Why females are physically weak?

banthrow · 2018-07-17T11:26:14+00:00

If you think about it, in nature there is no such thing as a strong beta male.

If you were a huge strong man, and then an "alpha" came and fucked you girlfriend, then you'd kill him, and fuck his women too.

Nowadays we have laws and police and if some guy smaller than you but with more game or a better car fuck you girlfriend, there is nothing you can do about it. You can be a strong beta now. In the past it was all about size and the ability to kill your opponents. Imagine if you were a 70kg PUA master in the 1200's, you would be knifed the first night around town.

Roadhouse1984 · 2018-07-17T15:27:07+00:00

Why? Because big broad shouldered broads are not attractive.

Also...humans have no such thing as true alpha males. Gorillas do and their male size and social standing reflects it in relation to females and other true beta males.

Everything else is bro science horseshit. Alpha should only be used as a shortcut to masculine

celincelin · 2018-07-17T12:31:15+00:00

The same reason humans don’t have tails anymore.

It’s a waste of resources to have something you never use anyway. Like human females and strength. You might as well have asked why males don’t have boobs like females do.

halfback910 · 2018-07-18T15:09:16+00:00

It also has to do with a species' mating/reproduction strategies. Generally speaking the more monogamous a species, the less sexual dimorphism will occur. The more polygynous a species, the more sexual dimorphism will occur.

Humans are neither the most monogamous nor the most polygynous of species. On the extreme end of monogamy you've got beavers and otters. They mate for life and the fuckers are nearly identical. Then you've got pheasants, which are very polygynous, and exhibit enormous dimorphism between males and females. The males look completely different, their beak is completely different, their talons are completely different, they weigh like 50% more.

Strong males could mate with several females while the weak ones died without passing on their genes.

Yes. This is also a strong argument for homosexuality being a sort of evolutionary catalyst that speeds up the process. Particularly in dimorphic social species such as ours. Not only do you give the best genetics more opportunity to pass through on more occasions, but you've also got men who can protect women without being a sexual threat thus freeing up the labor of their mates.

the_one_tony_stark · 2018-07-17T14:00:32+00:00

I first started thinking about this lying in bed with my second girlfriend when she told me that if anyone ever tried to rape her, she would just submit and accept it. I found it so strange that she would think that way.

Khutulun, the niece of Kublai Khan, was a fantastic fighter/wrestler.

Any man who wished to marry her had to beat her in a wrestling bout. Supposedly everyone who tried, lost and she died childless.

That's why women are weaker than men; it's a negative effect on evolutionary chances.

Although getting raped is worse than being able to choose your own mates and therefor, often deeply traumatic, the risk of fighting and dying may be worse and to some degree may be selected against, evolutionary speaking.

6273400 · 2018-07-17T08:33:39+00:00

The technical "why" is because of a lack of androgenic activity.

The reasoning behind that is debatable.

Wabbajak · 2018-07-17T08:42:24+00:00

Males are always the expendable sex, regardless of which species we are talking about. There was a relevant explainlikeimfive comment a while back. A more in depth description can be found there, ~~I will link to it later~~ (Edit: here is the link), but here is a short summary.

In general, species often are either K or r strategists. Here, r is the maximum population growth potential and K is the carrying capacity of the system.

Roughly speaking, r strategists, like insects, maximize the system's output as much as they can, the more children the better. If the environment is not able to support all of your children and 99% percent of them die, it's fine, since there are thousands and thousands who make it still. From this perspective it doesn't make sense for males wasting valuable resources which are needed for offspring production. Once their job, fertilizing eggs, is finished, they stop being useful.

On the other hand, there are the K strategists, like most mammals. Here, females are only able to give birth to a few children in their lives. Since their offspring is much more limited and requires a very long time to grow, it is crucial to protect children. The investment in an individual child is more ressource consuming but their chance of reaching sexual maturity is much higher, think of 50% instead of 1%.

What does this mean for men? A female, the gatekeeper of sex, has a higher pressure on deciding which male is more suitable of being father to her children. A male needs to protect the female as she will be pregnant and therefore helpless for months. After that, the male has to protect both the mother and his children who need years to reach adulthood. A man will not only have to force himself on a female but he will also have to compete with other male members of the species to show he is the alpha. This also means that a male's job is to protect his children against predators or other males. This way, with each generation, males become stronger, taller and more dangerous.

Either way, males are, from an evolutionary perspective, tools that are used by "mother nature", which gives birth and drives evolution, to either sacrifice for or to protect offspring with their lives. No matter how you view it, males are the expendable sex.

Luckylancer96 · 2018-07-17T22:27:23+00:00

This is bullshit. You should try to understand why males get stronger while females remained weak.

Why male ancestor's strenght is not transfered to girls and only transfered to boys?

Why those who have genes that give strenght to male offspring but not to female offsprings win againts those who have genes that give strenght to all children?

You cant give a good answer to these questions.

Note:i m not native speaker

Self-honest · 2018-07-17T20:09:07+00:00

I copied the following text from quora.

Thanks for posting the ramblings of some anonymous idiot. This post is full of non-sense rationalizations that are not backed by any real science or data. You can do better.

While we're at it...

Nothing in it is new for the true redpillers.

Like you?

But it seems like this sub have become more of a "I want to feel good", rather than "I don't give a shit about your feelings, I am just gonna present you the cold hard facts that the blue pill society don't want you know. I don't care if it makes you sad or angry, I don't care how you manage to cope with these cold facts. If you are here seeking something other than truth, then you shouldn't be here at the first place"

Is that why you're posting in the relationships sub asking for advice?

Me [24 M] have been told by a girl that she wants to date me and also she finds me way too good looking but not attractive. What does it mean to start a relation with such person?

u/nomsgplz

In the very beginning she told me that only if my jaws and shoulder would have been wider, and if I was tall(i'm 5'7 same height as hers) she would have found me attractive. And I should not take it in a bad way but I am good looking but not an attractive person. I took it as a rejection, and accepted that I cannot date her for like real. We talked on texts and in the mean time I found an actual gf to whom I was physical. Now the first girl is telling me that she is ready to date me for real, I told her that she don't find me attractive so dont waste my time, you want to date just so I cannot be with other girls and you can have all the attention of mine. She again told me that she stills find me way too good looking but not attractive, and if I wants to consider it rejection then its my problem.

She once in a while sends me picture of senior who she says she likes because he have good jawline and wide shoulders and is tall. I ignore it, because I cannot control whom she finds attractive and whom not, its not in her control even. But how can I be in relationship with a girl whom I know for sure that is not attracted to me and values other men more.

And to be honest this have shook my self esteem, and I have started questioning if any of the girl i've been with found me attractive. Because it seems like you either are attractive or you just are not. And I am just not

TLDR A girl wants to date me and tells me that I am good looking but not attractive, and its my problem if I perceive it as rejection. What should I do?

ASKTRP

Get your shit together man.

ABitterPill2 · 2018-07-20T22:18:19+00:00

Stupid explanation.

I hate when people say men are "expendable." Sorry but this makes absolutely no sense from an evolutionary perspective. Evolution acts to benefit the individual, not the group or species, so evolution would never create "expendable" individuals.

It is not that women are "weak." It is that men are strong. In most mammal species, the female is actually ideally adapted to its environment, and the male is maladapted because it must compete with other males. Greater size requires more calories to maintain and puts more stress on internal organs. Notice that females in almost every species live longer. The real story is that males have much more of a boom-bust evolutionary strategy, so there are larger payoffs for evolving strength. If you are the strongest male, you have the possibility of siring a huge number of offspring.

The particulars differ from species to species, but this is generally true. The more sexually dimorphic an organism is, the more that competition between males determines mating.

st3roids · 2018-07-17T16:00:23+00:00

per muscle tissue strength is around the same.

but males have this thing called testosterone which is main reason behind the psysicall difference.

Males especially in womb and in adolescences have 20 to 50 times more of this and thus the differences in body and facial structure , strength and mental differences.

Thus men have more muscle tissue thus the strength differences.

Adding steroids later doesn't add muscles in a hyperplacia sense but rather it affects hypertrophy so the differences are even more pronounce . That's the huge difference between a female and a male bodybuilder or strength athlete

whatsthisgarg · 2018-07-17T20:26:01+00:00

The simplest answer:

They are the ones who got fucked. The stronger the woman, the less likely it was that she got fucked. Too weak, got fucked but didn't survive.

BlackMarmoset · 2018-07-19T11:39:21+00:00

Why get physically strong when you can easily make men do the heavy work for you?

Self-honest · 2018-07-17T21:54:15+00:00

Edit: re-posted in response to the correct comment.

hiddenpleasures123 · 2018-07-18T23:58:01+00:00

Look, I've read a lot of shit here about height and weight. OP obviously has a size/height issue(read his post history.)

OP, I'm 6'2 250. I'm a powerlifter and have good genes. I have a friend thats about 6 inches shorter, is no where strong or as ripped as me. He has an average face. Yet, he rolls in pussy.

If you think being a handsome giant will get women to fuck you, it's only a small piece of the game. I have an extra point on the scale of attraction, yes... But it's not everything.

You seem to also relate smaller people with being insignificant warriors or protectors. This isn't the case. I'm big and strong and would make a formidable opponent in some instances. Not all. Smaller, shorter opponents are quicker, they have better balance and more stamina. When you introduce weaponry, we are able to kill dangerous game that would otherwise tear us to shreds barehanded. If I had to fight a smaller warrior over broken ground and unimproved surfaces, chances are a warrior my size would lose.

Smaller foes make excellent climbers, require less food and water. In some cases, they are smarter because they had to rely on their intellect in most cases. Intellect is amazing quality for a warrior to have, because it allows him to seek and exploit advantages. Which would make him a great command.

Stop crying about your height. Stop crying about your weight. The girl that rejected you, didn't reject you because of your physical nature. She rejected you because you're acting like a 5'7 pussy. She just let you down easy.

Nocryingok · 2018-07-21T19:14:53+00:00

It's not just size and strenght... social status and charisma matters a lot. You don't want to mess with one of the tribe leaders even if they're scrawny

sidescrollin · 2018-07-17T14:30:07+00:00

From an evolutionary standpoint, wouldn't it still be the case that stronger women would survive? Wouldn't it have been beneficial for women to be just as strong, pound-for-pound, and assist the men while hunting or be able to protect their young?

Title	Why females are physically weak?
Author	nomsgplz
Upvotes	36
Comments	147
Date	July 17, 2018 7:09 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/8zizwk/why_females_are_physically_weak/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/why-females-are-physically-weak.51479 https://theredarchive.com/post/51479

Comments

They are the ones who got fucked. The stronger the woman, the less likely it was that she got fucked. Too weak, got fucked but didn't survive.