Archived Article

So what is this hatred of w*men that Harvard men are perpetuating, you may ask? Is it on the level of the grooming gang scandals in the UK, with rape, murder, and violent exploitation occurring? You know, the kind of brutality and hatred that these "wominist" groups – for some strange reason – never speak out against?

Well, here's the main example the article gives of this so-called epidemic of "misogyny" at Harvard:

In the 2020s, misogyny has taken the form of the University’s lackluster response to harassment allegations from women levied against a powerful male professor, and arguably, the public crucifixion of former President Claudine Gay.

So it's giving an accused male professor the benefit of "innocent unless proven guilty", and the much deserved criticism of a divisive and activist academic who committed dozens of instances of academic dishonesty (plagiarism). And here I thought Harvard men were running around in gangs assaulting and enslaving these poor, oppressed victims on a weekly basis or something.

But no. The rest of this article is about "microagressions", "harmful rhetoric" like using humour, and more. Wow, this isn't even "first world problems", because what this author thinks are "problems" are actually delusions.

Also, what on Earth is a "History concentrator". If you look down at the bottom, this article is written by someone in employ with the University as a "History concentrator". So what exact duties does this job entail I wonder? And why am I absolutely certain it involves rewriting and deliberately misinterpreting history in some manner that further hates on men?