TheRedArchive needs help
With 700,000+ posts and 16,000,000+ comments archived, and new Red Pill content being added every week, keeping TheRedArchive alive and discoverable to everyone is starting to become very costly. As a 20-year-old student who just moved out and is living independently for the first time, keeping TheRedArchive alive is beginning to cost me much more than I thought.

Therefore, if you appreciate the website, have gained a lot of knowledge and insight from it, and want to show your appreciation, you can do so by donating any amount that you want via the options below. The money will be used on the expensive monthly host bill and any future maintenance of the website.
Thank you, and I wish you all a successful 2021 and a good luck with achieving your goals and dreams!

Best, /u/dream-hunter

Feminist GENUINELY (not trolling) calls 4 (nonviolent) reduction of male pop to 10% via eugenics. Why is she a professor & founder of Gender Programs at unis? This is like giving tenure to a Nazi. Her manifesto is also origin of "future is female". Using that phrase is like using slogans from Hitler

Reddit View
May 5, 2020
post image

Post Information
Title Feminist GENUINELY (not trolling) calls 4 (nonviolent) reduction of male pop to 10% via eugenics. Why is she a professor & founder of Gender Programs at unis? This is like giving tenure to a Nazi. Her manifesto is also origin of "future is female". Using that phrase is like using slogans from Hitler
Author mellainadiba
Upvotes 534
Comments 70
Date 05 May 2020 01:12 PM UTC (10 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:

[–][deleted] 65 points66 points  (19 children) | Copy

While it's true you could maintain the population with only 10% males, the society that would create does not necessarily have gender equality. Historically speaking, fewer men has meant a strengthening of traditional gender roles.

[–]Diogenes--64 points65 points  (11 children) | Copy

Who would build & maintain infrastructure? The idea is ludicrous. They act as though all the buildings, roads, electricity, etc. somehow just ... exists.

[–]Misogynes46 points47 points  (1 child) | Copy

Who’s going to feed all these women? Grow the food? Transport it? Stock the shelves?

Who’s going to defend the feminist utopia when some outside 50:50 group’s abundant males decide to come and maraud it?

[–]RepulsiveCockroach722 points23 points  (0 children) | Copy

Think of all the unopened jars in the world!! Someone please think of the jars!

Also the world would be overrun with spiders.

[–]Khufu258929 points30 points  (6 children) | Copy

Nothing, and they will blame men when it starts to crumble.

[–]markus_brutus3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy

Imagine you have a kid. The kid won't stop crying until you give it the big bag of candy you have in store.

Now... you know what's gonna happen if the kid eats all the candy but you give it anyway because you can't take the crying anymore.

The kid eats all the candy. Happy for a second. Stomach hearts all night and you have to cleanup the mess.

That's how i imagine women. They won't stop crying until you give them power but when shit hits the fan you have to deal with it.

[–]Khufu25893 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy

Some women.

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy


[–]Khufu25892 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Dont under estimate the institutional creep. This loud minority is drafting the policies that are governing our society.

[–]markus_brutus0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

I dare you to say you’re against (current) feminism in an office environment. Any office environment.

[–]orbitaldecayed12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

Food eaten is soon forgotten.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The women in your life must have been soft and subservient.

[–]silva_p9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy

You got any sources about the strengthening of traditional gender roles? genuine interest btw

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy

You can see it clearly in the United States after the world wars. Each war killed a portion of men while leaving the female population almost untouched. After each war there was competition for men and a return to a more traditional culture. Also, like 500 years ago, there were pretty much constant conflicts keeping the male population lower than the female one. This constant gender ratio inequality kept women at a societal disadvantage. Supply and demand. It's not a coincidence that women's rights (property, voting, etc) have come during eras of prolonged peace where the gender ratio is close to 1 and there's less competition for males.

[–]UneventfulLover6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

Makes a whole lot of sense to me. Thanks! Had never thought of it this way.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Something interesting to watch is parts of Asia where aborting female fetuses has caused the gender ratio to swing the other way. The shortages of women are causing communities to rapidly change their societal structure. Human history has VERY rarely seen women shortages so it'll be interesting to me to see what happens.

[–]markus_brutus0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

No sources or research papers but i'll give my 2cents.

Remove big government.
The only reason women can get away and act as they do now, is because our role has been abstracted away by the government. Welfare and financial stability with little or no effort, police protection (favours women), laws (favours women)...
So they get all the benefits we would provide but with none of the responsibilities.

Remove that and they're basically helpless.

[–]Mytriptorussia2018-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

No Society should be men and women should not exist. Who cares we are male seperatists anyway and we do not care aboit reproduction.

For god sakes I am not trolling or joking. I am serious.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

One toilet clogged and this alternate version of earth is fucked

[–]starburst_fairy41 points42 points  (4 children) | Copy

you are so right. It was actually proven that feminists support Hitler’s ideas. A group of academics rewrote Hiter’s “Mein Kampf” in feminist terms and it was widely accepted.

‘The trio points out that, if you agree “whiteness” and “masculinity” are problematic, you can come up with a lot of “nasty arguments” as long as you “frame it in terms of overcoming privilege.”’

[–]mellainadiba[S] 23 points24 points  (3 children) | Copy

Yes the grievance study hoax. The guys and gals are great. They also submitted troll stuff like men should stick stuff up their butts to empathise more and dog park rape culture... these were all accepted. Their point was these people are accepting stuff that sounds good and they like instead of what it true.... they would be laughed out of the park if they tried to submit that stuff to an actual science journal but because its gender studies etc it gets in

[–]starburst_fairy6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

I like how well you said it. :)

[–]mellainadiba[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Feel free to copy and paste, take any of my posts and improve them as you like... lets get the message out far and wide

[–]starburst_fairy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

you’re awesome. Thank you :) Feminism is already dying out and we need to make sure it stays like that ;)

[–]VestigialHead34 points35 points  (2 children) | Copy

How is she keeping tenure? Surely her University will do something about statements like this?

[–]EscalatingCommieRant31 points32 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because she's o my referring to the systematic reduction of men, not a minority or women.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

She's dead now. But the Uni of California.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (1 child) | Copy

"The future is Aryan"

[–]aayushVinayak19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Using eugenics, we will reduce their population"

[–]APlays71[🍰] 18 points19 points  (0 children) | Copy

What feminists say they want:Equality

What they actually want:FEMALE SUPREMACY

[–]Cynical_Silverback8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Such a genocidal.quote for an AZ quote

[–]casteliacitysax16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

She needs to be fired

[–]cuphead12346 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

This is actually making me feel depressed

[–]mellainadiba[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Lol don't. This stuff we should be paying her to say this. Like sponsoring her. Feminists are the biggest adverts for anti feminist out there. I couldn't say anything more to be antifeminists than just point out to what feminists do. This would get savagely dissed by men and women if I posted this on twitter. Go there that will cheer you up. Its only feminist circle jerkers into this. Obviously the issues is these circle jerkers have made it into public policy, but thats what we are trying to oppose, most men and women think these feminists are crazy

Like look at these fools. Lets pay these feminists to keep doing what they are doing spreading how stupid feminism is and how hate filled it is and making themselves look like fools:

[–]EscalatingCommieRant14 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy

Can you imagine what her world would be like if what she preaches was allowed to happen?

[–]mellainadiba[S] 12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy

Luckily she studies gender studies so she is too stupid to enact any of these things... she can do a lot of damage getting this shit int social sciences, and look she is a professor and has created gender studies departments... but ultimately her gender studies degree and that of all her students is not worth the paper it is written on and she won't be able to do anything... should have done computer science instead the fool

[–]Khufu25899 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy

Doesn't matter. People like her still have way too much influence. She would probably be one of the leaders of WHO if she would be alive today.

[–]mellainadiba[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

yeah true, or some UN body or some shit

[–]nacho-chonky6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is not surprising, I have sat through a gender studies course in Uni and this is the exact way of thinking they support, universities have essentially become propaganda factories for authoritarian ideologies

[–]UnfortunatelyNecesRY4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

As well as being stupid and immoral, it would reduce innovation of all kinds. There’s just so much wrong with this that even as a woman I don’t even know if it’s worth the time to write it. I feel like I could write for hours. Ugh can we get this person fired or what

[–]UgandanBruhaps3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

ok ok like this is fucked up, but lowkey, if 90% of the population was female id b chillin

[–]haydensushiguy2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is female supremacy, and it is a form of fascism.

[–]ravenseye214 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Maybe she’s a polygamist?

[–]Omar-Elsayed1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

If they did what she said, she'll be soon regretting it.

[–]Newman10000 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Fascist views from a fascist women.

[–]CaptainMurica2640 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Imma make a r/MenKampf post out of this

[–]mellainadiba[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Please do, and feel free to use any of my posts.. edit and improve as you please

[–]Jabronskyi0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

From 3.5b to 350m?

[–]rabel1110 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

Gearhart's statement of gendercidal violence is historical, not recent. It is a common belief of many feminists motivated by gender hatred rather than human rights.

What is both historical and recent is the continued publishing, reading and teaching of her genocidal views as valid expressions of female oppression. While any other person, academic or politican would be condemned and deplatformed, escoriated for such a radical and violent ideological outrage, Gearhart, remains revered and iconised by feminists across the world.

This is more evidence of the hatred that drives modern feminism, the sexist violence that fuels feminist theory and ideology, and the toxic payload being delivered by modern feminism into our children's education from preschool to college post graduate degrees. Most iconic feminists were/are homicidal sociopaths.

[–]mellainadiba[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

Word. Some feminists on feminsm reddit didn't get this... she's like ermm well she's not really feminists, and like well is she really accepted... da fuk she is a professor and has created courses... if anyone said this about women or race they would be no platformed like crazy

[–]rabel1111 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

The denial of feminism hatred of men is a core component of the modern feminist movement. Reframing revenge politics, denial of services to men and boys, discrimination against men and boys as valid opposition to patriarchal oppression, is the same pretzel logic denial that iconises sociopaths like Gearhart while sequesting and ignoring their violent sociopathic feminist statements.

If feminists ever gain control of the courts and the legislature, our communities will be brutal, intolerant and oppressive.

[–]mellainadiba[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well said sir/madam

[–]moria00 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Man-Haters are the worst. They all need a dick so bad they can't even cope with it. But non of us will fuck them because...

Feminism = Dick Repellent.

[–]meeselbon5730 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Talking genocidally about men gets you tenure.

[–]Mentioned_Videos0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Videos in this thread: Watch Playlist ▶

VIDEO COMMENT +6 - Lol don't. This stuff we should be paying her to say this. Like sponsoring her. Feminists are the biggest adverts for anti feminist out there. I couldn't say anything more to be antifeminists than just point out to what feminists do. This would get s...
(1) (2) +6 - Your opinions here are very welcome. I am happy to change my view if presented with views and evidence. You haven't said much though in that statement apart from im oppressed. Male privelage is an utter myth, apart from biologically I'll give you tha... +1 - Factual feminists breaks down sex assault stats. Sadly, feminism has created half these problems and fears for you and led to women being terrified of rape and assault. Men are way more likely to be killed, beaten etc but men simply don't worry about... +1 - Sorry but to be frank you've been indoctriated. This is what its like trying to discuss an issue with a feminists: Trying to talk to a feminist about boys education - this is why we need a radically different approach to feminism, and why feminism h...

I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.

Play All | Info | Get me on Chrome / Firefox

[–]PerP1Exe0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Who's gonna be funny when that happens tho

[–]Mytriptorussia20180 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

She go and shove that shit back up her own ass!

[–]FeniZio940 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

and now you probably understand why modern feminism is always associated with cultural marxism

[–]MeinChutiya690 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Reduce the population to 10% ? Is society supposed to build itself?

[–]god_the_II0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

35% men to 65% woman?

[–]immion0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Did someone read That Essay? Need Sauce

[–]Quarky_Neutrino0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

To some extent they have achieved it with all the attempts to emasculate all around.

[–][deleted]  (7 children) | Copy


[–]mellainadiba[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Your opinions here are very welcome. I am happy to change my view if presented with views and evidence. You haven't said much though in that statement apart from im oppressed. Male privelage is an utter myth, apart from biologically I'll give you that. Men don't have more rights, both have privileges and challenges, Women have more rights in health, education and justice system, for example In 5 mins:

Women have been horribly oppressed in the past JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. This is why patriarchy is false:

Even historically not true. Imagine being a woman 200 years ago. Flip a coin if childbirth will kill you, let alone the incontinence, life changing tears, prolapses and damage that might occur to which there will be no treatment. No contraception, so at any moment you can get pregnant. Pregnancy might kill you. It will certainly be awful. No medicine for you swollen ankles and morning sickness, God help you if you get a severe complication e.g. placental abruption. Flip a coin if any illness in general will kill you, you cut your hand? Better not hope you get sepsis and die. You have a monthly period, there is no such thing as modern sanitary products, you bleed into a reused cloth IF YOU ARE LUCKY, nothing for endometriosis, PMS, PMDD, not even paracetmoa for your crampsl, no public toilets, no wonder they used to call it periods a curse, on top of your period you pee sitting down and there are no modern toilets nor public ones. In a world that needs physical work, you are weaker than even a teenage boy.... given all of this no wonder women are not in universities, and scientists and politicians... why would you give women the burden of work as well in this kind of life? Why would you risk making a woman a doctor when it is 50:50 she will survive childbirth. Of course rich upper class women DID become doctors and scientists and inventors though. Don't forget that. Most importantly remember, men were not doctor and lawyers either. They were in coal mines dying. You cant glamrise it and say women were denied from being doctors, no they were denied from going to war and dying in a trench because your foot was infected and you got trench foot. They were denied from working coal mines, in the sea, under ground, at heights. Women were at home also working hard, less danger, but hard and also at the mercy of their biology.

That exclusion of women in science and work may have some sexism, but there is also biological reasons. Life was bloody hard. You'd be lucky to live past birth, then 30, then 40. Men and women did what they could to survive. Anywhere were women are oppressed men are too. Yes 1 percent of men may lead, but thats not 99 percent of men. Theres no point talking of male inventors, university etc and females being excluded because 99 percent of men were too. Women cant vote, GUESS WHAT men cant too, in most countries some women gained the vote before all men gained the vote. Only 1 recent of men can vote! Women were also largely protected and shielded from going up coal mines, chimneys, war etc

Secondly 1% of men is not representivie of society. Women are not oppressed any more than anyone else and YES historical too: very succinctly explained in 7 mins:

Also society is gynocentric. It makes rules and operates in a women and children first mode, so male leadership numbers make no difference to men. Men are more sexist to men than women, if anything women are more compassionate towards men. Some of the best MRAs and best antifeminists are women. All my favourite MRAs are women (a lot don't even call themselves that, they are just good people who aren't stupid enough to fall for feminisms cult)

[–]nacho-chonky3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy

There are 5 legal rights that women have that men do not in the USA, there are ZERO rights that men have that women do not have, we do not have more rights than you

[–]papayainthegarage-4 points-3 points  (4 children) | Copy

I can't wear tanktops or shorts because men can't keep it in their pants, walking at home at night I have the fear of being raped, wage gap (white woman get paid 80 cents for every dollar a man gets paid, black woman get paid 65 cents for every dollar a man is paid and latina woman are paid 54 cents for every dollar a man is paid), obama made it so it was easier for everyone to get health care (women have a harder time at getting healthcare) and now trump is repealing it, 1 in 3 woman have experience domestic violence from a man, 1 in 6 woman have been raped or have been attempted to be raped, if a woman gets pregnant the man often leaves out of fear of responsibility, dying in birth, woman in us dont get a paid maternity leave while carrying a god damn child, we get catcalled on the street all the time, woman are 51 percent of the population yet only 19 percent of congress. I let you get mad at me for a bit before coming back with more facts. You cannot deny any of these, they are all from reliable sources or personal experiences of me and woman I know. I will finish off with this one stat:

83 percent of woman experience sexism compared to 49 percent of men.

[–]nacho-chonky2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Haha a lot of those are false statistics and a lot are non gendered issues, if you really think the wage gap comes from a reliable source you truly are deluded

[–]TheonuclearPyrophyte2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

No one is legally restricting your right to wear tank tops and shorts unless you live somewhere like Saudi Arabia. Your right to self-defense may be restricted, but that applies to both sexes, and men often face harsher penalties for physically defending themselves. Things like "lack of fear" are not legal rights. As a woman, I fear getting lost while walking home at night (or even during the day) and my mother-in-law doing something stupid in her well-meaning naivete. Are my fears and experiences less valid than yours? Probably, because they don't align with your sources or ideals.

Of course women experience sexism more than men, or at least more women report sexism than men do. Women are constantly told how oppressed they are, while men are told they're privileged, despite the many legally-assured privileges women have that men lack. I won't even bother addressing the wage gap or the issues with the Affordable Care Act. Roughly 50% of all domestic violence incidents are instigated by the woman, and lesbian relationships are believed to be equally violent as straight relationships, if not more so. We don't know this for sure though, as woman-on-woman domestic violence and sexual assault are underreported because it isn't as "real" unless a big scary man did it.

If we're talking about personal experience, I've been sexually assaulted by 3+ women and 0 men. I've been catcalled and sexually harassed by innumerably more women than men. I've been physically abused by 5+ women and 2 men. My situation us more common than you might think, just not legally recognized as a valid issue. In every relationship I've witnessed, the women were the primary abusers, facing no punishment for stabbing, burning, and otherwise assaulting men, while the men faced felony charges for simply restraining the women from attacking them. When men reported the abuse, the situation wasn't taken seriously until the women got hurt.

Women are a protected class in Western nations, even to the detriment of other women, which perhaps defeats the point of feminism. No wonder most women would rather vote for a male politician.

[–]mellainadiba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Factual feminists breaks down sex assault stats. Sadly, feminism has created half these problems and fears for you and led to women being terrified of rape and assault. Men are way more likely to be killed, beaten etc but men simply don't worry about this shit as there is no vicim culture. Women are terrified, and its the fault of feminists peddling false stats.

Another harm it has done, is WOMEN and men will simply never take female leaders seriously, simply because all society is fed is this line that women are pathetic little victims aways getting abused, and when they report it no one will even believe them because they're little old women, and even CEOs and Angela Merkel get mansplained and assaulted cos they're little old women

Feminsm has been great for feminism... those feminists leaders are millionaires, books sales flying, whole sectors of journalism created, professors tenured, courses created.... the average woman just got fucked by feminism though

[–]mellainadiba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Sorry but to be frank you've been indoctriated. This is what its like trying to discuss an issue with a feminists:

Trying to talk to a feminist about boys education - this is why we need a radically different approach to feminism, and why feminism has a serious bias and indoctrination/delusion problem

Karen Sraughan:

I did an interview with Saachi Khoul of Buzzfeed News yesterday. I talked about boys falling behind in education from the primary school level onward, including:

* teacher bias against boys exists (female elementary school teachers grade boys down compared to gender-blinded evaluators)

* boys are aware of this bias (when third grade boys were asked to wager money on how good a grade they expected to get on a project, they wagered less when they were told the teacher was female and would know they're a boy than when they were told the teacher was male or that the teacher wouldn't know they're a boy)

* both boys and girls agree that boys receive the bulk of negative attention from teachers in classrooms

* because school at the primary level is dominated by women, and because of the above issues, and because boys might not have their first male teacher until grade 8 math, they are likely to internalize the message that school is not for boys

Her response to that was to first ask if the boys were white. I was like, "Uh... this affects all boys, including minority boys." She then said, "But CEOs of Fortune 500 companies are overwhelmingly male."

I was like... WTF? So I say, "what does what's going on among 50 to 70 year olds in the top 1 tenth of 1% of the population have to do with how boys are doing in elementary school?"

She says, "well, men are still dominant." I said, "those male CEOs were boys in elementary school 40 to 60 years ago.

What does that have to do with what's happening now in elementary schools? You have to realize there's a bit of a lag at work here, and if you look at age cohorts from oldest to youngest, you find women and girls catching up and then surpassing men and boys as you track backwards from older to younger cohorts. Single women in their 20s in cities now earn 8% more than their male counterparts. Your entire argument here seems vindictive--like you're happy to see boys punished because men are still dominant in the top 1% at age 50."

"So MRAs are complaining about women catching up, is what you're saying."

I said, "women had parity in post secondary enrolment in the 1980s."

She comes back with me not being intersectional enough. "Yes, but women of color earn much less compared to white men."

I said, "Not to get all intersectional on you, but the gender gap favoring women in post-secondary attainment in the US is largest in the black community." T

he producer interrupts and tries to get us back on the topic of bias against primary school boys and asks her to clarify her counterargument. She replies that she thinks her point about the dominance of men at the top of Fortune 500 companies is an adequate rebuttal. (WTF!!!????)

Honestly, it was like talking to a brick wall.

BTW its from this videos comment:

This is a serape interview with a feminist after she watched a mens issues event. Absolute psycho. Mens Lib suckers need to see this:

Complains about not enough women in the event and womens voices, when asked if men would dominate a feminists event she goes erm no!

The biggest irony, is SHE IS LITERALLY DESCRIBING FEMINISM.. LIKE LITERALLY. She is saying why are they gendering mens issues? WELL F*** HELLO, why is feminism?

Utterly deluded and indoctrinated woman. The hypocrisy is on another planet. She complains about a lack issues being defined but refuses to define her self as being a feminist. F*** hell.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter