Although the following article is not about domestic violence perpetrated by women but about the prevalence of female sexual violence directed against men and boys, its conclusion is extremely relevant to both domains:

"Men are afraid to tell about a sexual assault (update: or physical assault) from a woman, and the fear is from feminism, which strives to present a picture of 'an abusing sex and an abused sex' that requires a public belief that all violence is committed only in one direction – that women do not sexually assault (update: or physically assault) men. Such a belief necessitates silencing men who would disclose a much more bi-directional reality of sexual (and domestic) violence, and this is the motivation behind this feminist ban."

There is an active silencing of men, by powerful feminists, and until this silencing by feminists is not discussed, and stopped, the abuse of Depp and other men in his condition still continues. Feminist commentators cannot attempt to disclose in the media some insight or empathy for a person such as Depp who underwent abuse, while at the same time holding a hand on the mouths of other men like him to keep them from speaking up. Even now, after it was revealed that the abuse included cutting off a finger, putting out a cigarette on the face, punches to the face, and it seems that the victim might have been in danger of being murdered had he not escaped on time, only feminists and women in general are allowed to acknowledge in the media Depp's suffering - no man can or dares because of the threat from the feminist crowed, because of feminist editors who would reject - that same silencing that created Depp's and other's situation still continues. If a feminist woman acknowledges in a newspaper that Depp was abused but does not demand that a man will have social support for publishing safely the next article on the subject, and does not state that feminist silencing of men is what allowed the abuse to continue and become exceedingly radical, she is part of the silencing and hence of that abuse. Let men speak. Let, men, speak.

From the article:

"The research data demonstrates that first, the number of sexually-violent women is equal to the number of such men, and second, that indeed, consequently, the number of affected men is comparable to the number of affected women. Why then have we not seen in Me Too also the posts of those men whose existence is systematically and consistently reported in all these studies? Where are they? The common feminist explanation is that men are restricting themselves by wearing a “macho” persona and that therefore they are “ashamed” and not willing to report sexual assaults by women, but this is just another example of evading responsibility. Feminism itself enforces a ban that applies only to men, forbidding them to report in public sexual assaults and harassment committed against them by women. Men want to report and tell about this as much as women do, no more but no less, except that a man who reports being sexually assaulted or harassed by a woman is attacked by feminism. Right at the outset of Me Too, before anyone understood where this was leading, men who wrote a post about harassment or assault by women encountered feminist attacks. They received from feminist women insults, as well as private messages and phone calls with demands to remove the post. I know this, because I was on the receiving end of this treatment myself. Men who reported female assaults, were banned by their feminist friends. This entire type of censorship takes place within social media, so it is very difficult to demonstrate it, as social media sites do not have a reasonable search option and information published there in thousands of public correspondences is inaccessible, as if it never existed. But it is a very real and aggressive reality for boys and men, a reality which sometimes trickles down to blogging sites that allow a glimpse into the active and aggressive feminist ban on men reporting women’s assaults."