund the police and end the military all together. No more public service because that’s evil redistribution. Now it’s chaos and maybe a woman will seek shelter around you. What a prospect
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 06:04 AM
4

Why are you now talking about government spending ? That’s not redistribution. Think military for instance or i dont know education police etc etc. Those workers arent entirely women and arent getting their wage for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:49 AM
10

Show us lifetime tax contribution from men and women in norway to begin with then lifetime expenditure on men and women and we will be able to compare and have an idea
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:46 AM
9

Oh there's a tiny bit of redistribution that must be why you cant find love. Nice excuse so credible, try it on your next date
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:36 AM
10

Wtf are you even talking about, where are those 1.7M net loss per woman going ?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:34 AM
5

Lol Oh i see, let me inform you that norway isnt using USD and the rate of their currency is 10.5 for 1 dollar.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:29 AM
11

Labor productivity is not evenly distributed Just like income isnt as well. Good thing it's not a communist society
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:27 AM
7

Can’t speak for the US but in Norway a woman is a loss of like 1.7 million USD for the state due to life choices. How can you write such obvious bullshit ? Is it another redittor who told you this and you swallowed his words no question asked ? 1.7million...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 05:04 AM
14

So ? They're having a job working for themselves and charging women for their job. You and i are "benefiting" from their job the exact same way women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:57 AM
9

He can leave but he's responsible for his child that's where there's an issue if he isnt
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:52 AM
9

Free market has never meant you can steal or murder ...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:43 AM
14

And everyone gets paid for that. Are you somehow not charging the client if it happens to be a woman ?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:38 AM
2

How sick of you for pointing out that pure coincidence ?!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 10:38 AM
1

I don't have a side Oh rly ? You called me a simp based on my bluepill flair several times. Cut the crap
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 09:22 AM
1

Excessive and unreciprocated attention toward someone. Both women and men can simp. Why do you keep having that word in your mouth ? Im pro equality by definition if she doesnt reciprocate im out. I dont simp. Pretty simple. And as i said. It's funny how your side is the never the one defending the idea of not simping by splitting the bill.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 06:59 AM
1

The fact that you call yourself a ho as a man Call me a stud if that's your preference i wont mind. that you're a simp Do you even understand the concept of simp ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 06:40 AM
1

A concept from the redpill is spinning plates and not investing into one single woman Yehh i can see the benefits except that i have a lot of contempt for women doing that and i respect myself enough not to go as low. It's sociopath behavior . It's not to argue on the effectiveness but on the morale perspective. The fact that the date is such a big deal to you is what leads you to simp for women. Plenty of redpill men will fuck a woman and not take her on a date at all. It's bluepill men that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 06:27 AM
1

So there's a bluepill man he's splitting the bill because he wants a girl genuinely interested and attracted to him Then there's the redpill boy who cant get anyone that way so he focuses on alter ative ways such as being among richest and they normalise paying for first date they in order to get points toward women, they call it gender roles. Then they those same boys have the audacity to call the bluepill man a simp. Make it make sense
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 05:40 AM
1

I did get them rly hype and they'll be disapointed. Usually i try to deal with one at a time to limit damages and it's more respectful. I expected it to go well but this time all conversations lead somewhere
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 10:38 PM
1

I feel like you wont understand even if i rephrase. I made what's called a comparison all things equal. A/ 1 option Vs B/ 1 option + 9 gay men The only difference between A and B is the presence of uninteresting options (gay men) in order to weigh how much difference thatmakes. It doesnt make any difference. Having uninteresting options is meaningless. I proved my points.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 06:49 PM
1

And quite frankly really exposes you for how you think about money and women. I mean I've seriously never looked at a woman and thought 'Oh wow, I'll bet she'd like me due to money'. Let me remind you that you're the one having that kind of speech so go easy on calling others "feminists". That's great, how many can you pull? My current issue is having several dates scheduled and i feel bad for the ones i wont pick in the end and for the ones i had a conversation going that im now ignoring. Bild …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 06:26 PM
2

I'm just telling you what the majority has in mind about a passport bro. I dont make the rules and if you dont fit the description you have no reason to care I'd be curious what sort of caliber women you pull. I like them smart educated feminine and caring. They arent into redpill men , your tribe gets the goldiggers and transactional ones
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 05:25 PM
1

Okay so you are not a ppb, why do you want to associate with them ? Ppb refers to those i mentionned. Losers who cant get a woman from an equal ground, blame society for this and go somewhere their money will give them enough traction to find a girl. It's not about guys having a preference for certain appearance, it's a bit deeper than that. And quite frankly really exposes you for how you think about money and women. I mean I've seriously never looked at a woman and thought 'Oh wow, I'll bet sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:53 PM
0

No you're right it's pure coincidence that 99% of the time it's south east asia that is chosen and not france or netherlands or any other country with skinny women. Must be me having a porn addiction i suppose
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:06 PM
1

Oh weight so it could be almost anywhere in europe but somehow it's always a poor ass country that is chosen. I wonder what kind of leverage i could be talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:50 PM
1

Oh god. You had 1 interesting option. You multiply this by 10 you now have 10 options. 90% of those options are gay men hitting you that's 9/10. You had 1 interesting options. Now you still have only 1 interesting options but also 9 gay men hitting on you. Does that make you feel any better ?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:03 AM
-2

The right comparison would be having 10 times more options but now 90% off them are gay men. That wouldnt make you feel any better abd you'd still be struggling to make something out of those 10% interesting options that are women. Having those 90% uninteresting options doesnt make you feel better
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 10:12 AM
0

Nice claims but elaborate How does having those gay men hitting on you increase the possibility of finding someone that you want ?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 07:49 AM
-1

If you trivialise the question question to whether findind love abroad is inherently bad then the response is obviously no. What is denounced is the pursuit of an abusive relationship that is desired by no woman leading the guy to go the ppb way to benefit from additional leverage and maybe find a victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 07:40 AM
-2

who says that he does? Ppb themselves, it's like the whole concept, if you cant get a girl the normal way, make use of the world's poverty to find one who will have so much to gain that she may stick around.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 05:30 AM
-1

It all comes down to why did he NEED such leverage to find someone who will hear his presence
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 03:26 AM
1

You wish
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:39 AM
1

Im asking because most of the time there's only a small gap from one to another and being kind is precious. All you need is to save it for those who reciprocate and treat you with the same respect. Just be careful not to approach it in a transactional way
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 10:03 PM
1

What makes you a people pleaser and not a kind person instead ?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:33 PM
-1

The key is to not word it but to sexualise with bodylanguage. A silence can reveal itself rly powerful
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:25 PM
0

So take a bit fat guess as to what kind of man I thought I should become 😕 A masculine man able to tell when he's desired and when he's not with enough maturity not to get too emotional when rejected ?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:12 PM
3

What about all those who are average and are in a relationship ? You know, the vast majority of couples
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 09:08 PM
21

Honestly the attention from someone you dont want is meaningless. To get a better idea imagine being hit on by gay men. First few times it would feel good but very quickly it would get boring you'd know that you can get gay men but what you want is a woman and that doesnt help
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 07:35 PM
1

This kd as deep as it gets 95% of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 08:13 AM
1

I mean i suppose it's a "consensus" but this is so generic and not specific to the redpill. The bluepill says it better. This is just the virtue signaling part "look it's not what you think it's about self improvement" as if they needed trp to know wealth and a good physique helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:12 AM
3

You seem to complain a lot, what are you waiting to apply your own advice, havent you figured it out ? You should be drowning in pussies
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 04:16 AM
1

Don't make the mistake to believe everyone is as limited as you. Feminism is a female empowerment movement That's what i pointed out. For the redpill you're only looking at the noble origins and ignore everything else and the doomfest it became. You dont grant that privilege to feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 04:09 AM
1

I got a date next week, i like the girl, id be rly sad if i learned she's playing me and has a roster of men. Way more sad than if she simply never matched with me. What's so difficult to understand about that ?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:51 AM
1

There isnt a single consensus the redpill isnt an institution or whatever. I think trp is causing way more harm than good and that you can find all the tips needed outside of it. It's really not deep
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:48 AM
-3

Yeah lemme take on another full time job Dont you ever feel dramatic ? You can do a lot averaging 10min a day. Start by being on the apps build a good profile, you can even try different approach depending on the app then once you're setup it's random options popping randomly. Then there are all the usual ways through friends and going out/doing activities which provides opportunitied and for the more courageous you can cold approach women you find attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:59 PM
2

Says the attention whore who cant understand how planning 8 dates with 8 different people for the next 2 weeks makes him one. Wtf Go ask yourself make a post say you rly like a girl but you learned that the same week she went on 3 different dates with 3 other men and that there are 4 more men on the line planned ahead and ask for their opinion about that girl. Maybe you'd develop self awareness
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 03:23 PM
1

Oh i did i proved your double standard where you only retain positive aspects of the redpill and only retain negative aspects of feminism. That's disingenuous. you need to have feminist or red pill talking point That doesnt mean a damn thing and you're not the judge of what is a "feminist talking point". You literally contradict yourself when you define feminism as inequality
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:56 PM
0

How ? You asked i respond. Those feminazi barely exist in real life and do not represent a valid reason not to approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:14 PM
0

Why is the redpill immuned from its members action but feminism isnt ? If you were consistent with the way you approach both ideology you'd say feminism is only about equality and ending sexism and and that everything else doesnt fit. Eventually, I'll associate any "put women first" belief as blue pill/feminist And you wouldnt say this which is in direct contradiction with the description
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 01:55 PM
0

They barely exist outside reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 01:45 PM
0

Before engaging id like to have your opinion on feminism to see whether you treat everything the same way
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:55 PM
–

Lol you're a loser you are lost and you are projecting way too much Have you considered you low cognitive abilities to he the reason why you fail women ? You got lost at the meaning of "shallow" went completely off topic to whine about how hard dating feels for you and now you go that route. You're a fucking cliché and lack the ability to develop self awareness
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:53 PM
0

Lol look around you. I got into many arguments defending cold approach and the very vast majority of so called redpill men call it a waste of time and called me names for it. All they want is to have the excuse of not being top 1-20% to explain why they fail. Then they'll use all their delusional abilities to ignore that other average men like them are doing just fine
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:43 PM
1

Lol look around you. I got into laby arguments defending cold approach and the very vast majority of so called redpill men call it a waste of time and called me names for it. All they want is to have the excuse of not being top 1-20% to explain why they fail. Then they'll use all their delusional abilities to ignore that other average men like them are doing just fine
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:43 PM
1

I see i lost you at the meaning of shallow. You just wanting to vent about how hard it is for you to find someone who can bear your presence
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:40 PM
1

When they do self improve and do what they can, well, then they can't be blamed as much, and you know it It's the exact opposite actually. To fail dating and relationships can come from two reasons. The reason can be external : too ugly or too poor to ever be given a chance. People rejected for external reasons do have the benefit of the doubt, there is no valid reason to assume that person is bad On the other hand if there is zero external reasons and that the person does get the normal amount …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:25 AM
1

. But more often then not, it's not the individuals fault, it's bad timing, bad climate, or they picked a bad person to try to bond with That's textbook bluepill. Redpill will say it's your fault for being average and women's fault for only accepting top 1-20% (number varies hilariously)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:10 AM
1

Do you have a point beside yes TRP is full of shit but you have already seen someone else full of shit that wasnt labelled redpill ? For the example you mentionned, there's no double standard, may that person be an average man or a woman, blaming the other gender all together for failing all their relationship makes them wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:00 AM
-1

Once you see it you cant unsee it anymore. 95% of the time the driving factor behind every reasoning and popular RP idea is the search for an excuse for failure or inaction. It's to such extent you can predict their opinions by that factor alone. The redpill client doesnt want solutions he wants excuses. Therefore, cold approach is negatively seen even though on paper if the redpill was actually what it virtue signals to be, it would be overly in favor of it. Instead they opportunistically adopt…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:42 AM
1

Nice example but from your perspective it's an own goal Herere the double standard is clearly on the redpill side. Have someone say the exact same speech and they will agree if it comes out the mouth of a man but will disagree if it comes from the mouth of a woman. That's the definition of a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:25 AM
3

5 seconds and one google search later i got the actual number and it's 75/25 https://roast.dating/blog/tinder-statistics Makes sense to struggle and it doesnt represent reality that's my point
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:07 AM
0

That's not true and do you have a point beside "ok it's more shallow online than irl but maybe not as bad as 80/20"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:00 AM
1

Im loving the display of all the lame tactics. This time we get the "I'm referring to personal anecdotes while being as vague as possible so there's nothing to engage you can only trust my word and im right"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:56 AM
0

I know right ? You'll even see them complain about double standards they dont like the next post.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:44 AM
1

Why is sociology not defined as an exact science? Because a science isnt exact doesnt mean it's totally irrelevant. Otherwise economy or sociology wouldnt be a thing. There would be only maths and physics. Yes within 1000 ppl there will be a few who will lie. It creates a margin of error. The exact number isnt 8 but there's a 99.9% it is comprised between 7 and 9. idk how many times you lied on anonymous surveys but that's a rare thing and quantifiable through big numbers. No reason to lie there…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:40 AM
3

Thank you for providing a live example of the most common excuse "But some women do it too !"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:21 AM
-5

What does it has to do with shallowness and how tinder and real life interactions would he as shallow ? Do you struggle with the meaning of shallow ? It refers to how much looks is predominant. Looks matter more online and the vast majority of average guys will tell you they get more attention offline
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:18 AM
1

The trick is to use as many double standards as necessary. That way they can justify any contradiction
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:11 AM
3

Redpill men will always have an excuse for everything. That's the end goal of TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:57 AM
-8

In real life the ratio is 50/50 not 80/20 and the first contact isnt entirely about looks
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:55 AM
7

You're the one mass swiping and collecting matches like any attention whore. No ghosting if you dont choose to match beforehand. Those are bullshit excuses. And yeh i would totally prefer if the attention whore doesnt add me to her list and ignores me. Your kind is a plague. But you already know it and that's why you dodged 3 times the question about your female equivalent and how you'd feel knowing you're 4th of the week and that she bagged 4other men already. You'd be wtf is wrong with her and…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:52 AM
7

Most redpill men have a lot of contempt for the attention whore and i agree with them about that. I cant think of much bigger redflag than a girl who allegedly had a glow up and is now going on 8 dates in 2 weeks. Lol imagine you're on a date with a girl and you're the fourth and she has already 4 other men lining up on her schedule. Oh god how disgusting some ppl are
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 06:58 AM
5

You didnt respond the lost important part, how do you feel about girls who bag 8 different dates in 2 weeks ? It's like as extreme as it gets do you realise
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 06:31 AM
-6

and had 8 dates scheduled within two weeks of updating my photos. Lol what an attention whore , how do you feel about your female equivalent ? Women are just shallow. That's it 🫠 You're talking about dating apps, the most shallow place and with the most skewed ratio against men. Even in a perfect world there is only 1 woman for 4 men. As the average guy it makes sense to struggle
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 06:27 AM
-7

9 out of 10 times , the main reason is that the guy is not trying
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:57 AM
2

I can totally imagine that you've never been hit on and only been harrassed in your life. It's true for a lot of women. Cold approach almost died , only remains the catcall / harassment. But one thing you need to realise is that you're a minority. I did a good amount of approach and 90%+ of the time the response is friendly or neutral. The harsh bitch who gets angry at a hello barely exists
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 08:52 PM
4

Wtf is wrong with you, you're talking about catcalling and harassment and we're talking about cold approach. It's two very distinct things. The first thing we learn as pua is to not be those catcallers and harrassers
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 07:20 PM
1

Yeh you'll marry later than your parents what's the big deal ? Those years when you make money and doesnt have kids yet are a blessing you can do whatever you want. The redpill is based on reality while blackpillers are emotion driven and ignore facts they dislike like those 7-9 partners. The median is 8 i'e already took into account the minuscule portion of ppl who lie on anonymous surveys. Also those numbers correlate with women's numbers so that's another proof. Face reality idk
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 06:23 PM
1

The average man is married and had 7-9 premarital partners. The issue with doomers/blackpillers is that they look at the bottom 10% and pretend that would be the average experience
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 04:23 PM
-2

Yep, never had a woman impressed by my bodycount, i consider lieing :p
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:16 PM
1

Wdym That I did say it in the black pill sense? Words have a meaning. Saying it is completely over for average men means what it means and this is textbook blackpill. Seriously why havent you flaired yourself blackpill ? Is it because of shame ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:23 PM
2

I didn't mean "It's over" as in the black pill lingo Yeh , you said "completely over" But the red pill also admits that being average is no longer enough No, that's the blackpill. Redpill is more like anyone can do it you just have to focus on what matters : confidence game wealth and status and not being a simp. I used to be redpill as i was among the pick up artists but nowaday id be ashamed to call me it as it's been infested with doomers like you who mistake it with the blackpill
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:11 PM
–

Okay then i guess you meant harder in your first response. It would have been harder for him as sex was more repressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:02 PM
1

Yes im responding to your question. You said look how -18 movies used to be sexualised My response : there are millions of movies more sexualised than the two mentionned in this category
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:00 PM
–

Why are you saying several arguments going my way ? Did you change your mind and now agree that sexuality was more repressed or are you performing an own goal
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:58 PM
1

Oh they do have cinemas for -18 movies, one day you'll get to go too. They'll ask your id
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:56 PM
1

Ever heard of pornhub ? That's filled with other -18 movies
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:50 PM
–

Repressed as it was seen as a sin to follow sexual desires instead of keeping yourself for mariage
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:49 PM
–

?? Define sexually repressed by society
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:47 PM
–

Those are conflicted ideas , is it open to sexuality and promiscuity or is it repressing sexual urges ? What is being repressed exactly ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:46 PM
–

Why do you change topic ? It's about repressed desires by society in here, feel free to engage
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:41 PM
–

Why do you change topic ? It's about repressed desires by society in here, feel free to engage
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:41 PM
–

Friday the 13th or Nightmare on Elm Street Did you really pick two movies classified -18 ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:40 PM
–

Something like 45% of Gen z men have never asked a person out on a date in person. Yeh this is those who say men go to jail for saying hi to a woman. Because they've seen a guy on tiktok who said it but never because they would have experienced it. Worse scenario is a sideeye or a giggle then 5 seconds later it 's like it didnt happen
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:25 PM
–

It felt self explanatory. It's called sexual revolution/liberation. Society's opinion is that anyone should be free to follow his desires. It started with heterosexual relationships then with time it got extended to gays and now we are so accepting about any desire that we let ppl choose their gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:13 PM
–

You can literally change your gender if that's your desire
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:58 PM
11

All I've seen is 90+% of guys here openly admitting that it's completely over for the vast majority of men Lmfao if a blue pilled guy said this you'd have jumped on him for missrepresenting the redpill with the blackpill. Like it or not , the idea that there would be the wall and that suddenly men would have the upoerhand by 30+ is a common idea
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:52 PM
–

This idea is not backed by datas , look at the bodycount distribution
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:43 PM
–

This has nothing to do with the topic. He's saying that our hypersexualised society made him repress his desires. I say society used to repress even more desires
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:34 PM
–

Same. Society has traumatized a sizable number of multiple generations of men into being incapable of projecting desire That's bullshit our society is more sexualised than ever before. Sexuality used to be way more repressed. . Also now you have access to any ressource you need. Dont blame society
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:30 PM
–

It made me never want to be those kinds of guys, Good so I internalized any desire I had for women. That's where you've been wrong and it's on you not on society. It's not telling you to internalise any desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:26 PM
–

Damn and this was within our hypersexualised society, imagine how bad it would have been for you in the past when sexuality was repressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:17 PM
1

Waaw you're such a chad. How come are you still awkward after so many dates , weird
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 11:12 PM
0

Cool story bro who cares about your random opinion of a married guy about online dating you know nothing about. The topic was a comparison from 2012 and today. Today it's easier than it used to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:46 PM
0

?? Online dating is normalised now. The social stigmas for partaking are almost inexistent now. Would you say men or women are more subject to social stigmas in order to make their choices ? Ill let you draw the conclusions for the male/female ratio
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:39 PM
1

Nah, Tinder in its early days was like free sex at the free sex store. Not sure about Okay Cupid, but I heard good things about it. Wtf ?? If one thing it got easier as it became mainstream. It used to be a sausage fest To put it in perspective, I can get like 20 matches a week That' a lot no matter the app. I always had more matches on tinder but never 20 a week. Im still doing just fine. Do you struggle with conversations ?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:21 PM
2

The whole conversation was outstanding good job , please send me the data when you find ir
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 09:39 PM
1

Nice hypothesis My turn Tinder would be much better than 2012 okay cupid because at that time online dzting was seen as for the asocial creeps
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 09:34 PM
0

Lol you're full of shit you came up with your main argument about " ratings" which is meabingless then someone comes with a more impactfull more real data which is about actually sending a message and having a conversation and you have the audacity to brush it off with Speaking to someone =/= having a connection or date with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 09:29 PM
8

Okay there are exceptions i totally agree. Like someone who looks like an ogre can totally end up incel despite good personnality. Or someone extremely shy who never What is your opinion on the average looking guy though ? I think it's safe to say he's either not trying or he's constantly doing something wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 05:30 PM
1

Yep that's what i said. You have a morale issue with it, it's not about effectiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 03:08 PM
1

Men here cant see beyond their nose and cant relate to anything but them. They would gladly partake in casual hook ups. (even tho the next post they claim they dont and virtue signal about it and use it as a justification for their bitterness that's the typical hypocrisy but that's another topic) Therefore they cant comprehend the concept of pump and dump which in the end is what i describe, sell something to someone to get something and then to do not honor the initial promess. I rly suspect th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:38 PM
3

Well that's how you get experience , trials and fails. What's the issue ? Whether inexperience is not an issue and he gets the girl long term whether it is and it doesnt last but the guy gained the experience along the way and next girl will be unable to tell
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 07:41 AM
2

In the long run he gets the experience znd the issue disapeared. If one wants to argue the lie it is on a moral standpoint not about effectiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 07:38 AM
1

save it for marriage No thank you, feel free to make your own choices though You think any guy is going to trust and respect you enough to have a real relationship Redpillers are a minority. Dont speak in general but for yourself. Nothing wrong with your standard, just be honest about it and reject women accordingly. This is not the topic at stake. Im comparing one option from both the male and female side. As a guy i know she's most likely genuine while women have no way to tell if the guy is g…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 07:33 AM
0

Are you dense ? Is it something you learned recently ? Do you feel the need to spread that new knowledge ? By definition if she wants to hook up there's no manipulation involved that's just off topic. Damn the sheer stupidity
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:26 PM
1

You're describing the average redpill guy who makes up for being socially inapt by beta buxxing. There's a reason why they ignore all together having game and personnality and focus on simping with being rich. So much projection going in here. Me im pro equality , i always split the bill and never put anyone on a pedestal
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:22 PM
1

Honestly not really, the traits you mention do not describe him the best. He is confident and funny, also he has good game and knows how to escalate the situation
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 03:32 AM
1

I dont know many guy who slays without those traits
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 06:01 PM
1

It's not a guy a know it's literally my bestfriend. We were so equal regarding women that i had no idea that height was much of a factor
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 05:55 PM
1

wanting to get dates is being a creep? what? Are you also ... Slow ? go to a hobby Keyword : Hobby Btw im the one defending the position that the AITAH i made up is not creepy and im the one giving the advice to go for hobbies. It's just that this other creep made it creepy by making all and only about getting dates and female ratio in an attempt to make it as creepy as possible to induce negative reaction. Despite his efforts it didnt even rly work because yeh, hobbies are a good way to find op…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:07 PM
1

Have you considered being a creep ? It's a bit concerning you cannot see any difference. You're on the right topic, intentions , in mine the guy likes to danse and will enjoy the activity regardless of getting dates. The activity is enough in itself, it being filled with hot women craving for a man who can danse and it being a source for possible opportunity is the cherry on top. In his aitah , getting dates is the intention and the end goal regardless of the activity. That's creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:41 PM
1

Ill give you a chance to spot every differences you can see between the experiment i suggested and what he did. If you cannot see any just say it , it would be an interesting perspective imo
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:25 PM
1

You had to undercut the experiment and to bias it as much as possible. How lame does it get in here
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:10 PM
1

Please elaborate Not sure what you want me to elaborate, if someone rejects you outright , by definition that person is not manipulating you. Did i missunderstand something. will sometimes keep up with the charade if (s)he still has something to gain from the companionship. That's true for both men and women except that men know they wont have another opportunity easily so they are more tempted to manipulate the one opportunity they have than women who are a few swipes away from another opportun…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:49 AM
2

I dont agree that women are more likely to face manipulations women reject men outright and down the line much more often than vice-versa. Those two takes are in contradiction
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:34 AM
–

That's interesting because im convinced of the opposite, i think ill do it. Maybe ill ask ppd's predictions on a post first
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:30 AM
–

I could make an experiment on the AITAH sub. Id be like "im going to those danse lesson and even though i like it, it's true that part of the motivation comes from how it could make me more attractive to women and i might ask one out if i see a connexion I was at a party and two girls argued that makes me an asshole and a creep, i brushed it off but now i'm wondering so... AITAH ? What reaction do you expect ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:59 AM
–

Are you basing your reality off of TwoX subreddit ? Those women are insane and there's a heavy moderation against any disruptive idea. It doesnt represent anything but itself. It's like using a post from incels.is and then generalise to all men
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:21 AM
3

Our language is rich enough for all those nuances to be labelled. You are talking about a bootycall. Fwb are friends first and benefits come second. I had several fwb in my life and it didnt look like the bootycall you're referring to. We used to go to parties to do activities went on vacation, been each other wingman, been good advisors about relationships etc etc while also sleeping together on occasions
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:11 AM
–

What's creepy about taking dancing lessons exactly ? You'll look like a creep if you act like one. You missed my point or ignored it on purpose i dont know, i was referring to the female to male ratio of a given setting. Where there are 4 men per women, chances are you wont get a woman as even under perfect condition only 25% men will get someone. That's Tinder. The danse is just an example of a setting where there are more women than men. The same average man has infinitely more chances there t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:08 AM
–

See how these findings just happen to mirror the 20/80 principle on dating apps? There are 75-80% men on dating apps, if each girl goes with 1 guy that leaves 66% to 75%. It's simple maths. If you attend to a party with 80 men for 20 women, your odds wont be any better. Go to dancing lessons where there are 60%+ women and as an average guy you'll have good chances
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 09:57 AM
2

Have you never heard about friends with benefits ? Life is not your typical video game where you have a recipe and put a few coins in the right spot and bam there's love. when there's physical attraction but no personal compatibility, so the opposite to a friend. You get it wrong. Compatibility for friendship and for a relationship are completely different and that's where there's room for fwb situations Im not compatible with someone who doesnt want kid but i can very well be friend with that p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 09:53 AM
1

From my experience, consistent feminists are man haters and asshole personalities. That's your standpoint and i proved you wrong. Are you now going to adjust your opinion or are you going to let the emotional side of yourself take over and dismiss this info all together
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 09:43 AM
4

No that's far from being the only difference. The main difference is romantic feelings where you want the person to be yours. Otherwise it's just a hook up but even better as it's with a friend so no risk
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 09:38 AM
6

A good cold approach has to not look like one. I had my hoe phase where i did a good amount and followed some pua guides , the idea is to strike up the conversation using anything in your surrounding then to let her know you'll have to go in just a few minutes so she doesnt feel trapped and when the vibe is good and the conversation went well then you consider asking for infos. Like that it isnt based on looks but on tbe good interactions and since she's already been around you in real life it i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 12:49 AM
2

At this point it's a matter of morale and virtue, i wouldnt hit on a friend who's in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 12:13 AM
4

You can be friend and be ok to fuck at the same time tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:45 PM
1

Omg im not a genius but i know what a priori and a posteriori mean. that your argument is a priori, that is, that it relies solely on logic, like math And that's not it lmfao. It's a temporal thing , a priori means before the debate started, the initial claim is the a priori. If A posteriori (after the debate started) i changed my initial stance in order to exclude an inconvenient counter argument then this would fall under the no true scottman fallacy. Fuckin dipshit. :edit: inb4 you delete you…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:43 PM
0

Yeh it may be water is wet complexity the redpill is still failing at getting it when it's about them
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:27 PM
1

Read yourself again, how are you not ashamed for being that disingenuous. You got cornered try to respond on point instead of being sassy like that
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:22 PM
1

Convenient idea isnt it ? Is it how you discredit any data that causes you painful cognitive dissonance ? Those are anonymous surveys, there's no reason to see any big difference in the portion of liars which is also low as it's anonymous
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:20 PM
2

Well you're not supposed to under spend for your kids in the first place. How much do you think parents are spending on their kids ? For most parents to spend 50% of their income when they have 3 or 25% when they have 1 is the norm if not even more . Are you talking about the extremely wealthy/billionaires for whom it doesnt make sense and could be a lower number ? Are they your big concern ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:15 PM
1

Lol it's always the most ignorant who is the most agressive. Get ready for a teaching https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman "No true Scotsman or appeal to purity is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect an a posteriori claim from a falsifying counterexample by covertly modifying the initial claim.[1][2][3] Rather than admitting error" " Philosophy professor Bradley Dowden explains the fallacy as an "ad hoc rescue" " Key word is a posteriori claim. Here i made my general…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:00 PM
2

Im 6'1 my bestfriend is 5'7 we both slayed about the same in highschool/college , an interesting thing is that we never fought because girls were either on him or on I but almost never into both of us at the same time
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 12:00 PM
0

Some women are not physically attractive, socially savvy, or intelligent enough to lock down the men they actually want Some men are not physically attractive, socially savvy, or intelligent enough to lock down the women they actually want. It is the same, men adjust their expectations to who they can get as well. Now if we look at actual datas there are more men cheating than women and that's not even taking into account all the men who tried to cheat but didnt manage to while most women who wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 11:50 AM
0

See pump and dump as the concept it is. Not its application to extract sex from someone You can pump and dump someone to extract anything and by promising anything. Like a stagiaire you would tell he's gonna get a job at the end if he this and that only to not keep up with the promess and doing this knowingly from the get go.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 11:47 AM
-5

I anticipated your response. You're off topic. Everyone can be victim of manipulation once they commit and marry but only women when they see what appears to be an opportunity have a much higher chance for it to turn out not to be one and be actually something much worse a guy willing to mislead and hurt. When we get an opportunity for us it's different it's way more often a genuine one. That's huge
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 11:23 AM
-2

What about the dump ? There's no dump if it was agreed upon. Dont play dumb trying to make it lose all its meaning
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 11:15 AM
0

Which is why you should always take things slow, you've got nowhere to rush. Keep a cool head, think. That's only true for women. As men we have the privilege of letting go. If she's fucking you and telling you she likes you and wants something serious then chances are she is. That is huge Hold off on sex during the dating phase... maybe even longer than that. Men who are only interested in sex won't have the patience to wait, and will filter themselves out. Yeh and on the way you inevitably get…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 11:12 AM
2

It's about purposely doing fake promesses in order to obtain something out of someone only to dump the person without giving them what they were pumped with
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 11:05 AM
-1

Would you ? Imagine a girl manipulating you on purpose pumping your hope of finally getting a girlfriend or sex so that you take her on nice dates and give her lot of attentions only to dump you the second it's time to give you what you've been pumped for. I'd prefer if she doesnt respond at all
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:59 AM
1

Hookups and one night stands are just wasting of time. I agree and most women do as well, im not rly interested when there's no future to consider. Im glad im not being mislead. That's my point If you got rejected you shouldn't accept friendzone as well. There is nothing wrong being rejected. That's also my point
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:51 AM
33

Well, it's obviously offensive and a very rude thing to say and im sure those same women who disagree would have the same reaction to their boyfriend telling them along the same thing. If i try to rationalise and be the devil's lawyer, it isnt necessarely offensive in itself, for most women the bar for sexual arrousal from looks only in a hookup setting is extremely high and if you're an average-ish guy you already know you dont fit that category and it means she likes you for who you are and no…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 07:50 AM
4

All those questions are answered by the current kid's lifestyle and the 2000$ spent on him every month. The question is : should you downgrade his lifestyle down to 1000$ a month as it's the usa average or should you maintain it at 2000€ to preserve the kid That is the question at stake during divorces and usually the doctrine is to preserve the kid lifestyle the best we can Then depending on the financial situation and parents desires about custody there is an alimony a pension or nothing regar…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 07:24 AM
2

Never seen any feminism being sex-negative idk what you may be referring to Basically i stick to the core principles which are equality, no sexism, tolerance
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 07:00 AM
4

My mom is sahm she's far better at spending the money than my dad as she's the one doing most of the plannings and all the shopping so your point saying highest earner would be the best spender doesnt hold much ground. But you're too vague let's try to clarify let's say the average cost for a kid is 1000$ a month in usa overall Parker's family is relatively wealthy and is used to spend around 2000€ on their kid per month. You're the judge what do you decide ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:57 AM
3

Child support shouldn't be based on income, it should be based on what it actually costs. Your life expenditures are directly linked to your income so that's what is already happening. The idea is to affect kids the least negatively possible
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:44 AM
1

Also, the idea that in what could be her 40s, this person has just come across the idea that treating someone well affects them is really funny and sad at the same time. Yet the redpill broadly believes that "Personnality doesnt matter" "nice guys finish last" "women love assholes" 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:35 AM
1

I sure do why wouldnt i ? It is a matter of fact. Whether she's pro equality and against sexism whether she's not. She could claim being an helicopter or a feminist it wouldnt change a damn thing
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 03:08 PM
1

Ok that's your point feminism is corrupted and many brats claim to be feminists even though their ideas are in direct contradiction with equality and fighting sexism. I agree about that to be honest. There are a lot of inconsistent ppl who claim something without understanding what it rly means. Now how does it relate to MY point about consistent feminists? It doesnt. I made the distinction already.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:50 PM
1

Do you even have a point ? You keep talking about different women than those i am referring to. I am talking about a feminist who is consistent and doesnt apply double standards. Those women are great.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 02:13 PM
1

equality as an excuse to behave in an obnoxious and entitled manner. That's a complete contradiction Good job on doing exactly what i said you would... Moreover, fourth wave feminism is not about equality between the genders - the goal is to place the liberal girlbosses at the top of the hierarchy of privilege and supplant the so called patriarchy with a matriarchy where women of their class and creed hold the monopoly on power. Lol what a funny strawman you must be so deep in the loophole. Wake…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 12:10 PM
1

John is sexist , however John claims to be feminist for virtue points. Does feminism stand for sexism ? No it doesnt. Does john's claim to be feminist change the core ideology of feminism making it about sexism ? No it doesnt. Check any definition about feminism, you wont see any who is pro sexism. This is not controversial. This is not a nebulous.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:54 AM
1

Have you seen SOME men be content with “equality”? Have you been around here so long that you forgot the RP is a minority and that a comfortable majority is in favor of equality ?? What a weird question. The RP population is heavily skewed toward unattractive men(for whatever reason) who wish things would be different so maybe they'd have more success with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:46 AM
0

Yet you'll fail to elaborate the slightest. Only thing you may come up with is an example in total contradiction with feminism core principles. You're a cliché , what i call a npc
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:38 AM
1

If equality feels like oppression to her then she's inconsistent. That's my point. You all agree with me without noticing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 07:42 AM
1

https://www.surrey.ac.uk/news/new-study-debunks-myth-feminists-hate-men Im curious how the "scien pilled man" will find a way to dodge that reality causing him cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 07:38 AM
1

Some people think biblical gender roles are form of equality You struggle with meanings of words. This time your mean something along "fairness" instead of equality. Secondly , feminism isnt based off biblical gender roles , it rejects them. Claiming to be feminist then using the bible to justify gender roles are two things in direct contradiction. That's not consistent and that person doesnt fit the consistency i describe.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 07:34 AM
1

Then it will take less than a minute for you to provide me a few recent examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:20 PM
0

The way i see it is that the first half of my casual encounters are there to secure another encounter so i eat her and make her cum then when i know she's satisfied and most lilely to call me again i can focus more on my own pleasure and finish
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:16 PM
1

Good, we are making progress: feminism is inconsistent. Biiip wrong. It's some feminists ( if not most) who are inconsistent. Feminism has always been consistent about equality. If some brats say things in total contradiction with equality then she's not consistent with the ideology. It's really simple. You cant stop an ideology from being followed by some morrons. There will always be racists who pretend they are anti racist. Does it make the core of anti racism racist ? No it doesnt.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:09 PM
1

Okay whatever. Words mean nothing and a racist can call himself anti racist and you still find it consistent. Im sorry there's nothing i can do for you. It's a cognitive issue. You are unable to detect contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:04 PM
1

Biden does not call himself a communist He could call himself a communist a 1000 times that wouldnt make any difference. Me saying im an apache helicopter doesnt make me one. Do you struggle with this idea ? Give it a try say im an helicopter and see what it does. Rad fems' are just feminists who do the reading and don't skip the 2nd wavers. Communists are just socialists who do the reading and dont skip marx. Biden is therefore a communist accroding to your logic. But seriously why do you want …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:56 PM
1

And hoooooow would you figure out your mistake, exactly? Are you really asking ? You figure it out by the fact you're not making her cum. Wtf was that question. Sex education Another wtf, do you expect school teachers to teach you how to do a cunnilingus ? You're supposed to learn by yourself through practice... Why are you so God damn desperate to have an enemy in this discussion? It's fucking pathetic. Stop playing the victim it's so annoying. Im just pointing out that your excuse of not enoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:51 PM
1

I never wrote any of this. Putting it in quotes is a lie. Yeh you complained about feminism offering the very one thing you want which is traditional gender role. That's just absurd. My turn I hate this restaurant because they offer mexican food while all i want is mexican food.. how feminism does not offer any alternative roles to cis straight men Elaborate with actual example if you dare ? You're so full of shit. Go on, post on r/feminist and say that you arent interested in traditional gender…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:42 PM
1

...Are you being intentionally obtuse? Why would somebody ever think to correct themselves if they never receive an indication that their belief is incorrect? Are you really asking ? You try once then you necessarely figure out your mistake and then you're good to go. Only way not to notice is not being interested and therefore never try. Also who tf is making excuses? I You clearly are. You choose to ignore the vast majority of men bad in bed and to focus on the less than 1% who are so unlucky …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:31 PM
1

No you cant be a capitalist and a communist at the same times. You cant be misogynistic and be consistent with feminism at the same time. You cant be a man hater and be consistent about feminism at the same time. Call them feminist as much as you want. I dont mind to be honest as im referring to those who are being consistent with their ideas
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:26 PM
1

The amount of excuses is absurd. were never encouraged to correct their nascence? That's called not being interested so you literally never think about it and wont correct the false belief. But to be honest. How cab you be taught an incorrect spot for the clit ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 04:58 PM
2

That's on you this time his message was pretty clear
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 04:56 PM
1

"Feminism has only traditional gender role to offer" Me "No that’s not true you can be whatever you want that’s what feminism advocates for" "Okay you’re right but i said this for no reason because all i want is traditional gender role, i just wanted to rant to be honest, not rly trying to make any point with this" Also, no it is still an issue if a man does not stand up for himself. No idea what world you live in but feminism definitely did not solve that. Have you not noticed yet that a lot of…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 04:49 PM
1

Finally ! Now you know it’s the same for radical feminism versus feminism as it is for communism versus biden. It’s not the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 04:38 PM
0

The anti-racist movement is full of racists Yes. That makes them inconsistent. You're that close to get my point but i feel like you're playing the dumbest by always ignoring the elephant in the room which is consistency. pretending those racists are not in the movement (your strategy), How come is this my strategy ? Im the one making the difference and you're the one bagging everyone under the same label.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 02:12 PM
1

John is anti racist but at the same time he's extremely racist and hates all black ppl. Is john being consistent ? Is it a no true scottman fallacy to say that since he's racist he isnt anti racist ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 02:06 PM
1

Would you say biden is a communist ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 02:04 PM
1

Feminism has nothing to offer most men but the traditional male gender role. That's pure ignorance and factually wrong. It advocates for letting ppl choose for themselves. You can be a sissy it wont be an issue
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 02:03 PM
0

No problem let's have a practice. John says he hate black ppl that they smell bad that they're uneducated and more. On the other hand john claims to be anti-racist. Would you say his hatred for black ppl and his claim of being anti racist are consistent or not ? Im sure you'll be able to respond to that question. Good luck !
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 02:02 PM
9

I'd be curious about the conversation you're referring to. I've been a lot online and i've never witnessed what you say here. Except when the guy said sth crazy and yet it's rarely as violent as you mention.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 01:59 PM
1

The ideology that protected my would-be-murderer and conditioned my would-be-friends to treat me as though I am just as disposable as my attacker treated me? That ideology? Mp This is pure insanity and at the opposite of reality. You're describing the traditional mentality when men couldnt be seen as victims.l You suffered frotrm not enough feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 01:44 PM
8

Oh i see you are referring to one isolated comment that didnt get upvotes. These things happen dont give it attention there's always a few morrons no matter the topic
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 12:15 PM
14

Responses are empathetic so long the guy doesnt go on a misogynistic rant about how it's women that are responsible for his singledom
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:43 AM
1

It's fascinating how many meb in this sub do not understand the simple concept of consistency. Probably because you guys are full of double standards. So much that consistency is a word that doesnt exists in your vocabulary. Nice try though but i never made it about "tru feminists" only about consistency which is verifiable
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:37 AM
1

I don’t need to if I accept that different people say many different things Yep but that's not feminism if it's not about equality. Do you struggle with the meabing of words ? Would you say a guy against abortion can also claim at the same time that he is pro choice ? Would you say hecause of that morron that pro choice means at the same time pro abortion and anti abortion ? No you wouldnt the same applies to brats expecting special treatments
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 08:29 AM
1

You had one entire day to do this 5seconds search come on ! What other opinions than equality ? Where have you find this ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:59 AM
2

If feminists do not call this out and actively oppose it, they're being complicit in it, and Yeh that's one of my metrics for consistency. One of the most important actually. The ability to call out members of your own tribe Even if it is unintentional, feminism (as a social phenomenon, not necessarily any specific individual) is encouraging/fermenting this state of affairs where (some) women demand Cafeteria Traditionalism This i disagree , the main advice is to become independant and not to re…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:58 AM
2

Did i use the word "true" ? No i didnt. It's all about consistency which can be determined. If she doesnt contradict her own values then she's consistent. As simple as that
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:52 AM
–

Being pumped and dumped is so much worse than a simple rejection. That's also why on average women are more insecure. What you call options arent. Having a guy willing to pump and dump is a net negative. Annd you're absolutely delusional when you think a 70yo granny could bag a relationship with a ton of young men. Are you attracted to grannys ? I suspect projection on your part for you to imagine it so likely
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:50 AM
1

They're actually two brands of the same thing: fascism Alright i dont need no more, you have no clue about thz real world and you are a very confused person. Soon you'll tell me being a communist and left wing is literally the same right
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:42 AM
1

Im sorry that happened to you but i dont understand why you blame feminism for this ? Feminism is pretty clear about domestic violence /any form of violence and it advocates exactly in favor of giving victims visibility and it's against victimblaming
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:40 AM
0

Are you unable to detect consistency ? Because i can
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:37 AM
1

YOu just confirmed. "one of the good ones", means the overwhelming majority of the others are assumed to be bad. No that's not rly what it means, it doesnt indicate proportions. Do you assume all women are good ? I can do the same and say to few individual feminists, that they are one of the good ones in the see of man hating radical sexists that make up the rest of feminists. Are you happy with that? Well i did already, i do praise women who are consistent with their beliefs and arent just root…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:37 AM
1

I strongly suggest that you google "is feminism about equality" You'll see you're wrong and will be able to move on. I dont even expect you to come back admitting it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 08:09 PM
1

Are you playing dumb ? I told you i know more than enough so long i know the person cant hold consistent values. From that point i am not interested in the details of their double standards. A womab who claims at the same time the value of equality but fails to keep that value the second it doesnt benefit her, she's inconsistent with her values and i dont want her. Yes to me it's a sign of intelligence to be able to hold values or not
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:47 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:26 PM
1

Im only making one claim which is inconsistency. I dont need anymore. If she wants special treatments just for being a woman, i know she's not made for me and i dont pursue. That's literally all i need to know. Im into intelligent people who are able to reflect on their own ideas
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:25 PM
1

What word ? Yes i did read about it and i agree with its principle of being equals.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:58 PM
1

Weird because im highly praised for being one of the good one which imo isnt much of an achievment as im only treating them the same way i expect to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:55 PM
2

I see it as the heritage from history. It's women who were in need of equality so it's been called feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:48 PM
1

I dont know i dont date them since im pro equality. I let those women for redpill men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:45 PM
1

Hating someone based on gender is bad. That's the rule. Now if you apply this rule only 50% of the time , you are not being consistent. How is this so difficult to comprehend ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:44 PM
1

No you're not , yiu are not attacking feminism, bot engaging about ideas, all you can do is to point out at brats who say things in total contradiction with feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:42 PM
1

Yeh i shouldnt have engaged i dont know anything about that and you never even tried to link this to the topic at stake
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:40 PM
0

What are you even talking about ? To be honest i dont rly care about wannabe tradwives, they can adopt whatever gender role they want
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:38 PM
1

Are right wing people responsible for radical right wing nazis ? No they're not those are two very different things. I do oppose man haters too, just like i do with women haters
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:34 PM
3

Or maybe she likes you a lot and that's why it's easier...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:33 PM
1

How unfortunate ! You made a mistake and gave links about radical feminists, aka the brats.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:44 PM
1

Okay ill be unable to go simpler than that please make an effort John is AGAINST ABORTION. However John says he is pro-choice. Is it a true no scottman fallacy to say that he actually is not pro choice ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:41 PM
1

People have different ideas about what equality looks like Such as ? I think you meant different ideas about what gender roles look like
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:36 PM
1

It has nothing to do about me but once again it's all about consistency. Whether she is consistent whether she is not. It's a matter of fact and objective truth
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:34 PM
2

Since you have no clue what it is im sure it sounds like an insult to you. But yeh i like to be equal to women
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:31 PM
1

Consistency. If a person bitches and insults the opposite gender abd that im consistent ill always criticise that person. If il inconsistent ill base ly judgment on that person's gender abd have two different reactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:24 PM
1

If someone is defending another one's idea that we should judge men on their gender and hate them, that person is not consistent with the core idea of feminism that is that we're equals and should be judged for who we are and not our gender, then that person is not a feminist. It's all about consistency.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:22 PM
1

I have no idea if you are being consistent though but on paper you agree with feminism yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:20 PM
1

It's simple logic. Whether you are pro equality whether you are not. You cant be both at the same time. What is it that you dont understand with that concept ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:19 PM
2

Nah reddit is such an echo chamber that i can believe you've been trapped in some obscure places for so long
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:18 PM
0

I dont find traditional masculine role advantageous. Id rather split the bill and be treated as equal
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:17 PM
1

Oh i see you're trying to be cool. Guess what you're basically a feminist even if you dont like how it sounds
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:14 PM
1

Open your own topic as it doesnt relate to mine. To respond that water is wet argument , yes of course but if she expects it to go only one way BECAUSE of her gender and some sort of superiority or whatever then she's not a feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:12 PM
1

He killed innocents, christianity is against killing innocents and he's going to hell for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:09 PM
1

I want a feminist. I do not want someone inconsistent with her beliefs. See ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:05 PM
2

Yep most variations of communisms arent against private property they're against private property of the means of productions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:04 PM
1

Someone consistent with his belief and someone who isnt arent the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:03 PM
1

What is it about equality that you oppose ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:01 PM
1

That's one way to filter out
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:00 PM
2

No you're olain wrong about that. People cant just say whatever making it reality. That's not how it works. Words have a meaning.Saying Im an apache helicopter doesnt turn me into one. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:00 PM
0

Well then it's a completely different thing if it doesnt rely on equality and you're referring to something completely off topic. Now if you ask if i see a problem with man hater, yes i do. Ill stick to my consistent feminists who are pro equality
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:56 PM
0

Dude, is FEMinisn not HUMANism. Women are at the core and the purpose, Yeh i somewhat agree but the objective is always equality. They re not in favor of having men being harassed in the street, they're in favor of being let go just like men are
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:54 PM
0

I know that's my point. Those brats are way closer to redpill men than they are to feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:49 PM
1

Indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:48 PM
-1

Read this topic and see hiw many men have no clue what feminism is about, you'll see there are some heavy retarded minds out there
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:47 PM
0

Lol you must live in a cave i suppose
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:46 PM
1

But men are the problem at the base of everythign and for the issues of women, the oppression, and therefore they are hated. Well if you make yourself guilty of all those things you'll be hated but id argue the opposite that as the bar is set low , being decent is already rewarded. I see the low competition as a good thing
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:45 PM
1

Anyone can call himself anything that doesnt make it true or them consistent with what they claim
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:40 PM
0

Why are so many ppl reading true instead of consistent ?? Call everyone a true feminist i dont mind, im referring to the ones consistent with the core beliefs whi arent full of contradictions. That's tangible
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:38 PM
2

Yep i used the word consistent. That means consistent with the core beliefs. That's it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:37 PM
2

Words have a meaning, if you're against private property you're not a capitalist
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:36 PM
1

. There are plenty of women who will look you dead in the eyes and tell you that women deserve special treatment because they are women Yep and i dont want them as they're not consistent feminists that's kind of my point
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:35 PM
0

From my experience, consistent feminists are man haters and asshole personalities. That's not consistent with the idea that we are equals and shouldnt be judged based on our gender. That's not feminism just like hating women isnt feminism. It's the same, that's what being consistent mean. Too bad, that feminists see equal treatment as misogyny. Studies show that feminists expect benevolent sexism (better treatment) as a baseline, and men who treat women as equals, expecting split bills, fair spl…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:41 PM
-2

It's basic knowledge that feminism considers men and women as equal and that we shouldnt be judged according to our gender but according to our actions. if men and women are equals already then what is the purpose of feminism? why does it still exist? Does it feel like such a consensus it doesnt even need to be mentioned anymore ?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:35 PM
3

It is inconsistent with the traditional view of relationships where women were SAHM it is a fact no matter what people say and exactly my way to filter consistency If my date is like yeh my money is my money but your money is our money that's inconsistent and im out. It made sense when men were the only one making money now it doesnt.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:32 PM
-4

"the belief we're equals and should be treated as individuals" That's a simple consequence from being equals. Since we're equals then the only thing to judge from is the individual itself
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:19 PM
-4

No one is complaining about the consistent trad wife. It's inconsistent if she desires traditional benefits of being a woman while demanding equality on areas she'd typically lose in the traditional mindset
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:15 PM
-2

No you cant be a man hater and a feminist it goes in complete contradiction with the belief we're equals and should be treated as individuals instead as according to our gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:11 PM
5

Feminists believe in women having choices Well Yes 👍but not only women it lets everyone choose for themselves it doesnt prescribe what your relationship should look like. That's another good thing about feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:09 PM
2

You can’t gatekeep feminism and dictate who is and who is not a real feminist I can, just like i can say someone in favor of purely state owned means of productions isnt a capitalist , even if somehow he claims to be one. If she says that as a woman she deserves and expects special treatments according to gender roles then she isnt a feminist even if somehow she claims to be one
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:56 AM
-3

Notice how i used the word consistent
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:52 AM
–

Lol you rly rly need to touch grass if you believe those match are from men genuinely interested. Those are men who swipe right on all profile without giving it a look and who make their selection along their matches. Second , we're talking about relationship and what ppl expect, not about casual sex, yeh most men are fine with dumping their load on most women and shooting down
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:00 AM
2

Id be curious how you determine one's delusions levels. Those rp men would have to post their pics and what they consider as their looksmatch. We would then need to produce a randomised and representative sample to vote on wether he's delusional or not. Quite tedious
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:26 AM
24

Yeh just say it's your preference dont hide it behind "healthy". It's 18-25 that is considered normal weight. Also what age are you ? The older the more it becomes a high standard in usa as it's shared by most men and not met by even half that amount of women
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:45 AM
12

I believe it's the opposite that is happening and redpill men who are for the most part delusional and chasing above their league failing to realise which one it is. That would explain why they struggle so much and also why they end up so bitter as their entitlement doesnt meet reality. It also explains why they care so much about this idea that women would have inflated demands as it's the only way for them to make it make sense without accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:14 AM
0

That's not hiw it goes because ppl arent binary. A comfortable majority is open to long term and it depends on the girl. For one that is ugly or doesnt sound so classy, it usually ends up in only wanting to hook up but for the next match the same guy wont behave the same
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:09 AM
3

and the risk of divorce is roughly the same as a woman with 4-5 partners. It's actually higher at 1 prelarital sex partber than 2-8
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:05 AM
-13

A man who is maybe insecure about his partners past is treated like it’s his problem Well it is his problem,he cant undo her past so whether he accepts it or not. Seriously what response would you expect beside this ? If a woman is insecure about her boyfriend’s past she is generally validated and told that the man is bad. You're way too generalistic, did he go to jail or beat his ex girlfriend ? Can you come up with an example where you think with reversed gender the opinion would be reversed a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 07:06 AM
1

I literally never said anything about unprotected sex True, i mistook you for another guy. Though you havent brought a single argument as to why casual encounters should be shamed, that's not any better. Are you regarded? What does hedonism and instant gratification addiction have to do with recreation after work? EXACTLY. Im not the one calling this "hedonism" out of the blue , you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 06:31 AM
–

Oh i forgot the long term effect of knowing yourself abd what you want in a partner. So terrible
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 02:31 PM
–

Your own source states that people have more positive affects than negative ones after a hook up. Most of the issues relate to unprotected sex and .. shame
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 02:22 PM
1

You really are unable to argue without using a strawman. First it was unprotected sex now it has become hedonism. No you havekt explained anything because you do not have a point against protected sex between consenting adults. Therefore you rely on making it about hedonism to save your ass Ill contradict you with that simple question. It's the week end you and your friends choose to have fun and play football on your spare time. Does it make all of you hedonists causing the fall of society ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 02:13 PM
1

You really are unable to argue without using a strawman. First it was unprotected sex now it has become hedonism. No you havekt explained anything because you do not have a point against protected sex between consenting adults. Therefore you rely on making it about hedonism to save your ass Ill contradict you with that simple question. It's the week end you and your friends choose to have fun and play football on your spare time. Does it make all of you hedonists causing the fall of society ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 02:13 PM
3

Same thing in France, we are very successfull outside our country because our women are perspicace and wont be fooled easily. Been an exchange student in america and women were way more naive
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:33 PM
1

No, the reason you're blue pilled is your inability to recognize patterns and think in complex patterns Lmfao , the concept of condoms is too complex for you and that's why you made a speech against unprotected sex. Literally your only argument. So you follow the simplest and most emotionally comfortable option available. That's the modern redpill My first reply wasn't emotional I was being nice with that assumption. Otherwise that means you're too limited to consider using a condom which is wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:10 PM
0

No you havent. That’s not an explanation , that’s a claim. You made a claim that you failed to support even the slightest.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:48 PM
1

Read the flair im bluepilled that means im doing fine with women i dont need the redpill to provide me a ton of excuse as to why id fail women. Im simply pointing out how slutshaming is counterproductive. Im facing a bunch of emotional responses from ppl unable to elaborate beside using arguments against unprotected sex which isnt my position. Just like you did
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 11:01 AM
0

It's a short term ego boost with long term negative consequences Like being confident ? What else do you have in mind. Im not talking about unprotected sex , there's no bad consequence
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 06:18 AM
1

You're so emotional you forgot about condoms. Literally all your points drop the second we're talking about protected sex. Dont be so water is wet , yeh raw sex is bad. Im not talking about a sex addiction emotionally focusing on the outlets and less than 1% of the population. im talking about normal people having casual sex when the opportunity arises and the vibe is good. Piss off calling people emotional, pussy. How emotional .... Im laughing at your lack of awareness
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 06:15 AM
1

Arent men lieing about not being virgins ? What's your opinion on this
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 05:37 AM
1

They correspond to the violation of intuitive boundaries. Too many emotional men
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:19 PM
1

Yeh it makes sense for women, for men it doesnt..
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:18 PM
1

Who are you talking about ? You can be virgin for many reasons but that reason isnt "average men get nothing"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:16 PM
1

No they dont , during prohibition the consumption of alcohol went up. People who value no alcohol werent profiting from the situation, all it did was losing track and make dangerous unregulated alcohol be served. In a world without slutshaming, a girl with a low n count would be her personnality. It wouldnt be the result of suppressed desires that can come back anytime
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:12 PM
0

Sluts are amazing , meeting one is a huge ego boost , it just feels great
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:08 PM
0

I agree , by no one i meant no men. I do understand the perspective of a prude womab who slutshames, it elevates her status
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 08:06 AM
2

No it's not. Ppl having sex are in a better mood, that's good for society. Chill with your wife and let ppl be
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 08:03 AM
0

Yeh and what do you want to imprint ? Stop having sex with me im corrupting your soul ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 07:59 AM
1

To calculate the benefit you have to substract the costs. Here the costs are tremendous for an ab abysmal effect we dont even want anyone. Bitter ppl can find something else to bitch about
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 07:51 AM
1

Yeh that's the typical assumption when in my experience it tends to be the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 07:49 AM
1

I want them to realise slutshaming isnt helping anyone, that's it. Also i dont want to get cockblocked by societal pressure
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 07:44 AM
-1

Yeh that's not virgin shaming. I have never seen capable of having girl but saving himself for mariage being shamed Thing is, those guys are extremely rare, for the vast majority it is the result of failing every women. If the guy is an ogre then that's the likely explanation, if the guy is somewhat average then him fucking up somewhere is the likely explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 07:43 AM
1

Nice input
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:58 AM
2

Yeh i have no problem with shaming unethical marketing
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:58 AM
0

Yeh, let the "slut" be. She's not harming anyone, quite the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:55 AM
1

Waw , it helps bitter men to unleash. So justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:54 AM
1

To me that's a mistake but i wont shame ppl who wont have sex before mariage. I'm just like "yeh ok different ppl they're not hurting anyone"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:51 AM
2

You are your own cockblock man. I hope you're consistent and you would definitely refuse to have sex with a woman as you are so dirty that you corrupt women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:33 AM
1

Rumors drama and shit, not sure what yih want
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:30 AM
1

Slutshaming isnt zn umbrella. It doesnt protect anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:27 AM
-1

Lol not in France
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:26 AM
-2

Slutshaming doesnt turn your sister in someone prude , it makes her hide her sluttiness and save it for chads online
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:25 AM
-1

From the perspective of women who are prude it makes sense to slutshame it's one way to raise their smv. which has huge health, social and demographic consequences that everyone has to handle. Yeh less loneliness less depression , better shape , bondings etc etc..
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 08:34 PM
-2

Lol wtf is that comparison. Yeh shame ppl who are abusive with their kids. There's a victim to protect, the kid. When talking about casual sex there's no victim
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 08:31 PM
2

I disagree , it's less blunt as before but it's still within minds and spoken about and seen as very negative by many, way beyond a simple "not my thing"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 08:29 PM
0

The double standard is consistent with slutshaming and your argument goes my way. LTR : "I like this guy and want sth serious, because of slutshaming ill make him wait so i have better long term chances" Casual : "I just wanna fuck why make him wait" Without slutshaming you would see much less of that double standard
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:19 PM
1

I take the info into consideration then i determine the reason for the higher ncount. It's like a red stain , could be blood but chances are it's not and it's just tomato. I wont start accusing of murder everyone who has a red stain
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:10 PM
-1

shame is a useful tool in discouraging negative behavior Yeh , except that it's not negative and it's not your business when two ppl are having consensual sex. You're still free to choose not to engage with ppl you deem too promiscuous. only in modern times because of free love type of movements. Yeh we're lucky as fuck to have that privilege. Let's not ruin it with dumb counterproductive slutshaming
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:04 PM
-5

If it doesnt make a dufference then there's no reason to do it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 05:56 PM
-1

I dont think it does, inthink women are still having casual sex but it's more hidden, on dating apps for instance where chads thrive. Instead she could have had her fun zt a party with a guy within her social sphere
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 05:54 PM
1

I dont rly see much virgin shaming beside in response to a guy clearly telling on himself through a delusional take that almost only comes out the mouth of an incel. What examples do you have in mind ?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 05:53 PM
2

I disagree with him. To me it certainly does make a difference. My point is , supposing he'd be right and slutshaming would have zero impact then it becomes pointless bullying and we should still better stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 05:45 PM
-1

Then better stop ? All it's causing is sadness and bullying
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 05:00 PM
-4

Does its presence make you sleep with women ?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 04:55 PM
-1

She probably mistook you for another guy who harassed her the moment before. Otherwise she'd be spending her time reporting men if a "hey" was too much for her. The security wouldnt take her seriously either after the X report
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 04:51 PM
6

If you look closely it's not even that, 27 and 29 are lows and 26-28-30 are plateaux. Today we learned that if your age is a pair number women find you more attractive. Thank you the redpill
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 04:49 PM
1

It's precisely the fact that you wouldn't want a promiscuous woman I assume you're smart enough to not tell her beforehand ... In a society where slutshaming doesnt exist, she wouldnt assume you'd be worried about her count and she wouldnt lie. In this american society lowering their count is almost always the safe bet so the incentive to lie is big.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 04:05 PM
2

I meab okay but how is slutshaming helping in that situation ? It adds plausible deniability ," maybe she's attracted to me but scared to be labeled as a slut i should totally go on that 7th date !" Without slutshaming he knows she's just probably not into him
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 04:02 PM
0

I'm not sure who you're trying to appeal to here. To everyone, there's no winner with slutshaming that's my point This isn't necessarily true, even as someone who agrees with you for the most part. I assumed you were implying consent, so I won't touch on that. I don't think you even believe this statement though. You know how many regretful one night stands people have, both men and women? What about post-breakup makeup sex? Yep sex can harm yourself but it's not to others to tell you when not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 03:57 PM
2

Bruh the guy made several waves around 28-32 for men , that looks super scientific to me
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 03:45 PM
-2

You ignore the elephant in the room and then use examples who wouldnt fit otherwise. Those russian women and other examples didnt leave because they couldnt find anyone. They moved and happened to find someone. For ppb, finding someone is the intent and the idea behind it is to use wealth discreptancy to buy their way into a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 03:32 PM
1

What an unrealistic story lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 01:26 PM
1

I agree with this, maybe not the ratio 1/2 itself :p
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 07:34 PM
1

Why isnt it instead something along : John is a piece of shit and unfortunately because of guys like him, genuine dating is impossible for all. Because of them women have to vet a lot men they meet in order to make sure they're not facing a john. It ruins it for all but it's necessary. Sarah has been naive sure she probably could have avoided it by taking precautions but overall it's sad
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 07:09 PM
1

Why the hell would i give consideration to some chick i barely know that im only interested in having sex with lmfao. Because you'd have morality ? Is there nothing stopping you from harming others for your own benefit beside the law ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:59 PM
1

Depends on what you value
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:26 AM
1

I wouldnt go that far, i think some are doing it as evil sociopaths but many are also doing it with very low understanding of how hurtfull that is. To them it’s the same since sex is good and she’s getting rejected anyway + occasions are rare
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:24 AM
2

1) First option. I will have the best outcome served to me as women do the same. It’s Sarah, she’s not your ex It's on the woman the enforce the strict boundary of no sex before commitment as she is the gatekeeper of sex. If She isnt asking for commitment she is asking whether john is on the same page " I like you and so far i see a future to this and im looking for something serious" John is not on the same page but he can trick her by lieing 2) They are called chads I disagree, men with fewer …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:20 AM
2

there’s no way to know if you want a serious relationship with a guy you went on one date with. Yep you never know what the future hides but there are ways to tell you DONT want a serious relationships. Like in the situation i described. John knows he doesnt want anything serious They are obviously going to lie about their feelings. I dont think that’s true. I always had decent success with women so i’ve always been honest about my intentions and always tried not to hurt anyone. It’s not worth i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:14 AM
0

To me that’s victim blaming , blaming her for being too naive too trusting. It’s not absurd yes there are ways for women to prevent being used for sex but that doesnt make her responsible for the whole thing. She even clarifies her intentions , she likes him and sees it going further and wants to make sure the guy is on the same path
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:09 AM
1

. I think men who choose such options are acting understandably but immorally. This is such a bland response. I do see the appeal for sex , therefore i "understand" too. It being immoral is also obvious the question is whether you findnis’immoral as stealing candies pr immoral as being a evil sociopath or something in the middle
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:05 AM
1

Do you exist ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 06:00 AM
2

I don't see Tinder as an app for serious dating. If you meet a guy from tinder and suck him off the first night you meet him and he leaves I think it's pretty much on you. Are you being honest about your intentions ? If yes and she still wants to fuck and gets disapointed when you dont change your mind then no problem but that’s not the topic
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 05:58 AM
1

Either she does want to have sex per se or she does it transactionally for having my favor in the future. Uh ? That’s not the scenario i described. Sarah is genuine she likes john and she knows getting pumped and dumped is way worse than a straight rejection so she made her intentions clear
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 05:54 AM
1

Agree
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 05:47 AM
1

A man (or woman) leaving at any point isn't in and of itself evidence that anyone got taken advantage of. Kind of a water is wet moment , it didnt need explanations i dont know anyone who’d disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 05:46 AM
1

That’s basically asking Will you ghost me or stop talking to me if you don't like me for whatever reason And the answer is yes , indeed. What’s your point ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 05:44 AM
0

How ? He had a nice date he made out and has his ego boosted
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 05:37 AM
0

Agree 👍 but i think it's sad women have to hold it despite the desire not to , in order to protect themselves from the liars. It ruins many genuine interactions
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:30 AM
1

I agree , her being explicit is where it starts being definitely wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:24 AM
1

It changes everything imo. When sleeping together he was honest
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:18 AM
1

Zero consideration for your partner ? I wouldnt get hard knowing im hurting the person at the same time. "Hahaha wait until you find out who i really am and how devastated you'll be hmm so sexy"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:16 AM
1

If the other party is agreeing to sex under the conditions that they think you like them, then you're using someone. What's the part you do not understand in this ?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:14 AM
1

"women are not a monolith" Men are not a monolith either, that's why some fit the Nice guys ™ description while others dont. It's like the gold digger , she exists, it's an existing profile, yet all women arent a gold digger. In the end it's just you who doesnt understand things and then try to play dumber than your already dumb interpretation
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:38 PM
1

Lol and do you agree with such stupid idea ? No idea who you refer to as "you guys". For instance the pickmegirl is another recognised pattern
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 02:02 PM
1

are you going to get both sides of the story or just believe the (wo)men at face value? Are you ? Let me remind you that you're the one unable to consider the existence of "Nice guys™" Where i can agree is that the accusation isnt always justified but it deginitely describe a pattern that exists
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 01:08 PM
1

that there is no "those men" Oh boy you're very delusional or maybe just very naive. Hang in there and you'll quickly find men justifying lieing to women and say whatever they think will get them pussies
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 01:03 PM
1

Why would it be righteous ? The vast majority knows it's normal to not be attracted to everyone. No reason to lie about it. They're describing an actual profile worth shitting on. What is your opinion on those men ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 12:57 PM
1

Dont you think the guys they're describing as the "Nice guy ™" are worth shitting on ? They're your spineless dishonest simps with no integrity or dignity trying to get their dick wet at any cost
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 12:31 PM
2

The thing is that when men say "nice guys finished last" they actually mean that being nice is actively detrimental It's not though. It's putting her on a pedestal, being scared to contradict her , being a doormat , saying amen to anything she says etc etc that is detrimental When men say they are nice they dont realise they're also those things mentionned above. Men use nice guy to actually mean nice guy, women use nice guy to mean both that and the literal opposite, depending on the context. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 12:29 PM
2

Bruh it's definitely not women who came up with the idea that "nice guys finish last" They use the term sarcastically as it most often comes from the mouth of someone problematic who tries to hide it by being "nice"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 07:15 AM
0

Pretty much everyone would say the doctor gave shit advice. I think pretty much everyone would say the patient is quite dumb to take such counter intuitive "advice" without questions The reason the term Nice guy is being used is because they're the one calling themselves it. That's why you see phrases like "nice guys finish last" and such
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:33 AM
1

Do you have a positive opinion on Charlie hebdo massacre ?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 08:25 AM
1

Another argument that comes in mind is Elliot Rodgers the incel mass killer. The guy is good looking he would be seen as a fraud and a fakecell
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 08:03 PM
1

We'll never know but in my opinion the profile you describe is at best 20-50% of the crowd For most you can tell within a few questions that they're assholes with very low morality and accountability. Being average men they struggle as a result and they fantasize about chad (occasionally) getting away with being a dick thanks to their looks. That's why they care so much on the idea that women love assholes personality doesnt rly matter and such. Your bottom 5% looks is aware he's ugly. At this p…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 08:02 PM
1

Im talking lookswise , obviously they're bot average overall
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 04:34 PM
1

That's one part of the population here but i hardly doubt it would be the majority Most men here are around the average and that's why they emphasize on the idea that average men would have it so bad, in order to explain why they have it so bad
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:24 PM
1

it's just that it doesn't overwrite looks, that's the common argument If you're talking about sub3 / bottom 10% looks then yeh i can agree. Anyone near the average look can only blame himself
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 06:00 AM
1

I should have said wouldnt instead of doesnt, yep
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 04:37 AM
1

The bluepill is very aware of the looks factor and provides that truth in the middle. Give a quick look on r/tinder subreddit. This is as mainstream as it gets and yet rules 1&2 are be attractive, dont be unattractive to emphasize on the looks factor
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 04:24 AM
4

Manosphere is full of assholes who try to cope with the idea that personnality doesnt matter and that it cant be the reason why they fail women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 04:09 AM
1

There isnt an objective morality duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:49 AM
1

There is always worse it's not an excuse. Talking with one guy, then calling another to smash at night. Going "slow" with multiple guy, letting them take them out for months, while going to dinner or the club with other guys who get to hit it right away It's not near as bad as the industrial process he described but it's fine. What is your opinion on this kind of woman ?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:47 AM
1

It doesnt tho. The difference being that then it's a threshold to pass and the amiunt of single men can be reduced or increased
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:42 PM
3

Lol it's like a set a rules and values to judge a situation. Is the concept of morality a stranger thing to you ? Are you unable to form an opinion on those men and women ? Are you purely emotional ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:01 AM
4

I think if you are in a bad neighborhood, you should carry a gun. Yeh sure, keep yourself safe accordingly that's a very morale thing to do anywhere. Morality is subjective to your environment. Wait what ? No it doesnt
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 09:56 AM
2

Cool, no idea who she is but sure why not , is she average ? How many gina Serrano are out there ? Do you have a point beside it exists ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 09:48 AM
6

If she's intentionally misleading several men lieing to them giving them false hope to extract them as much as what she wants then yes i feel the same , what do you feel about those two ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 09:18 AM
2

So, the worst thing I do is dump someone No it's not what you describe. The woman would not have engaged in the first place knowing your intentions. Aware of this you lie for as long as possible and then goes to your next target. I would ask the same to a woman bragging about exploiting multiple men by lieing for as much and as long as possible and yeh they're a small minority like yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 08:48 AM
-1

That's not an answer, i dont even know how murderers feel about themselves and it's definitely not a monolith. Maybe he has some remorse maybe he's full on sociopath
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 08:43 AM
6

Strenght isnt a straight correlation with weight. Men are way stronger. The average female lifter is barely as strong as your average guy that doesnt lift. Your obese woman isnt strong she's just heavy. Im sure you overpower 80+% women even as a weak man
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 08:41 AM
3

How do you feel about hurting the many people you deceive on your path ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 06:40 AM
8

You’re talking about maybe 1% of the male/female encounters where the male is weaker, that’s not’representative at all
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 05:51 AM
1

It's a matter of definition. According to you Integrity and honor means to giveup and hide while in my world it means shoot your shot and dont be a pussy scared by potential rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:32 PM
1

Try backing up your claim little guy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:02 AM
1

It's not morally wrong though. I've been in that kind of situationship and i dont blame the girl. She's been honest all along it didnt stop me from thinking i'd be unique enough to change her mind with my magical wand. It didnt work we eventually stopped sleepinh together and it lead nowhere but there's nothing to blame
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 09:26 AM
2

My partner’s sexual fantasies are definitely "my problem" for instance if she’s constantly wayching gangbangs for instance id be concerned. It goes both ways, you’ll figure
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 09:06 AM
1

I think around 90%+ men would disagree. Once you made it flear it’s just going to be a hook up there’s nothing wrong in it. I’ve never seen a guy refuse sex in that situation to be honest. Your definition of shitty includes almost everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:58 AM
0

I disagree, once the situation was made very clear it would be unfair to walk off and choose for the guy whether or not he wants to be friends
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:44 AM
3

You meet a woman throwing herself at you. She wants long term you reject her clearly and then she insists on having sex with you (still hoping you might change your mind) Are you a shitty person for sleepinh with her ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:37 AM
2

Men not being emotional, doesn't stop women from turning them down. It does actually. It's because of them that women are on the defensive in those encounters. Society as a whole would be way better off if they stopped harassing women rejecting them. And not being cowards, increases the chance of conflict. Not being cowards would prevent them from attacking women. But there's a way to stop them form going ballistic in the first place. Yeh not being a piece of shit attacking innocents
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 08:31 PM
5

Beta buxx is not the act of being good to your girlfriend, it's when the relationships relies on it only and when it's unbalanced. If your gf is as good to you as you are to her then it's a great relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 02:15 PM
1

And you find that appealing ? I'd rather have genuine friends
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 02:12 PM
3

You forget to mention the normal category. Chads are top 20% betabuxx are bottom 20% then there's everyone else
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 02:11 PM
0

Betabuxxer gets something. A negative dna test
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 02:07 PM
3

You're absolutely right imo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 02:06 PM
–

What do you mean by "i understand" ? I understand criminals and their motives , i understand the cheated spouse who killed his wife in rage etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 01:58 PM
1

And it simply depends on whether or not you're willing to meet new ppl. If the interaction went well it becomes an option that is easy access and can go smoothly. Having had that real life conversation you're way less worried about how a first date would be etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 01:52 PM
2

Bruh it's just men that are way too emotional making them angry at their own fails and unleashing it on innocents. They're also cowards as you'll see them back away 99% of the time the second they're facing men . There's no justification they deserve both a beating and some jailtime to educate them not to go ballistic
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 01:42 PM
–

. When you constantly fail why would anyone keep trying? Most men are barely trying and then some are drawing wrong conclusions like this one
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 01:31 PM
1

You honestly think I have to audition ideas for you? That’s adorable. Lol you're a joke you're the one saying sex should be a human right which is already a reality so yeh i ask you to elaborate and the only thing you can come up with is to legalise sex workers And fyi? At any given moment she numbers in any bracket are roughly 58% female. That means newborns as well as elderly. ... What i wonder is how you came up with this on you own , a simple google search and you're proven wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 07:33 AM
1

Seems to me the real problems come with those in our society who seek to lock it up and dole it out as a commodity conditional on compliance to their personal agendas. No one is going to stop you from having sex with someone and since it's 2024 you can do it with the same sex too so long there's consent on both sides
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 06:34 AM
1

There are more men at birth abd more women at very old age to be specific but yeh it's pretty much irrelevant data licensing and unionizing sex workers isn’t such a bad idea either. So far that's your only one suggestion. Okay let's do like germany where prostitution is legal. It becomes slightly easier to pay for sex. Is that all you have in mind? To legalise prostitution ?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 06:30 AM
1

I only date within a 3km radius so it's not much of a commitment and easier to get dates , id hate having to go through a video call
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:50 AM
1

Sex really ought to be classified as a human need With what consequence added to that human need ? You don’t need to have a relationship to have sex. Yep water is wet but then the competition is much higher and there are a ton of men per woman seeking to hook up. Of course she'll choose someone desirable (abd therefore desired by other women as well) . I think even now men are taught that simple recreational sex is some evil thing, Not really no since women are fine with just hooking up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:09 AM
–

Yep you do sound very unaware If saying "men are dumb" or "men are all the same" isn't misandry, Getting trigerred by a "teehee haha men are dumb" calling it misandry in response to a guy saying he doesnt face any of it is the same as any other woke ppl seeing racism everywhere all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 04:27 PM
–

Using big words calling someone a misandrist for "teehee haha men are dumb" said in a light hearted way That's the issue with woke and what i call professional victims from america
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 04:22 PM
–

Oh god you're such a professional victim. i bet saying black ppl love eating chicken makes someone a racist to your opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 04:02 PM
1

Lol, what example do you have in mind
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 03:19 PM
4

Try to find me cars that no one bought that are actually good ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 09:33 AM
-1

Chad is bluepilled because he's seen himself lose a ton of girls because of his behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 07:09 AM
3

Many men have zero option and go with the first that comes and then end up bitter being stuck with the wife they dont love. I think it's pretty much equal
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 06:50 AM
1

Would you say it's as commpn among men ?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 06:44 AM
1

Because men who didnt pursue women didnt reproduce
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 07:29 PM
1

What about loving and being proud of your country ? You dont need to work for something to feel pride
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 07:06 PM
6

Not too long ago ppl used to be ashamed for taking those craps
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:13 AM
1

All i did was making fun of you for your false report of an argument with someone calling the girl in black as skinny and rightfully going for men that arent overweight That was all in your head , you had your own little argument with yourself and it keeps going with And you are using her as evidence to prove that women look for guys that are almost equal to them? So let me return the question you kindly asked Are you mentally ill lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 05:55 PM
–

... And you have the audacity to call out women for being delusional You're hearing voices, no one called the girl in black skinny or anything about her not being attracted to overweight guys making sense because of that. Seriously wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 05:29 PM
–

Lol no you havent , she said all 3 girls are of normal weight and that she sees fat couples all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 05:13 PM
–

Oh ive seen some women say sth similar and they got insulted to oblivion
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 04:47 PM
–

I cant imagine the amount of hate you'd get if you said this as a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 04:39 PM
–

It's not too complex either, just call any contradiction a simp or a liar with ulterior motive and bang eternal victimhood granted
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 12:00 AM
–

Would you be cool with it if she does it for free ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 11:47 PM
–

I'm siding with you bro , no matter what we do we are blamed for it 🥹 im no simp im like you and i blame all women. It's undeniable logic , it's either all of them or me and i cant be wrong so that means there's a problem with all of them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 11:45 PM
4

Also, notice how straight men aren’t allowed to explore sexually. How would you feel in reverse about a girl getting thundered by chads she pays to help her "explore sexually"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 09:02 AM
3

thats like a meth dealer saying way more people do meth than you realize. your perspective is skewed Yeh this
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 08:02 AM
3

Wahhh but this is so sad , you're such a poor victim , women are leagued against you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:58 AM
3

I never said anything about sex being a big deal, im sure you had fun fighting that straw man though. I do see the appeal and the convenience argument but in normieland we usually get enough sex from common ways for escorts to not be worth it Consented sex with someone craving your body is far superior too , you cant compare this and going to a hooker as equal My judgment is far less harsh for military personnel and other circumstances where meeting women is impossible for a long period of time …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 09:38 PM
2

the same way I see women who just care about money. The comparison should be with a man who just cares about sex Paying does show the inability to get sex, no one would pick an escort given the option not too
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:02 PM
1

Yes there will be different rules, men arent facing much danger when going out so ill be pretty chill about it but my daughter i will take her there and bring her back home to avoid danger
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 01:04 PM
9

People start to date in middle school because puberty and starting late doesnt matter so much as the learning will eventually come and teens arent nice with each other, there's almost some rough times
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 03:46 PM
1

42% first mariages end in divorce frol which only 10% has an alimony. That's 4.2% risk, you're looking for excuses that's all
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:25 PM
1

As for the latter, it's shared custody until she decides to move states... Lol you cant just move out , both parents have equal say in the question. It's not a race to whoever parent moves out of state abducting his child first. Yeah no shot lmao. Any girl with that kind of money is living in LA or California. There's no way I am competing against actors, entrepreneurs, executives, and millionaire Chad Thundercock. Oh rich problems, being so wealthy it's hard to find someone as rich. Btw, there'…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 04:57 AM
1

It’s called karens
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 04:18 AM
2

It's very debatable. Women take way less risks than men do. Consider 1000 women walking alone at night and 1000 men doing the same path. The group of women will face way more agressions being easier targets and valuable not only for their wallet but also for their body.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 06:53 AM
2

It's called premaritak assets znd those are protected by default , you dont even need a prenup. What is shared is the money made diring the mariage.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 06:22 AM
1

Marry someone close to your income and you wont pay alimony if you are in the 42% who have a divorce. About staying responsible for your own kid , that's normal wtf , go the shared custody route
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 06:20 AM
1

You can clearly climb a few ladders thanks to looksmaxxing and self improvement and i've never seen anyone say you can get any girl given confidence
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 06:07 AM
1

You cant call it a good way. Convenient is the best term, efficient no definitely not you'll end up with no response 90% of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 07:56 PM
1

I think he dodged a bullet.. 🤣 When people make fun of the average reddit expérience they're talking about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 07:54 PM
1

I guess that means you're entitled insufferable and much more according to the crowd
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 07:51 PM
2

Are you trolling making fun of guys capping like that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 06:52 PM
1

Lol you're the one who came up with the idea of entitlement so i made a comparison between the girl and the guy. She's not the one upset , no entitlement at all, she's just bot interested by the question On the other hand there's this guy who feels so entitled to a response he posted his L on reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 06:15 AM
1

I also think that it’s also naive and childish to make an entirely separate post discussing this topic There's this idea that the crowd would automatically side with women. So i brought an example where the crowd excessively sides with the guy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 06:12 AM
1

self improvement community is not at all in line with looksmatching What community ? What is it in line with ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 06:09 AM
1

You mean the guy ? "Entertain me with your favorite topic peasant" "How dare she not entertain me ! Gonna post on reddit 🥹"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 06:05 AM
1

Who made him evil ? The worst id say is that he's clueless and quite entitled when he's so surprised the girl doesnt find a topic for him thzt he posts his L on reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:59 AM
1

How did you manage to completely miss the point? Because your comparison doesnt make any sense. It's not alike. To engage asking the person to pick the topic is putting all the burden of the initiative on that person. I never said she'd have to keep carrying the conversation all along. But she's the one having to start it. That's undeniable. It's not surprising she doesnt want to put the massive effort to get out this lame question and find something interesting when he didnt put any effort. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:55 AM
0

Your argument is the equivalent of me asking you "What do you want for lunch?" Lol no 😭 that's still boring as fuck but at least it's an actual question. No one has a favorite topic they like to discuss with total strangers. But tbh it's not the approach i blame him for. It's one tactic he can spam it to any girl and maybe one will eventually respond positively. Why not. It's the doubling down on his question part and getting butthurt and blaming the girl afterward that is the real issue. Shows …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 11:06 PM
1

What do you like about it ? Convenience ? Btw you said The only way it could have been better Followed by "that would be perfect"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:55 PM
1

That's exactly the way i go too. I try to find something clever from her photos she wont have seen 10 times already. If i cant i go either the silly road or ask out immediately in last resort. I found that all that is required is to prove her she wont have an excruciating time by having a date with you. No need to prove yourself, only that you're not boring and funny
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:49 PM
1

Yeh i agree overall, NPC is the term , could have been Alexa It also shows lack of awareness. It's Tinder one has to stand out. The job interview style wont do the cut
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:44 PM
2

What's hidden is always in favor of OP. That's what he chose to share. Chances are that was the very beginning or maybe did he start with something even more boring/lazy/empty
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:39 PM
1

There are her photos and he could say whatever that comes in mind, even the silliest thing would be better than this job interview kind of approach Most profiles are empty learn to deal with it or be forgotten being among the least interesting approach being lazy asking her to start the conversation for you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:36 PM
0

Is it absurd to expect someone approaching you to come up with something to say ? Isnt it lazy and boring approach ? That's not being antagobistic, that's being nice enough to tell him why his approach was odd instead of simply ignoring. She even gave him a chance with the first reply
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:34 PM
2

Yeh i agree. I wouldnt know what to respond to that. I have a ton of topics i like to discuss but i never come up to anyone saying oh i want to discuss about that thing. Not even my friends or for very specific stuff that implies not being strangers, that's not how a conversation goes on Tinder
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:31 PM
2

It would have been slightly not as bad but to call it perfect is crazy. If you want success on dating apps keep in mind the competition.. she will receive way more entertaining and easier messages to respond to. Ones where she wont have to find the topic and have something to rebound on. Going the job interview way wont do the cut
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:28 PM
1

What a perfect opener, just copy paste it to everyone and bitch on the girls who wont a conversation for you. In a way i agree, if a girl sticks around despite such approach, then she's REALLY into your pictures Though that's missing out on attractive women who will have way more interesting and easy messages to respond to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:24 PM
1

You’re on a high competition marketplace full of impatient, entitled people and you can either lead the situation the way you want it, proving you’re a capable valuable guy who doesn’t let goofiness get to him, or you can post it on here and let a bunch of other frustrated people make you feel vindicated that you let your ego get the better of you. Nicely put
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:15 PM
0

Lol yeh i put total blame on him. Lame lazy approach Which is okay but followed by a tantrum for not getting his way. That's the issue and absence of self awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:13 PM
0

Damn the bar is low being happy the guy didnt turn mad when rejected for his bad approach
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:08 PM
1

Wtf are you talking about. It wasnt about "boundaries". It would be even more weird though. What kind of boundaries do you expect beside the typical ones from two strangers? Please resppnd that one Are you even a real human, how can you read it as such thing. , it's a dating app, Yes that's the point. She's receiving way more interesting messages where she doesnt have to find a "topic" to discuss with a guy who's too lazy to find one even though he's the one doing the approach he meant to know w…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:06 PM
0

The dude was engaging Not really, he asked her to engage the conversation the lady is insufferable. How come ? Id be much more neutral id say she was uninterested in finding a topic to discuss and carry the conversation from this lazy opener he probably copy pasted a bunch of times And she is focusing too much on the formality of playful banter. She's saying something obvious, the one who engages should come up with a topic or something to say. "Hey please talk to me find us a topic and if you d…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:34 PM
0

But the full burden of carrying the conversation was on her... which is weird since he's the one who engaged. That's the point
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:29 PM
1

Damn you could have said "ppl arent all as good at conversations" You didnt even state your opinion, just a bunch of words to say ppl are different in different ways. Ah you said it didnt take him a lot of time, which i agree, that lazy opener can be copy pasted
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:21 PM
0

What did she do wrong ? Was she obliged to find a topic for him ? What's the entitlement ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:15 PM
3

but “i’m a private person i don’t discuss such things I read this as a polite way to decline instead of "wtf you engaged come up with something dont ask me to do it for you that's weird" She reacted very normally imo. Maybe she shouldnt have respond at all would that make her a good person ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:14 PM
1

His opener was arguably suboptimal. She showed mild signs of paranoia/entitlement. How is she showing any sign of entitlement ? He's the one guilty of that. He's the one butthurt about his "arguably suboptimal" opener asking her to engage the conversation for him. He's the one feeling enttilted to a positive response , so much that it makes it his worse interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:09 PM
3

Lol yeh that's among my hypothesis. They can see themselves using such "opener"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:05 PM
1

It's weird lazy and ineffective but i could agree with the use of the word "reasonable". It's not unreasonable per say yep What isnt reasonable is to expect a favorable response and to get butthurt when it doesnt happen then to post his interaction on reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:03 PM
0

Because the burden of conversation is on men Not really, women are known for being very chatty, not sure where you come from with this. You probably meant the burden of the first step which is true is most cases yep. He shot his shot but really poorly. Yet the "bluepill" the mainstream opinion sides with him and blames the girl for not being receptive enough to "what's your favorite topic to discuss" which is a crazy expectation. and still women think they're superior to men with shit like this.…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:59 PM
1

In dating you’re not bored, you’re boring. Damn, i could make a post about it given how true that is. Ppl tend to forget they're their own common denominator They both sound boring and annoying. This is why there’s complaints on both sides. The pairs that deserve each other can’t tolerate someone that’s comparable to them either. Imo this is spot on and the reason for the majority of complaints.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:56 PM
2

Lol nice roast
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 01:11 PM
1

RIght now almost 1 in 3 women are not able to adapt How did you come up with that number ? What is it for men ? It doesn't change what they are attracted to, instead it changes their willingness to settle AND their desire for casual sex. Do you see the difference between these things? I do see the difference but that's not what's happening. It's not because there's better looking that you arent attracted to your partner. I know my exes werent 10/10 and it's fine im very attracted even though i "…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:13 AM
1

Lol the amount of hamster happening right there. Like it or not it's the same. It's about people unable to determine their smv leading them to repeated failures being outcompeted. Most men and women adapt and some are unable to do so and often prefer to victimise themselves instead because most will eventually figure out where they land and seek similar mates. Indeed. You completely contradict yourself with your first claim saying men are delusionals because there are hot women around.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 09:52 AM
1

What's the problem with lookmatching and ppl pairing with relative close looks? It does not make you attractive by any means You just stated "All of those things make you an appealing partner" wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:30 AM
1

Be in a good shape in a good mood have your shit together skincare good style be kind hearted to those reciprocating and neutral to others dont be a wimp learn how to communicate learn how to dance learn about bodylanguage have boundaries , grow your social circles, be curious about things etc etc etc I dont know what else to say, it's not near as much about your bone structure as you think it is
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:18 AM
0

What i find fascinating is how often women are called out for being delusional then there's you describing the same thing but this time it's for men and still you put the blame upon women. That's crazy , hold the same standards to everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:12 AM
13

Probably the same women love assholes trope
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:22 AM
0

I disagree, very few men are at their best potential and that's what self improvement is all about. You wont become a NBA player but the vast majority has the potential to become attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:20 AM
5

The idea is that is you fawn over someone after 1 date then chances are you do so with anyone showing you attention. That's not being picked out of compatibility for who you are, that being his/her only option
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 02:52 AM
1

But overly sexualized clothes definitely has a negative impact on men Oh come on name it as it is. It's your frustration that has a negative impact it's not the clothing itself Try speaking for yourself, i enjoy seeing a nice/sexy/revealing outfit from a hot girl and many probably most men do. ultimately hurts other women… What do you even mean by this
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 07:49 PM
27

Lol , the actual data is 42% first marriage who end up in divorce. That means your average first mariage lasts for life
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 06:02 AM
2

do you think women at the bar are forming "genuine" attraction? and not just thinking, "oh he's okay looking and i want (any)dick?" Lol that's not how 90% of the casual sex occurs
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 05:52 AM
–

I am sure this will horrify many women here, and with good reason, but all this is agreed upon. I am sure this would horrify most fathers too
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 09:02 PM
9

This website is bullshit it shouldnt base the percentage on the whole population but based off the single ones and a given age. Then we see the proportion of those that are both lean and without kids. That's like t least 30-50% depending on the age chosen
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 04:47 AM
14

You never see a man attractive enough to pull women that age complaining about the opinions of these women. Maybe that should tell you something. Outch
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 05:47 AM
1

You respond by sarcasm to my initial sarcasm, funny
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:21 PM
1

Yeh until they're not and find someone they're attracted to. That's the way
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:19 PM
5

You're just projecting that's what terrible people always do. In the vast majority of cases women are attracted to their partner and when they're not is when it goes badly quickly. Be more confident go for men you like dont give up like that making a victim on your path. Or be very clear about it being a transaction
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:19 PM
1

She's most likely trying to cope with her inability to pull men she likes so she's considering going for men she dislikes, she hates it but sees an opportunity to benefit from it. Then she ignores what's actually happening and hamsters the whole thing to make it acceptable to her sick mind and the only way is by having this sort of superiority complex where she'd then be doing a favor to men, justifying getting something in return. It doesnt have much to do with Halo effect women tend to benefit…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:21 AM
1

Yeh it's all about sperm production capacity ! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:12 AM
-4

Women truly are wonderful. Fuck seriously you were spot on sh'es a terrible person but you had to generalise to women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:09 AM
20

Wtf am I reading. Women dating men they're not attracted to are NOT doing a favor to the guy. It's toxic and doomed to fail from the get go It's taking advantage of someone's feelings unless clear communication that it's basically prostitution and that he shouldnt get attached as it's only a transaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:05 AM
2

Where it brought me a lot is about posture bodylanguage kinoescalation , room reading , how to frame the approach, how the message should be "i already have a great life im inviting you to join it" , the concept of shit testing , inner game , not being result oriented but trying to have fun in the meantime and more
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:58 AM
–

Errr i wish you hadnt made that claim before me
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 05:40 AM
0

But how ? Wealth is almost always mentionned and they're not on the 50/50 trope. They want to pull thanks to their gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 04:28 AM
-1

Indeed , not that much though
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 05:11 PM
2

Id be highly bothered by the information but id primarly judge my relationship for how it goes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 03:41 PM
–

My look is my biggest asset im kind of a lazy 30yo bum so i dont gain any point from status on wealth. I'd be screwed
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 01:33 PM
-1

Yeh i tend to agree. To me height is mostly irrelevant from 5'7 to 6' , above and below is when it starts to actually matter
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 07:57 AM
2

Are you among the woke retards saying men and women are just as strong ? o, it’s just that you can’t accept that they’d obviously go after weaker Indeed they go after weaker and women are weaker than men on average. Women aren’t idiots Are men idiots ? they walk in groups and tale precautions. Yep they take higher precautions .... Because they face higher danger Men unfortunately generally are and they go out alone So you compare women being in group and taking precautions with men being careles…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 06:33 AM
–

It's a cognitive issue at this point. THEY TRY TO MAKE SURE YOY CAN’T RUN AWAY!!! .... So they choose women as they are way easier to corner and make preferable targets. And as i say , we risk our phone,they risk their phone as well but also being raped. Therefore it's safer to be a man. Is it that difficult to comprehend
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 06:25 AM
–

How clueless are you. Men run faster than women. Men are way harder targets than women. Men arent risking being raped women are. Given the choice criminals will prioritise a female target given those obvious facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 06:21 AM
–

Ok, then you're in tho minority of mugging if you just "ran away" most muggers corner/surround you. Lol you're the one who hasnt been mugged. Criminals are looking for easy target. By running and screaming you increase by an order of magnitude their risks of getting caught so 90% of the time they give up. There's always the risk of not being able to escape , i've been there and i lost my phone and my change. It sucked not gonna lie but it wasnt all that much
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 06:15 AM
4

Lol , you're definitely cappin. I don't talk to people who automatically assume the man is in the wrong I explained my thought process. Im saying that given the very few informations you gave me, it is extremely unlikely. That's why i invite you to give more informations. What happened after you said hi ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 06:11 AM
–

I have been mugged and that's the exact reason why im not scared. I know that it is the worst scenario. We're not sexual targets, only for our belongings. Losing one's phone and change isnt the end of the world even though it sucks
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 06:07 AM
4

Yeh i do believe you're either a liar or totally blind to your own behavior. If it happened only once it could be a statistical error, if it happened several times it's most likely on you. Like seriously how did it go ? You said hi and she called the police immediately ? Is that it ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 06:01 AM
–

Worst thing that could happen to me is having to run and im most likely to evade and if i ever get caught id lose my phone. Women on the other hand are very unlikely to outspeed their aggressor and the risk is being raped
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 05:55 AM
5

What do you mean ? Everyone's experience matter that's why i focus on actual studies instead of a random guy speaking out of his sheer emotions with no rational thinking my experiences of nothing but rejection being polite and getting accused of rape when I didn't even touch the girl doesn't matter If it happened once then it's likely bad luck, if it happened several times there's most likely something that you're doing wrong that you're unaware of. Maybe you're pushy and do not back up when giv…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 05:51 AM
3

Are you able to provide even one example ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 05:16 AM
7

We are unwatched in anonymous survey. It's just datas that contradict your ideas so you choose to ignore them. Then you tunnel vision yourself onto swipe statistics on tinder lmfao. Go back to reality playing the victim is trending in america but it wont help you much
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 05:13 AM
9

So what do you believe ? Is it solely based on your feelings and emotions ? Yes there's some lies but it's not only short men who would be pathological liars with everyone else being honest. It's only a small proportion that is too embarassed to tell the truth on anonymous surveys and it affects every group of men relatively the same. But yeh dodging reality is easier for doomers. It's all about confirmation bias. You'll see a tiktok going yoir way and you'll be "oh yeh i choose to trust this ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 05:00 AM
5

Where is the normal redpill ? Cant find it anymore. I used to be pua , it used to be healthy and to push men to action. But it takes courage and it doesnt fit most of the doomer demographic so they adapted to this cherrypicking tiktok content hellfest
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:56 AM
3

You should type on google something along" height and mean amount of sexual partners" You'll see the correlation isnt that strong
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:47 AM
3

Not really, blackpill is just the advanced and uncensored version. Redpill is almost the same with a huge dose of virtue signaling where it would be abiut improvement (but they ignore the most important and focus on being "alpha" and "providers"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:45 AM
4

Im not the one having only that one word in mouth
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:38 AM
10

Did you learn the word patriarchy recently ?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:21 AM
3

It's a matter of high exposure, those criminals never are popular but among the hundred of thousa ds women there will always be a few that will be interested
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 02:01 PM
2

You cant
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 04:53 AM
7

What i find funny is that i thought you meant how women see men the same as they see their lipstick and it would have (not) made sense the same
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:01 PM
-3

What i think it meabs is that the bar is on the floor regarding common redpill criteria like status and wealth. Nowadays those dont matter so much and by just having a place and a job you're good to go. Then it's up to 1/ attraction then personnality compatibility
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 08:56 PM
3

You have to be trolling , she's not responsible if some weirdos ignore the normal hints and keep hitting on her. She doesnt have to adapt to those delusional men
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 01:29 PM
14

I assure you if you woke up the next day with hundreds of women blatantly interested in casual sex with you, marriage to 1 of them would be the furthest thing from your mind. That's true but for most men this phase lasts 6months to 3 years then we dig ltr
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 11:04 AM
–

How do you feel when your feminist counterpart says the exact same thing for men ? Are you self aware and like "yehh she's just as biased as i am we're just preaching our side"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 10:47 AM
2

"it's not all ! it's only the vast majority duh"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 04:09 AM
1

Yeh that's a tough height, should going for a smallee population makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:37 PM
–

communists, socialists democrats Those are ,well defined terms. Show me your redpill bible ? What makes it the official one ? You'll never be able to respond
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 11:16 AM
0

Several reasons for this. Very attractive men with as many options as women tend to get just as selective. It's called sorting out your best option and everyone does that and swipes relatively to their match rate
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:35 AM
1

1 match a day is more than enough and swiping a ton isnt rewarded your profile is seen a set amount of time
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:33 AM
1

Lol, did you missunderstand and thought i was talking about a 1 day test ? Im talking of about an average over a longer period, obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:31 AM
1

That's the common missconception, tinder doesnt reward mass swiping... Simply because it cant. There are 3 men per women that means if women are swiping on average let's say 100 times a day then Tinder can distribute only 33 (100/3) views per men per day.. Swiping a thousand time that day will only result in showing your profile to the same amount of women but from a more diluded pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:11 PM
0

Id say it's kinda sad instead of hilarious, on the other hand you're taliing about bottom 10% women, it's not too hard to reach average
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:06 PM
1

Yeh you can focus on the amount of likes instead if your swiping habits are extreme
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 05:30 PM
1

This is grotesque example, no dont insult the one you are seducing, tbat's not a personnality trait and ill stick to what i said. A nerd wont appeal to most women but if he tries to disguise himself as "alpha" or whatever it's just worse. Even if he manages to cosplay his way into a relationship the mask wont last long
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 05:29 PM
1

Damn you must be very handsome, i like how all those likes make you very picky, same as for women
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 04:22 PM
1

I'm not calling anyone hypergamous for desiring a partner they're attracted to
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 04:00 PM
1

Never heard a guy call himself hypergamous for desiring a partner he's attracted to
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:57 PM
-1

Well it's up to each individual to choose singledom/ constant rejections over going for their own league. The issue is when they complain about their choice and blame an entire gender for it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:55 PM
0

That's why the first mission in the PUA journey is to get 10 rejections to desensitize yourself and realise it's meaningless. It's quite liberating
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:50 PM
0

Yeh i agree and that's why they say be yourself because that's the best way to be interesting/fun , everything else is about being able to read the temperature and to avoid gross mistakes
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:48 PM
6

You can “approach” a thousand women of similar SMV & you will be ruthlessly rejected 1000 times Men and women with delusional standards is unfortunately very common, at one point it's time to adapt
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:44 PM
1

You cant have less than a match per week unless you match with less than a bot a week ....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 12:52 PM
0

. Enough guys with shit personalities (who happen to be attractive) are quite successful dating, and disproves that personality matters Is the same as saying that enough guys with no jobs are quite successfull due to being born in wealth and that it would disprove that having a job matters
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 10:12 AM
-1

It’s hard to put it up, i was being sarcastic pointing out how they never post their photos or actually try and how bad this advice is usually taken. Not my best take but anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 10:04 AM
15

I don't think men look at it that way; men aren't fixated on dating up, they are simply interested in what they find attractive. Yeh same for women and yet they all whine and call it hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:12 AM
1

This is an illegal advice
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:11 AM
0

standards have changed in the last 5 years or so No they havent dating apps were already mainstream, the situation barely changed. If one thing changed, it's feminism who lost influence , which would make the situation slightly easier
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:05 AM
1

However mine are actually true. Lol, redpill is an abstract constructiona that is evolving over time. Nowadays it's lame podcasts broadcasting any onlyfan girls or delusional mgtow ranting about how much women will regret "it" later on , add to that the blackpill zoomers and all the obsession on being "Alpha" and you get an overview of the mainstream manosphere in 2024. Im sure if we go back to your good old times we can find figures of the redpill that fits your idea of it yeh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 07:57 AM
0

Why would the situation be any different than in 2017 ? It was peak feminism when metoo appeared and shit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 05:24 AM
1

You are the same as a feminist who would say "but feminism is only about equality and allowing women to vote"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 04:57 AM
1

Yeh alright you missed the redpill those 15 last years. Seriously how blind can you get to your own ideology. I guess it's easier to defend it when you deny 75% of its content
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 04:56 AM
0

Oh god It's not a matter of proof but basic logic. It's the same as comparing your income with the median income. Not everything is perfectly the same from an individual to another and yet you can compare. Not sure what is your argument. There are a few bots so what's your point exactly ? What is it … 1 a month ? What does it change exactly if ppl on average are matching with 1 bot a month
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 04:51 AM
1

Depends on how selective you are yep, how often do you swipe left ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:59 PM
0

Would it be Happn ? I'm french and it's the only one french brand i can think of and yeh i always had terrible results on this app, not sure why. I guess their algorythm is even more favorable toward the most attractive profiles being shown even morz than in tinder
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:09 PM
1

You missed my point. How common bots are is irrelevant as it's as common for all men. It's clearly not that often since 13% men have less than 1 match a week, it means men are matching with less than 1 bot a week Im on the apps and yes it's very rare on a time basis. For those who get 0 match and end up matching with h a bot once a month, bots represent most of their matches but it's still one bot a month
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:05 PM
1

Yeh one of two stats dont add up and to me it's the 0.6 average , that would mean women would have only 1.8match per day on average which sounds impossible
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 05:53 PM
1

Maybe shadow ban , i was for months
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 05:51 PM
-1

Not necessarely ugly, could be bad pics or even a shadow ban but yeh your profile is clearly bottom tier
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 04:58 PM
0

Oh come on, you're either very new or delusional about the average redpill perception. The betabuxx alphafucks is all over the place saying women are only attracted to 20% men
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 04:57 PM
-3

Low pop means you'll rub out of women seeing your profiles earlier but in the meantime it's the same
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 04:56 PM
1

You are assuming that A. Someone has swiped on you, and B. That that person isn’t a bot or sex worker. There's no assumptions, it's a comparison all things equal, all men are exposed to sex workers and bots about the same. It's also a rare occurence, bots are a small minority let's cut the crap for a sec,
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 04:54 PM
2

You missed my point so bad that it's funny. Having had a few drinks doesnt make you an alcoholic No relationship should start with stuff I’ve done with other people but you aren’t good enough to even try with. You got yourself a winner there! Wtf is the rant about ? If it's a relationship by definition it's not a hook up. Do you demand your relationship to begin with a first night hook up is that it ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 04:50 PM
0

Well... Yeh obviously, once you went through all profiles there's no more profile. Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 03:58 PM
1

I agree it's a fair limitation to this approach. One who is very picky knows he is though. That's assuming average swiping behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 03:52 PM
1

They both agree on their 80/20 rle and how average men would be invisible
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 03:49 PM
0

You're essentially spinning wheels in place for months on end, if not years. Only if you never learn, it's really not as dark as you imagine it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 02:19 PM
0

Lol, cold approach isnt made for all. Not everyone has a circle of friends from which to try with many women. Not everyone is comfortable hitting on women in live and enjoy the distance the app provide. A lot of people enjoy the privacy the apps are giving, low to no repercussion from trying , no social stigma U see ? Your opinion is far from universal but good for you if you slay the way you do
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:40 PM
-8

That's so over dramatic, yes you match with a bot from time to time. maybe once a month. That's men in the bottom 13% , bottom 13% women have it shitty too
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:37 PM
-2

R/im14andThisIsDeep So alright you dont like OLD , then what is your way ? Do you think it is better and suited for all ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:34 PM
1

Swiping 100s of women wont make your profile shown to 100s of women that's missunderstanding how the app work. Women are seeing a given amount of profiles and that amount is divided among all the men. Basically your profile is seen by X women a day. Let's say 20 , if you swipe on 100 girl, 20 put of them will see your profile , if you swipe on 1000 girls, that's still 20 but you have diluded the pool among who will see your profile. You will be seen by 20 women a day until there isnt anymore to …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:24 PM
1

Well yeh thank god the general opinion isnt to be as disingenuous and manipulative as the redpill is and not as driven by hook up culture being more focused on long term
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:16 PM
1

The size of the pool doesnt matter much yet there are profiles left your profile is still shown to a relatively same amount of women. And yeh that's how aggregated statistics work, it necessarely takes into account different kind of profiles. Taking all kind of profiles and locations , the median man gets near 1match a day and it doesnt fit with the RP storytelling where he would be invisible
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:14 PM
1

Lol so what's the deal then ? Your suggestions
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:11 PM
–

It's not self reported but tinder's own stats
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:53 PM
-1

You've been proven wrong, cant call me bad at stats without any counter argument. Im using this source as it's biased in your own favor but still proving the rp wrong. The median guy isnt invisible and gets near 1 match a day
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:49 PM
-2

Once again I am talking about the median. It's the value that splits the population in half. Take 100 men , half (48%)of them will have 1 match a day or more The median amount of match per day is therefore 1 (slightly below)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:38 PM
0

Swiping right on a million women a day wont make your profile seen by that million of women. But try telling me where im wrong. Im literally having those 50%+ match rate by only collecting my match every other days (second profile is almost always a match when you've been off a few days) All you have to do is to be in the active users pool to be shown to women, then the amount of timd you swipe doesnt change how many chances you're given. Instead of showing your profile to 20 women out of the 50…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:36 PM
1

Another misleading statistic that is mostly the result of a longer average stay on the app. There are near as many women as there are men going on the apps, the imbalance mainly comes from men taking longer to find someone while actively searching than it takes for a woman who deletes the app way faster https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/02/key-findings-about-online-dating-in-the-u-s/ 34% men vs 27% women who use online dating, on a 100 base that's 55.7% men
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:01 AM
-6

Im not focusing on swipe statistics as they are quite meaningless , ill make a post about it another day. Basically your profile is shown to a set amount of women per day may you swipe 20 times or a million times it wont change that set amount. If you connect only once a week and swipe left on the second profile you can get near 100% match rate. That's how biased and meaningless this stat is. Take the same guy swiping 10 times a day or 100 or 1000, he'll still have 1 match a day but can have 10/…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:40 AM
1

Doesn't add up, It's called cognitive dissonance and you'll try anything to divert or dismiss this fact. Might be outdated It's the most common excuse to dodge reality but it's from 2024 sorty bud You can't extrapolate the data to something it does not say. It says 13% men get 1 match a week or less 48% men get 1 match a day. If you get exactly 1 match a day you are top 48% , you are average. If you get only or kot even 1 match a week then you are in bottom 13%> It's quite undeniable. I will agr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:29 AM
1

https://roast.dating/blog/tinder-statistics Have fun reading, it's a source another incel gave me to prove his point, it backfired badly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:08 AM
1

You're the one that seemingly doesn't know what Red Pill is. Oh i do , it's made up of very conventional self improvement tips flavored with misoginy and excuses. That's the uniqueness of rp, not the self improvement part
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:06 AM
1

We're talking about dating apps 48% get more than 1 match a day. You are spreading a lie. If you're talking about men getting 1 match a week you're referring to the bottom 13% not the average
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 09:55 AM
2

Is English not your first language? Indeed Relative to other average guys, the biggest, by a large margin, slayers are physically attractive men. Okay if you want, yes looks can sometimes be enough by itself. Now can you focus on what matters and the 75% men that are around the average. Im bluepill because we use different definition, to me bluepill means common mainstream advice , to you it means this strawman with zero nuance. The mainstream advice has all you need. Get your shit together be f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 09:12 AM
2

Lol how does it play in your favor ? Do you copy paste this comment everywhere disregarding the topic ? But yeh im now asking you the question. Most men are average anyway so that's the thing to analyse and among average guys some are slaying and some are failing , therefore the bluepill + game importance proven
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:40 AM
2

Ahem, dodging the question I see. You're not an extremely attractive guy, it's pretty much irrelevant. I've also seen top model girls get away with being shallow and empty and men overlooking it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:31 AM
9

Have you ever drink alcohol ? 95% will respond yes
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:14 AM
2

Redpill gonna simp for gold diggers aand complain afterward, as always
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:01 AM
0

How do you feel about spouting the incel rhetoric ? How much are they your buddies and thought leaders ? Never seen how two average guys can have completemy different success with women ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 07:59 AM
1

It's literally two dofferent sport from the perspective of a top 10% and average
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:10 AM
0

Most BP guys can't get that far though, so the RP isn't much use for them. Lol wtf ? RP is made of men who struggle with women while everyone else has normal/nuanced opinions or what's called bluepill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:06 AM
1

I would add that the only difference is that the settling is the same but it comes earlier for men. In middle school all boys are after the same 2-3 girls bit we face rejections earlier and adapt until aiming for your league earlier
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 09:58 PM
1

Well it depends, if it was just a hook up she's unlikely to recontact you but you dont care anyway If she likes you she'll definitely give you several occasions. Women love when you cum too quick from time to time. They feel appreciated and then you can go for round 2 where you'll be able to last way longer And yes it really doesnt take long to get the basics of sex. You wont be a god after 3 intercourses but you can be average if not above it just by caring
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 09:54 PM
3

It's only true for extreme counts, for the majority that os around 5-10 there's no big difference to point out
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 09:26 PM
3

You get like at least 3 shots before getting dumped for being bad in bed and it's a quite natural thing. You shouldnt worry too much
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 09:24 PM
3

5'8-5'11 ==> height is basically irrelevant and it's all about face and proportions 6'-6'4 ===> height acts as a multiplier to already existing beauty but more often comes with bad proportions 6'5 becomes quite niche comes with back pain and often shit proportions
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 07:23 PM
7

Looks > height for the vast majority of men. Tall very often comes with shit proportions. Only when extremely short is when it starts to matter more than the rest
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 06:57 PM
1

Let's be honest the extreme majority of glow ups happen before 25 and mostly during/ thanks to puberty. Ppl suddenly changing their lifestyle almost completemy past 25 are a rarity
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 06:50 PM
1

Yes, I said average meaning median. The arithmetical average count is much higher than the median (positive distribution/distribution skewed to the right same as for income)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 02:22 PM
1

The median is the value that splits the population in half. A median Ncount of 8 means that 50% men have a count equal or higher
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 01:50 PM
1

Id say your friends are between bottom 10% and barely average given your testimony
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 04:29 AM
8

Mutual assistance, tax reductions, better credit capacities, add a strong symbol to the relationship. Religious reasons etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:04 AM
1

Most men are actively looking for a partner and view all social interaction through that lens Im responding to this idea. It's obviously not true so i suppose it's projection from your own way of viewing all social interactions
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:34 PM
0

Why would I want her to appreciate me approaching? Idk why you keep focusing on the women being validated or appreciating being approached. That's not the point. Im not telling you to give random compliments to girls for the sake of making them happy. I'm saying shoot your shot when you like someone, you're doing it for you, to find someone
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:07 PM
0

Well cold approach is only one way to meet women, a very niche one, you can do without it and use more common methods. PUA requires a lot of social skills , it's definitely not for everyone. Just saying it's easier than before but cold approach has never been easy and never will be
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:01 PM
2

Men have to take what they can get. That literally means picking their best option. It's the same, both men and women pick their best option You're a scumbag who tries to get men to humiliate themselves in public by getting them to approach women. You have a victim complex. Earlier on you said that when women reject you , you interpret it as if they want you dead. You're sick get some help, this paranoïa will eat you alive. My point is that there are many men like you too scared to approach, mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 05:18 PM
1

The "doing wrong" bit is down to genetics. Oh god. Looks like you're beyond any hope. You made a whole system in order to remain volcel and it should work just as intended Why should you shoot your shot As i said 10 times because that's how you get a girlfriend. Clearly you seem uninterested. That's okay but dont complain you dont get results when you dont even participate
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 03:58 PM
1

We have already discussed it. It works for the average guy, he does get laid by 17-19 yo and has several gf. Stop being a loser who doesnt even try, shoot your shot, find what you do wrong and eventually you'll find someone, like other average dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 01:56 PM
1

I responded already , men approach women to get a girlfriend/wife/ONS. Seriously, how absurd is this question ? Why should men enter stores that have what they desire ?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 01:39 PM
1

Why wouldnt I ? Also it's just the side effect of shooting your shot, the main one is getting the girl
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 01:09 PM
1

Lol, that's from the last time i got on the app a week ago. I got the 99+ likes and 190matches as shown on the screenshots
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 01:07 PM
1

First sentence and seconde one have zero connexion ? Eating an apple gives farmers some money. It does mean you're ugly
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 12:42 PM
2

https://imgur.com/a/X4jIpOi?third_party=1 But i have been on the app for quite some time so it's normal
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 12:40 PM
0

Lol "Okay they are happy they feel like they are happy but that's only because they lie to themselves, deep down i know better how they feel and they are unhappy." Worse argument i've seen so far. But yeh you are a god who knows better than those surveyed themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:37 AM
2

The median Ncount is around 6-9 depending on which western country so they do fuck Those who dont fuck and get no match arent average. Seriously why cant you accept the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:34 AM
1

She rejects you because you're ugly. Lol , this can be the reason among the other ones That doesnt make you ugly. Dont have a fragile ego. One opinion doesnt define who you are. Why should men approach women anyway? if they want one
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:32 AM
-3

Except that the average age to lose virginity is dropping. Idk how it could fit with increased standards from women https://www.bustle.com/p/the-average-age-people-lose-their-virginity-across-different-generations-8015518
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:27 AM
2

Id say that's the bottom 2-5%
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:15 AM
-1

What you said is gender neutral. Men pick the best option they can get as well
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:11 AM
0

Yep, sounds quite typical to me, i've been the same
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:08 AM
1

Strange take, i wouldnt want to be your friend if you only see it as a way to get access to more pussies. Do you also stop having social interactions once you're in a relationship ?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:04 AM
-1

The average guy will be called a creep by most women for trying. Especially in an age of OLD where actually approaching or talking to someone is considered creepy. Lol no they wont, creeps are called out for a reason and it's never to have had approach. It's for insisting or saying something really absurd and being terrible at reasing signs. Otherwise you're way more likely to flatter the woman and to be praised in return for your courage and good manners You call them rejection averse, but reje…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:58 AM
-1

The average guy will be called a creep by most women for trying. Especially in an age of OLD where actually approaching or talking to someone is considered creepy. Lol no they wont, creeps are called out for a reason and it's never to have had approach. It's for insisting or saying something really absurd and being terrible at reasing signs. Otherwise you're way more likely to flatter the woman and to be praised in return for your courage and good manners You call them rejection averse, but reje…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:53 AM
0

Go on, see if it looks like the average or below or above experience
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:42 AM
–

Well maybe, that still leaves a crowd of delusional ppl
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:39 AM
1

Rejection is humiliating. It literally means that the woman finds your genes subhuman and wants you dead. That isn't insulting? Wtf ? There are so many reasons to reject someone. Most obvious one being already taken
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:32 AM
2

It's not about trust it's about data. The average guy gets close to 1 match a day. If you talk about men who get 1 match a week you are referring to the bottom 13% men (who have it hard indeed)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:21 AM
0

Lmfao , so the number would be 72-76% of happy men in relationship. That doesnt change shit, not many ppl are dumb enough to lie on an anonymous survey
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:08 AM
1

Depends on the genetic and environment, for some it's not exactly hard to not be single
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:03 AM
1

How would you know ? You never tried rejection is humiliating No it's not , only in your eyes and others copers who are too terrifiee to shoot their shot
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 06:12 AM
2

I haven't asked a woman out in my life This has to be a joke, start trying before complaining I offer solutions . My advice to them is to become above average You're hilarious ngl. Most men get no matches a day on Tinder: Your own source contradicts you. 48% users get 1match or more a day , the 50th percentile gets then close to 1match a day. Which is my reality as well as a fairly average guy. 1 match a week is the bottom 13% of men. That's what you use to define average but in reality it's the…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 06:03 AM
1

https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-is-happiest-married-mothers-and-fathers-per-the-latest-general-social-survey Scroll down a bit to find men's statistics and face the reality. Most men aren't happy in relationships Isnt true. Why do you spread lies like this ? Is it the simple result of ignorance ? Now that you know what does it change to your worldview
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 05:31 AM
1

Im giving you 2024 statistics. 17-19 median age ro lose virginity 43% first mariages who ends in a divorce 74% men happy in their relationship That's the reality. Maybe not yours but dont pretend yours would be average
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 05:17 AM
2

Median age to lose virginity is 17-19 , most men get married, most first mariages dont end in a divorce , median Ncount is 6-8 etc etc. That's the reality in 2024
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 05:11 AM
2

Yeh the concept of average is quite abstract The "average" man in the US is 40-55 years Is only one way to approach it
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 05:08 AM
0

For people in the dating pool in general ?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 04:51 AM
0

74% men are happy in their relationship https://www.mixbook.com/inspiration/study-the-most-happily-married-couples-in-america-2023
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 04:46 AM
-1

Reality doesnt virtue signals. The average man does get a few girlfriends, loses his virginity by 17-19 and ends up married with less than half of those ending up in divorce, may you like it or not
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 04:41 AM
-1

Reality says otherwise, how do you deal with this ?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 04:05 AM
-1

In other words :"Damn the vast majority disagree with me but i cant compute the idea of being wrong so ill make up a story where there would be a plot against me where everyone is dishonnest or trolls
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 04:04 AM
3

I’m thinking the average guy is invisible to women More like the bottom 20% women so they are actually describing an above average guy Men and women tend to give similar descriptions
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 07:21 PM
14

That's my intention
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 06:21 PM
5

Lol, tell this to any incel and he will (quite rightfully) freak out. Second issue is that most ppl with low value have no clue that they are low value Usually they consider themselves average then they rant bout how hard it would be for the average man
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:48 PM
4

The point is, most women aren't single and chasing men at 30. Who cares about the ones who arent single ? It's about those that are abd how rhey behave
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 06:47 PM
–

Lol no it isnt , it's common mainstream self improvement tips we can find anywhere with the misogyny and a victimhood culture added
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 04:43 PM
1

Dating apps already exist and would still exist in this scenario. Nothing changes on that matter
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:53 PM
3

Why would there be a ton of attractive men in this scenario ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:29 PM
2

Yep but we're not talking about the same thing, im talking about the appeal of something being different when you are in scarcity or have unlimited access to it. When in a dry spell you are likely to feel like you'd need and want to bang a new chick every week, that's the common belief but in reality, when you get there you quickly realise that it isnt an actual ned and that the desire was mainly one for validation and most attractive men end up having LTR despite the idea that they wouldnt. Bee…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 10:17 AM
9

Give the same toy to a group of 100 rich kids with hundreds of toys and to another group of 100 poor kids with just a few. Do you believe the two groups will have the same level of excitments and appreciation ? The only difference is scarcity. Now give those 100 kids enough toys and at one point they will reach the same level of appreciation as the first group of rich kids. But i'm saying things that are way too obvious, to a point i wonder what you can be arguing against
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 09:32 AM
11

Yep, but the scarcity intensifies the desires and expectations. Remember when you were a child and believed you would buy candies everyday once you'd be an adult ? That was mostly because of scarcity
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 09:14 AM
22

Sex is more appealing when in scarcity. Even attractive men get bored with casual hook ups or arent even interested in the first place and have desires to build something meaningful
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 08:37 AM
0

I wish you had bot dodge her question. What are you referring to with the male sexuality being shamed
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 06:58 AM
2

Assess what went wrong and fix it. We're our own common denominator
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 09:06 AM
1

Im attracted to average girls but overall there are maybe only 30% of them that i find attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 06:18 AM
0

You basically said you would only go on a date with him if you liked his personality. Isnt it a good thing ? Should women make their decision only on looks ?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 06:11 AM
1

What's your excuse if you have been gifted with good look and genetic ? I understand the logic of incels but for you it should be obvious you're the one screwing yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 06:53 AM
1

What's the typical response when a fat bitch says outloud how she'd never date a guy that isnt fit ? Now imagine that same bitch on reddit insulting men for having delusional standards and why it would be the reason why she cant land such fit guy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 06:42 AM
3

Oh boy, you need education on social medias and how the algorythm works. Your foryoupage is only showing you 1% of the overall content. The 1% that is triggering you the most and making you engage the most. It has almost nothing to do with reality, you will always have someone to agree with whatever idea. For instance or r/shortguys they complain about how often they find content mocking short men while i have never been presented such content If my tiktok page was reality then 90% women would b…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 06:29 AM
3

Oh god, i checked his post history, there are dozens of posts and pictures about his sexdoll. Half of them are in order to say it’s normal healthy and how every men should have one
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 06:17 PM
9

We got in a debate about a video she posted admiring this guy for like worshipping and kissing his cat because "it's just so sweet!" and I told her that isn't healthy male behavior. He's treating that cat like it's a woman replacement. That's a red flag not a green flag. Have you lost your mind ? You are the thing you hate the most. That person on social medias judging the most harmless and meaningless thing turning it into a redflag. And then you wonder why some are getting away from you
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 05:52 AM
1

Omg. Im talking about person A and person B who decided together to have consensual raw sex. Person A and person B are equally responsible
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 05:41 AM
0

It is super delulu coming from 95% of RPers. It isnt exactly the group that gathers the top 10% most attractive men
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 05:37 AM
6

You rly rly missed the point "It's okay that im damaged but i absolutely refuse my partner to be as well" delulu
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:20 PM
–

That's fair but I don't think it's too much to ask for women to recognize that it is vastly easier for women to attract and find men than the other way around. Not saying those men will all be high quality and desireable, but it's far easier to find someone you're compatible with if you're not desperately struggling to get more than half a dozen dates a year. It's easier to find a meal you like when you're in a buffet than if you can't even afford to set foot in the door. This sounds reasonable …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:08 PM
–

If she doubles down on the "women never have any privileges and men never face issues" feminist train, then it's going to be hard to take seriously as a partner This i totally agree and it's among my very short list of redflags. I dont want a narcissist blaming everyone but herself the question now is if she is going to recognize the female privileges she enjoys in the dating world and acknowledge men face issues she does not? If so then its all good. This id rather be cautious , women have an e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 08:09 PM
–

Yeh makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 08:05 PM
–

Ngl that was a funny take but now i believe there's a chance you've already done such calculs :p But when should a guy become bitter then ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:58 PM
1

Elaborate, what do you mean by taking responsibility and what scénarios ? You mean by not having an abortion and being forced to raise/take responsibility for a kid they dont want ? Im pro choice i want ppl to be able to choose. Men are still unable to choose to keep a kid when they want to, that's a huge advantage women get to be able to do that
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:20 PM
1

Ohhhh you cornered me so bad ! I also had to change a second word from deposit to receive ! That's exactly the same, we're talking about consensual sex , both parties are equally responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:15 PM
–

You're talking on your own behalf. There's no consensus on a bodycount of 3 being this morale failure to be angry at. So what could have she said to make you respond positively ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:12 PM
–

Damn, i thought you'd get a more positive response, your profile is among the best according to their values and hyperfixation on bodycount
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:11 PM
–

Bruhh what would satisfy you if with her count of 3 that's already too much and causing you this reaction ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:07 PM
1

There is no additional choice for women once they deposit the sperm into their body Can you stop being such a caricature of the basic anti-choice opinion. Literally eveything you said applies exactly the same for women. I dont even need to rephrase your speech. Just change men by women and vasectomy by tubal ligation or any BC. How can you not sée it ? It's fascinating in a way that you exist
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:38 PM
1

Wear a condom. Pull out. Get a vasectomy tubal ligation. Abstain from sex. There's 4 choices. Seems pretty pro choice to me. I swear you're hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:31 PM
0

Or just don't ejaculate in women you don't want to impregnate. That's your choice. You are the most anti-choice there is. Open your eyes on yourself like seriously. They say this word for word in order to criminalise abortion. "Or just dont make a guy ejaculate inside you, that's your choice why would you need an abortion, you're responsible"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:27 PM
–

Does it apply to men who complain about dating ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:23 PM
1

I asked how come because i dont see why you're saying this. If a man wants to keep a child he wouldnt be able to opt out afterward, it sounds obvious to me. Basically during a pregnancy both parents would get to make a decision and then they would have to stick with it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:11 PM
0

No one should be able to "opt" out of parenthood unless they can adopt out Lol You are so anti-choice If anything, a vasectomy is less invasive. Only seen on reddit 🤣 An abortion doesnt make you sterile it doesnt compare at all The logistics of a man opting out are just so different from a woman getting an abortion It explains why women can choose to raise a kid on their own when men cant and will always ve submitted to their partner's choice. That's a huge advantage you arent even considering. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 06:09 PM
1

That's women's privilege because of pregnancy. Women can choose to raise a kid on their own if they want to. Men cannot and will always have to face an abortion when their partner doesnt want to keep the kid. Men cant choose to be solo father. I think it makes sense because to obligate women to go through the pregnancy would be asking too much and against personal freedom
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 05:55 PM
1

How come ? All i want is to allow people to choose for themselves. May it be a man or a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 02:53 PM
2

A kid born under terrible conditions is a 1000times bigger burden to society than having to pay a doctor for a few hours in order to abort and have that kid born under good circumstances a few years later in a stable family
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 02:32 PM
3

Are you against abortion ? Not sure where you’re coming from with these silly questions. Would you say that any man who chooses to opt out of parental responsibility should have to willingly undergo a vasectomy or be forced to pay child support? Why do you gender the question instead of making it about both men and women ? What is your opinion on the topic, should we sterilise women who choose abortion ? Imo no we shouldnt sterilise them, that’s such a crazy idea
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 02:28 PM
4

What are you even talking about ? An undesired child that will need state support and will grow in terrible conditions isnt profitable for a society. Have you never heard about the consequences of single parenting vs duo parenting ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 02:07 PM
4

In my perfect world everyone would be able to choose to opt out or not. Why make no one able to choose
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 01:38 PM
1

that many subscribers indicates that TRP is fulfilling a need. The need for an excuse by blaming women for having standards
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:33 AM
2

They won't agree here for obvious reason. You’ll have to clarify the obvious reasons. What makes you think women in here would be totally different and thereflre completely irrelevant ? But in general ask any woman randomly on street and she will tell you I've see guys like this on a beach, he's just an average guy with "some muscle". Honestly, im considering doing it today for the fun it will bring. Ill be : "i know a guy who thinks this is an average guy and he says the vast majority of women …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:09 AM
2

Lol, that blissfull ignorance gets shattered pretty early in their life
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:00 AM
2

Wtf, i’ve been around more women than you would in 3 lifespans. Clearly you havent asked the question, where are all the women allegedly agreeing with you ? Where are all the studies ? This is all in your head trying to find reasons why women arent into you
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:57 AM
2

Not’really, unless you count men trying to pump and dump as "orbiters" then maybe yes, but that’s not something to desire much. Being mislead and used for sex sucks
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:54 AM
2

Yeh that’s my point. Men tend to see average women as below it and wolen do the same for men. We have a distorted idea of what is average for the opposite gender
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:49 AM
3

No they would never call this movie beast on steroid "average". They’d most likely prefer him with slightly less muscles. But this guy has rly good genetic so he can get away with too many muscles
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:47 AM
2

Seen by who ? Depends on who responds. If it’s a guy he’ll likely say the woman and vice versa
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:33 AM
2

Show me the studies you have in mind if you have any. Are you soeaking only out of your sheer emotions ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:31 AM
3

What makes you a goldsmith ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:24 AM
3

Take any study and you’ll find out women arent into overly muscular men. They prefer much more lean and athletic, aka natural
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:24 AM
1

None of the Women you mentioned are struggling to find partners except single mothers, so yes our standards are very low Oh really ? How come they are just as many as men to complain about dating being difficult. It’s just that it’s difficult for those that are unattrqctive may it be men or women
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:21 AM
1

Fuck her good and feed her
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 09:13 AM
0

Yeh it's so easy to have z better body than average
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 05:53 AM
0

No they dont, good people get healthy relationships, you gotta stop with the idea that being an ass would someone improve your chances. Being a liar and to pretend to be good when you're not will help your chances because ultimately goodness is rewarded. Ppl lie and pretend for a reason
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 10:38 PM
1

Are you even capable of communication. You linked an article and i explain how you failed at understanding it. It's called "Nice Guys™" because those men are the ones calling themselves nice guys while always having an agenda behind every move and being dishonest about who they are in order to get laid
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 05:47 PM
1

Nice guys™ pretend to be good because it increases their chances
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 05:44 PM
-2

right before citing multiple definitions. There are more than one word yes. The first one is "good" or being a nice person. That's a first concept. Then there's what they call the "Nice Guy™" which is a completely different concept. You really are limited arent you. Ill make it super clear to avoid any misconfusion. Anything said about the "Nice Guys™" doesnt apply to being good since it's two different things. Stop going into all your paranoia and non-sense. I have faith in you. Grasp the diffe…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 04:52 PM
-2

Stop playing dumb im sure you can do better than that. It's not multiple definitions. There's being nice and a good person. Then there's the Nice Guy ™ Stop doing so much to be a victim seriously this is what's wrong and so ridiculous about americans. You always all want to feel the victim This is dehumanization in action Lmfao are you a bot ? You read manipulating women and being a fake person pretending to be nice expecting sex in return and getting angry when it doesnt as "being a good person…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 04:36 PM
1

Lol yeh, it has to be an agenda ! Not sorry but you are what's worst in this society, fuck around but dont make kids you abandon
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 04:21 PM
-2

... This article doesnt prove your point at all. You simply cannot grasp the difference between being nice and the "Nice Guy". Read your own article omg
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 04:14 PM
0

No it's not, PUA is actually useful and keeps it at broad statements about human natures that work in every fields of life with women but not only, with men as well
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:37 AM
-2

Straw mans everywhere. What is denounced is when a guy does lead a girl on by saying he is interested in more than a hook up when he knows he isnt and he is lying because otherwise the girl wouldnt be interested. I think you will agree it's scumbag behavior. Yes sometimes it is mistaken with men who have been genuine all among who are indeed seeking long term but didnt catch feelings after all. This situation is just fine , you cant always predict the future But when a guy becomes friends with a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:30 AM
–

Wtf a proud deadbeat father. You really are the bottom of society and what everyone hates , men and women included
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:11 AM
-3

lol it's just the consequences of feminist propaganda, being nice was seen as something disgusting, How can a real human type this kind of shit. Find me one example where feminism says being a god caring person would be disgusting. Have you lost your mind ? Because you wont find any
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:07 AM
-2

waw using the 0.0001% of men that are very famous in order to draw a picture. So relevant and grounded.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:05 AM
-1

They look down on those traits because they do have them, they're wankers or assholes so they'd rather believe their (lack) of value would be a good thing and then they scream out loud how alpha they are
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 09:46 PM
6

who believe that completely normal male behavior is being overly pathologized What behavior do you have in mind exactly ? I've never felt targeted when they describe toxic men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:24 PM
2

Well then that means that a majority of people are winninh since dating liberalism is what a majority prefers
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 10:16 AM
2

Man you really need to wrap your head around the impact of social media and how it affects women Imo the general perception of it is wrong. The average girl doesnt receive many DM. If you're going for stacys only (i use these words as well,mostly because they're efficient and quick) then yeh the competition is most likely higher than in the past where that women was chased only by her immediate social circle. Btw im 30yo and still dating, going for both women my age and younger . The ability to …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 09:51 AM
-2

Tinder don't penalize women from left swipes like it does men Men arent penalised for swiping left wtf. We are when swiping only right and trust me ain't none of em swiping on anyone below a 8 if they are lucky The infamous "trust me bro". It's just your emotions speaking but I do feel Indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 08:13 AM
-3

Yes tell me about it ? Do you think women all swipe on the exact same 20% men ? No they dont, half of their swipe are for conventionally attractive guys and the other half goes to more average men that happen to be their type
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 08:08 AM
-3

How would you know ? They do pick average men, if you are never oicked maybe that means you belong to the bottom of the barrel
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 08:02 AM
1

Things didnt change much, yes there are more encounter through dating apps but otherwise dating is the same as 10years ago When they get to a party they already know who they want to fuck based off the guys social media. It's cut and dry man the party is a formality lol. Always been true, yes women are curious and they have crushes on men. They always asked for who was coming to parties
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:43 AM
-6

Oh boy you're unable to argue. Be careful it could harm your chances with women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:03 AM
1

Wtf is wrong with some men in here. 90% of my "ONS" had nothing to do with what you describe and i had my fair share of those. It wasnt "hookup culture" either but instead a good encounter during a party or a first date which wasnt followed up for some reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 06:38 AM
1

Well, I didn't really want to get into the whole thing but early encounters with people are all a form of mirage called "egotism á deux" by Erich Fromm in The Art of Loving where you're enjoying seeing yourself through other people's eyes. It's called external validation and yes it feels good. But it goes against the idea of presenting a fake version of yourself. Otherwise you only validate your ability to manipulate and lie. What makes you think the women aren't doing the same thing? That doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:38 PM
1

If lying is ok, it's ok Ohh god, the absence of any kind of nuance... Maybe you are an idiot after all if you cant tell the difference between a lie to save a life and a other one to scam or whatever. The motive is irrelevant. It is the only thing that can justify a lie. When there's a bigger cause than the lie at stake. Otherwise by default it's wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:09 PM
1

I don't have any concerns here? Wtf , you justify lieing for your own safety. Which is a totally different things thing than lieing to manipulate someone into liking someone you're not. You are obviously dodging the matter on purpose. You are not an idiot you do see the difference and that the first being justified doesnt justify the second
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:01 PM
1

Are you cheating on your wife or something ? I rly dont get your concerns But tbh you're being off topic, it's not about lies for safety measures, but lies to pretend to be more attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:41 PM
1

Lol, if that's really a concern you can always refuse to decline your identity. How many women stalked you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:21 PM
1

I've already worn a superman muscle suit , hasnt been a problem because it was being honest and obvious it wasnt my natural body You rly miss the point on purpose it looks like. It's about lieing and deception. Height shoes are actually cancer. Not my opinion but it's your emotions speaking, you cannot really elaborate. What if the girl likes it when her man wears those shoes. It's all fine
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 01:34 AM
1

Why would you lie if you have in mind the gross interaction where two people fuck solely on a physic basis ? And yeh i do know the difference except that the vast majority of ONS arent what you have in mind but instead the result of a refreshing/fun encounter.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 01:28 AM
2

Feel free to "lie" by making yourself more visually attractive. Could be a nice shirt that fits you well ! Feel free because there's nothing wrong with that so long you're being honest. I think it's the simple concept of lies that is above you. Wearing a shirt : not a lie we know there's your skin below, same with makeup. Can be a lie if she pretends to be natural when she's not. Like wearing lift shoes, one can do it , it's effective so why not, it's all good so long the guy doesnt lie and pret…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 01:19 AM
0

Ah you're that kind. For most it involves quite a lot of intimacy and it is why being lied to is unwanted
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 12:27 AM
2

Lol no you dont you align every incel opinions there is + it's irrelevant. I simply explained why your comparison doesnt work. Makeup doesnt constitute a lie. Lying and deception is wrong, it can be justified for a greater cause , trying to get one's dick wet doesnt fit
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 12:23 AM
0

How do you define fair game ? From my pov it doesnt fit at all. Dating and relationships arent meant to be about deception
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 12:20 AM
6

Oh it's definitely both
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 12:17 AM
1

If you already had a girlfriend you'd know that you're supposed to see her without her makeup relatively quickly. It's only a lie if she pretends not to wear makeup
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 12:16 AM
1

That's my point. It wasnt remotely about looks. Or if you set the bar there then 90% topics should be removed. It was about what's shallow and what isnt. This post is way way way more centred around looks than mine was
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 08:12 PM
0

Dont selectively apply the rules Im referring to my last past that had nothing to do with looks and was about the desire for physical attraction not being shallow. You removed it for being about "looks". Which it wasnt or then everything is. Im gonna repost it this is such bullshit when this thread gets your support and a comment
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:59 PM
–

Which safety net are you talking about ? The ones meant for childs ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:32 PM
–

Okay ... Representation then what do you actually suggest ? Try being real for a second
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:31 PM
–

And women considering us worse than bears. Is that "mature" to you? Grow up and stop playing the victim. This question was never about all men but about the risk of facing one of the dangerous one being bigger than the <0.1% of being attacked by a bear in the same wood.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:24 PM
–

From my experience men do most efforts before t Being married not after. Marriage being delayed sounds like a good thing on a macro level from that perspective only. those who are terminally single and only themselves to disappoint. But that's another topic ? We're discussing how first relationships are now coming a bit later than before, we're not talking about lifelong inceldom
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 06:10 PM
–

Wouldnt it result in men doing more efforts ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 06:04 PM
2

It slightly involves a dimension where it's about looks , why havent you closed that topic as well ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:00 PM
1

What kind of person follows someone around Reddit trying to tell them who they can date? I'm not, i already responded to that. I'm only using basic logic. The best metric for attractivity is and will always be who and how much something or someone attracts. Your league is who you can pull, may you like it or not. Someone unattracted by all of his/her options is someone whom standards are above his/her league. I'm not assuming any information, you said it all. You do have options but you find all…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 11:07 AM
3

come here and tell me who I can date and not. I dont have to. Reality is already screaming it at your face. You can do your best to ignore it and get angry but truth is that your league is who you can pull. Your issue isnt about not finding someone fit practicing sport, it's all about shallow look requirement that are above you can pull
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 10:36 AM
1

There are probably some women that are fit and also in your league. She wont have a feminine build but she will be your league and fit. Once again your league is who you can pull
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 10:24 AM
2

It only means that the redpill is a bunch of bullshit and having muscles and money isnt near enough by itself and doesnt define SMV. One has to also be decent and good to be around. . Or, you know, maybe women are just shallow as fuck about height. You are even more shallow you literally refuse having relationships because you dont find your own league attractive enough
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 10:14 AM
1

Your smv is determined by who you can attract. By définition you cant be two points clear of any woman who would have me. It just makes zero sense It's called being delusional or having standards that are too high for yourself. You're not the first to be guilty of this, you should cosplay as a woman and you'd get along great within FDS
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 10:05 AM
1

Nah it's hilarious you speak exactly like those gonna be ladycats with delusional standards no accountability and who blame their love life on men all together. Open your eyes on yourself idk
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 09:35 AM
1

Yeh you bring up another excuse which is your height while in reality most men yiu height are doing just fine. Women do it too when they say it's because they have no ass
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 09:23 AM
2

Most guys I know are exhausted and fed up. This isnt relevant Most men with my IQ aren’t happy. Do you realise how you sound ? What's your opinion on women who are doing the same as you are. Bitching about how the bar is so low for men and how it's being intelligent that's holding her back. You are being a caricature like seriously. It's hilarious how the arguments are the exact same may it come from angry men or women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 09:20 AM
1

https://images.app.goo.gl/GQFTEfHyP7eSaU8U9 I assume you are in the 35-44 bracket , 78% men are happy. 70% men if you're a bit older than that. Most men aren’t happy. Therefore you're wrong. Get back to reality and accept it. It's encouraging it means there's hope but it requires accountability , ppd men's kryptonite
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 09:00 AM
3

Just because some gets laid or married, doesn’t mean they’re happy. There are studies about happiness too and the majority is happy, that includes the average man I’m muscular with about 12% body fat and a full head of hair. Then you have the proof that nothing is holding you back except yourself how you behave and who you pick. It's entirely up to you, nonexcuse for your case. You start with a ton of bonus point compared to the average guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 08:40 AM
3

Reality doesnt agree with you. The median guy gets laid at 17-18 , the vast majority gets married and there isnt any major difference between bodycount repartition between men and women. You describe the reality of the least attractive in the room the bottom 10-20%
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:45 AM
2

Are you talking about the average man or about the ugliest in the room ? What about the average man ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:33 AM
2

Nope, money acts the same way as looks , it's part of the initial threshold
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 04:10 AM
1

Come on , that's the most incel-ish take you can make Truth is you either pass her looks threshold or not and there's not much if not nothing you can do about it. Once you do pass that threshold , when you get a date for instance, then it's all about personnality compatibility and game. Unless you're a greek god and some girls will fuck you ignoring redflags
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 04:05 AM
2

All these guys want to know how to talk to women. Its just like how you talk to any person Yeh but the main issue is that they are unable to do that. Most of the time they use lame ass comparisons to straw man whatever idea and be always right in their complaints. I think this place is filled with sociopaths and narcissists coping with their reality with what narrative suits them best
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 04:00 AM
6

You're just finding ways to complain at this point. Her message had it all. She doesnt deny the importance of looks/dick size. Maybe are you the one who overestimate its importance which ,would explain your current opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:43 AM
1

Read about the game it provides usefull informations, it helped me a lot. It shouldnt be written on your face that you're "inexperienced"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:30 AM
2

I dont downvote opinions for being different than mine. I'm not sure what's yours , i dont rly get your point. I agree with most things you said The reason I am even asking this is because the older you get the weirder it is to be a virgin. Anyone who's saying its not at least a little strange is lying. My first thought would be, "I wonder why he's a virgin" I literally cannot make any judgements one way or another without getting to know the person first. I agree Everyone here wants to harp on …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:58 AM
1

How and when do they usually notice it with you ? But that's my point, by the time she does, you gained experience
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:51 AM
0

Right so you frame it in the context of what you can gain from her. What a weird way to put it. If you prefer you can replace "my chances" by "our chances" it's literally the same Nary a thought towards what set of circumstances or belief systems contributed to her celibacy for 40 years. She's either extremely closed to the idea of dating making her reject all her options(could be trauma or standards) or there's something wrong about her making her without any option. Cant tell without more info…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:43 AM
-1

What do you mean ? Dont mark on your forehead that you're inexperienced. By the tile she'll notice you'll either be fine with her or have gained the needed experience
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:32 AM
4

No one has never made it so chances are i wont be the one exception
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:29 AM
-1

It's not a big deal to fail your first relationship because of inexperience, then you have it and can avoid repeating the same mistakes
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:24 AM
6

I'd be like "my chances are really low"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:23 AM
–

Those are opinions, are they only based on your emotions and feelings ? What's so wrong about the One time i approached a black woman she told me im charming but that she isnt into white men. What is si wrong about her being naturally into black mzn ? What about white women who arent into black men ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:48 AM
–

No you havent ?That's the only thing you said
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:41 AM
–

Hmm so it seems to be about selectiveness and being delusional What if the person is attractive enough to gets what he/she is attracted , how does it affect your opinion ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:36 AM
–

In response In response to something no one said 🤔 Beside that obvious addition, what is your opinion on the topic ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:31 AM
–

If everyone is shallow then the word has become meaningless. Also my questions werent meant to be responded by a yes or no it was asking you to elaborate your moral system and how you judge things. To me so far it's based purely on emotions
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:22 AM
–

It's not really a nuance though, more like an addition, a precision about attraction not being set in stone, but it doesnt nuance the fact that not being attracted to someone isnt a shallow reason not to be/fuck with someone. Even though in other circumstances attraction could have been there
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:20 AM
–

Elaborate further please. I think it makes sense to first choose based on looks then to check for compatibility
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:00 AM
–

That's what i'm asking, why did you comment this ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 10:57 AM
–

Is everyone shallow or do you have to be attracted to a minimum amount of the other gender ? How and where do you set the bar ? Is being into 20% of your coworkers being too shallow or not ? Im curious about how you set the rules. So what if you set the bar at 20% to be shallow. I happen to be attracted to only 10% women. What does it mean about me ? What should i do ? Should i start dating women i find unattractive otherwise im bigoted narrow minded and disgusting ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 10:54 AM
–

because they actually care far more about what other people think about their partner than how they themselves feel. How do you know ? I've seen this accusation but havent witnessed it irl. How do you tell the difference between someone with conventional preferences and someone who has them because of what other people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 10:46 AM
–

Thinking the only difference between friendship and romance is surface level looks is incredibly shallow. Yep but no one said this so far
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 10:40 AM
2

Nearly half (47%) of all Americans say dating is harder today than it was 10 years ago Id be curious to see what it was 10years ago since the idea of dating being harder was already commpn
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 04:50 AM
4

Damn you're one of the lucky one, a top percenter, must be flooding in so many pussies and women fucking you no matter your behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 03:34 AM
1

Lol. Top 5% men will have sex with women trying their best to appeal to them. Ugly girsl are getting pumped and dumped with disrespect and no care for their pleasure. That's only considering options for meaningless hook ups which is at best the equivalent of fast food to gastronomy. I’ve asked maybe 10 women I know how many men could they text right now “I want to get married this year. Would you be open to that?” Or literally “will you marry me?” Every woman I’ve asked says they have at least t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 08:28 PM
1

It's simply not true. The average man loses his virignity at 17.5 the average man is married with kids and had a few relationships beforehand The bottom 10% of women have way more options than the top 5% of men How you can type this with a straight face ? That's absolutely crazy. Ugly girls' options are terrible, handsome men's options are genuine
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 06:11 PM
1

It's not men are failing women, it's some men. Can be for many reasons. Terrible look or personnality or not trying among other reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 06:02 PM
1

Funny how you dont consider the common denominator to be the reason why. Maybe he's a bad fuck so women lose interest
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 07:52 AM
1

The redpill honestly and unflattering informs men we have been losers and cannon fodder throughout the ages and that’s the deal. It isn’t pretty. Come on the average man is doing alright. Truth is there has always been losers, from both sex but it's a minority. Which is the actual hard truth they both try to evade thanks to fds or trp
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:59 PM
1

Yes FDS is the same Are you failing men ? Dont worry FDS has you covered, with us it's possible to blame men while being the common denominator ! Details vary as tonwhy but that's it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:57 PM
0

He maybwonder why they sleep with him then lose interest
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:20 PM
1

FDS women are just as convinced as you are that their bullshit would be the truth. TRP isnt based on reality it mostly serves the purpose of giving excuses to men failing women. Being a pos or the most boring man there is ? No worries trp has you covered, just say it's women's fault for being hypergamous. Wanna feel average instead of a loser ? TRP has you covered, we pretend the average man is as much a loser as we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 09:56 PM
1

Same for trp who claim they want to be traditional but banged a dozens of girls and expect their future wife to both do the chores have a job and be low bodycount
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 08:10 AM
1

Results are king of you want but how do you explain that the result and conclusions of fds and trp are exactly the same but reversed ? Who is right ?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 08:08 AM
1

One similarity to discuss is they both recommend spinning plates, which makes me think they often find each other in the dating market place and it creates a "Mr & Mrs Smith" situation Im not sure, they both advise each other how to avoid each others and as toxic as they are. But when tjey do find each other it must be hilarious FDS sometimes discuss how to keep a guy on the side for sex whilst dating "HVMs" and pretending to be a prude, "because men have a Madonna-Whore complexes", which is wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 08:01 AM
2

You can wonder why you so often pick this kind of person
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 07:54 AM
1

Which conclusions from trp i presented do you disagree with ?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 07:44 AM
0

Yeh i agree
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:34 PM
3

Nicely put
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 08:52 AM
7

FDS is completely unrealistic, it tells women to just have higher standards financially, socially Honestly i agree, it's very much projection when both side calls each other delusional. Have you seen trp common standards ? The girls they call mid ? They want pretty young low bodycount submissive etc etc all aiming for the same small portion of women It might as well be the female version of the blue pill for how useless it is. 😂 But we probably have different definition of the bluepill. To me it…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:52 AM
1

Yeh never seen a woman complain about her man looks and absence of self care or clothing Obese men are slaying just as much , women arent looks driven. Only men are. Am i one of your girlies now that we agree women are so much better
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:39 AM
1

Do you really believe that letting yourself go is on the same level as hitting your spouse? Come on i shouldnt have to clarify it. No i dont. It's to show how absurd these rhetorics look like applied to extreme situations. Not my best approach ill admit that The going on dates things is absolutely a fair equal, as both translate in putting work to impress your partner/keeping the flame alive/whatever. Yeh that was my best example imo. I wonder how i would be received if i came and made a post on…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:29 AM
1

Omg... it's a comparison. It's not my belief. Yes i gave several intensities of the same reasoning going from neglecting yourself to straight up obvious domestic abuse. It is made in order to help you understand the slippery slope of it but also why it's wrong all together. If a man says "yes i gained 20kg but that's because my wife is not enough and im not happily married" you wouldnt see it with a good eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:12 AM
2

You guys = FDS or TRP mindset TRP strategy to be successful. Successfull at what ? At deceiving people in order to extract what they want. That's fucked up and morally loaded I am unsure of where and how you concluded that I therefore believe in manipulating people I date, or that I am min-maxxing relationships to extract the most value out of them. Because you validate trp and fds which is all about it. In my first comment I even said I am in a great relationship And im sure you're happy that y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:08 AM
1

I gave several examples in order to avoid you responding this. Forget all together the violence. Focus on all the other examples of a man justifying letting himself go by his wife not being good enough. That's the top post of fds
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:02 AM
1

You literally claimed that women like to see men miserable. No i havent
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:00 AM
1

If a man is happily married he would never hit his wife ! If a man is happily married he would still go on dates with his wife ! If a man is happily married he wouldnt cheat ! If a man is happily married he would help with the chores ! If a man is happily married he would keep a job ! Men arent saying "hahaha now i can stay at home and not da single thing of my life" It's not commletely absurd but you do see the trend
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:56 AM
3

At least you show consistency ill give you that but your mindset is exactly what i denounce. No the end doesnt justify any means. You guys have corrupted the essence of relationships, it's not about what you can extract from someone else. It's not about following a playbook in order to be the most appealing. It's not about being deceptive in order to make "work" what wouldnt otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:51 AM
4

I would not want my daughter or my friends to cross the path of a redpill guy. But the thing is that, just like FDS, these strategies work for them. Who really cares who does it Do you hold the same opinion on redpill men because it works for them when they're being "strategic" ? Be real
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:35 AM
1

Ah yes, a post dodging accountability. Also go past the top post of a community if you want to make a proper idea. "
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:33 AM
1

Idk they can be sneaky and they often are aware what they can reveal or not about their fucked up views. If they were always honest it would be easy yes but id rather be cautious
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:27 AM
2

Oh you're right i should have added that to the list of similarities. They both claim they act and their ideas are in response to the other gender
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:24 AM
3

I do care, i would never want to cross the path of a FDS woman. They're disfunctional and have corrupted the essence of relationships and love. They are cold af and have close to zero empathy for men's perspective. They also are fake calculating every move in order to look best and to shit test men constantly
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:22 AM
4

I tend to disagree, FDS does a ton of broad statements about men and what we would be attracted to, what we respect and dont etc etc. Same as TRP and they both admit that there are a few good ones among the other gender. The form is different but the substance remains the same. They do talk about what makes allegedly a high value woman
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:16 AM
1

You must be trolling , there's no way to defend fds. It's a bunch of sociopaths trying to get the most out of being sociopaths
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:58 AM
1

You cant defend FDS it's the equivalent of the most hardcore redpill men where they see women only as a mean to sex
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:55 AM
1

If they really were among the ugliest , they would just say it outright. Instead they portray the ugliest's reality as what it would be for average men which lets le believe they do it from the perspective of somewhat average men, for a big part of them. The blackpill is a gross exagerration to feed excuses for their failures and to hate on women for allegedly not caring about personnality at all. The bluepill aka mainstream/balanced opinion knows very well how looks matter a ton
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 02:24 PM
1

Yes it's possible to be so ugly that there's no hope but it doesnt apply to the vast majority of incels
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 12:54 PM
1

In your mind no excuse is valid is what I'm getting, which is just as delusional a take as theirs Not what i said They're excuse makers because they even put the blame for not having friends on being ugly. That idea should be laughed at or at worst a rare occurence They're excuse makers because they paint the average men as an incel. They do it because most of the time they have average genetic. Being fit and having good posture does a ton , only the worst genetic are doomed
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 12:53 PM
1

Is it really a hard truth when so many of them want so bad to believe in it and relieve themselves from any personal responsibility ? Look how much they underline any topic that involves accountability. They're excuse makers for the most part
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 12:11 PM
1

Looks gets you the foot in the door, personnality does almost everything else. Im not blackpilled because they heavily underline the importance of game /personnality. I do aknowledge the importance of look, if she's not attracted it's at best a friend
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 12:08 PM
2

For efficiency. I hardly see myself tell my hierarchy i wont do a job because it involves some one on one aspects with female coworker. I wouldnt ask them to babysit us to make sure nothing sexual is happening. Seriously how do you handle this if it's more than words on ppd ?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 03:04 AM
1

Then it's a he, it doesnt rly matter
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 02:59 AM
1

I think she has a point, it largely depends on your reputation and how you're seen by coworkers
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 02:58 AM
1

You're very paranoid even though what you say isnt completely absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 02:53 AM
8

There's no way you feel smart from this lame gotcha attempt. Btw i have a question, what is your estimation of the risk of being attacked by a bear in a wood ? It's really low in case you didnt know. Been in walks my entire life where there are bears and in my lifetime no one died there
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 02:16 AM
2

Yeh nothing wrong with being ugly or having unattractive features out of your control. That's disingenuous to ignore the fact she doesnt fit at all beauty standards. Huge shoulders no boobs, manly posture and a bland somewhat okay face. Also that's ignoring her own standards. Im sure she could get a man but not the ones she wants. Could just as much if not more be a case of someone being delusional with their standard with her being conventionally unattractive going for too high
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 04:28 AM
6

That’s not a proper way to argue. You’re delusional af if you think being 6’1 is seen as attractive for women. Tall is good but up to a point only, dont gaslight 6’1 women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 02:45 AM
0

Conversely, we can deduce that a man with plenty of options is the man that women want. Bro that's deep. It doesn't matter how close the man lives to the woman or how close he is in age, she still has the tendency to examine if he's a loser or not. She determines that by how many options he has. Thanks to this Amazing discovery we found the trick to have unlimited success with women. Just say you have 5 other women chasing you. Sure will do the trick
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:27 PM
-3

From the other, it might help to decrease the numbers of men involved into it and it will stop getting into popular feed of social medias where impressionable teens can see it. I disagree , being exposed to reality and other views is the only backstop they have. The more marginalised the more extreme
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:53 AM
1

That's fallacious reasonning
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 07:44 AM
1

It's awfully irrelevant. Are you top 0.1% face ? Why do you care
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 06:00 AM
1

i agree with the appproach. Smv should be based on actual experiences, not some random wealth or own opinion on own looks I think im a 7 in look , 9 in game , 3 in status and i pull mostly 4-8 women. Im not too demanding so long she's into me and craving
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:21 PM
2

How did you come to that conclusion ? Based on what
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:15 PM
2

How attractive are you ?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:12 PM
1

This guy is typically not representative, he's an extremely good looking guy, his reality is just different, we dhouldnt care much zbout him or top Hollywood stars. That's my point
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:11 PM
1

lmao exactly because you know what would happen is just attractive people bullying ugly people and then the sub would die No that's not the reason, my point would be to center the discussion on average 20-80% instead of the extremes what kind of bullying ?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:09 PM
2

Yeh tbh i have second thoughts on my take, it wouldnt bring so much and yeh people are immediately connecting looks with blackpill
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 08:59 PM
0

I agree i despise the blackpill, i dont think they should be the only one talking about look. Without nuance brought, the blackpill is the only source of information available at the moment for men wondering whether it's their looks as a somewhat average guy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 08:56 PM
1

I wasnt, im probably making a lot more mistakes, hopefully i'm understandable
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 08:54 PM
1

Force everyone to post their pics or at least post their photofeeler ratings Id love that tbh but it's very unrealistic. Photofeeler isnt the most accurate, i get bad ratings even though im good looking :p If lookism were allowed, then just allow it in it's ultimate form No clue what you mean by this. I said the same situation and its interpretation varies depending on look.. Same with someone's results. If you're average looking it's most likely your fault, if you look like a monster have tons …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 08:52 PM
2

It's not blackpill point, the bluepill aka mainstream opinion is perfectly aware of how much difference it makes. The blackpill is an excuse machine and not much more. They pretend average men would have it completely dry. That's not true. I will agree for the bottom 10-20% , they wont be given a chance romantically by the extreme majority, no matter how cool and nice they are
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 08:41 PM
–

Have you seen how poorly the man vs bear thing has been received ?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 05:42 PM
3

I got a pretty unique insight. I was obese until 16, was extremely insecure so i was acting asexual and used to be several girls' bestfriend. I used to exchange notes and they were giving me their secret diaries to have my opinion. Pretty fun stuff when i think about it. I also have a cousin my age i was rly close to, during vacations it was either her at my home or me at hers. When at her home, a lot of times i've been included in her friend group, the typical group of popular cute very feminin…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 05:01 PM
2

Being top 1% earner and jacked makes it impossible to determine whether it's this or your height and genetic, which is what the blackpill is all about. Me i know for a fact that look is huge because im 30yo with no status or money , all i have is my look and cool to be around personnality. I know im always appreciated but without a good look i get close to no woman (used to be obese). Been through depression and still had good look at that time, and wasnt able to pull either. When i have both a …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:48 AM
6

Congrats, now you know what it feels like to be an ugly girl. No i dont. Among those 10 match the ugly girl gets , 5 are from guys who havent even seen her pics , swiping right on all profiles. 2 would unmatch but wont bother , 2 would try to pump and dump and maybe 1 is somewhat interested and will stop the conversation the second it's boring or demanding. The conversations will be sexual very early etc etc If i compare to my 10 match , it's not the same at all. They want to engage learn about …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:36 AM
0

Im not blackpilled , they are excuse makers, they pretend they dont have friends because they are not attractive, wtf. The only crossover is that looks matter a lot in dating and given how high in conventional attractiveness they think you are , people will behave differently. Therefore the analysis of someone's dating life has to consider the look factor
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:29 AM
16

Taking look into account doesnt mean blackpill content. They dont have the exclusivity on the topic. Also their takes are way too defeatist
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 08:39 AM
5

A man with 10 match and a woman with 10 match isnt near the same situation. The man has been selected 10 times by women swiping left 95% of the time , he is in their top 5% The woman doesnt know whether it's from guys swiping right on everyone. She doesnt know if the guy finds her only fuckable not datable. And quantity is directly related to quality, You cant say this with a straight face, most of the time it's the opposite. On tinder it definitely is the opposite. As a man i get 5-10 match per…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 08:08 AM
1

. One thing pointed out by men is that average women get the same attention as a HMV man That's simply not true , unless being in bad faith talking only about the quantity of attention and not the quality. The attention from a guy trying to pump and dump isnt desirable at all
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 07:05 AM
4

Well, there's the "on paper i cant blame her" and the actual feelings. If i had to learrn that the girl inwas considering a relationship with fucked another guy after we started dating, it would definitely affect my opinion on her. I wouldnt blame her but it could very much mean the end of the relationship for me
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 05:22 AM
1

but it is still easier for women to set up the relationship and test for commitment, than it is for men No it's not easier, women wont know until a very long time if the guy does like her and is not just using his opportunity after a dry spell. For men it's easy. We shoot our shot and we're rejected or not and move on accordingly
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 04:35 AM
5

Im surprised by 50% men believing in patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:31 AM
7

Hopefully you're in the top 20% then
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:18 AM
0

Definitely not true
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:11 AM
0

Online dating was WAY worse , it was a no go zone with 9 men per woman. It had huge stigmas attached to it and seen as the desperate way for desperate men
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:11 AM
1

I agree with she doesn't usually put herself in your shoes to see what you should do, she puts herself in the other woman's shoes and tells you what you should do from her perspective as the woman in that situation It's both a good and bad things, it helped me understand how oblivious to men's experiences they are and to understand the various misconceptions and common missunderstandings. Men are kinda oblivious to what works for women too when they say "just hit on men it's easy for women" when…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:15 AM
1

How is it gaslighting myself ? You cant know why a girl rejected you. If the same approach works with a girl then 5 minutes later it doesnt, i just assume it wasnt her type
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:43 AM
1

actually want to see you succeed more than they would care about giving the politically correct opinion to gain social credit points. This only happens on internet or in a group setting tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:35 AM
–

Going straight to Nazis 🤣🤣 You're right we are victims of genocide because women are scared of men with bad intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 06:43 PM
–

There's a clear desire to prioritise this interpretation over the other ones. My interpretation : having a random bear somewhere in the same wood isnt that a big risk, happens all the time without noticing so the fact that a portion of women find this risk as lower as a man who would happen to have bad intention isnt much of a shock. I know they do not have in mind all the men who wouldnt do anything wrong but the ones who would, which isnt me
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 06:41 PM
–

Why do you want to believe that ?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 05:15 PM
1

They were able to get the guy whose research looked into the understanding of alpha male wolves to back down and tell us all that we're crazy No, it's the definition and the idea of what does the alpha that is missconceptualised. The alphas that remain the longest are the most emphatetic and social in the group. Strengh is required but far from the only thing. Agressivity is detrimental
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 01:13 AM
0

Agreed, except free will is a dumb framing Annnnd that's when it becomes bullshit. Seriously you said so many words for something as simple as "genetic plays a part in our behavior, genetic has been selected through times". Which is obvious, almost a water is wet take. The bullshit comes when you extrapolate with "there's no freewill". There is , even though it is biased by in many ways To establish that genetic plays a role isnt enough to then claim whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 01:10 AM
1

Oh lala, you used the word soy, you're so badass by not approaching women
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 04:57 PM
–

How would you feel if you invested a lot of your attention on a girl you thought were rly nice and matching your intentions only to find out later that she lied all along and she's on onlyfans doing that to as many men as possible ?? I guess you'd be "I consented at the time that happened so it's fine"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:55 PM
–

I covered this in my initial post, men don't owe women relationships You keep ignoring the elephant in the room. Seriously why do you think men lie ?? For fun ? For absolutely no reason ?? Because of some weird pathology ?? They lie because otherwise they wouldnt have sex knowing very well when the girl doesnt want to just hook up. That's using someone for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:44 PM
–

Another one ignoring the elephant in the room. Using someone for sex happens when someone is dishonest about his intentions. When she wouldnt have sleep with the guy if she had not be mislead. Casual sex / hook up is rarely the intent, that's why a lot of guys lie and pretend in order to have sex even though they already know it wont go anywhere else
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:29 PM
3

I was accepted in the girl gang, literally as if i was one too so they were as trashy as it gets. I learned that they are not the innocent princess i thought they were, that they talk about sex with wayyy more details than men do, that they love to pursue a guy that they're insecure af that they simp as well etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:21 PM
8

Your own source is proving my point furthermore. Do you actually believe that 75% men 18-45 are on onlyfans ?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 01:46 PM
–

He wont respond, you scractched his delusional world
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 06:42 AM
–

I get his point, be precise with the words, calling everything a rape isnt good. Could make it meaningless. I agree with his definition . Bargaining for sex is a douchebag move but shouldnt be considered rape (unless extremes maybe)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 01:51 AM
14

I have a cousin my age she gave me a precious insight
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 12:59 AM
1

the only difference is that she doesn't have to pay, which is irrelevant to the moral issue It's not irrelevant it's the whole point. If someone needs to pay for it, that's because he cant otherwise and that means everyone always rejects him. So chances are it's for good reasons and better not bother. That's the underlining logic
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 08:11 AM
5

Id donate him money for his talent, it takes huge understandings to fake it so good
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:54 AM
2

Yeh i agree, i have most success when in a setting where i can talk and flirt, like cozy bars with big sofas and soft music. It’s fun talking to me i can conversate for hours about anything, my typical date is 4h long. Im challenging i stand for tm opinions im not afraid to call my date’s bullshit if she happens to say one, im able to recognise when i said something stupid and will laugh about it instead of denying or dodging , i understand social norms and play with them, im good at reading the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:50 AM
6

I rly believe he’s serious and not a troll, check his post history
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:19 AM
14

This is gold and the paroxism of coping with one’s reality , i screenshoted before he deletes it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:08 AM
1

its not a strawman It is. It's the same as using a mass murderer who did it on the name of god and then say "Look christianism is all about mass murders". You gave an accurate definition of feminism believe it or not. Put it to the test, ask feminists whether they agree and you'll see a vast majority who will. Differences in interest/passion, way of seeing the world, the shape of the IQ distribution, talents, ... You're not saying much with this, id be more interested in the consequences, do you…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 07:43 PM
2

Do you understand , yes or no, that a claim can be valid without it's contrapositive being valid as well ? It's as simple as that. Squares are parallepiped. This is valid even though not being a square doesnt mean not being a parallepiped (recrangles) Inexperienced men are irrelevant. This is valid even though not being inexperienced doesnt make you automatically relevant. (Andrew tate).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 10:30 AM
2

Your claim : Contrapositive are ALWAYS verified. Therefore if i can prove that her claim's contrapositive isnt verified, then her initial claim is proven wrong. My response : Nope. Contrapositive arent always verified. I gave you several examples. Therefore by proving that the contrapositive of her claim isnt verified, you didnt contradict her initial claim. In other words, you only proved that the contrapositive isnt verified in this situation but didnt contradict the initial claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 10:16 AM
4

No it doesnt. How did you come up with that idea ? Are you speaking for yourself ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 09:53 AM
3

For example, "If it rains, I will be wet." -> "I am not wet, therefore it did not rain." Thank you for making it easier. Another option is you were inside when it rained. Not being wet isnt equal to it did not rain... The contrapositive is rarely verified. Another example Squares = parallepiped Restangles (not a square) = parallepiped
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 09:44 AM
3

Therefore contrapositive: People who have touched a girl's vagina should be listened to about this topic. Flawed logic, why would this have to be true for her claim to be valid ? Clueless men who never had actions are irrelevant, that doesnt mean we have to listen to andrew tate. You made a straw man. Her claim isnt "if a man has experience then you must necessarely listen to him"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 09:30 AM
12

Sex is just one aspect of expressing love through physical touch. Yeh, it doesnt change my point though. Why would you refuse to check compatibility on that aspect ? I hope you then would then agree that women could hold men to those same standards. Not exactly sure what you meant with that but yeh obviously everyone can have the standard they want, it's not my business. I do believe that demonstrates lack of patience How come ? What is the benefit of marrying without checking sexual compatibili…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:46 AM
17

I want good sex, not salvageable sex. I am kinky and my love language is physical touch. It isnt compatible with everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:18 AM
4

You're proving her point without notice and that's funny. You have person A and person B who both fit the same description of tall handsome and confident, but one is masculine and the other isnt. Therefore the definition used isnt valid
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:52 AM
21

My opinion is that mariage is a big deal and id rather check sexual compatibility beforehand
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:50 AM
1

I use hypergamy the same even tho it has some small nuances between men and women. In the end it remains the same, being unhappy with your own "league" being overpicky with a dose of delusions. Your type of girls most likely happens to be the same as a lot of other men and you are outcompeted. Honestly i feel bad for those with very restrictive / high standards /preferences. You dont rly choose to be too picky, feelings are feelingd therefore why it's a curse imo
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:17 PM
1

Yeh being hypergamous can be a curse, good luck
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 11:56 AM
2

Yeh, among the 200+ comments there are of course 3 women who came to say how they hate being hit on and how they believe all women would think the same. I know they exist but i dont give them much credit and i wont feel bad for a 5second interaction with one of them in real life
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:15 AM
0

I never "hit on" any woman, i just randomly start conversation with people nearby and when it goes rly well i i take the person's infos. I have near 100% success rate because i dont shoot my shot if the interaction wasnt special. Also i dont come off as hitting on them as it's not the primary objective
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:13 AM
1

I dont think i am that good looking
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:03 AM
2

Well, they remain women so it is an advantage but having kids is a huge disadvantage
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:42 AM
2

Yeh that's where you assume wrong. It has not been 48hours but months since the last time a guy had a genuine conversation with her. Those event are a rarity nowaday. There's only a few rare losers who ask the number within 30s
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:36 AM
1

Speak for yourself. Also i noticed women here tend to have in mind the gross approach where the guy goes randomly to a girl at a wrong time and directly ask for her number. That's suicidal and doesnt count
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:30 AM
1

No that's not true. There will always be a portion of women who will be annoyed no matter what, but that portion of women is much smaller now. Of course it's not a 100% success rate
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:28 AM
1

Yeh dont run around the city to find girls to hit on. Be a social butterfly, speak to women around you and when it goes particularlt well. Ask for her number
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:24 AM
1

The logic is rather simple. Women were annoyed by being hit on so often. Now they're not so they're not annoued and your chances are higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:22 AM
3

And that's a good thing for us. Now cold approach is easier than ever before
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:21 AM
0

Women in prior generations didn't mind rejecting men, but they did their best to not hurt people's feelings. Now, women enjoy making rejection a humiliation ritual and are more mean spirited. So lots of men have checked out. The opposite, now women are way nicer when it's the first time of the year
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:12 AM
3

There isnt much of an equivalent to the mgtow thing or on a much smaller scale
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:55 PM
2

I love how passionnate they can be and how it makes me see things in a different way. I love when they're outgoing and push me to go out of my comfort zone. I love how they smell the way they Laugh i love their body their softness the way they move. I fucking love women
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:35 PM
1

You are wrong about the definition of cold vs warm approach. It is purely a stranger vs social circle thing. It's that most men are terrible at it. Be social and when the interaction goes very well shoot your shot, dont be result oriented. I probably have 5 interactions for each times i ask someone's info. As soon as i feel the person is closed i back up. It's usually very easy to tell. From my experience the ones like you are a minority. Which i respect, all it takes is one or two micro express…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 10:18 PM
0

It's that most men are terrible at it. Be social and when the interaction goes very well shoot your shot, dont be result oriented. Just today i had a refreshing encounter with an ukrainian cutie (yeh that's cliché af) I was looking for a bench to eat my lunch, infortunately they were all taken, i had to sit next to someone. Asked her if i could sit then 5 minutes later someone dropped his trash on the floor in front of us, we both saw it were equally shocked then we had an eye contact and starte…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 09:55 PM
0

Yeh that's suicidal that's why it doesnt count as it's doomed to fail. What i count as an approach is a situation where the context allows a conversation to begin and after 5 min of nice talking the guy makes his move. That's how you meet someone
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:47 PM
0

Lol you're so wrong. Here is the way it works Gigachad : she'll fuck him anyway Chads : she'll fuck him given no obvious redflag, no need particular chemistry Normies : about 20% women are attracted to you being their type. Must have no redflag and nice compatibility for it to work Bottom 20%: look will disqualify you with 95% women no matter how cool you are
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:43 PM
1

Yes she's not unique neither are you. I wonder what you count as an approach. A catcall / guy directly asking for your number doesnt imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:38 PM
1

Idk man i've been there, except that i got kicked out and havent been granted the benefit of doubt. It sucked but it hasnt been traumatising either. Tbh inrly dont recommend night clubs to get women, unless you have a big crowd to go with
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:55 PM
-4

You care about your dating victim status dont you ? Im speaking from experience not out of belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:20 PM
0

The first step of my PUA journey was cumulating 10 rejections the same day. Did that 10 year ago, been desensitised from rejection ever since. Honestly all you need is to assume the girl had a boyfriend or that you werent her type, no need to assume you fucked up. Unless you obviously did something wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:05 PM
1

So you said hi to a girl, she immediately called the cops who told her to fuck off is that it ?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:55 PM
-1

Yeh that's why it takes courage it's not a freewin. On the other hand, using your casino analogy, the bet is free, you wont lose any of your savings, maybe 30s to 5 min at wors.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:51 PM
-1

Im not blaming you, im willing to accept the idea that you've been extremely unlucky. How much jailtime have you done for saying hi to a woman ?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:42 PM
-1

You and your friends must be extremely unlucky, or maybe you are doing something wrong without knowing
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:13 PM
1

If you're handsome it's less important as you're already having easy success on tinder. Cold approach allows average looking men to stabd out, where they wouldnt on dating apps
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:14 PM
-2

Even "genuine and respectful approaches" do not result in success becuase the amount of creeps approaching women hardens them to instantly and harshly reject any guy approaching they dont like the look of right away. Clarify your idea. Are you saying that the approach doesnt matter ? She may see you getting rejected by another girl seconds ago, it wont change anything ? That's as stupid as it gets so im giving you an opportunity to clarify
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:12 PM
0

Glossing over how you basically said that anyone who used dating apps is a creep That's on you. I said the reputation it had, didnt give my own opinion Yeah so that’s the issue. You’re conflating “easier to approach” and “easier to approach and succeed,” which are two separate ideas. Im not, in my previous response i stated that it's both more effective and easier than in the past Easier to approach” than ever - not true, or at least not demonstrated how by your comments. Another cognitive issue…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:09 PM
2

Okay bro
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:04 PM
-6

You are obviously a mgtow , my point is made for men who havent given up with dating. If you think women cannot bring you anything positive then yes approaching them doesnt make sense
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:01 PM
-1

As a side question, your flair is "blue pill man" but the stance "don't believe what women say .... on twoXchromosomes My stance is dont give credit to loud extremists speaking only for themselves. I see the bluepill as the nuanced approach of dating where everything matters and not only your look and wealth as the redpill claims. I agree with several things with trp, im a former pua there are crossovers
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:50 PM
0

Tbh im just really chatty so i often talk to strangers may it be men or women, zero intent, when the interaction goes much better than the average one, i ask for a number at the end of’it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:38 PM
0

So all the women that I met on dating apps and went on dates with, were they creepy too? Or is it only men that can be creepy? What a terrible gotcha attempt. Yes women can be creepy too. Also, you have yet to prove why you believe it is “easier” than ever. What’s your metric besides feelings? I did already. In the past all men were aproaching so you were competing vs all men and your approach was like the 3rd of the weej. Now no one does, the competition is vs street harasser and when you appro…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:36 PM
-2

I guess it helps with the theory but at one point you need the practice. It's only by doing several approach that you end up lowering the stress it induces
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:29 PM
-2

Going on dating apps is easier and less effective at the same time Edit: also, dating apps were around 10-15 years ago, and they were amazing back then. They are actually way worse today. No. It was seen as the creepy way to find someone, for those who cant in the real life. Online dating suffered a lot of stigmas for a long time. Or should the argument be changed to “it has never been more effective to approach women,” Nope, both easier and more effective than in the past. Approaching women rem…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:25 PM
-2

but putting on a fedora going around greeting every women you meet with “M’lady” and asking her out will not only make you an object of ridicule, but is likely to get you arrested for being a public nuisance Those are not genuine and respectful approaches, that's hitting on everyone and yeh that's both ridiculous and unattractive as fuck. They want to be chosen
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:19 PM
-1

Yeh it's so stupid it has be done in bad faith. They understood what they wanted to hear , an excuse to not approach anymore and stay in their room while complaining they have no other option than apps
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:16 PM
1

That's not what i said. You used the example of a girl who is approached 6 times a day to which i respond that it's true only for a tiny minority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:13 PM
-5

Maybe you're boring idk, it tends to be the case when men try too hard to be respectful. But your take was off topic since you're talking about warm approach. Also i didnt say it is easy , i said it is easier than ever before
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:09 PM
0

How would you learn without trying ? It's okay and normal if you fail your first approaches and get rejected
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:05 PM
-7

Yes, that’s the point. More men were approaching because it was easier to do so. No, they were approaching because dating apps werent the baseline to meet women. Now it is and people tend to do what's easiest not the most effective,, which is going on apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:03 PM
-8

women are loud about how much they dislike men. Your diagnosis is simple : too much internet
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:01 PM
-1

I agree with everything.good take
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:00 PM
-1

It's a matter of mathematics. To have most women being approached regularly we'd need to have most men approaching regularly. The median woman doesnt get approached. Only a few men do it and
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:56 PM
-4

. Women do not like a confident guy when he's like the 6th one they have to tell no to in the past 48 hours. Indeed, but that's the experience of 1-5% women and you're delusional if you think otherwise. Men stopped approaching therefore women arent approached anymore. The median woman is unlikely to have been approached yet in 2024
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:54 PM
1

As an average guy you have WAY higher chances by approaching women than using dating apps. Im not a chad. I struggle on the apps getting 1-3 match. It's near impossible to stand out from my pics alone. With cold approaches i can
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:46 PM
-4

Nope. It was way easier about 10-15 years ago. No, there was way more men approaching women making the competition much harder and each individual approach less valuable as they were less scarce for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:41 PM
-3

Yes you do exist but your experience isnt representative of most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:32 PM
-2

Hmm i agree overall. My take isnt made for those who approach with zero result, it's aimed at those who arent even trying At this point how much of an asshole do i need to be to inflict my presence This is where i disagree, as i said, most women do enjoy being approached even when they dont reciprocate. It feels good and most women are quite insecure. You are not inflicting your presence and tbh the interaction will last 5second if she's in a hurry, rly not a big deal
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:29 PM
2

Here is the caveat. Straight forward approaches are much less acceptable than ever before Very accurate, good take. The more natural it feels the better and if you sound like a player doing his 10th approach of the day, it wont work. The best way is indeed to use the context. The last number i got was after my bus got delayed a woman complained outloud and i joined saying something along "yeh this is so annoying, definitely the worst bus line in town blablabla
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:20 PM
3

See this as a good lesson, do not take at face value the most extreme views you witness on internet. The loud ones are rarely the most representative
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:10 PM
-1

I'm not your ex. Avoid saying "we" , you do not represent women. You are a small minority too prone to judge. In a way i understand the worries about an imbalance but you should limit it at that. There's a risk and im cautious about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:10 AM
-7

How come ? I dont believe id be preying on anyone. Assuming i would be solely from the age gap is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:14 AM
-10

Yes please judge me on a situation you know nothing about. Imagine the horror she’s 18 and im 30 , most horrifying part is we met thanks to reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:26 AM
3

Im 30yo i met an 18yo girl yesterday , im gonna shoot my shot
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:13 AM
–

Women won’t respect you for empathizing with them. They don’t want it and aren’t evolutionarily hard-wired to accept it. These sentences NEVER come from a guy that is doing fine with women
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 06:10 AM
3

Like most cases made here it relies on a straw man. No one tells lonely men to go to escorts to find companionship. It's only advised to men wanting sex or saying women are only good at that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 10:11 AM
14

Lol the disingenuity. You can demand to have your activities paid by men who will put up with this but at least be thankful dont try to turn it into some sort of normal and due thing
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 01:28 AM
1

video, a woman catalogs the makeup (...) it totals over $1,700. Redflag for many reasons Seems like a fair trade, no? It isnt a trade to begin with, im not asking my girl to spend a ton on make-up, she's fine with 20e a month. But im in favor of equality, redpillers are allowed to simp and use money as leverage but imo it is a bad tactic leading to consequences they tend to regret and bitch about
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 01:05 AM
–

Is the debate about drafting ? Let's suppose it's not. In case of drafting i see no reason to only draft men. There are so many positions that do not rely on strengh to make women fit in. They'd still get an advantage being less on the front line as we need the most fit for each jobs. If i had to be on the front line id rather be surrounded by drafted men than drafted women. For professionals i wouldnt mind as long as the training and admission standards are the same for all
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 06:47 AM
1

Not having a point and heing as agressive as you are is what makes you a troll. It's not calling you names or whatever it's saying facts. You can toy with the definition and say you're only half a troll if that amuses you. Several people asked you as clearly as it gets your point. You are in bad faith because you dont have any point. That makes you a troll. Deal with it or have a point
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 08:55 AM
-2

I came here asking your point. Still missing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 08:49 AM
10

You must be a troll. There's no other way, you havent made a single point, you asked an open question , didnt like the answer and then this wall og angry words
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 08:47 AM
1

Making unreasonable demands... We decide what is reasonable and what is not based on what we can actually achieve. How meaningless is this take ? Are you saying that one cant be unreasonable because.... One decides what is reasonable for himself and it doesnt has to be grounded to reality ? So, you are just flat wrong and don't know who or what you are talking about. Btw i cant wait to read you say the same and jump on the next guy saying women have unrealistic standards
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 06:24 PM
–

I see this trotted out all the time, when I have the gall to take offense at men being generalized as "violent, rapey" sociopaths, and I'm tired of it. Most men do not know a plethora of sexual assaulters that they are turning a blind eye to. Every single man I've ever known in my life to my knowledge has respected consent. Totally agree you had me so far Yet I'm expected to be okay with the vitriol coming out in regards to a silly hypothetical question about bears. Women are claiming they're on…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:33 PM
1

Framing it like this makes it completely unrelated. Alright you win you dodged successfully i got bored. Dont give your opinion on those men. All you had to do was to say yes i agree those 30% are absolute scum and then yeh you can add that women would know whether they're facing one of them or not. They never do and it's quite terrifying. Protection from society isnt always granted
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:19 PM
1

I'm not talking about men in general, there's still 2/3 men who wouldnt rape in any circumstances. Im asking your opinion specifically on those 1/3 who would be fine raping a woman given a free ticket. I think they're absolutely disgusting and i compare them to thieves who would kill someone for as low iphone as an iphone. Being willing to cause 10 times more damage than the benefit they get from it. Raping someone fits this and anyone who would do so given a free ticket is a horrible person. Il…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:05 PM
2

Waw you really are dodging as hard as possible agree men are dangerous, women should go to the woods where it's safer, like I said in the first place. I explained why it doesnt make sense. In the wood there isnt society's protection. Stop being so lame and respond to the question, give your honest opinion dont be this afraid
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:58 PM
2

It's your idea of the bluepill that is most likely a joke
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:54 PM
2

Stop dodging the question, what is your opinion on those 1/3 morality and value system. Are you one of them ?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:50 PM
2

It is the real world. 1 in 3 men would force a woman to have sex with him given the opportunity. It's not made up. It means the only thing stopping them are the consequences. What does it say about them ? The fact that they are selfish enough to deal tremendous damage to someone in order to nut.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:49 PM
-2

Being alone in the wood with a man equals losing protection from society, that's the concept behind the question. No one said they felt safer with bears than within society where rape has consequences. Now can you give your opinion on those 1/3 men who would force women to have sex if no consequence ??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:37 PM
0

Yeh the concept is that within society there is a justice system which prevents those 1/3 men who would rape given the opportunity and the guarantee they'd get away with it. Joke aside , what is your opinion on that statistic ?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:27 PM
–

Let's create a support group for victims of this trend. It clearly affects you a lot so have my shoulder, you can cry in peace. Yes you are bullied it's sadistic and dehumanising
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:17 PM
–

You never had a girl attracted to you ? That's insane
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:11 AM
2

Is it harder or were people marrying for wrong reasons ? We've seen the astronomical divorce rate following its legalisation. Now it's dropping. This tells us it's harder today than in the past and so does the total fertility rate Yeh it's harder but you start with bonus points being above average look. If you fail despite that advantage it's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:52 AM
2

How is it a debunk ? It kinda prove the opposite showing that a big majority ends up married. Your look isnt below average so yeh it's on you
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:47 AM
2

Ah so you linked this graph for absolutely no reason ? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:41 AM
2

"Quite simply, feminism is about all genders having equal rights and opportunities." And that is why feminism doesnt tell men to suppress their feelings because they're men. It isn't what I see in practice though so pardon me if I don't believe what feminism actually says. Do the experiment, go on a popular subreddit and ask if according to feminism men should suppress their feelings and ask the same question on a masculinist subreddit asking if you should open up to your partner. Then compare Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter