Our system incentivizes women to make false rape claims because they know that if there is a lack of proof, which there generally is, they will come out as the winners because the accused will be humiliated, possibly fired from his job, never trusted again, and he will have to cover his own legal fees, which can be extremely hefty in rape cases.

Shouldn't the victor of the suit have their legal costs covered so as not to incentivize the filing of false rape cases?

Furthermore, when there is no case at all (e.g., Assange), people are left thinking that it was only because there wasn't enough proof to convict Assange. If you are unable to prove your claim, and you have caused the other side to incur costs, then you should have to restore them to their rightful position, which means the recuperation of all legal costs.