William Costello is one of my most intelligent and interesting Facebook friends. This article fiercely criticizes an attitude towards involuntary celibate men that even pops up time and again on this sub; apparently by people who are 'all against misandry' but think discussing the realities of dating goes 'too far'. The article is mainly about the personal discrimination incels have to suffer, and already worthwhile because of that. Also the role lookism and even more heightism play in the rejection of men is interesting. And I agree on what William says about the dubious reasons people find it so important to shame PUA's.

Most interesting are these words:

'I believe that much can be done to bridge the supply and demand chasm that exists between what women want and what men are offering.

We will need a more sophisticated and likely uncomfortable conversation than we are currently having. That conversation will need to grapple with uncomfortable issues like the tension between women’s success in the workplace and hypergamy. We will need to reframe the value of traditional masculinity, which has been culturally demeaned.

The conversation will need men moving beyond defining their self-worth through sexual success expressed as the denigration of ‘beta incels’.

It will take women moving past absconding and obvious slogans like ‘incels are not entitled to anything’ and perhaps even considering coaching hapless but well meaning men on how to better succeed.'

This demands something from both men and women to make a more balanced society in their own interest. And I think that's a good thing.

https://williamcostello.medium.com/step-your-dick-up-why-incels-deserve-better-advice-307879d7c97b