I've seen women talking about how men don't open up to each other or they have no emotional intimacy with each other and blaming the male loneliness epidemic for this (not taking into account that the male loneliness epidemic is also about men having NO friends than bad friends). I'm just wondering how they came to this conclusion, the only way they could have is if they spied on men privately, which is weird to begin with.

these women talk so confidently about how male friendships should work (which is basically act like women) and not take into account that men and women operate differently, they assume that men don't show each other love rather than they show it differently or in other ways they can't seemingly comprehend.

and besides, if men did act how they wanted they would assume the men were in a relationship, which brings to another point. How do these women know that the friendships they see when men are openly affectionate towards one another, are in a relationship? Because I see women assuming these men are lovers, so maybe they have seen men being affectionate the way they say men should act, and automatically assumed they were together. So, what gives?

Men express love towards one another differently. I find it condescending they're saying that female friendships are better because of this, and men should act like women because someone they connected male friendships to male loneliness or suicide, ignoring that women are more likely to attempt.