TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.

throwaway20210821

June 10, 2022
1 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2022/06/07/views-great-replacement-theory-yougov-poll-june-1-
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.
Author

throwaway20210821

Upvotes 1
Comments 26
Date June 10, 2022 6:40 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/v9ei6t/be_careful_about_aiming_activism_too_much_at/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/be-careful-about-aiming-activism-too-much-at.1116507
https://theredarchive.com/post/1116507
Top posts by throwaway20210821

Scott Adams, who notably said in 2011 to MRAs "get over it, pussies" in response to MRAs complaining about unfairness that men experience, has now suggested to parents of troubled boys that the only option may be to either "watch people die" or "kill your own son".

293 upvotes
July 7, 2022
/r/MensRights

"It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.

168 upvotes
May 15, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Justin Waters who is running for the 3rd congressional district in Florida considers you as a man to be expendable. Let the people here that live in that district show him that we disagree by voting for his challenger

163 upvotes
December 5, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.

141 upvotes
July 17, 2022
/r/MensRights

A good article from The Spectator written by Bettina Arndt on the situation of men ages 18 to 60 being prevented from leaving Ukraine.

103 upvotes
March 16, 2022
/r/MensRights

A good way to reduce harm to men's lives both at home and abroad and make war and proxy wars waged less common and less longer in duration that a left wing men's rights platform could push for: advocating for restrictions on Congress owning defense and military contracts

79 upvotes
May 26, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Timely reminder: be careful of the recent trend of media and researchers pretending to care about men’s issues

71 upvotes
January 14, 2022
/r/MensRights

Serious: be careful of the recent trend of media pretending to care about men's issues

64 upvotes
November 15, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We don't aim our activism at any specific group of men. We advocate for all men.

But I do think we are firm enough in our egalitarian convictions that we can engage with such disaffected young men who find themselves seduced into the right wing, and try to show them that there are still people on the left who care about male issues, and try to convince them that egalitarian values would make for a better world.

Of course we should be firm in not tolerating bigotry to be expressed in our communities. But that doesn't mean we should ignore the legitimate concerns these young men may have.

[–]bottleblank 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

I was writing a response to this, but in trying to do so I realised I don't actually know what you (or this survey) are saying. Could you clarify a little on what it and this post are intending to show?

[–]throwaway20210821 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

The gist of what I'm saying is this: many "disaffected young men" that claim to have drifted to the right wing (regardless of race) and who have said they were pushed to politicians like Trump, can often by motivated by undercover racial and xenophobic inclinations, not necessarily what they are claiming about how they feel put upon because they are men.

​

Sort the poll specifications by

​

GRT - Jewish People > By Race (4 category) > Trump - Voters or Trump - Voters 2020

​

and compare to other voters (Biden Voters, independent voters, registered voters). Among various groups, young men (even those of color) who are Trump voters are notably more inclined than other voters to indicate that they think they are being replaced, and that possibly explains more about their feelings of alienation and their rightward "drift".

​

MRAs should be careful about reaching out to such men, because it is very possible they don't really share the same concerns that MRAs have and have views that would prevent cooperation between men.

[–]bottleblank 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I see, thanks for that clarification.

I, in turn, would caution against suspecting that right-wing men have become right-wing because they are racists, because they may have legitimate concerns which have been dismissed or demonised by the left. I say this as somebody who considers themselves to be mildly left-leaning (in a UK context, for clarification).

I wouldn't want to rush to the idea that because a man is right-wing it means that it's because he's an alt-right hardcore racist who wants to beat women if they're not making his dinner, right? Because a lot of male issues are painted as "bad" even if you raise questions or objections, in the face of feminist opposition. I can't blame guys for going where they feel accepted, even if I don't like the politics of the group they end up gravitating to.

[–]throwaway20210821 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

This poll is of people in the US, where politics has arguably become far more polarized and steeped in fixation about cultural identity and race than in places like the UK.

​

I do not think that a man becoming right wing is always because of racial inclinations or anxieties, but I do think it's a possibility among many such men that fit that ideological description. Feminists in the media have been saying this, but from the data like this poll, I don't think they are always necessarily incorrect.

The danger is that when the MRM embraces "disaffected young men that have turned to the right wing" unconditionally and universally, it can present the risk of bringing people into the movement that have views that are not conducive to cooperation and rooted in fear, distrust and apathy of others that are not like them, which makes it difficult to work on men's rights issues affecting men in many countries. This poll suggests that caution in universally embracing "disaffected young men that turn to the right wing" or in always lending a sympathetic ear to them is not unwarranted.

[–]bottleblank 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Well, what my original response was going to include was the point that you can't really take the feminists' word for what "right wing" means, or why men might be turning to it, because it's often shorthand for "asshole who disagrees with me", you know? Some of them would have you believe that any man disagreeing with the feminist cause, or becoming right wing, means that he's 100% against women having any rights (and probably also hates gays and blacks and basically anybody who isn't a straight white male).

So I do now see the concern you present, but I would be very careful in trying to figure out why any one particular person might or might not be aligned with a particular political party.

[–]throwaway20210821 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Have you seen the communities they are in and what they say as well as what they are primarily motivated about? I have. It's not men's rights. It's not usually even the economy.

I tried to be clear in this post that by right wing men I don't mean just any general right wing men, but the ones that claim that they were "disaffected" and were pushed to the right wing and more specifically, politicians like Trump.

I would be very careful in trying to figure out why any one particular person might or might not be aligned with a particular political party.

This is another thing, it doesn't necessarily matter whether those people are 100% aligned with the republican party. They share much the same view points with that political party on key issues (immigration, ideas of race and culture, disregard for men outside of their country), which are all potential roadblocks when caring about men in other countries is an issue (such as with forced drafting of men in Ukraine and other abuses of men in foreign wars).

[–]bottleblank 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Have you seen the communities they are in and what they say as well as what they are primarily motivated about? I have. It's not men's rights. It's not usually even the economy.

I've not, no, but what I mean is that if you're trying to court right-wingers back to the left, or understand why they ended up on the right in the first place, I think it's wise to be considerate and contemplative of the issues they might be interested in and the idea that some are fickle and likely to be influenced by the group they end up in.

Example: Let's say someone who was centre or left tried to engage in gender politics. They saw a bunch of (supposedly) left-leaning feminists badmouthing men. They thought "huh, maybe this isn't the space for me", so they looked for alternatives. They saw the right wing as being more accepting of men who didn't agree with feminist rhetoric, and figured "maybe this is the right place".

Some weeks, months, years pass, they've been invested and involved in the community they joined, others in it have made plausible-sounding points about how nobody cares about men, especially white men (which was confirmed by the feminists and SJWs before they switched), and it all started to sound very sensible. Maybe women don't care. Maybe women should be slapped back down. Maybe race is important and maybe I am being demonised for being white. Maybe that means the black people are the problem.

You see what I mean? How it could progress from a starting point of "goddamn blue haired lesbians" to "and also Mexicans are parasitic scum"?

[–]throwaway20210821 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

if you're trying to court right-wingers back to the left, or understand why they ended up on the right in the first place, I think it's wise to be considerate and contemplative of the issues they might be interested in and the idea that some are fickle and likely to be influenced by the group they end up in.

I have tried to understand those issues and where they are coming from, but everything I have seen from looking at how people in those communities interact suggest that what is reported in the media about such people primarily being driven by racist and xenophobic sentiments seems fairly accurate. I don't wish it was that way, it's just what I've seen.

Example: Let's say someone who was centre or left tried to engage in gender politics. They saw a bunch of (supposedly) left-leaning feminists badmouthing men. They thought "huh, maybe this isn't the space for me", so they looked for alternatives. They saw the right wing as being more accepting of men who didn't agree with feminist rhetoric, and figured "maybe this is the right place".

Right wing spaces are not at all accepting of men, they are just not actively hostile at first. If you don't repeat what they say and stick to the script, they will attack and bully you just as much. Watch how anyone in these so-called "not necessarily right wing but anti leftist" "classical liberal" communities treats people that criticize politicians like Reagan. They are right wingers, usually from the start.

​

Some weeks, months, years pass, they've been invested and involved in the community they joined, others in it have made plausible-sounding points about how nobody cares about men, especially white men (which was confirmed by the feminists and SJWs before they switched), and it all started to sound very sensible. Maybe women don't care. Maybe women should be slapped back down. Maybe race is important and maybe I am being demonised for being white. Maybe that means the black people are the problem.

It's not just white men, the poll I linked in this thread shows black and hispanic men also that can fall in the ideological camp of having "drifted" towards the right can be just as motivated by racist and xenophobic feelings, as well as a belief that their country is slipping away from them because it no longer resembles the Pax Americana non woke hegemony that was present in the 1950s to 1980s.

​

You see what I mean? How it could progress from a starting point of "goddamn blue haired lesbians" to "and also Mexicans are parasitic scum"?

​

Because many of them held xenophobic sentiments or were easily captivated by it from the start but hid it well. The talk of "blue haired lesbians" was less about anti-feminism and more at anger that their feeling of cultural belonging that existed in Pax Americana of the 1950s to 1980s no longer exists and no longer being endorsed by the wider culture. Such people aren't likely to care about men's rights in totality, only hardline traditionalist issues like "what is a woman" and "men not being men and taking what is theirs".

[–]reverbiscrap 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As one of those black men, black men have never 'drifted right', the black community is traditionally conservative socially and liberal economically.

As for the turn to Trump, that has 70 years of backstory, but the short version is that it is nonsense. Black men are the largest democratic voting bloc exceeded only by black women. Any political change is based on how the liberal left has . completely ignored issues that affect black men's health and livelihoods, like how black men died of Covid-19 more than any group by a factor of 2, black men make up 50% of all homeless and rough sleepers, the list goes on. The liberal left does not pay its debts, so fuck'em, is the growing feeling.

[–]throwaway20210821 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

the black community is traditionally conservative socially and liberal economically.

This is controversial to say but many groups of non-white men are more conservative socially than many liberals would like (including men that are Middle Eastern, East Asian and South Asian), and this drives a lot of resentment and racism from liberals against these groups of men, who feel these men are correspondingly a threat to the values they hold dear.

​

Black men are the largest democratic voting bloc exceeded only by black women. Any political change is based on how the liberal left has . completely ignored issues that affect black men's health and livelihoods, like how black men died of Covid-19 more than any group by a factor of 2, black men make up 50% of all homeless and rough sleepers, the list goes on. The liberal left does not pay its debts, so fuck'em, is the growing feeling.

Yes all this I believe is true, but at the same time look at the statistics in the poll and how across races of those that are more likely to fall in the group of disaffected young men that turn to the right, the feeling of being "replaced" is driven by racial and xenophobic angst and to a non-negligible extent, scapegoating jewish people, even among non-white men who actually seem to express this sentiment in greater numbers than white men (contrary to popular belief that it's mostly white men with these views and motivations)

Even aside from how liberals abandon the working class, it can still be primarily racial or xenophobic feelings and wanting a certain type of culture to exist while looking down on/hating how that culture has been thrown to the wayside that mostly explains this sentiment and the drift to voting for those like Trump. It's a complicated issue, but the most uncontroversial way I can say this is that other races of men that aren't white aren't immune from having the same racial, cultural and nationalist biases as white Cultural Christian/religious right type conservatives (who most here already know don't really care about men's rights) of what they consider normal and reacting in a reactionary way (that has little to do with men's rights) when they feel that is threatened.

[–]rochesterslim 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

‘disaffected’ always annoys me. We’re all disaffected as men tbh. But i don’t become a racist. I’m an MRA but some men (and women) I really hate because they’re twats. I’m not going to pretend I care about a young man who is a neo nazi i’ll be real.

[–]bottleblank 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

To back up what I said in another comment here, I do care, because if we understood what drove them to that in the first place, we might be able to prevent it.

Am I going to endorse their tragic and disgusting opinions? No, of course not, because I don't believe in any Nazi ideology and I think it's probably horrifying. But if it helps to understand what got them there, that's important, because that's knowledge that can be used to prevent the next guy landing there too.

[–]rochesterslim -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

i get that but i just…can’t do it. Maybe it’s because i’m a minority and i’ve had some shit happen. It just makes you lose all empathy when ppl hate you. But idk…it’s how it is.

[–]bottleblank 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, I get there's some level of disgust, and rightfully so. I get that there's a reluctance to talk, to be around, to integrate in any way with the people who hold absolutely opposite political opinions to you, especially if those opinions are directly harmful. I don't think it's weird in any way that people would want to step away from that.

But we must understand what the causes are, what the desires and needs are, what the political expectations are.

Like I said in another comment, it's no use for feminists to say "incels are scum and they don't deserve for me to listen to a single word they say", but listening to them is the only way we'll learn why they got there and, hopefully, how to fix it.

[–]ProMaleRevolutionary1 points 4 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

Bad people are usually just born that way. Environment just pushes them further.

[–]bottleblank 4 points5 points6 points 4 years agolocked comment (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't really know what to say to that other than "I disagree".

How can you possibly know that people are "born bad"? Have you done any studies on changes of opinion or political affiliation over time?

I believe that political stance is 100% social, not given at birth, because... why the hell would it be otherwise? How can you transmit political beliefs biologically?

Sure, by birth you could be afflicted with a particular set of genes which make you more inclined towards certain behaviours, but... what kind of thinking is "born evil"?

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate[M] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years agolocked comment (1 child) | Copy Link

We don't believe in original sin. Keep that shit out of here.

[–]throwaway20210821 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

In particular, Sort by GRT - Jewish People > By Race (4 category) > Trump - Voters or Trump - Voters 2020

​

It's been an emerging theme in the MRM to show sympathy to disaffected young men that drift to the right, many of whom are said to have turned to figures like Trump or become more favorable towards right wing ideas. However, the reasons they do so should be examined closely to avoid unintentionally sympathizing with those that really are more concerned about racial and cultural homogeneity and hardline traditionalist stances.

One thing that stands out: it is among Trump voters (which include the men that have been said to drift to the right wing out of feelings of alienation and including non-white Black and Hispanic men on the right wing that are typically thought to have much less focus or feelings of xenophobia and more expression of feeling betrayed by liberals) that feelings that they are being replaced by others in the context of racist and anti-semitic reactionary theories is particularly prevalent. This is not prevalent in any where the same levels with Biden voters, independent voters and registered voters as a whole.

​

The MRM should not necessarily disregard when the media (which does have a feminist bias) points out that many concerns about disaffected young men, "economic anxiety" and feeling like they are struggling or falling behind can be more driven by racism, xenophobia and anti-semitism, instead of mis-attributed feelings of failing to identify the real causes of why they are falling behind and struggling.

​

This is by no means a cut and dry issue, men can still struggle even separate from carrying very repugnant and reactionary views because of economic factors, but caution should still be exercised. Otherwise, the MRM (specifically left wing oriented men's rights movements) can leap headfirst into embracing men that really have other concerns other than men's rights and don't value solidarity or consideration with and of all men in the struggle for attaining men's rights.

[–]genkernels 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It's been an emerging theme in the MRM to show sympathy to disaffected young men...to avoid unintentionally sympathizing with those

Wait what? You don't want to unintentionally sympathize with people who believe bad things? Is mere sympathy for the 'other' subject to an investigation of the subjects political views now? You don't see any fundamental problems with this at all?!

it is among Trump voters

And you're basing this on some sort of composition theory? "Some people who own dogs also fuck dogs, therefore we should be wary..." Fuck this.

The MRM should not necessarily disregard when the media (which does have a feminist bias) points out that many concerns about disaffected young men, "economic anxiety" and feeling like they are struggling or falling behind can be more driven by racism, xenophobia and anti-semitism

"Many concerns". How weasely can you get? I read the other comment thread where the guy asks you what you're even saying, and I still don't know what exactly you're claiming. 2%, 5%, 20%? What exactly makes a person's other views "driven by" the racist view, rather than the reverse?

 

Also what's with the scare quotes for "economic anxiety"?

How the fuck do you even measure if a person's anxieties are based off of racism rather than some other concern?

Come to think of it, why does anti-semitism not fall under racism here?

[–]bottleblank 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait what? You don't want to unintentionally sympathize with people who believe bad things? Is mere sympathy for the 'other' subject to an investigation of the subjects political views now? You don't see any fundamental problems with this at all?!

That, as an example I'm quite familiar with, would be just the same as feminists/feminist allies/the left/the media demonising incels, when what we should be doing is figuring out why incels are in a bad place, working out how to get them out of that place, and also the process by which a man could feel so bad about his life and prospects that he feels the need to join some community to discuss and validate it.

I'm still not 100% certain of what the OP was about, but I agree, we should be looking at all men, left and right, trying to work out what young men need, what they lack, why they might feel the need to go hardcore into less socially accepting movements, and so on.

I don't care if an incel is a Trump voter, I don't care if he's a potential rapist, I don't care if he wants to kill his mother (well, ok, I do, but read on) - what I care about is that we can reach him, understand him, help him, and lead him to a place that isn't as dark, with opportunity and hope. Right wing, left wing, whatever, men need help, and if we can present the right solutions, maybe they won't feel the need to become extreme in any way, maybe they'll just join the rest of society and we can all move along together in a positive direction.

[–]genkernels 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That, as an example I'm quite familiar with, would be just the same as feminists/feminist allies/the left/the media demonising incels

Turns out there's a reason for that lol.

[–]throwaway20210821 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Wait what? You don't want to unintentionally sympathize with people who believe bad things?

Yes, I don't want to sympathize with people that end up having views I consider repugnant and counterproductive to the rights of all men. Not only does me doing this result in me mis-placing my trust in others and telling them things that they can later use for their own agenda, I don't want to engage with people that are clearly not interested in men's rights and are just as using it as a cover for their personal grievances.

I sympathize with them if they are struggling with issues and unhappy as a result of discrimination against them because they are male, but not if the main reason they are struggling with issues and unhappy are because of other concerns that they have involve race and anger about cultural issues that have very little directly to do with men's rights.

So far my experience from looking at discussion sites where such men gather has been that a lot of disaffected young men that have moved to the right have concerns that are more about what race and cultural background they want a country to be, they just pretend that it's about them being male because it's popular to portray every topic in terms of "young struggling working class men" nowadays. They do a job good job trying to convince people of this, but upon closer examination it's obvious that they are more concerned about race and culture, with complaints about feminism and men's rights being more about what they expect to the be the predominant culture around them and how they are regarded, not safeguarding and working towards men's rights.

​

How the fuck do you even measure if a person's anxieties are based off of racism rather than some other concern?

Through polls like this. If there is a non-negligible (compared to other groups of people) belief in certain theories like Great Replacement and blaming jewish people among groups that are known to have a lot of disaffected young men that drifted to the right (like Trump voters), then there is at least some evidence that people who are a member of that group have anxieties based off of racism.

​

Also what's with the scare quotes for "economic anxiety"?

Because it's often not that, it's just an excuse. Sometimes it can be economic anxiety and worry about men falling behind, but instead many times it is about anger that the predominant trad culture they wanted (for the sake of wanting what they considered to be normal to be in place) is no longer in place. What exactly they want the culture to be is hard to describe, but it has very little to do with men's rights, it's way more about race and demographics and personal insecurities they have (some of which may be men's rights related, but most of which is not and is moreso anger that what they considered normal is no longer in place).

​

What exactly makes a person's other views "driven by" the racist view, rather than the reverse?

The criteria for that imo is whether they are more worried about the predominant culture around them and how they are viewed as men, or whether they are (hopefully) more interested in working towards protecting the rights of all men and pushing for more protection under the law for men in general.

​

Come to think of it, why does anti-semitism not fall under racism here?

Anti-semitism is a particular form of prejudice specific to one group of people and jews aren't necessarily considered a race, that's why anti-semitism is often separately mentioned apart from racism.

[–]bottleblank 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, I don't want to sympathize with people that end up having views I consider repugnant and counterproductive to the rights of all men.

Right, and I get that, but this is the same problem we have with women who say the same kind of things. "I'm not going to empathise with incels because they're irredeemable misogynist scum!" screams the harridan chorus. But if they gave a shit, those incels might be more likely to be productive, cooperative, understanding, and part of society - perhaps even optimistic of finding a partner.

You can't write off a whole group, even if you think of some of them might be natural stained arseholes, just because they don't necessarily believe what you believe. I understand why you would be against certain right wing views - I am too - but if we're going to fix this mess we're going to have to cooperate. We're going to have to tolerate, at least as long as it takes to understand and to teach, in a way that resonates with those political opponents.

[+]throwaway20210821 -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

But if they gave a shit, those incels might be more likely to be productive, cooperative, understanding, and part of society - perhaps even optimistic of finding a partner.

I have looked at those forums too of those that identify by themselves by that label. I believe they don't want help and also they are actually and unfortunately everything the media has proclaimed that they are.

If they want to move away from that situation, I believe they are only ready for engagement when they themselves decide to completely move away from it. I realize that's similar to what feminists say, but on this subject I don't believe everything feminists say about groups outside of MRAs is wrong.

​

You can't write off a whole group, even if you think of some of them might be natural stained arseholes, just because they don't necessarily believe what you believe. I understand why you would be against certain right wing views - I am too - but if we're going to fix this mess we're going to have to cooperate.

I do not know how that is possible when there are multiple experiences people have had trying to reach out to those people, only to see that those people are exactly what others had said about them and are impossible to reach without them co-opting your engagement for their agenda.

You can look for yourself at forums disaffected young men that turned to the right go on, places on comminities dot win for example. It's full of racism, bigotry towards anyone that doesn't fit into their mould of what they consider normal and anger at how they feel they didn't get what they deserved in life, along with bullying people they might have agreed with a few hours or days ago the minute that person is not in tune with the narrative they want. I don't know how the men there can be helped. Some say those people are either trolls or paid bad actors but I know that even if that is the situation, it represents a lot of the state the "disaffected young men that have turned to the right" is in, the group of people that the media almost seems to be egging on the MRM to embrace.

​

I do know that as much as they may claim otherwise, they resent people reaching out to them. They are angry but also reserved enough not to frequently lash out in real life. They know a lot about how to gain others sympathies so that they can get an audience. Not all men are good. There exist bad men that want to take advantage of others. I believe there are a lot of such men in those groups and on those sites. It's something I didn't think could happen, but after years of feminists talking about extremist males that incorporate anti-feminist sentiments (even if not really in all parts), it's starting to come true.

​

We're going to have to tolerate, at least as long as it takes to understand and to teach, in a way that resonates with those political opponents.

I have no problem if they stick to discussion of men's rights and work with other MRAs. But I have often seen that they don't do that, they run off the ideas they learned and use it for their agenda. Then you hear in the media ideas that once were repeated in the MRM (such as the ideas of "gynocentrism", "empathy gap") being mis-used for completely twisted political purposes. It's hard to trust anyone like that. Sometimes it goes to extreme ends and someone that goes on a political crusade ends up having repeated what they learned when in men's rights circles (Chris Cantwell and former MRAs that became active figures in the alt-right being examples of this). It puts the MRM in a very uneasy situation. It puts individual MRAs in a bad situation too, which makes those that want to conflate MRM with the worst humanity has to offer absolutely giddy and portraying it as a "reckoning of MRAs having to face the monsters that they created".

​

It also comes with a realization too: the MRM cannot bear the entire world of men on its shoulders or try to reform them to working towards men's rights and helping not only themselves but other men. It's simply not possible.

​

And ultimately a lot of these disaffected young men that have turned to the right wing are stuck in their ways far more than people that don't want to work with them. They'd only be happy living in a country that is exactly like what they want and expect to be normal, they'll use anyone that is naive enough to achieve this end.

[–]Razorbladekandyfan 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, these "disaffected young men" feminists demand we endorse,

they don't have the same concerns.

They are perfectly capable of having separate concerns.

It is entirely possible for them to both struggle because males are discriminated against while having priorities to establish a racial, cultural and normalcy standard that existed in the 1950s to 1980s (and arguably from the 1990s to the time pre Great Recession) in the western world that many people would typically think only white religious right types would want.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter