The Supreme Court Ruling on The New Rules of Evidence In Sexual Assault Trials - Toronto Criminal Defence Lawyers

DavidByron2 · 2022-07-25T03:26:29+00:00

Basically the Canadian law courts now treat the male defendant as if they were presumed to be guilty, not innocent. As such whereas in a normal court case theprosecution must disclose all the evidence they have tending to show guilt, not the defence must provide the prosecution all the evidence they have tending to show innocence -- this is to stop them providing any further evidence of innocence once the trial starts. In other words the rules have been flipped wrt innocent / guilty.

Nice job Canada. Male = guilty.

the majority began their reasons with statements about the low conviction rates in sexual assault crimes

A typical feminist "argument". Too many innocent men are being let off without punishment so the courts must rig the process.

Some objected:

unprecedented and unconstitutional erosion by Parliament of the fair trial rights of the presumptively innocent ⸺ who, it should be borne in mind, will sometimes be actually innocent. It seriously impedes the ability of such persons to prove that innocence, by making presumptively inadmissible all private records relating to the complainant that are in the possession of the accused and which the accused intends to adduce in a sexual offence prosecution. It is the only evidentiary rule that mandates pre‑trial disclosure of defence evidence and strategy, before the Crown has made out a case to meet, and even where the evidence sought to be relied on is neither irrelevant nor inherently prejudicial.

The flaw in the argument is that it assumes some men might be innocent which of course is false under feminist ideology that says all men are rapists. Now Canada's highest court agrees.

ZimbaZumba · 2022-07-27T14:10:06+00:00

Notably the majority began their reasons with statements about the lowconviction rates in sexual assault crimes and statistics showing that itis severely under-reported. With numbers of convictions in mind, themajority declared in para 2: “More needs to be done.”

WTF This is the Supreme Court!

Title	The Supreme Court Ruling on The New Rules of Evidence In Sexual Assault Trials - Toronto Criminal Defence Lawyers
Author	bloodfuel
Upvotes	60
Comments	20
Date	July 25, 2022 2:26 AM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/w7cwe6/the_supreme_court_ruling_on_the_new_rules_of/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-supreme-court-ruling-on-the-new-rules-of.1124939 https://theredarchive.com/post/1124939

Comments