~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Kincaid21
[–]Coltyn24 44 points45 points46 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Everytime FDS gets brought up remember those femcels are miserable and old
[–]40moreyears 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That’s so hilarious. r/childfree is close to the top. Can’t make that shit up.
[–]cloudlessjoe 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That sub is crazy. I went in expecting it to be about people choosing not to have children and the benefits, etc., but it ended up being just complaining about people who do have children.
[–]diobreads 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm not against prostitution, even if slightly overpriced.
[–]alex137a1 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I won't toss the word "golddigger" out if the window. It's up-to-date and has no defined sex attached to it. Plus once it was a profession, you know — to go into the specific regions and dig the earth in search of gold. Guess who worked their asses out the most...
[–]Rol9x 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And prostitutes are honourable women. I know the myths.
[–]AndrewTheBritishNump 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The difference between beauty and someone’s money is that a person’s looks is still them - you still love them. A person’s money is something they own and is not them.
An example would be her listing ‘hardworking’ as a character trait that she’d like. I can give my old economics teacher who was an amazing teacher, hard working, dedicated, inspiring, properly made you love the subject. He was the poster boy for hard working, but, as a teacher, he probably didn’t make as much as he could’ve. Reckon this woman would want to date him, or is it money that she’s attracted to, and not the hard working personality trait.
[–]Nice-Cranberry9397 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well the issue to me is, all most of these women bring to the table is looks. If all you bring is looks and you sexualise yourself then why do you complain when people come to you only for your looks?
[–]AntWillFortune15 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s just a skin suit. The question is, if you would love them if they were ugly? The answer is no. It’s equally as shallow. Men should really get off their high horses. Not sorry.
[–]Bara-enthusiast 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Men liking pretty women: Honest about it, genuinely love them.
Women being golddiggers: Leeches who don't give a fuck about their partners
[–]AntWillFortune15 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Lolll and a woman that wants a man with resources can’t genuinely love a man?
If a woman loses her looks a man would be out the door/and or cheat on her but if a man loses his resources then a woman better stick around? Bahahaha let’s not delude ourselves.
[–]AmraamHusain 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Kay why es and gtfo from this sub,your b||ch a_$ isn't welcome here
[–]AntWillFortune15 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Lmfaooo so you just wake up in the morning and decide to be a pathetic loser that disappoints mommy everyday?
Ask me if I care?…I don’t. Block me bitch.
[–]AmraamHusain 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lolz Shut you dirty c|_|nt you dirty wh9re
[–]AntWillFortune15 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lmao someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning. You good? What? Mommy doesn’t love you?
[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]AntWillFortune15 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Lol except no one cares. I’m okay with being 45 and single. There are more important things to me. And just because I’d be 45 doesn’t mean I can’t still date for fun. Sucks to suck bro.
And what value do men bring other than resources? I’m just saying that it is a fair exchange and men like yourself shouldn’t be bitching and moaning about it. Yet here you are. You want the looks without providing the resources.
[–][deleted] 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntWillFortune15 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lmao dude I’m not reading this wall of text…tf? But I’m sure it’s just you rambling about nonsense from the first couple of sentences. I don’t care 🙃
[–]Renn132 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Golddiggers are smart but exchange wealth for their moral values. Paradoxical, isn't it?
[–]AntiSocialPartygoer 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It's okay to date rich men, as long as you like them as actual people and their money is just a plus.
Dating rich men solely for their money is wrong.
[–]ban_ehyni 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Is it wrong to date a woman solely for her looks?
[–]AntiSocialPartygoer 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes, that's exactly the point. Dating a person under ulterior motives is wrong, no matter the resource aimed (looks, money, social prestige, etc) and no matter the gender.
[–]ban_ehyni 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well if she’s a gold digger then the guy is obviously ugly and rich and is only dating the woman for her looks so they are both in the wrong
[–]modsarebrainstems 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Meh...they can do whatever they want as both parties get exactly what they're after.
[–]DeJuanBallard 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They inspire the hate they claim to fight.
[–]MagentaSteam 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with being either one IF both people know that it’s purely for getting rich/ showing off a pretty face. If one person is in love and the other is lying to the person about also being in love , to me, that’s sleazy and cruel because you’re messing with someone’s feelings.
Am I missing the big picture?
[–]Wildhouse83 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
According to feminism and FDS, women can do no wrong and can not bear any sort of responsibility.
[–]Defiant8287 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i saw this shit 2 mins ago. I also got banned from that sub-reddit. Let me tell you those women have problems.
[–]modsarebrainstems 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well, yeah...we want the hottest piece of arm candy we can find. The real issue here is that you pretend to not care about that while we're all about it and see no reason to apologize for it, either.
[–]Kiberbirdo 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
She's got a point thought. Anyway down with the feminazis
[–]alex137a1 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
What point?
[–]FixThatDrill_M8 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
that golddiggers hate the term golddigger
[–]alex137a1 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
and criminals hate the word "criminal". water is wet, sky is blue. nothing special
[–]WaterIsWetBot 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Water is actually not wet; It makes other materials/objects wet. Wetness is the state of a non-liquid when a liquid adheres to, and/or permeates its substance while maintaining chemically distinct structures. So if we say something is wet we mean the liquid is sticking to the object.
What keeps a dock floating above water?
Pier pressure.
[–]Kiberbirdo -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Both sexes are superficial and we as a society would do much better if we accept it.
[–]LatterSeaworthiness4 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is the same sub that says that men are predators for dating women more than 5 years younger than them ☠️
[–]Rongorongo2 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well she's basically right. But it's feminist who refused to recognize the natural order of things. Men want sex objects. Women want success objects. Lots of people have pointed that out throughout history. It's nature. Just accept it and move on to live a life
[–]SAUS__ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
TLDR, basically, she's saying that even though it's bad, it's okay for women to do it because men did it
This girl has the level of intelligence that a door know has
Nevermind, she's less intelligent than a door knob
[+]billymazere -13 points-12 points-11 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
…she isn’t necessarily wrong though.
[–]mlhow 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A sugar baby is honest about what she likes in her man, a gold digger isn’t. I would like to continue to differentiate between the two.
[+]meownowcow333 -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
They are right….. Why are gold diggers shamed but the shallow old men aren’t? The women are being smart the men are just thinking with their dicks
[–]ban_ehyni 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The men know they are gold diggers but they are ugly and have no options
[–]modsarebrainstems 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well, I guess they're "smart" the same way a starving man eating is "smart".
[–]meownowcow333 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well maybe if men were smarter they wouldn’t get with gold diggers in the first place
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Coltyn24 44 points45 points46 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]40moreyears 11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cloudlessjoe 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]diobreads 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]alex137a1 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rol9x 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AndrewTheBritishNump 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nice-Cranberry9397 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntWillFortune15 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bara-enthusiast 20 points21 points22 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntWillFortune15 -3 points-2 points-1 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]AmraamHusain 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntWillFortune15 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AmraamHusain 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AntWillFortune15 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]AntWillFortune15 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]AntWillFortune15 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Renn132 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoer 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ban_ehyni 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AntiSocialPartygoer 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ban_ehyni 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]modsarebrainstems 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DeJuanBallard 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MagentaSteam 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Wildhouse83 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Defiant8287 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]modsarebrainstems 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kiberbirdo 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]alex137a1 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]FixThatDrill_M8 11 points12 points13 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]alex137a1 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]WaterIsWetBot 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kiberbirdo -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LatterSeaworthiness4 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rongorongo2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SAUS__ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]billymazere -13 points-12 points-11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]mlhow 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]meownowcow333 -7 points-6 points-5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]ban_ehyni 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]modsarebrainstems 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]meownowcow333 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link