TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

What privileges do "cis" white men have over anyone else? Please be specific.

DoctorFeel69

April 22, 2015
3 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title What privileges do "cis" white men have over anyone else? Please be specific.
Author

DoctorFeel69

Upvotes 3
Comments 58
Date April 22, 2015 3:55 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/33frjz/what_privileges_do_cis_white_men_have_over_anyone/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/what-privileges-do-cis-white-men-have-over-anyone.282549
https://theredarchive.com/post/282549
Top posts by DoctorFeel69

Who all here can admit that they are a human capable of making mistakes, being wrong, and feel empathy for the pain of others?

4 upvotes
May 1, 2015
/r/PurplePillDebate

Comments

[–]logsin4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Each of these things have their own privileges.

White:

  • Enormous representation in media, especially positive representation. Models, TV and movie stars are whiter than the population at large.

  • No need to fear being racially profiled by police. Police officers aren't going to question your immigration status because you're hispanic. They won't stop you for "driving while black" or think you're "reasonably suspicious" based on your skin tone.

  • No one will ask you about your human experience as a "white person", because being white is normative. Being a minority will guarantee you will be asked to speak on behalf of your race to someone of a different race as an authority.

  • No one will assume you got a job by virtue of affirmative action.

  • No one will assume you are a terrorist because someone of the same skin color as you committed an act of terrorism, even if it was for a reason completely independent of race.

Male is actually a super complicated one, and I think more fluid at this point. I don't imagine I will be able to convince you of male privilege, because it's often shouted down here. But, with some trepidation, male:

  • No one will assume you got your job by virtue of affirmative action.

  • When you fail at a job/task, no one will assume it was due to your gender. It will not reflect back on the ability of men to do that.

  • If you decide to have children, no one will think you're a bad parent for wanting to continue in a demanding career that keeps you away from them.

  • If you decide not to have children, people won't tell you that you won't be complete as a person without them, or that every man should be a father.

Cis:

  • Your gender will not be questioned or misidentified frequently.

  • People will not judge you on whether or not you're "passing" for your identified gender.

  • You will generally be considered more suitable for retail or other jobs that require high personal skills because you don't make people "uncomfortable" at some point in your life.

  • Your dating pool is likely a lot larger.

  • You don't feel pressured to disclose your gender identity with your date before you get physical with them.

  • You have never feared violence or harassment from strangers, or even your date, if someone knows your gender identity.

[–][deleted] -1 points-1 points-1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]logsin2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is false.

Evidence? This is a well known problem.

This is also false.

I provided evidence of racial profiling of police on a large scale. Can you provide evidence of large scale police profiling of white people? I'm willing to be convinced.

You victimize yourself over nothing.

This is your opinion. It makes people feel uncomfortable and annoyed. It's counterproductive to ask one person to represent a whole race. People don't want to be constantly reminded that they are a minority. As a white person you can essentially ignore your whiteness most of the time. Stop belittling other people's experiences as "nothing."

Right, they'll assume I got my job because of "white privilege" which is so much better. Fail.

No, they will assume you got your job because you were qualified.

Yes they do.

When have you ever been suspected as terrorist or told that "white people are terrorists?"

Male "privilege" says you're an asshole.

Is this an argument?

"Typical male."

Is this evidence?

Who typically wants children? This demonstrates a huge gap in your understanding of male psychology.

No, it demonstrates a huge gap in a "typical" woman vs. an individual. Individuals are allowed to make decisions based on what they or their partner wants, they shouldn't be judged based on making atypical decisions. Just because a woman wants a career and a kid doesn't automatically make her a bad parent. Just because a guy wants to be a stay-at-home dad doesn't make him a bad man.

Cry more. People judge and criticize me for all kinds of shit. Where's my victim card?

You asked for examples of privilege, don't get mad at me for providing them. Just because you aren't privileged in literally every aspect of your life doesn't mean that you should ignore people that don't have the same set of privileges you do.

World's smallest violin playing for your mental disorder.

Oh, look, another example of privilege. As a cis-man, wanting to be acknowledged as your gender isn't considered a "mental disorder."

This is patently false and is demonstrable in all forms of media as well as in reality quite frequently.

That's quite a claim. Evidence?

Women are crazy, so you'd be surprised just how small it actually is.

Just because women don't like you doesn't mean that cis-men as a whole don't enjoy a larger dating pool than trans* and gender non-conforming individuals.

Yes we do actually. Most women want to know I'm a man if they're straight. This is some of the most disingenuous horseshit I've read today.

First of all, most straight women don't want to know your gender identity and sexual orientation, because most women aren't interested in sleeping with you. Secondly, since you're presenting as your gender as a cis person you aren't hiding anything. There is nothing to reveal, so there is no pressure to disclose. This is not true of someone who identifies as female, but still has a penis, for example.

Another list of literally no male privileges. Man, you bloops can't make a case to save your lives.

You didn't actually respond to the fear of violence or harrassment based on gender identity for transpeople. Putting that aside, why the fuck did you make this post if you didn't even want to consider even one of the privileges that people are bringing up? It's a debate sub, at least respond with something even remotely close to a response or stop shitting on people who are earnestly trying to answer your question.

[–]asdf_clash0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So you don't really know what a "privilege" is, huh?

[–]GridReXXit be like that5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

They typically get the benefit of the doubt.

It's not malicious.

It's a natural consequence of majority / minority dynamics.

People relate to things that are similar to them.

A white male board of a Fortune 100 company will likely consider only white men because that is their network and what they are used to and what they relate to.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

They typically get the benefit of the doubt.

For what? Accusations of rape?

[–]GridReXXit be like that0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

No, everything else.

And "accusations of rape"?

Black men get that over anyone else.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You're saying black men typically get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to accusations of rape? Let's be clear here.

[–]GridReXXit be like that1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Oh...

I misinterpreted you.

Clearly I meant the opposite. Black men do not get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to rape accusations.

To answer your question again.

Sure white men get the benefit of "innocent until proven guilty" more than other racial groups when it comes to rape.

And they also get the benefit of the doubt at job interviews, etc... At least when compared to minority man of equal stature and credentials.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Clearly I meant the opposite. Black men do not get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to rape accusations.

I think you are naive to believe so strongly in outdated racist stereotypes. It's more even now than it has ever been.

And they also get the benefit of the doubt at job interviews, etc... At least when compared to minority man of equal stature and credentials.

One word, diversity. Two words, white genocide.

[–]GridReXXit be like that3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I think you are naive to believe so strongly in outdated racist stereotypes. It's more even now than it has ever been.

I think you are naive to believe that racial discrimination is nonexistent now.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I think you are disingenuous to say that I claimed it was nonexistent.

[–]GridReXXit be like that1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I think you're disingenuous to equate what I wrote with "outdated stereotypes."

There's nothing outdated about what I witness on a regular basis.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Tell me about what you witness on a regular basis.

[–]hippydipster0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being a pedophile. Being a potential danger. Being a male chauvinist pig.

And yes, being the leader, management-quality, being better at certain jobs.

Privilege is just a loaded term for stereotype, and stereotypes are a dime a dozen for just about any group, some positive, some negative.

[–]la-la-leesah4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

tl;dr: They happen to already be the most successful, so environments of success cater to what they're likely to be used to and good at, which makes them more likely to keep being the most successful

I think the biggest built-in advantage that cis white men have is that they as a group already have the biggest overlap with the countries, jobs, environments and behaviors that correlate with success (think: wealthy-ish Western countries, STEM fields, the atmosphere in a boardroom of CEOs, ambitious, commanding, risk-taking personalities), so small (or large, but mostly small) things about those environments or positions are catered to what they're used to, the skill sets they naturally have, and the norms they've been raised with, etc. Because of this, they're far less likely to have to work against the behaviors and expectations that they were raised with and are used to in order to place themselves in a position to be successful and then excel in that position.

This is not malicious, this is nobody’s fault, this is not set in stone, and this does not directly benefit all cis white men , but it does make it probable that cis white men men will continue to be the group with the highest overlap with success, which sort of keeps the whole thing going.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

things about those environments or positions are catered to what they're used to, the skill sets they naturally have, and the norms they've been raised with, etc. Because of this, they're far less likely to have to work against the behaviors and expectations that they were raised with and are used to in order to place themselves in a position to be successful and then excel in that position.

Let's talk about these norms and environments in more detail. What would you like to see change? Specifics please, I am still unsure of what you're even saying.

[–]Level100ProtWarrior 7 points7 points7 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Our Congress is something ariund 80 women, 500 men.

If you interact with a judge, police officer, school principal, or most other authority figures, chances are they're male.

Society pushes you towards the highest paying sectors of the economy.

In most jobs, even female dominated jobs, you're generally not seen as the "token" member of your gender. Contrast male nurses with female engineers, architects, etc.

Most bosses that you will ever have will be male. If not, their boss is, repeat ad nauseum. Obviously some companies have female CEOs but it's not the majority.

You are blessed with the power of testosterone.

Very few common, important sections of life involve "men" and "can't". Ex driving, budgeting, etc. Contrast to women. Women can't drive, women can't save money, etc. See also - tokenism.

You don't deal with tokenism as often. Eg you're bad at math. "gee, john is bad at math." karen is bad at man "wow, women suck at math"

You are the default by which others are compared. (esp if you're white)

Your self-worth isn't nearly as tightly bound to your physical appearance.

You can abstain from sex and people call you a saint. You can fuck mad bitches and be a player.

It goes on.

but lord, there are reasons for tho-

It doesn't matter if it's the most justified thing in the world, privilege is privilege.

but a lot of these aren't very concrete!

Privilege doesn't have to smack you in the face to exist.

but women win at-

Yes, every single population segment probably has SOMETHING going for it. It's a matter of who gets the biggest piece of the pie. (pssst, it's a) wealthy b) white c) young d) men)

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

In most jobs, even female dominated jobs, you're generally not seen as the "token" member of your gender.

That's because males don't get token jobs by virtue of being males aka affirmative action. It's easy to assume someone is a token employee if there are structures in place that enforce the hiring of members of groups that person belongs to. Start openly and explicitly prioritizing employing males in extremely female-dominated professions and you'll get what you are wishing for.

Damn u logic!

[–]CFRProflcopter( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This isn't entirely true. It's easier for men to get into nursing school, in most cases. The emphasis on having diverse populations has definitely helped men in women dominated fields.

[–]21307 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Do the majority of women who get jobs in male dominated fields get them through affirmative action? Do you think that the majority of men want their own version of affirmative action to help them get into female dominated jobs?

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If the majority of women got token jobs, they would stop being token jobs. Being a token employee is by nature an exception.

Counterquestion: do you think that if the option to work in a more fulfilling but worse paying profession wouldn't have an impact on one's ability to get dates or feed one's family (as it tends to be the case fo women), men would take it as well?

[–]nicethingyoucanthaveRed Pill Male9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Our Congress is something ariund 80 women, 500 men.

Logical fallacy: begging the question. You're assuming that the men in congress are "looking out for" other men. But you have absolutely no evidence to support that.

The truth is actually the opposite of what you're attempting to imply. Both men and women tend to view women more favorably. This is a well known psychological effect called "automatic in-group bias." The truth is, women's interests are considered constantly, while men's are not. The truth is, 500 men in congress is not a male privilege, but in-group bias is female privilege.

If you interact with a judge, police officer, school principal, or most other authority figures, chances are they're male.

Irrelevant. See above.

Society pushes you towards the highest paying sectors of the economy.

Hogwash! Men and women are different (on average). Our brains are physically different. Men are much more likely to be interested in technical fields that are in higher demand, are more valuable to society, and thus pay more. There is mountains of scientific evidence for this.

The truth is, society encourages and supports women through scholarships, internships, mentorships, etc. specifically because so many people believe the feminist lie. The truth is, you've named another female privilege.

In most jobs, even female dominated jobs, you're generally not seen as the "token" member of your gender. Contrast male nurses with female engineers, architects, etc.

This is a result of affirmative action and does not represent male privilege, but rather an unintended consequence of the misguided social engineering of feminism.

What incredible hubris that you create a problem and then suggest that you have the solution to that problem!

Most bosses that you will ever have will be male. If not, their boss is, repeat ad nauseum. Obviously some companies have female CEOs but it's not the majority.

Irrelevant. See above.

You are blessed with the power of testosterone.

That's like saying a Ferrari is blessed with the power of horses. You can't say that something is an advantage without specifying "for what." Because a Ferrari's supposed advantage of HP isn't really an advantage over say, a Jeep, if the "for what" is fording a river.

Testosterone is indeed an advantage for certain things, but estrogen is an advantage for other things. Men and women are different, but complimentary. Therefore, if you accept that testosterone is a male privilege, then estrogen is female privilege and they cancel out. So, your score is still zero.

Very few common, important sections of life involve "men" and "can't". Ex driving, budgeting, etc. Contrast to women. Women can't drive, women can't save money, etc. See also - tokenism.

Are you kidding?? It is totally socially acceptable to say that men are stupid, incompetent fools who can't do anything right: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BumblingDad

It is totally socially acceptable to criticize men as a group. The president of the united states did it in the state of the union! It is not acceptable to criticize women. A politician who criticizes women will be out of the job. There's even a name for this: The "women are wonderful" effect. Once again, you've actually named a female privilege.

You don't deal with tokenism as often. Eg you're bad at math. "gee, john is bad at math." karen is bad at man "wow, women suck at math"

Are you aware that you're repeating yourself??

You are the default by which others are compared. (esp if you're white)

This is hardly a privilege. If I perform poorly, I will be said to have performed poorly - it matters not at all that I will be said to have performed poorly relative to other white males.

Your self-worth isn't nearly as tightly bound to your physical appearance.

This sounds like a personal problem. It's ridiculous to suggest, "you're privileged because *I* want to be pretty!"

If you want a more concrete example, imagine a culture where everyone is judged by how well they can ride a horse. It's ridiculous for someone from that culture to say to someone from our culture, "wow, you're so privileged because your self-worth isn't tied to riding horses!"

You can abstain from sex and people call you a saint. You can fuck mad bitches and be a player.

LOL. You cannot possibly be this naive!

If you abstain from sex, as a male, everyone will assume that you just can't get sex. You'll be shamed as a pathetic virgin.

On the other hand, since women are the gatekeepers of sex in our species, if women want to have sex with you, then yes, that's considered a good thing. That's external validation. "Other people like you." Of course the same isn't true for women. Of course!!

Once again, you have everything backwards. You're trying to say that receiving approval (as in, a male receiving the approval of women) is a privilege. The truth is that the real privilege is in granting that approval. A woman saying, "I would have sex with that guy" is granting him approval. Her opinion means something. A man saying, "I would have sex with her" is wasting his breath. His words mean nothing. He doesn't have that privilege.

[–]BeyondTheLight3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And guess who votes for the men going to congress. Men and women. Guess who make up the majority of people. Women. So really you should be mad at women for picking those men. The reason why those men are high up there, is because they sacrifice a lot of time and work really hard to get there. The irony of it all is that you are talking about the small elite that gets there to begin with. They aren't seen as a "token" of their gender, because of the damn quotas that favor them. I wouldn't take a man seriously if he didn't get their on his own as well. And let it just happen to be women who have those quotas. Most of the people up top are there, because of their hard work and sacrifice. It also would help that those persons don't get pregnant and won't make the company suffer, because they were too selfish. The reason why you don't see women or at least a lot of women in the army is, because they either don't want to be there or they can't keep up. Women can drive, can have money, can be good engineers or insert some other job. They can do all that. The question is do they want that? Can they keep up with the best of the best?

[–]AmIWhatOrNotPurple Pill Man1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, I disagree on the self-worth thing, considering the vast difference in an attractive and unattractive mans life. I feel pretty worthless considering barely any woman wants me, while I know dudes that are wanted by like 80% of women.

Edit:crap I responded to the troll account...

[–]hippydipster-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are blessed with the power of testosterone.

Kind of sticks out. What? That's not "privilege". If you're saying having testosterone is a great thing, that's just biology. If this is some sort of snark I'm not getting, please explain.

You can abstain from sex and people call you a saint. You can fuck mad bitches and be a player.

You can say hello to a woman and be called a creep.

Your self-worth isn't nearly as tightly bound to your physical appearance.

Because nobody values it

Society pushes you towards the highest paying sectors of the economy.

Not a positive thing for everyone

You are the default by which others are compared.

Until you step out of that default vanilla white role

You don't deal with tokenism as often. Eg you're bad at math. "gee, john is bad at math." karen is bad at man "wow, women suck at math"

This is absolutely true for the most part. White men have the definite advantage of mostly being judged as individuals. Not always, but more so than other groups.

Very few common, important sections of life involve "men" and "can't". Ex driving, budgeting, etc. Contrast to women. Women can't drive, women can't save money, etc. See also - tokenism.

Childcare, cooking, cleaning, sewing, knitting, doing laundry, etc.

In most jobs, even female dominated jobs, you're generally not seen as the "token" member of your gender. Contrast male nurses with female engineers, architects, etc.

Not token, but treated very much different, used differently because now you're the only man there so you get called into every situation that involves physicality.

If you interact with a judge, police officer, school principal, or most other authority figures, chances are they're male.

And that can be good or bad depending on the circumstances. There are times a lady will get more benefit of the doubt from a man than a man does, and there are times when the opposite is true.

[–]kick6Red Pill Man-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Our Congress is something ariund 80 women, 500 men.

How is this a privilege?

f you interact with a judge, police officer, school principal, or most other authority figures, chances are they're male.

This is a responsibility, not a privilege.

Most bosses that you will ever have will be male. If not, their boss is, repeat ad nauseum. Obviously some companies have female CEOs but it's not the majority.

Once again, a responsibility

You are blessed with the power of testosterone.

how is that a privilege?

[–]MindTheFuture3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Testosterone is a great drug. It is good to know the priviledges. I never really thought I had any. And if there are some, I better actively seek to use them. so maybe I can fix that not-wealthy part faster. So if I can get away with more, or progress faster just by being a presenting as white male, sure, why not (I'm a trans*, but I can pull off the traditional white male act).

What would be the concrete ways to use these priveleges for your benefit?

u/la-la-leesah mentions that you have to present as certain type of white male to get ahead easier. So competitive, commanding and taking risks, alright, I can be pushy and talk over others, sounds like a good start. And move to a place where majority of others are not white and well off. Maybe then the priviledges would manifest more clearly.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This explains feminist behavior more than anything I have read so far. Thank you.

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because you were born on third but treated like you hit a triple, especially if you're wealthy or middle class.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Explain to me what being born on third is, and what base were you born in? Where are you located on this diamond? Were you conceived under the bleachers?

[–]akimboDeagles0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Leading roles in Hollywood and almost all other media representation, for one.

[–]AmIWhatOrNotPurple Pill Man9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not to mention higher rates of homeless men!

It almost seems that being a man puts you at higher risks of living in extremes.

From social status, to wealth, as well as your position in the sexual market place.

[–]akimboDeagles-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't deny that men on average aim for outcomes with higher risk/reward. Making a career out of acting is certainly one of them. But, even within the confines of a cutthroat industry, is there or is there not an overrepresentation of, as OP describes it, "white, cis males" for leading roles relative to the general population?

"B-but muh 18-34 demo!" says the red piller.

And this is entirely true. "White cis males" aged 18-34 spend more than any other demo, so naturally movie productions do their best to cater to the largest portion of the pie (though I wish they'd attempt to make films that can transcend demos, but I'm not the expert here on what the kids like).

So yes, for business reasons, they stick with the "white cis male" for leading roles, just as much as they would aim for action movies in the summer or a romance title approaching Christmas.

However, I feel the need to press the point again, how does this not disproportionately benefit "cis white males" over other groups? You can give the demo explanation or any other, maybe it's all just coincidence, but how does this coincidence not benefit them?

When, for example, was the last time you've seen a lead Asian, for example, cis/trans or male/female? They make up 5% of the population, have more buying power per capita than any race, I assume they watch movies like most people (which I concede may be too big an assumption to make), yet it's not as if they make up 5% of leading roles.

Lastly, though males make up more of the homeless than females, black males and black people in general overrepresent in this category, so no, homelessness is not a specifically "white cis male" dominated floor, either.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And shouldn't we have those? We are still the majority in America as well as the founding race of the country.

[–]AjaxelerBrownish colour0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about perception. If a white male is aggressive in applying for a promotion it is seen as a good trait. Yet if a female or person of colour does it its seen as negative. Though this could vary depending on how handsome the person of colour is.

Anything you do is not judged on colour, sexuality or gender. Its judged on your ability to do it. (or not)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Well it's not "cis" white men that have the privileges, it's white people in general. Everyone seems to forget that a white woman probably has more shit handed to them than a black man.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

What exactly is a black man not handed that a white man is?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I shouldn't have said "handed" because it seems like nobody is handed anything these days. But TRP likes to compare a man's crime to a woman's crime. If a man and woman commit the same crime, the man is more likely to be more harshly punished. Same thing for race. A person of color is more likely to be harshly punished for a crime than a white person. There have been people that have been fired because their natural hair is considered unprofessional or offensive. I know Hispanics that change their first names on resumes to sound less "foreign" and had more luck finding jobs after changing their names from Yeissen or José to Jason or Joe.

Now one privilege minorities do have over white people is that color quota shit, where companies and schools want to have a good amount of people from other races with them.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I shouldn't have said "handed" because it seems like nobody is handed anything these days.

A rational person would have an epiphany after saying this.

But TRP likes to compare a man's crime to a woman's crime. If a man and woman commit the same crime, the man is more likely to be more harshly punished. Same thing for race. A person of color is more likely to be harshly punished for a crime than a white person.

You bloops assert that white men have privilege over women, but then admit women get away with shit the most. Your logic is non. You try to mix in race and confuse the issue, but it's black and white clear as day that you are wrong to think men have a leg up over women.

There have been people that have been fired because their natural hair is considered unprofessional or offensive.

Because white men can totally grow their hair and beards all the way out naturally and still be considered professional.

I know Hispanics that change their first names on resumes to sound less "foreign" and had more luck finding jobs after changing their names from Yeissen or José to Jason or Joe.

So? If a name is hard to pronounce, people tend to create nicknames.

Now one privilege minorities do have over white people is that color quota shit, where companies and schools want to have a good amount of people from other races with them.

Clearly minorities and white women are the most privileged of all, so to claim that white men are privileged is just racism.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Did you not read my posts? I don't think that "cis" white men have privilege over women, it's white people as a whole that have a slight privilege over everyone else. And I don't know what the fuck a bloop is.

[–][deleted] 0 points0 points0 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I never said they didn't. I don't think you understand what I'm saying.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No I get it. You try to confuse the issue by arguing race and gender instead of admitting this whole straight white male privilege shit is just that. It's racist.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, you obviously don't understand.

Do you really not believe that minorities have to deal with shit that white people (both men and women) don't? Race is part of the reason I don't care for feminism and why no one gives a shit about it where I'm from, it's annoying when people try to compare middle class, privileged, attractive white women to people who actually go through worse shit than being catcalled and people taking up space on a train.

Lol it's not racist to point out that your life is different from mine.

EDIT: Hell, just listen to what black comedians say. Why do you think they make so many jokes about their experiences with white people, they're not pulling those jokes out their ass.

[–][deleted] 0 points0 points0 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

The question is for BluePill, so top level comments need to be from them.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

Can you explain to me the logic behind that rule? Cause it looks exactly like censorship from where I'm sitting.

-edit- The deleted comment was by /u/RedPillRevolution and said something to the effect that men have given up their privileges long ago, so in essence, we don't have "male privilege" anymore.

[–]ReginleiferOnly Zombies want female brains5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's an anti-circlejerk rule. Probably also meant to make the discussion here smoother (you ask Blue, you get blue) . While I don't agree with the mods in a lot of things I recognize that if they didn't make SOME rules, then this place would become super toxic hard to navigate, and eventually would kill the sub.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

It's to prevent circlejerking. The point of PPD is to have your ideas and views challenged, not have your own views reinforced by those who already agree with you.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Not to be a pedant, but can you give me your definition of what a circlejerk is?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There was a post from /u/CFRProflcopter a while ago addressing this:

"Don't circlejerk and void leading questions designed to put people on the defensive. What is circlejerking within the context of Purple Pill Debate? Any snarky comment that contains mocking terms (alfalfa, white knight) designed to insult, or otherwise perturb users. Comments should add to the conversation, not sabotage it. Circlejerking can also be interpreted as a string of comments that express a single view point repeatedly. You have your own subs for circlejerking. Conversations about anti-Red Pill concepts and between Blue Pillers should occur on /r/TheBluePill. Conversations about Red Pill concepts and between Red Pillers should occur on /r/TheRedPill or /r/AskTRP.

That last part is the critical change. There are already community subs for BPers to discuss TBP and RPers to discuss TRP. We want to avoid threads like this where a user asks a "question for Blue Pill" and all the responses are RPers making sarcastic jabs at TBP. We also want to have a policy in place to deal with any unintentional brigades from TBP or SRD. For now, this is our answer to both problems."

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That last part is the critical change. There are already community subs for BPers to discuss TBP and RPers to discuss TRP. We want to avoid threads like this where a user asks a "question for Blue Pill" and all the responses are RPers making sarcastic jabs at TBP. We also want to have a policy in place to deal with any unintentional brigades from TBP or SRD. For now, this is our answer to both problems."

I like this.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm glad you can see where the mods coming from. We're not about censorship, but this is a debate sub, and we need to try and keep that on track where possible :)

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Urban dictionary: circle jerk. "When a group of males sit in a circle, jerking each other off."

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Gotcha, misandry.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't hate the messenger, hate the message. ;P

Here's another definition: When a bunch of blowhards - usually politicians - get together for a debate but usually end up agreeing with each other's viewpoints to the point of redundancy, stroking each other's egos as if they were extensions of their genitals (ergo, the mastubatory insinuation). Basically, it's what happens when the choir preaches to itself.

[–]DoctorFeel69Purple Pill Man[S] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If I was a lesbian, a circlejerk would be pretty awesome.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter